Search

Background: Current guidelines recommend a personalized, multimodal, and interdisciplinary approach for the treatment of chronic pain. Already in the acute treatment of postoperative pain, it can be useful to minimize risk factors for chronification. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be an effective non-drug therapy for the treatment of chronic and acute pain., Aim of the Work: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of aVNS in chronic and acute pain as well as its effect on medication intake., Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out on the application of auricular electrical stimulation in chronic and acute pain. Studies were classified according to their level of evidence and evaluated via the Jadad scale as well as their scientific validity, and then analyzed in terms of indication, method, stimulation parameters, duration of treatment, efficacy, and safety., Results: Twenty studies on chronic pain indications, ten studies on acute postoperative pain, as well as seven studies on experimental acute pain were identified and analyzed. The search revealed a total of n = 1105 aVNS-treated patients. The best evidence on the efficacy of aVNS is available for the indications chronic low back pain, chronic cervical syndrome, chronic abdominal pain, and chronic migraine as well as acute postoperative pain in oocyte aspiration, laparoscopic nephrectomy, and open colorectal surgery. Additionally a significant reduction in analgesic or opiate intake was evident in most studies. In three randomized controlled trials in chronic pain patients, a sustainable pain reduction over a period of up to 12 months was shown. Overall, aVNS was very well tolerated., Conclusion: This review indicates that aVNS can be a complementary and effective non-drug treatment for patients with chronic and acute postoperative pain. Future studies in these indications should focus on standardizing and optimizing treatment parameters, inclusion of quality-of-life outcome parameters, and longer follow-up periods to better understand the sustainable therapeutic effect of aVNS., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Copyright of Rheuma Plus is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Apart from rehabilitation research, there have been no studies regarding the expectations of patients with chronic back pain in terms of inpatient multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this naturalistic longitudinal study is to explore treatment expectations, their fulfilment, and influence on the treatment success of inpatient multimodal pain therapy., Methods: This study included 118 patients with chronic back pain who were physically examined and assessed for their psychological comorbidity. They were interviewed pre and post pain therapy. Treatment expectations were recorded via the questionnaire for assessing rehabilitational expectations and motivations (FREM-17), and further variables via the Pain Disability Index (PDI, german version) and the german Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)., Results: The results show that treatment expectations have an impact on therapy success or failure. In particular, patients' expectations of coping with illness and recovery could be met by inpatient multimodal pain therapy, whereas health and pension-related expectations remained unfulfilled. In addition to the treatment expectations, the therapy result was primarily determined by the patient's ability to perform before the therapy., Conclusions: From the clinical side, treatment expectations should be explored and checked for feasibility to avoid patient disappointment., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: The S1 guideline on long/post-COVID of the AWMF [German Association of the Medical Scientific Societies] registration number 020-027) was updated in August 2022., Methods: Under the coordination of the German Society of Pneumology, the guideline was updated by 21 scientific associations, two professional associations and clinical centers each and one institute and statutory accident insurance each. Each scientific association was responsible for its own chapter. The German Pain Society prepared the chapter "Pain". The coordinators of each chapter performed a selective literature search and also received approval for the chapter within their scientific association. During an internal period of comments, all representatives of the participating institutions could comment on all chapters. The AWMF task force commented on the draft of the guideline, which was then finally approved by the boards of all participating institutions., Results: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) increases the risk of persistent headache and musculoskeletal pain. Long/Post-COVID pain is frequently associated with fatigue and cognitive problems. A specialist assessment might be considered if symptoms with limitations of daily activities persist 3 months after the infection. The diagnostic workup of long/post-COVID-associated pain should be performed according to the standards of pain medicine. Management should follow the pain guidelines of the AWMF., Conclusions: The updated S1 guideline on long/post-COVID is a clinical manual which offers orientation for diagnostics and treatment despite limited data., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The concept of self-efficacy expectation shows high relevance for interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMST) aimed at activity and self-regulation due to its theoretical embedding and empirical correlations to the experience of pain. Several issues limit this potential: At the level of the construct definition, there are ambiguities and overlaps with other concepts. A pain-specific transfer to IMST has not yet been performed. With the help of existing instruments, only a small part of what an IMST can achieve in terms of increasing pain-specific competence seems to be detectable. In perspective, a clarification of terms by including patients and the conception of a questionnaire based on this is indicated., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Research Question: The aim of the study is to assess the status quo of emotional competence in people with chronic pain. How do patients experience themselves regarding to their ability to perceive, express, and regulate emotions? And does this assessment coincide with the assessment of emotional competence (EC) by mental health professionals?, Methods: The study took place in the context of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy at an outpatient clinic in N = 184 adult German-speaking individuals with non-cancer-related chronic pain. EC was assessed at the end of therapy using the self- and third-party assessment scales of the Emotional Competence Questionnaire. The external assessment was performed by the mental health team. Standard scores were created using the norm sample provided by questionnaires. These were analyzed descriptively and inferentially., Results: Self-perceived EC was average (M self &#95; total  = 99.31; SD = 7.78). The mental health professionals predominantly rated the emotional competence of the patients significantly lower (M external &#95;total  = 94,70; SD = 7,81; F(1.179) = 