Search

Copyright of Soziologische Revue is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: There is still a controversial discussion on the treatment of talocalcaneal coalition with and without planovalgus deformity. From 2002-2014 80 cases of talocalcaneal coalition in children and adolescents under 18 years of age were surgically treated by J. Hamel. The objective of this study is a retrospective analysis, especially of unfavourable results., Methods: Patients with minimum follow up of 12 months were included (35.7 months on average). In 31 cases treatment consisted of resection and fat-grafting (group 1), in 26 additional cases tarsal osteotomy was added because of planovalgus-deformity (group 2), and in 23 cases primary fusion of the talocalcaneal joint was performed (group 3)., Results: In group 1 one patient was lost to follow-up early with a severe peroneal spasticity and unknown further course. Two further patients still had remarkable pain after 15 months, and another patient had to undergo secondary fusion because of persistent pain. In group 2 secondary fusion was undertaken in two cases and offered in four other cases. In group 3 two patients still suffered from moderate tarsal pain, although complete fusion occurred; one of these patients underwent bilateral treatment. All other patients were pain free or nearly pain free on the last follow-up visit, with marked improvement in comparison to the preoperative situation., Discussion: Surgical treatment of talocalcaneal coalition is successful in most cases in the short to medium follow-up, but unfavourable results are not uncommon and may require secondary fusion. Differential indication between resection, additional deformity correction, or primary fusion seems to be most important.

Objective: A new method of osteosynthetic stabilization of talonavicular fusion is presented., Indications: Idiopathic and posttraumatic talonavicular arthritis, talonavicular destruction in rheumatoid arthritis, adult acquired flatfoot deformity, cavovarus deformity, talonavicular degenerative disease in tarsal coalition., Contraindication: Major hindfoot deformity or instability, severe osteopenic conditions of tarsal bones., Surgical Technique: Talonavicular fusion is stabilized with a medioplantar 6.5-mm lag screw in combination with a dorsolateral 3.5-mm claw plate (Charlotte Claw compression plate; Fa. Wright Medical Technology, Memphis, USA) by a dorsal surgical access., Postoperative Management: Nonweight-bearing in a cast or walker for 6 weeks; after radiologic control increasing weight-bearing is allowed., Results: The technique was used in 44 patients, among them 31 cases of isolated talonavicular fusion. Complete bony healing was observed in 42 cases after medium follow-up time of 13.3 months. All 19 cases of isolated talonavicular fusion without posterior tibial tendon dysfunction healed uneventfully; two cases of non-union were observed in 12 patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.