Search

Introduction: Compared to traditional models of care, midwife-led models of care provide better opportunities for midwives to make use of their full scope of practice. This has consequences for their professional satisfaction. The aim of this survey was to gain an overview of the occupational situation of midwives in the maternity units of a Swiss canton and to compare the situations between institutions with and without midwife-led care., Methods: An online-survey was developed based on a literature search. All 17 institutions with maternity units in the canton of Zurich were eligible to participate. Data was analysed descriptively using Stata 15., Results: 16 maternity units (94.1%) participated in the survey: 12 public hospitals, 2 private hospitals, and 2 midwifery-led birthing centres. A total of 5 units (31.3%) provided midwife-led births or were birthing centres. In institutions providing midwife-led care, women and midwives were more likely to know each other before admission to birth (60.0 vs. 9.1%, p=0.063), fewer routine interventions were carried out (e. g. venous access: 20.0 vs. 81.8%, p=0.036), midwives had more decision-making competences as well as responsibility (e. g. autonomous discharge check-up: 60.0 vs. 9.1%, p=0.063) and used supervisions more often (60.0 vs. 9.1%, p=0.013)., Conclusion: Fostering midwife-led models of care increases continuity of care and decreases the application of routine interventions. It also fosters the independent assumption of tasks., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Aims: This is an official guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline is to improve the prediction, prevention and management of preterm birth based on evidence obtained from recently published scientific literature, the experience of the members of the guideline commission and the views of self-help groups., Methods: The members of the participating medical societies and organizations developed Recommendations and Statements based on the international literature. The Recommendations and Statements were adopted following a formal consensus process (structured consensus conference with neutral moderation, voting done in writing using the Delphi method to achieve consensus)., Recommendations: Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents Statements and Recommendations on the tertiary prevention of preterm birth and the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes., Competing Interests: Die Interessenkonflikterklärungen aller Autoren finden Sie in der Langversion der Leitlinie., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Aims: This is an official guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline is to improve the prediction, prevention and management of preterm birth based on evidence obtained from recent scientific literature, the experience of the members of the guideline commission and the views of self-help groups., Methods: Based on the international literature, the members of the participating medical societies and organizations developed Recommendations and Statements. These were adopted following a formal process (structured consensus conference with neutral moderation, voting was done in writing using the Delphi method to achieve consensus)., Recommendations: Part I of this short version of the guideline lists Statements and Recommendations on the epidemiology, etiology, prediction and primary and secondary prevention of preterm birth., Competing Interests: Die Interessenkonflikterklärungen aller Autoren finden Sie in der Langversion der Leitlinie., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)