Search

Aim of the Study: The evaluation of complex interventions such as different forms of healthcare are methodologically challenging. The aim of this study was to use generalized estimating equations (GEE) to investigate how quality differences between family practitioner-based healthcare (HZV) and standard care develop over time., Methods: A longitudinal secondary data analysis for 2011-2018 was conducted using routine data from the AOK Baden Wuerttemberg health insurer. A dynamic cohort of insured persons that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis at the beginning of each year of observation, so the size and composition of the cohorts varied from year to year. Quality differences between HZV and standard care were investigated, whereby an autoregressive covariance structure (AR1) was assumed for multiple measurements. Under observation were a group variable for healthcare type, a variable for year of observation, and any interaction between the two. The resulting estimates provided information on the relationship between the two groups at the beginning of the observation period, and on how the groups developed both individually and in relation to one another over time., Results: The GEE were used exemplarily on the quality indicator prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in elderly insured patients. At the beginning of the observation period, the chance of PIM in those over 65 years of age (year 2018; N=628,523) was significantly lower in the HZV group than in the group receiving standard care (odds ratio 0.978; 95% confidence interval: 0.968-0.987). The chance of a PIM in the following seven years declined in both groups, but faster in the HZV group than the group receiving standard care., Conclusion: A secondary data-based trend analysis with GEE of quality differences in comparison groups over time has considerable potential in the evaluation of new and existing forms of healthcare., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: GP-centered health care ("Hausarztzentrierte Versorgung", HzV)-the terms of which are described in § 73b of the Social Code Book V-came into effect in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, on 1 July 2008. The HzV is aimed at enhancing health care for patients with chronic diseases and complex health care needs (e.g., those requiring long-term care)., Objectives: On the basis of four working packages (WP I-WP IV), the present paper examines the impact that GP-centered health care has had on patients insured by the "AOK" regional sickness fund and their GPs. WP I addresses the association between HzV participation and the corresponding health care utilization of patients on the basis of claims data. WP II looks at any changes that GPs and patients noticed were potentially attributable to HzV participation. WP III focuses on health care assistants in primary care ("Versorgungsassistenten in der Hausarztpraxis", VERAH). These assistants play a special role within the framework of the HzV. WP IV analyzes the quality of health care for patients aged 65 years and over, also on the basis of claims data., Materials and Methods: A mixed methods design was used for this evaluation, and quantitative and qualitative approaches taken. This design enabled insights into the implementation of the HzV in regular health care to be obtained from different perspectives., Results: Numerous positive associations between HzV participation and the variables of interest were observed for all WPs. These are presented in detail in the paper., Conclusion: The results obtained so far clearly support the continuation of HzV and associated evaluations.