Search

Copyright of Der Chirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Chirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The tremendous increase in medical knowledge over the last decades and technical progress in medicine have caused further professional specialization. Numerous medical fields have evolved through the process of separation from the parent specialization and the traditional distinction between surgical and medical disciplines has been blurred. As a result of this development organ-specific interdisciplinary units have been formed and new partners have united, such as surgeons and gastroenterologists in the field of interventional endoscopy. The fading boundaries brought with them resistance and even resentment and called for a mutual regulation by the professional associations which took place 10 years ago. Nowadays, surgeons and gastroenterologists in Germany are trained in interventional endoscopy and are the foundation of endoscopic interdisciplinary teamwork in emergency care, diagnostics, therapy, complication management and palliative treatment. Technical innovations striving for a minimization of operative trauma like NOTES depend on the cooperation of both fields of expertise. The driving force behind these efforts should be the shared interest in further improvement of patient care at the highest level of individual expertise, patient-oriented process optimization and adequate use of resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Urologe A is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The medical councils (Ärztekammern) develop the contents of the further training regulations with the support of the specialist society. The hospitals with the training supervisors have to implement these contents for the trainees in continuing education and confirm the acquisition of competence for the individual tasks. Surveys of young surgeons in recent years have shown that many participants do not receive structured continuing education, so that there is general dissatisfaction. Therefore, the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) is required to provide assistance to its members to improve continuing education in the departments. For example, the DGAV organizes more than 100 surgical courses annually on all topics of visceral surgery, anatomy, skills courses and revision courses with the Further Education and Advanced Training Quality Center (WeiFoQ). This year a continuing education curriculum was developed over the 6‑year continuing education period, so that a structured continuing education is achievable. The contents of the continuing education regulations are included in this continuing education curriculum with explanations, video clips, and graphics, thus providing quick information on each individual surgical clinical picture. A digital surgical catalog provides a quick overview of the status of personal continuing education. It is planned to set up an interface to the eLogbook of the medical councils., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The fast-track (FT) concept is a multimodal, interdisciplinary approach to perioperative patient care intended to reduce postoperative complications. Despite good evidence implementation seems to need improvement, whereby almost all studies focused on the implementation of surgical modules regardless of the interdisciplinary aspect. Adherence to the anesthesiological measures (prehabilitation, premedication, volume and temperature management, pain therapy), on the other hand, has been insufficiently studied. To assess the status quo a survey on the implementation of anesthesiological FT measures was conducted among members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) to analyze where potential for improvement exists., Methods: Using the SurveyMonkey® online survey tool, 28 questions regarding perioperative anesthesiological care of colorectal surgery patients were sent to DGAI members in order to analyze adherence to FT measures., Results: While some of the FT measures (temperature management, PONV prophylaxis) are already routinely used, there is a divergence between current recommendations and clinical implementation for other components. In addition to premedication, interdisciplinary measures (prehabilitation) and measures that affect multiple interfaces (operating theatre, recovery room, ward), such as volume management or perioperative pain management, are particularly affected., Conclusion: The anesthesiological recommendations of the FT concept are only partially implemented in Germany. This particularly affects the interdisciplinary components as well as measures at the operating theatre, recovery room and ward interfaces. The establishment of an interdisciplinary FT team and interdisciplinary development of SOPs can optimize adherence, which in turn improves the short-term and long-term outcome of patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

The paradigm shift in the treatment concept for acute appendicitis is currently the subject of intensive discussions. The diagnosis and differentiation of an uncomplicated from a complicated appendicitis as well as the selection of an adequate treatment is very challenging, especially since nonoperative treatment models have been published. The laparoscopic appendectomy is still the standard for most cases. Guidelines for the treatment of acute appendicitis do not exist in Germany. Therefore, a group of experts elaborated 21 recommendations on the treatment of acute appendicitis after 3 meetings. After initial definition of population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) questions, recommendations have been finalized through the Delphi voting system. The results were evaluated according to the current literature. The aim of this initiative was to define a basic support for decision making in the clinical routine for treatment of acute appendicitis.

An intestinal stoma (greek στὁμα, stoma: mouth, opening) is a surgically created opening of a gut section through the abdominal wall, which serves as an artificial intestinal exit for excretion of feces (synonym preternatural anus). A stoma of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is often surgically created at the distal small intestine (ileostomy) and the colon (colostomy). Temporary or permanent deviation of fecal excretion may be required to treat various pathological conditions (e.g. congenital anomalies, ileus, inflammatory bowel diseases, posttraumatic, diverticulitis, colorectal malignancy). The creation of an end vs. a loop stoma is technically different. To achieve sufficient patient satisfaction close collaboration between surgeons, professional stoma care with guidance and training as well as support from self-help groups are required. In this way serious stoma-related complications can be avoided.

