Search

In a randomized, prospective study at the Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Hospital of Giessen 4 different ways of inducing abortions with prostaglandins were tested between the 15th and 24th week of gestation. The aim of the study was to determine the best approach to inducing abortion in order to minimize the psychological and physical stress to the patient. Subjects randomized to the first two groups got a single cervical installation of either 0.5 mg Dinoprostongel (Prepidil, N = 22) or 0.5 mg Sulprostongel (Nalador, N = 21). Six hours later, i.v. infusion with Sulproston (8.3 micrograms/min) was started and continued until the abortion was complete. Patients randomized to the third and fourth group received either 0.5 mg Dinoprostongel intracervically (N = 15) or 1 mg Gemeprost vaginal suppositories (Cergem, N = 21) every 6 hours until the cervix was 1-2 cm dilated. Subsequently the patients received an i.v. infusion with Sulproston until the abortion was complete. In the first group with intracervical application of Sulproston the total time until abortion was 17.8 h +/- 7.8 h. This was shorter than following a single application of Dinoprostongel (22.5 h +/- 14.7 h). Although there was a five hours difference, the between-group differences were not statistically different because of a wide range in values following Dinoproston treatment. This range could not be explained by the age of the mother, week of gestation or parity. In the group receiving multiple intracervical applications of Dinoproston the time till expulsion was twice as long as that after multiple vaginal suppositories of Gemeprost (33.8 h +/- 13.9 h vs. 15.6 +/- 6.0 h, p < 0.01). The time span until a cervical dilatation of 1-2 cm was 27.0 h +/- 13.7 h in the group with repeated Dinoproston application. This period of time was more than twice the time span seen in the group with repeated Gemeprost application (12.5 h +/- 4.2 h, p < 0.01). On the average four treatments with intracervical Dinoprostongel were required while the average with Gemeprost vaginal suppositories was two to achieve a cervical dilatation of 1-2 cm. Furthermore in 7 of 21 cases treatment with Gemeprost achieved the expulsion of the fetus without Sulproston infusion (11.4 h +/- 5.2 h). Comparing single versus repetitive prostaglandin application we could demonstrate that the duration of Sulproston infusion was cut in half after repeated therapy with Gemeprost. We conclude that repetitive application of Gemeprost vaginal suppositories decreases the time to abortion and subject discomfort tremendously. The application of Gemeprost suppositories provides the easiest and most efficient therapeutic approach for both patients and staff. Furthermore the regiment that provided the best results was also the most cost-effective (range 180,-DM to 317,- DM per case).

This study was designed to answer three questions: 1. Is there a change in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate during pregnancy? 2. Are there alterations of these parameters during standing? 3. Is there a relationship between mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate at rest and during standing? In a randomized study 161 clinically healthy pregnant women between 8th and 41st week of pregnancy were tested with a modified orthostatic test over defined time periods during pregnancy. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were registered in one minute intervals over a 30 minute period with an automatic Dinamap measuring device. This period was subdivided in a 10 minutes lying period, 10 minutes standing period followed by a 10 minutes lying period. There was a marked increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at rest with the beginning of the 34th week of gestation (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). Despite this, maternal heart rate continued to rise over the whole course of pregnancy (p < 0.01). Furthermore, women with a fall in heart rate on standing were only seen in late pregnancy. Finally, pregnant women with a low mean arterial blood pressure (< or = 85 mmHg) did not experience a fall in blood pressure on standing more frequently than normal controls (> 85 mmHg). We conclude that a fall in blood pressure on standing is not dependent on blood pressure at rest during pregnancy.

To our knowledge there is no study that answers the question, whether low blood pressure itself or the fall of blood pressure during standing have a negative effect on pregnant women. These patients suffer from signs of reduced central and/or peripheral blood flow like fatigue, headache, cold extremities, paresthesia, flickering, black outs and dizziness. In addition, it is of interest whether frequency, occurrence and intensity of these hypotensive symptoms alter during pregnancy. In a longitudinal study 12 hypotensive pregnant women were compared with 13 normotensive and later on in a randomized study 102 clinical healthy pregnant women were tested with a modified orthostatic test over defined time periods during pregnancy. Blood pressure and heart rate were registered in one minute intervals over 30 minute period with an automatic Dinamap measuring device. This period was subdivided in a 10 minutes lying period, 10 minutes standing period followed by a 10 minutes lying period. In addition, the pregnant women were asked about frequency, occurrence and intensity of typical hypotensive symptoms. The frequency of subjective symptoms were related to low blood pressure (p less than 0.001) but not to the fall in blood pressure during standing. The occurrence of different hypotensive symptoms (p less than 0.05) and their intensity (p less than 0.01) were most often in early pregnancy and decreased until term. We conclude that the subjective symptoms were twice as much during early pregnancy than during late pregnancy and were more often in patients with low blood pressure. Furthermore, fatigue, headache and cold extremities occur frequently during pregnancy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)