Search

Historically speaking, fairy tales have been powerful instruments in the education of children and in the transmission of moral standards from one generation to the next, from the dominant class to less powerful groups. As they make certain ways of life or ideals appear attractive and others repellent, fairy tales also contribute to form normative identities in their young readers. A normative identity combines a descriptive account of who one is with a normative account of what one ought to do. Such identities can be empowering or disempowering. Fairy tales can be seen as using a technique of narrative persuasion to impose normative identities on their audiences, making certain ideals and ways of life appear natural and self-evident. To deconstruct a disempowering normative identity imposed by a fairy tale involves separating its descriptive and normative components and making vivid the problematic aspects of the norms, values, and ideals involved. In this article, we analyse Angela Carter’s deconstruction of a disempowering normative identity imposed on women by the Ashputtle fairy tale, as told by the Grimm brothers. In our analysis, based on close reading and philosophical criticism, we reveal how Carter herself makes use of the fairy-tale technique of narrative persuasion in her deconstructive work, vividly bringing out certain appalling consequences of the ideals of submission and self-sacrifice implied by the Grimm version of the Ashputtle story, thereby also subverting that version.

Fieldwork in early 2019 by the Gebelein Archaeological Project encompassed surveys of two cemeteries situated south of the ancient town of Per-Hathor/Pathyris in the area of the Eastern Mountain of Gebelein. One of these is dated to the Old Kingdom and the First Intermediate Period, the other tentatively to Fatimid times. The third survey searched for local chert sources on the Western Mountain, investigating a local tradition of lithic tool production.

Background: For the implantation of pedicle screws, navigation-supported systems are nowadays used more and more to avoid screw misalignment by making the direction of the screw more predictable., Objective: Examination of the precision after instrumentation of the pedicle screw with the hand-guided aiming sleeve. The aim was to verify that the implementation of the pedicle screws is plannable and precise by using 2D X‑ray only., Method: This retrospective study analyzed 27 consecutive trauma patients (17-84 years, 13f/14m) with vertebral body fractures. The position and precision of 108 screws, implanted using the hand-guided aiming sleeve was investigated. To determine the position the actual course of the screws was examined using the postoperative 3D CT data set (GE Optima 540, General Electric Company Boston, MA, USA; slice thickness 1.25 mm). The screws were then compared to the previously defined ideal position of the tip of the screw. In addition to the absolute and relative deviation from the ideal target point, the convergence angle and the parallelism to the cover plate were determined., Results: Of 108 implanted pedicle screws, 90 (83%) were within target. The remaining 18 (17%) represented a clinically irrelevant screw deviation: A lateral deviation was found in 17 pedicle screws (16%) and a medial deviation in 1 (1%). The average deviation from the ideal target point in the vertebral body was 2.3 mm ventrally with a standard deviation of ± 2.3 mm. No screw misalignment or pedicle perforation was found., Conclusion: The transcutaneous implantation of pedicle screws with a hand-guided aiming sleeve in the thoracic and lumbar spine represents a safe and precise procedure. The risk of misalignment needing a revision is lower compared to other methods of navigated screw implantation reported in the literature [1-6]. A CT-based preliminary planning is not necessary. The method is economical, special technical equipment is not required., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

From an attachment perspective, insecure attachment patterns in both infancy and adolescence are risk factors for the development of anxiety disorders in adolescence. Dysfunctional emotion regulation and biased social information processing are possible mediating processes. This study examines differences in emotion regulation, emotional vulnerability, and behaviour inhibition in adolescents with clinical diagnosis of anxiety disorder and healthy controls. Adolescents with anxiety disorder reported more maladaptive emotion regulation depending on the specific emotion and a higher incidence of reporting hurt feelings in social interactions. In contrast, behaviour inhibition did not explain additional variance. The results suggest that adolescents with anxiety disorders show a bias in the interpretation of social interactions as frequently emotionally hurting, and the use of dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies that minimize the possibility for effective social emotion regulation by close others or therapists. The results are interpreted within attachment framework.