1. [Risk-adapted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma]
- Author
-
M-O, Grimm, K, Leucht, S, Foller, and V, Grünwald
- Subjects
Axitinib ,Antibodies, Monoclonal ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ,Ipilimumab ,Kidney Neoplasms ,Immunomodulation ,Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological ,Nivolumab ,Treatment Outcome ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Quality of Life ,Sunitinib ,Humans ,Neoplasm Metastasis ,Carcinoma, Renal Cell - Abstract
Current pivotal phase 3 studies have permanently changed the first-line treatment landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. These studies showed that immune checkpoint combinations were more efficacious than sunitinib, a previous standard of care. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is characterized by a survival advantage, a high rate of complete response and durable remission in patients with intermediate and unfavorable prognosis. Despite frequent immune-mediated side effects, fewer symptoms and a better quality of life were observed compared to sunitinib. Pembrolizumab or avelumab plus axitinib were characterized by an improved PFS and a high response rate with a low rate of intrinsic resistance. In addition, a significant survival benefit was achieved with pembrolizumab plus axitinib. The side effect profile is driven by the "chronic" toxicity of axitinib, but there is additional risk of immune-mediated side effects of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. The quality-of-life data published so far do not suggest any improvement compared to the previous standard sunitinib. The PD-1/PD-L1 immune-check-point inhibitors thus form the "backbone" of the first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Monotherapy with VEGFR-TKI remains an option in cases with contraindications and possibly for subgroups with favorable prognosis.
- Published
- 2020