Search

Background: Prevalence rates for eating disorders remained stable over the years despite the implementation of numerous prevention strategies. This may be due to discrepancies between research and practice and scientific findings are not fully applied to the care of risk groups. The school-based programs PriMa and Torera for primary prevention of eating disorders have been delivered in Thuringian schools since 2004. A current survey provides information on barriers and facilitators for a long-term implementation in the school routine., Objectives and Methods: Using the "Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research", factors which impact the implementation process are discussed., Results: Impeding factors for a long-term implementation are missing framework conditions, staff turnover and a lack of financial support from politicians. Possible solutions could be the establishment of extra time in the curriculum, the employment of individuals responsible for prevention and a close network between all people involved., Conclusion: According to the Society for Prevention Research, discussing implementation factors builds the last part of comprehensive program evaluations. We illustrate the barriers for the integration of evidence-based prevention programs in daily school life. It is important to implement new structures prior to the implementation of resource-intensive new prevention programs in order to increase the effectiveness of said programs and enable long-term implementation., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The "Guideline for the Development of Evidence-based Patient Information" project is a novelty. The aim of this project is to enhance the quality of health information. The development and implementation process is guided by national and international standards. Involvement of health information developers plays an essential role. This article provides an insight into the guideline's underlying methodology, using graphics as an example. In addition, the results of a qualitative study exploring the competencies of health information developers are presented. These results will guide the implementation of the guideline. We conducted systematic literature searches (until June 2014), critical appraisal and descriptive analyses applying GRADE for two selected guideline questions. Out of 3,287 hits 11 RCTs were included in the analysis. The evidence has been rated to be of low to moderate quality. Additional graphics may have a positive effect on cognitive outcomes. However, the relevance of the results is questionable. For graphics, we found some indication that especially pictograms but also bar graphs have a positive effect on cognitive outcomes and meet patients' preferences. In order to prepare for the implementation of the guideline, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the competencies of health information developers using expert interviews. Four telephone interviews were conducted, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed according to Grounded Theory. Six categories were identified: literature search, development of health information, participation of target groups, continuing education and further training of health information developers, cooperation with different institutions, essential competencies. Levels of competencies regarding the methods of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based health information vary considerably and indicate a need for training. These results have informed the development of a training programme that will support the implementation., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

From 2004 to 2012, the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) established its first funding programme for the promotion of prevention research. 60 projects on primary prevention and health promotion and the meta-project entitled "Cooperation for Sustainable Prevention Research" (KNP) received BMBF grants under this programme during this period. The experience and knowledge gained and recommendations arising from the research funded under this programme are compiled in memorandum format. The "Memorandum on Prevention Research - Research Areas and Methods" highlights 5 research areas that are considered to be especially relevant from the perspective of the involved scientists and practice partners.The promotion of structural development and sustainability enhancement in disease prevention and health promotion are central areas that should branch out from existing nuclei of crystallization. Improving the health competence of the population and of specific subpopulations is another major area. Research in these areas should contribute to the development of theoretical concepts and to the empirical testing of these concepts. The transfer of knowledge for effective use of developed disease prevention and health promotion programmes and measures is still a scarcely researched area. Among other things, studies of the transfer of programmes from one context to another, analyses of the coop-eration between politics and science, and the continued theoretical and conceptual development of transfer research are needed. Long-term data on the effects of intervention studies are also needed for proper evaluation of sustainability. The latter dem-onstrates the importance of method development in disease prevention and health promotion research as an area that should receive separate funding and support. This research should include, in particular, studies of the efficacy of complex interventions, health economic analyses, and participative health research., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The positive experiences regarding peer review practice go back to the 1990s and can be traced in the position paper of the German Medical Association concerning quality assurance in the field of pathology. This evolved into the initiative of pathologists in Saxony to implement the peer review practice within the remit of their State Medical Association. Since the 14(th) of May 1999 various institutes as well as medical group practices in pathology and cytology have joined forces to undertake voluntary inter-institutional quality control measures. The aim was to improve the process and especially the outcome quality by reviewing each other's quality (analysing samples) on the basis of defined criteria. A positive review outcome report, which will have to be unanimously agreed upon by all participants, will lead to a positive recommendation for a certificate issued by the Medical Association of Saxony. Between 1999 and 2011 a total of 56 peer review proceedings took place. The potentials for improvement concern the problem of "kitchen pathology" still being used in the context of macroscopic description, the quality of microscopic description including the use of correct nomenclature, the quality of tumour classification and immune histological investigations. Statements concerning the advantage of the peer review method in particular refer to the integration of resident pathologists. Due to the long period of implementation of the peer review system und the small number of proceedings, it is not possible to come to a clear conclusion about the improvement or deterioration of quality. During a period of more than 10 years three peer review proceedings were not successful. In this situation, it is appropriate to ask the question of how restrictive peer reviews should be. The three most important aspects for the pathologists in Saxony are: self-determination, learning from each other, and a commitment to quality improvement. So this method set an example of how a quality management method can persist for more than 10 years through voluntary engagement. And the initiative of pathologists in Saxony has given an important impetus to the development of other peer review systems in various health care organisations or disciplines in Germany., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)