Search

Fragestellung: Fingeramputationsverletzungen der Zone 1 und 2 nach Tamai stellen gewöhnlich lediglich eine relative Replantationsindikation dar. Im Gegensatz zur primären Stumpfbildung sind Replantationen sehr aufwändig und erfordern spezielle supermikrochirurgische Fähigkeiten, [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL], 59. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie

The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.Die Brustrekonstruktion mit freiem Gewebetransfer vom Unterbauch als (muskelsparende) TRAM oder DIEP Lappenplastik stellt das Standardverfahren der autologen Brustrekonstruktion dar. Durch operative Fortschritte ist es gelungen die Hebedefektmorbidität durch muskelsparende bzw. perforatorbasierte Techniken zu minimieren. Hier stellt sich die Frage, in wie weit dies als ein notwendiger Standard angesehen werden kann oder ob auch Lappenplastiken mit Muskelanteilen (MS-TRAM) noch als zeitgemäß anzusehen sind. In einem Konsensusworkshop der 3 Jahrestagung der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße (DAM) wurde die Datenlage kritisch geprüft und durch eine Expertengruppe ein Konsensus erarbeitet. Dieser beinhaltet neben den aktuellen Daten zu Lappensicherheit und Hebedefektmorbidität aus der Literatur auch ein aktuelles Meinungsbild der Expertengruppe bzgl. verschiedener technischer Details des operativen Vorgehens.

There are only relative indications for distal digital replantation in zones 1 and 2 according to Tamai. In contrast to primary closure for fingertip amputations, replantation is a complex procedure that requires skills in supermicrosurgical techniques, as vessels with diameters between 0.3-0.8 mm are connected. In addition the time spent in hospital and the time off from work are longer. Distal digital replantation is thus only indicated, if the expected functional and aesthetic benefits surmount those of primary closure. We retrospectively analysed all fingertip amputations in zone 1 and 2 according to Tamai between 9/2009 and 7/2014 where we attempted distal digital replantation. The success of replantation, wound healing and functional results were evaluated according to Yamano. We performed 11 distal digital replantations in the study period. There were 6 total amputations, 4 subtotal amputations and 1 avulsion of the digital pulp. Revascularisation with long-term reattachment of the amputated tissues was possible in 8 cases (73%). In 3 cases (27%) secondary amputation closure was necessary. The mean operating time was 3 h 56 min. 6 patients, which had a successful replantation, were available for follow-up examinations after a mean period of 19 months. 5 patients were satisfied with the result and would again prefer replantation over primary amputation closure. 4 patients reported a good function of the replanted digits and did not complain about any limitations in their use. 2 patients complained about restricted function. All patients could return to their previous places of employment and were free of pain. Of the 12 affected digital nerves 11 nerves had a 2-point discrimination (2-PD) of ≤15 mm, 3 of them had a 2-PD between 7 and 10 mm and 4 of them of6 mm. Soft tissue atrophy was obvious in 3 replanted digits and nail deformities in 2 patients. Distal digital replantation is complex and technically challenging. It leads to high patient satisfaction with only minimal functional limitations, if successful. Due to the good results that can be obtained by these procedures, fingertip replantation should be attempted, if operative risks are minimal and if requested by the patient.

Soft tissue reconstruction with a temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF).Defect coverage with thin, pliable, and well-vascularized tissue. A bilayered TPFF provides a gliding surface in tendon reconstruction. Further options include TPFF harvest with overlying skin or subjacent bone for composite tissue reconstruction or the application as a sensate local fascial flap. Maximum defect dimensions: 17 × 14 cm.Absolute: prior injury to the flap or flap pedicle, temporal arteritis, Moyamoya syndrome, defects with volume deficit. Relative: alopecia along the planned incision.Pedicle location is outlined using Doppler ultrasound. Injection of the incision line with diluted epinephrine solution. Skin incision with subsequent visualization of the temporoparietal fascia and supplying vessels. Skin flaps are raised carefully paying special attention to the hair follicles (CAVE: postoperative alopecia). Primary closure of the donor site. Defect coverage with pedicled or free TPFF with subsequent full or split-thickness skin grafting. Dressing: Bolster or V.A.C.Immobilization/elevation in the setting of extremity reconstruction. Removal of bolster dressing or V.A.C. on postoperative day 5. Dangling protocol instituted on postoperative day 7. Removal of sutures/staples at the donor site on postoperative day 5-7 and at the recipient site on postoperative day 12-14.The TPFF was utilized for soft tissue reconstruction in 8 patients. A pedicled TPFF was used in 2 patients. Mean time to healing was 16.3 days. Mean follow-up was 13.4 months. Successful reconstructive results with satisfactory functional and aesthetic appearance were obtained in all patients. Complications were encountered in 3 patients and included alopecia at the donor site and iatrogenic injury to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Vascular compromise was observed in the early postoperative period in a third patient. However, operative revision resulted in successful flap salvage.