Search

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kriminologisches Journal is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kriminologisches Journal is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neue Kriminalpolitik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article "The quality of implementation of measures in probation and prison: Implementation research in tertiary prevention" emphasizes the importance of implementing measures in probation and prison. Studies show that the quality of implementation has a direct impact on the effectiveness of the measures. Various factors for successful implementation are mentioned, such as the support of all practitioners and adherence to guidelines. The text also emphasizes the importance of competencies, organizational factors, and factors at the management level for successful implementation. Various studies on the implementation of measures in probation and prison are presented, highlighting the importance of implementation quality for the success of the measures. The text deals with the need to develop support systems for measuring implementation quality in the German-speaking region. It is noted that there are international examples and developments, but they are not available in translated form for Germany. Successful establishment of implementation activities and examination of implementation outcomes in probation and criminal justice could lead to an improvement in the quality and effectiveness of services. The article deals with innovation processes in the field of criminal justice, particularly in probation. Considerations on innovations in social work and the public sector are discussed, as well as findings from innovation research and the examination of an innovation process in probation. The article describes subsidies as a funding instrument to ensure an effective and modern prison system in Switzerland. Probation in French-speaking Switzerland is conducted as a pilot project to improve practice and strengthen the identity of probation. The desistance approach is tested and evaluated, aiming to promote desistance from crime. The text addresses the question of innovation in the field of criminal justice and probation in Switzerland. It emphasizes that innovations should go beyond what is already known and bring new substantive aspects. The dissemination of innovations to other contexts and the safety and risks of innovation in criminal justice and probation are also discussed. The text discusses whether innovations in the field of criminal justice and probation can raise public awareness of these issues and lead to a change in their image. It emphasizes that the long-term effects of innovations in criminal justice and probation should be examined. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neue Kriminalpolitik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neue Kriminalpolitik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Polizei & Wissenschaft is the property of Verlag fur Polizeiwissenschaft and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The sexuality of imprisoned men was long one of the last taboo subjects within the modern penal system. In society in general, the perception of prisoners' sexuality was marked by socially distorted clichés and lack of interest in their plight. Early studies on the sexual deprivation of inmates and sexual violence within the U.S. prison system, above all J.F. Fishman‘s Sex in Prison: Revealing Sex Conditions in American Prisons (1934), D. Clemmer's The Prison Community (1940), and G.M. Sykes' The Society of Captives (1958), laid the groundwork for later research. An early German work dealing with the sexuality of prisoners is Karl Plättner's now forgotten Eros im Zuchthaus (1929), a vivid account of his own prison experience during the Weimar Republic and the consequences of sexual deprivation for inmates and their partners. Research on prison culture and sexuality among inmates was continued in the United States in the following decades. Despite the international interest in the subject, few studies were undertaken in the two post-war German states, with a resulting lack of concrete scientific data. This article reviews the early American research and Plättner's autobiographical work, then discusses several later 20th C. American studies and two German surveys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article evaluates Austrian penal system statistics, based on the "Statistische Übersicht" (Statistical Overview) published by the Bundesministerium für Justiz (Federal Justice Ministry). Incarceration rates in Austria are compared with those in the Netherlands, Great Britain, Belgium, France, and Denmark. Distribution of work assignments to inmates are presented.