Search

Large hemispheric infarction (LHI), synonymously called malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, is a severe neurological disease with a high mortality and morbidity. Treating physicians as well as relatives are often faced with few and low quality data when attempting to apply optimal treatment to these patients and make decisions. While current stroke treatment guidelines focus on risk factors, prevention and acute management, they include only limited recommendations concerning intensive care management of LHI. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) and the German Society for Neurocritical and Emergency Medicine (DGNI) organized an interdisciplinary consensus conference on intensive care management of LHI to meet this demand. European and American experts in neurology, neurocritical care, neurosurgery, neuroradiology and neuroanesthesiology were selected based on their expertise and research focus. Subgroups for several main topics elaborated a number of central clinical questions concerning this topic and evaluated the quality of the currently available data according to the grading of recommendation assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) guideline system. Subsequently, evidence-based recommendations were compiled after weighing the advantages against the disadvantages of certain management options. This is a commented abridged version of the results of the consensus conference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Decompressive hemicraniectomy reduces mortality in patients with space-occupying MCA infarction. Quality of life in surviving patients is discussed controversially. We assessed attitudes of neurologists and nurses providing care to this patient group towards decompressive hemicraniectomy. Methods: A postal questionnaire on attitudes and opinions on prognosis and quality of life after decompressive hemicraniectomy was returned by 280 neurologists and 166 nurses from tertiary care centers throughout Germany. Results: In both groups of professionals, estimates of the probability of survival after decompressive hemicraniectomy and the resulting degree of disability were consistent with results of clinical outcomes studies. Only 9% of the nurses and 33% of the physicians assumed that the majority of survivors achieve an acceptable quality of life; 58% of physicians and 32% of nurses would suggest decompressive hemicraniectomy to their nearest relative. Under the assumption of an uncertain outcome, 61% of physicians and 22% of nurses would agree to decompressive hemicraniectomy. In both professional groups, agreement for surgery increases when scenarios with a more favorable outcome were proposed [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 2-5)]. If an outcome of 4 on the mRS is proposed, indicating moderately severe disability, only a minority favored decompressive hemicraniectomy (25% of doctors and 8% of nurses). Conclusions: Despite a realistic assessment of prognosis after decompressive hemicraniectomy, a majority of respondents estimated the quality of life of survivors as unsatisfactory. Nurses had a more pessimistic attitude towards decompressive hemicraniectomy. The majority of respondents consider an outcome of 4 on the mRS as unacceptable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]