Search

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are to be considered in the differential diagnosis of a transient loss of consciousness. Their discrimination from syncope, epileptic seizures or vascular events can be difficult and requires profound knowledge about the semiology and clinical presentation of PNES and their differential diagnoses. Erroneous diagnoses and the resulting therapies lead to elevated morbidity, elevated costs and a poorer outcome. The aim of the present article is to provide an overview on PNES and their delineation from the clinical pictures of epilepsy and syncope.

Primary brain tumors and metastases are common causes of symptomatic epilepsy. Seizures, neurological and neuropsychological deficits can interfere with driving ability. The present paper aims to systematically review the incidence of epileptic seizures in brain tumor patients and to discuss driving ability in the context of the current German guidelines and expert opinions.To evaluate the incidence of epileptic seizures which occur at the beginning and in the course of the disease, we performed a systematic literature research in PubMed from 1960 to 2007. Additionally on the basis of this data we performed a survey collecting expert opinions regarding the driving ability of brain tumor patients from members of the German working groups "Arbeitsgemeinschaft für prächirurgische Epilepsiediagnostik und operative Epilepsietherapie" (Working Group for Presurgical Epilepsy Diagnostics and Operative Epileptic Therapy) and "Neuroonkologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft" (Neuro-oncological Working Group).The incidence of epileptic seizures depends on the entity, dignity and localization of the tumor. The driving ability of brain tumor patients is not explicitly regulated in Germany. Of the interviewed experts 72% judged the guidelines to be precise enough and 44% did not want to deprive the patients of their driving ability without a first seizure, independent of the individual risk.The available studies are methodologically insufficient and show that a further evaluation is necessary to assess the driving ability. Possible restrictions of the driving ability in patients with a high risk of seizures in the course of the disease have to take into account the balance between individual rights and the interests of the general public.