Search

Background: To evaluate the possible effects of multiple intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections on intraocular pressure (IOP)., Methods: This study included 50 eyes of 50 patients who underwent multiple (≥ 10 injections) intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in one eye with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion. IOP was recorded after every injection on the first postoperative day. IOP > 21 mmHg was regarded as abnormal. For statistical analysis, the IOP was correlated with the number of injections., Results: A total of 669 IOP-measurements (mean 13.4 treatment/eye) were analyzed. No IOP-elevation was recorded in 43 eyes (86%). Transient elevated IOP > 21 mmHg was measured after 19 intravitreal injections (2.8%, one patients with 8 IOP elevations). In general, there was no increasing risk of IOP elevation with time, no case of sustained IOP elevation and no additional long term glaucoma treatment necessary. Eyes with pre-existing glaucoma were significantly more affected from transient IOP-elevation than non-glaucoma eyes (5.5 vs. 2.2%)., Conclusions: Multiple anti-VEGF injections are not associated with an increased risk of sustained IOP-elevation. On the other hand, individual risk factors exist and predispose to IOP-elevation (e.g., pre-existing glaucoma)., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The goal of this report is to provide a review on different strategies for the use of pro re nata (PRN) and treat and extend (T&E) regimens with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents (bevacizumab, ranibizumab or aflibercept) in patients with retinal diseases such as neovascular AMD, diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion. The main focus is to present the effectiveness and visual outcomes of both PRN and T&E regimens in the main pivotal trials and studies based on currently available evidence. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both regimens, as well as monitoring and treatment of the disease, including treatment intervals and injection frequency. Currently there is increasing interest in establishing a regimen which offers the best visual outcome with lower injection frequency, and with reduced treatment burden by individualising treatment intervals and minimising the number of clinic visits and costs. Studies have shown that the PRN regimens in a clinical setting are insufficient in assuring the best visual outcome. The PRN regime requires frequent clinic visits to monitor disease status and intravitreal treatment if needed in a reactive approach. Individualised T&E regimens can improve visual outcome and require fewer injections than those administered in a monthly regimen and fewer monitoring visits than those in a PRN regimen., Competing Interests: Nein., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Retinal angiomatous proliferations (RAP) are a subgroup of exsudative or "wet" age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) with devastating reduction of visual acuity in later stages. Intravitreal ranibizumab provides good therapy, but is considered to be less effective than in other choroidal neovascularizations (CNV)., Objective: We investigated the efficacy of ranibizumab in late-stage III RAP with retinochoroidal anastomosis compared to the outcome of other CNV lesions., Materials and Methods: The data of all patients with wAMD treated with ranibizumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into groups depending on the lesion type into RAP (identified and selected clinically, proven by fluorescein angiography) and CNV lesions (identified by fluorescein angiography only) named occult, minimally and predominantly classic groups. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was obtained before (at the timepoint "diagnosis"), during (1st, 2nd, and 3rd injection), and after upload ("1st control")., Results: Before first injection, visual acuity decreased in all groups (0.73 to 0.78 logMAR for all CNV, 0.95 to 1.02 logMAR for RAP). During upload there was no further decline in visual acuity but no improvement as well up to the 1st control visit in the RAP group (1.02 to 1.03 logMAR), but a statistically significant increase in all other groups (0.78 to 0.67 logMAR)., Conclusion: Treatment of late-stage III RAP with ranibizumab is effective. Stabiliziation of visual acuity can be achieved, but-in contrast to other forms of CNV lesions-no further improvement. Therefore, patients with this special form need to be identified and treated as early as possible.