Search

Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) allows visualization and quantification of calcium in the coronary arteries. This has been demonstrated to correlate well with the overall plaque burden in the coronary arteries. EBCT is, therefore, well suited for the detection of early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Especially in asymptomatic patients with several risk factors, staging coronary artery disease by coronary calcium, scanning may allow prognostic assessment and guide preventive and therapeutic interventions. To date, only scant data are available regarding the cost effectiveness and the economic impact of this imaging technique. In this manuscript we compare various methods for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease using a theoretical model and review the results of a prospective trial in our emergency room of coronary calcium scanning in patients with acute chest pain. Using Framingham data and prognostic data from long-term follow-up, we discuss the impact of coronary calcification scanning on primary preventive measures and its economical consequences. EBCT is a promising technique which has created a lot of attention due to its ease of application. It is currently undergoing critical appraisal in the medical literature. Further randomized prospective trials are needed (and underway, i.e., MESA, EDIC, CARDIA II) to better define its value and limitations in the clinical arena.

Background: Electron beam CT (EBCT) can acquire rapid, multiple thin-section tomograms of the beating heart in synchrony with the electrocardiogram and quantity coronary calcification without intravenous contrast. Coronary calcification is an active process exclusively associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation and regulated in a manner similar to the calcification of bone. Clinical studies have demonstrated that EBCT coronary calcification (1) follows a pattern similar to the epidemiology of coronary artery disease (CAD), (2) has a high sensitivity (90-95%) for coronary plaque and significant angiographic coronary stenoses, and (3) has the potential to assess the prognosis of patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. Coronary calcium area or "score" correlates best with overall plaque burden within the coronary system. However, coronary calcium is of limited value in distinguishing coronary stenosis on a segment-by-segment basis., Ebct and Cad: Due to spiraling health care costs, there is a need for cost-efficient strategies in the diagnosis and stratification of patients with known or suspected CAD. There are two major patient groups in which EBCT calcium scanning has a potential for cost-efficient application: (1) in asymptomatic, high-risk patients, identification of significant plaque burden may direct judicious use of long-term drug therapy or further investigation to those individuals most likely to benefit from an aggressive risk factor modification and medical program; (2) in patients with chest pain syndromes but no prior CAD, EBCT calcium scanning compares favorably with conventional diagnostic methods. In particular, using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of an EBCT calcium score of 80 in detecting obstructive CAD are both about 85%. Using a theoretical model, EBCT calcium scanning was found to be the most cost-effective approach to diagnosis in populations with a low-to-moderate likelihood of obstructive CAD when compared with treadmill exercise, stress thallium, and stress echocardiography., Conclusions: EBCT calcium scanning is not a substitute for coronary angiography, but it has clear advantages over other more traditional diagnostic methods for CAD. In particular, it can be performed conveniently and inexpensively in most patients. Additionally, the site and extent of calcification are intimately related to the atherosclerotic plaque burden. The analyses presented suggest that it may also provide a cost-effective clinical alternative in specific subsets of the population.