Search

Copyright of Anaesthesiologie & Intensivmedizin is the property of DGAI e.V. - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Endotracheal intubation remains the gold standard for securing the airway in emergency medicine. However, difficult endotracheal intubation and complications are common during emergency intubation. In contrast to conventional direct laryngoscopy, the new generation of devices does not require direct visualization of the vocal cords for endotracheal tube placement. These devices allow a better glottic view and successful endotracheal placement of the tube, especially if direct laryngoscopy is difficult. Recent studies showed that utilization of these devices can be easily learned. The technique of indirect laryngoscopy is currently used for securing the airway in daily anesthesia routine as well as for managing the difficult airway in the operating room. This article gives an overview of available devices for indirect endotracheal intubation as well as the current literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endotracheal intubation remains the gold standard for securing the airway in emergency medicine. However, difficult endotracheal intubation and complications are common during emergency intubation. In contrast to conventional direct laryngoscopy, the new generation of devices does not require direct visualization of the vocal cords for endotracheal tube placement. These devices allow a better glottic view and successful endotracheal placement of the tube, especially if direct laryngoscopy is difficult. Recent studies showed that utilization of these devices can be easily learned. The technique of indirect laryngoscopy is currently used for securing the airway in daily anesthesia routine as well as for managing the difficult airway in the operating room. This article gives an overview of available devices for indirect endotracheal intubation as well as the current literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The McGrath® videolaryngoscope was used in a patient with immobilized cervical spine and suspected difficult airway after a high level fall with traumatic brain injury and suspected cervical spine trauma. The airway was successfully secured in the preclinical setting using an oral endotracheal tube with full view of the glottis. Because videolaryngoscopy offers potential advantages compared to established airway management techniques, further studies are required to evaluate the significance of videolaryngoscopy in prehospital emergency medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Notfall & Rettungsmedizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The German guidelines for airway management aim to optimize the care of patients undergoing anesthesia or intensive care. The preanesthesia evaluation is an important component for detection of anatomical and physiological indications for difficult mask ventilation and intubation. If predictors for a difficult or impossible mask ventilation and/or endotracheal intubation are present the airway should be secured while maintaining spontaneous breathing. In an unexpectedly difficult intubation, attempts to secure the airway should be limited to two with each method used. A video laryngoscope is recommended after an unsuccessful direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, a video laryngoscope should be available at every anesthesiology workspace throughout the hospital. Securing the airway should primarily be performed with a video laryngoscope in critically ill patients and patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration. Experienced personnel should perform or supervise airway management in the intensive care unit., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Awake video laryngoscopy is a novel option in airway management that is drawing more and more attention as an alternative to awake endoscopic guided intubation.Main issues: Intubation under preserved spontaneous breathing is the safest method to secure the expected difficult airway. In direct comparisons to awake flexible endoscopic intubation, awake video laryngoscopy achieves satisfactory intubation times and a high acceptance of patients and anesthesiologists. Specific cases, in particular very limited mouth opening or sub-glottic masses, require awake flexible endoscopic intubation. Sufficient topical anesthesia and a sophisticated sedation protocol are prerequisites for successful awake video laryngoscopy., Conclusion: Awake video laryngoscopy cannot fully replace flexible endoscopic intubation. It is a useful option, but it must be considered that this technique is not suitable for all types of airways, patients or even anesthesiologists. Expertise and adequate practice is mandatory for both techniques. Careful planning, an appropriate blade design and a high expertise in video laryngoscopy are crucial for a successful intubation., (© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Video laryngoscopy has become increasingly important in airway management in the pre- and intrahospital settings. However, using video laryngoscopes in the presence of body fluids can make visualization of the airway difficult. A simulated regurgitation model was used to compare two video laryngoscopes (VL) with direct laryngoscopy., Materials and Methods: A total of 72 physicians participated in this randomized trial. The hypopharynx from an Airway Management Trainer was filled with artificially warmed turbid liquid. In addition, the cervical spine of the manikin was immobilized. The VL GlideScope® (GS) and McGrath® Series 5 (McG) were examined with the laryngoscope with Macintoshspatel (DL). Fogging of the camera optics in percent (0 %= clear view, 100 %= no view), the visibility of the glottis by Cormack and Lehane classification (C&L), and the POGO Score (percentage of glottic opening), the time until the endotracheal tube placement, and the success rate were evaluated., Results: No fogging (median 0 %) was present using the GS (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-4), in contrast 45 % fogging was found in the McG group (IQR: 30-60; p < 0.001). Glottic visualization using C&L was better using VL (p < 0.001). A similar result was observed using the POGO Scale: GS 90 % (IQR: 76-100), McG 80 % (IQR: 70-90), and DL 20 % (IQR: 0-50). The time for correct placement was in the DL with 27.6 s (IQR: 22.5-35) faster (p < 0.001), with the GS 48.5 s (IQR: 34.3-65.1) and the McG 66.3 s (IQR: 45.4-90). Successful placement was possible with GS in all cases (72/72), with DL in 71/72 cases, and with the McG in 70/72 cases., Conclusion: Using a video laryngsocope with an "anti-fogging" system improved visualization in a simulated aspiration model. In this scenario, VL showed no advantage to direct laryngoscopy in terms of success rate and speed of intubation.