Background: Mechanical bowel obstruction is a common condition in geriatric patients in the emergency department. It accounts for up to 50% of all emergency surgeries in the elderly. In recent years, diagnosis and treatment of mechanical bowel obstruction has improved, but little is known whether elderly patients benefit from modern treatment approaches., Objective: The aim of the work is to generate knowledge about possible improvement of diagnosis and treatment of mechanical bowel obstruction in the elderly., Methods: A retrospective review of 132 patients was performed comparing geriatric (>80 years of age) and nongeriatric patients (50-70 years of age) admitted with mechanical bowel obstruction. Etiology, time from first contact to operation, bowel resection rate and morbidity/mortality were compared. Data analysis included Fisher's test and Student t‑test., Results: In patients under 70 years of age it took 18.23 ± 0.79 h from first contact until laparotomy in the operating room (OR) vs. 43.38 ± 12.08 h in patients above 80 years of age (p = 0.0111). In 58.9% of geriatric patients, resection of bowel was necessary, while only 35.3% of <70-year-old patients needed bowel resection (p = 0.0401). In all, 50% of geriatric patients experienced major complications (Dindo/Clavien >IIIB) vs. only 12.7% of 50- to 70-year-old patients (p = 0.0002). Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was significantly prolonged in geriatric patients compared to younger patients (93.97 ± 17.36 h vs. 26.11 ± 3.73 h, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Time from first contact in the emergency department until laparotomy in the OR is prolonged in geriatric patients, leading to a higher probability of bowel resection with greater morbidity and mortality. Diagnostics should be intensified and accelerated in geriatric patients. Emergency surgery should be considered earlier.

Background: Esophageal variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, which is pathophysiologically explained by the presence of portal hypertension. The incidence of such bleeding greatly depends on the severity of the underlying liver disease., Objective: The aim of this article is to present the current treatment concepts for acute esophageal variceal bleeding, the management in acute situations and the indications for treatment of the causal portal hypertension with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)., Results: In patients with liver cirrhosis or any other disease causing portal hypertension, a staging examination by esophagogastroduodenoscopy is first carried out for determination of the stage of the varices and the resulting necessary treatment. In addition, determination of the portal pressure gradient is useful. In patients with varices a medicinal or endoscopic bleeding prophylaxis should subsequently additionally be initiated. After an acute variceal bleeding event, under clearly defined prerequisites an evaluation for TIPS implantation should be considered. This is the only effective treatment for reducing portal hypertension., Conclusion: With appropriate indications implantation of a TIPS is an effective strategy to lower portal hypertension and therefore prevent recurrent variceal bleeding. The resulting improvement of the portal hemodynamics leads to an improvement in kidney function; however, it also leads to deterioration of liver function with subsequent development or deterioration of a previously existing hepatic encephalopathy.

Background: Quality assessment in surgery is gaining in importance. Although sporadic recommendations for quality indicators (QI) in oncological colon surgery can be found in the literature, these are usually not systematically derived from a solid evidence base. Moreover, reference ranges for QI are unknown., Objective: The aim of this initiative was the development of evidence-based QI for oncological colon resections by an expert panel invited by the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV). Reference ranges from the literature and reference values from the Study, Documentation, and Quality Center (StuDoQ)|Colon Cancer Register were compared in order to deduce recommendations which are tailored to the German healthcare system., Results: Based on the most recent scientific evidence and agreed by expert consensus, five QI for oncological colon surgery were defined and evaluated according to the QUALIFY tool. Mortality, MTL30 (mortality, transfer to another acute care hospital, or length of stay ≥30 days), anastomotic leakage requiring reintervention, surgical site infections necessitating reopening of the wound and ≥12 lymph nodes in the specimen qualified as QI owing to their relevance, scientific nature, and practicability. Based on the results of the systematic literature search and the statistical analysis of the StuDoQ|Colon Cancer Register, preliminary reference values are proposed for each QI., Conclusion: The presented set of QI seems appropriate for quality assessment of oncological colon surgery in the context of the German healthcare system. The validity of the QI and the reference values must be reviewed within the framework of their implementation. The StuDoQ|Colon Cancer Register provides a suitable infrastructure for collecting clinical data for quality assessment and risk adjustment.

Introduction: Although the perioperative management has been optimised over the past few decades, there has not been a remarkable improvement in the mortality rates of patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). The aim of this retrospective trial was to define pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters which influence the perioperative and long-term outcome of patients and which can be modified by the operating team. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was performed in 49 patients who had undergone an operation of rAAA in our certified centre of vascular surgery between the beginning of 2006 and the end of 2012. The minimal follow-up period was 30 months. The statistical analysis was done univariately using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank-test, and multivariately with the Cox model. Results: Intrahospital mortality was 40.8 %, perioperative mortality (30 postoperative days) was 28.9 %. The survival rate for 1 year was 52.4 %; the survival rate for 5 years was 45.3 %. In the univariate analysis, significant differences in the early postoperative survival rates were found depending on preoperative systolic blood pressure, preoperative haemoglobin (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 g/dl), the intraoperative need of blood and frozen plasma transfusions, type of perforation, type of AAA, the need for further surgical interventions, postoperative MOF, acute kidney failure and postoperative septicaemia. The late survival rates were significantly influenced by the type of perforation and AAA, pre-existing coronary disease and diabetes mellitus in fully identified patients discharged from hospital (n = 27). In the multivariate analysis pursuant to the Cox model, patients with pre-existing coronary disease had a 3.9-fold higher relative risk to die after the operation of rAAA, while patients with a free perforation of the rAA had a 10-fold higher relative risk. Conclusion: The high mortality of rAAA is caused by haemorrhagic shock and its complications, which are mostly non-surgical. Therapeutic efforts should focus on those perioperative parameters which can be modified by the treating teams. Alongside the centralisation of rAAA in high-volume-departments of vascular surgery, the systematic sonographic screening for asymptomatic AAA in the population older than 65 years should be enforced. A possible advantage of EVAR in rAAA has yet to be shown by trials in progress such as IMPROVE, AJAX and RCAR., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)