Search

Consideration is given to the shallow-water equations, a hyperbolic system modeling the propagation of long waves at the surface of an incompressible inviscible fluid of constant depth. It is well known that the solution of the Riemann problem associated to this system may feature dry states for some configurations of the Riemann data. This article will discuss various scenarios in which the Riemann problem for the shallow water system arises in a physically reasonable sense. In particular, it will be shown that if certain physical assumptions on the disposition of the Riemann data are made, then dry states can be avoided in the solution of the Riemann problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Comparison of puncture deviation and puncture duration between computed tomography (CT)- and C-arm CT (CACT)-guided puncture performed by residents in training (RiT)., Methods: In a cohort of 25 RiTs enrolled in a research training program either CT- or CACT-guided puncture was performed on a phantom. Prior to the experiments, the RiT's level of training, experience playing a musical instrument, video games, and ball sports, and self-assessed manual skills and spatial skills were recorded. Each RiT performed two punctures. The first puncture was performed with a transaxial or single angulated needle path and the second with a single or double angulated needle path. Puncture deviation and puncture duration were compared between the procedures and were correlated with the self-assessments., Results: RiTs in both the CT guidance and CACT guidance groups did not differ with respect to radiologic experience (p = 1), angiographic experience (p = 0.415), and number of ultrasound-guided puncture procedures (p = 0.483), CT-guided puncture procedures (p = 0.934), and CACT-guided puncture procedures (p = 0.466). The puncture duration was significantly longer with CT guidance (without navigation tool) than with CACT guidance with navigation software (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the puncture duration between the first and second puncture using CT guidance (p = 0.719). However, in the case of CACT, the second puncture was significantly faster (p = 0.006). Puncture deviations were not different between CT-guided and CACT-guided puncture (p = 0.337) and between the first and second puncture of CT-guided and CACT-guided puncture (CT: p = 0.130; CACT: p = 0.391). The self-assessment of manual skills did not correlate with puncture deviation (p = 0.059) and puncture duration (p = 0.158). The self-assessed spatial skills correlated positively with puncture deviation (p = 0.011) but not with puncture duration (p = 0.541)., Conclusion: The RiTs achieved a puncture deviation that was clinically adequate with respect to their level of training and did not differ between CT-guided and CACT-guided puncture. The puncture duration was shorter when using CACT. CACT guidance with navigation software support has a potentially steeper learning curve. Spatial skills might accelerate the learning of image-guided puncture., Key Points: · The CT-guided and CACT-guided puncture experience of the RiTs selected as part of the program "Researchers for the Future" of the German Roentgen Society was adequate with respect to the level of training.. · Despite the lower collective experience of the RiTs with CACT-guided puncture with navigation software assistance, the learning curve regarding CACT-guided puncture may be faster compared to the CT-guided puncture technique.. · If the needle path is complex, CACT guidance with navigation software assistance might have an advantage over CT guidance.., Citation Format: · Meine TC, Hinrichs JB, Werncke T et al. Phantom study for comparison between computed tomography- and C-Arm computed tomography-guided puncture applied by residents in radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 272 - 280., Competing Interests: Lorenz Biggemann: L. B. declares travel grant from Siemens Healthineers and speakers honorarium from Bristol Myer-Squibb unrelated to this project.Jan –Peter Grunz: J.-P. G. declares employment as “Research Consultant” at Siemens Healthineers unrelated to this project.Markus Kopp: M. B. declares participation at the Siemens Healthineers speakers’ bureau unrelated to this project.Simon Lennartz: S. L. declares institutional research support from Philips unrelated to this project.Timo C. Meine: T.C.M. declares passive participation at the BTG TheraSphere™ DACH Summit 2018 unrelated to this to this project.Bernhard C. Meyer: B.C.M. declares relationships with Siemens Healthcare and ProMedicus (outside the submitted work).Frank K. Wacker: F. K. W. declares relationships with Siemens Healthcare and ProMedicus (outside the submitted work).David Zopfs: D. Z. declares institutional research support from Philips Healthcare unrelated to this project., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore inequalities in healthcare from the patient's perspective., Methods: 44 semi-structured interviews with patients, aged 59-80 years, were conducted at the university hospital in Halle, Germany in 2014 and 2015. We analyzed the narratives following inductive qualitative content analysis., Results: Most of the patients (82%) perceived inequalities in healthcare. Dimensions of healthcare inequalities from the patient's perspective were regional differences, type of health insurance, quality of physicians and the patients themselves (Income, Age). The patient's engagement in utilization was mentioned most often as a dimension of inequalities, but not considered a disadvantage. From the patient's perspective, inequalities were more prevalent in the outpatient sector (waiting time, lack of time). Economization in the healthcare system was viewed as the main reason of healthcare inequalities. We found no differences between patients of high and low socioeconomic status., Conclusion: From the patient´s point of view, their own capacity to orient and engage themselves in the healthcare system, as well as reduction of barriers to accessing outpatient care are highly important for reducing inequalities in healthcare., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenskonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Communication between physicians and patients has a great influence on patient adherence, patient satisfaction and the success of treatment. In this context, patient centered care and emotional support have a high positive impact; however, it is unclear how physicians can be motivated to communicate with patients in an appreciative and empathetic way. The implementation of such behavior requires a multitude of communicative skills. One of them is active listening, which is very important in two respects. On the one hand active listening provides the basis for several conversational contexts as a special communication technique and on the other hand active listening is presented in current textbooks in different ways: as an attitude or as a technique. In light of this, the question arises how active listening should be taught in order to be not only applicable in concrete conversations but also to lead to the highest possible level of patient satisfaction. The aim of this pilot study was to examine some variations in simulated doctor-patient conversations, which are the result of the different approaches to active listening. For this purpose three groups of first semester medical students were recruited, two of which were schooled in active listening in different ways (two groups of six students), i.e. attitude versus technique oriented. The third group (seven students) acted as the control group. In a pre-post design interviews with standardized simulation patients were conducted and subsequently evaluated. The analysis of these interviews was considered from the perspectives of participants and observers as well as the quantitative aspects. This study revealed some interesting tendencies despite its status as a pilot study: in general, the two interventional groups performed significantly better than the control group in which no relevant changes occurred. In a direct comparison, the group in which active listening was taught from an attitude approach achieved better results than the group in which the focus was on the technical aspects of active listening. In the group with active listening schooled as an attitude, the response to the feelings of the standardized simulation patients was significantly better from the perspectives of both participants and observers.