35,73; p < 0.001; η 2  = 0.17). Emotional expressivity, as a component of EC, was externally rated as below average (M expressivity&#95;external  = 89.14, SD = 10.33)., Discussion: Patients with chronic pain rate themselves as unimpaired in terms of their daily emotional awareness, expression, and regulation abilities. At the same time, mental health professionals rate these same individuals as significantly less emotionally competent. The question remains open as to what extent the divergent assessments can be explained by assessment bias., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Chronic pain in the elderly is becoming increasingly important and is associated with serious health impacts. Therefore, international guidelines demand that pain therapy for the elderly preferably be a multimodal therapy based on a bio-psycho-social pain model. Specific psychometric tests and interview guidelines are available for the interdisciplinary pain assessment. Evidence for the effectiveness of multimodal pain therapy in the elderly remains limited. However, controlled clinical trials have shown that these patients benefit-especially if the intervention is adapted to their specific needs. The focus of movement therapy is not only muscle strengthening but also coordination exercises. In individual physical therapy and occupational therapy, everyday solutions can be developed for individual physical limitations that are more frequent in old age. In psychological training, pain acceptance, balancing rest and activity, social integration and dealing with aging are particularly important topics. Relaxation and mindfulness techniques can also favorably affect pain and function. Thus, these are popular with patients and are often adopted in everyday pain management. Pain education is considered useful as an adjunctive measure and can also be increasingly supported by digital media in the elderly. Complementary therapy components include confrontational treatment of fear-avoidance beliefs (the German AMIKA scale, Ältere Menschen in körperlicher Aktion, "older people in physical action") and naturopathic applications as an active self-help strategy. Since it is unclear how long the achieved therapeutic effects last, follow-up care is of particular importance in therapy for older patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Severely disabling chronic pain affects approximately half a million children in Germany. If there is a lack of response to unimodal treatment, an inpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) can be considered., Objective: This review article describes the supply situation of pediatric inpatient IMPT in Germany and presents the current evidence on the effectiveness., Material and Methods: Based on a systematic literature search, studies addressing the effectiveness of pediatric inpatient IMPT in Germany were identified. In addition, further sources were used to extract information on pediatric IMPT treatment centers in Germany in order to describe the treatment approaches, the qualification of personnel and characteristics of patients., Results: There are four pediatric pain centers in Germany that are specialized in inpatient IMPT for children and adolescents. Treatment duration ranges between 3 and 4 weeks. The multimodal treatment is carried out by a multiprofessional team and is generally available for patients up to 18 years. The majority of patients are female. The effectiveness of pediatric IMPT in Germany was investigated up to 4 years after treatment. Positive effects were shown for pain characteristics and also for the emotional burden. Additional treatment modules can facilitate further optimization of treatment effects., Conclusion: Further research on the effectiveness of IMPT in Germany is important in order to refine and optimize the available treatment programs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Approximately one fifth of the German population suffers from chronic pain, which is often associated with limitations in coping with everyday life, social isolation and psychological comorbidities such as anxiety and depression. The importance of a treatment approach that considers biological, psychological, and social factors (bio-psycho-social model) as well as non-drug interventions is emphasized in current guidelines, but presents challenges for primary care practices. To support the implementation of evidence-based best practice recommendations, the RELIEF project (Resource-oriented case management to implement recommendations for patients with chronic pain and frequent use of analgesics in general practices) aims to develop a case management program for the primary care of patients with chronic non-tumor pain., Methods: Prior to intervention development, a rapid review was conducted to identify best practice recommendations for the care of patients with chronic non-tumor pain, barriers and strategies to their implementation, and gaps in care in current guidelines and literature. Selective searches of guidelines, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, bibliographies of relevant publications, and the gray literature focused on assessment and monitoring, education, promotion of self-care, and rational pharmacotherapy., Results: Numerous recommendations on assessment and monitoring were identified, but only a few studies examined their feasibility in primary care practices. Guidelines contained few specific recommendations on content and format of patient education on chronic pain. Recommendations for non-drug self-care measures were mainly related to physical activity, relaxation techniques, behavioral therapy techniques and external applications. Especially for the area of physical activity, numerous barriers but also strategies for a successful implementation could be identified., Discussion: In a potential primary care model for patients with chronic non-tumor pain, pain assessment should aim to identify patients who need support in implementing medication and non-medication interventions in the primary care setting and/or could benefit from specialized care. To implement recommendations for pain education, primary care physicians need educational materials in a variety of formats and levels of detail that ideally could be processed by patients at home and then get addressed in practices using simple key questions. Non-drug measures should be an explicit part of the treatment plan., Conclusion: Many of the identified recommendations for the treatment of patients with chronic non-tumor pain can also be considered relevant for the primary care setting. Specific guidelines and concepts for primary care physicians that include setting-specific characteristics at the physician, patient, and system levels would be desirable for a successful implementation of these recommendations., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

The use of yoga, especially as an intervention for chronic pain, is increasing worldwide. Available data on chronic low back pain, within limits also for chronic neck pain and certain types of headache, show statistically significant positive effects related to pain intensity and pain-related impairments. The data provide evidence that yoga is at least equal in efficacy and safety to other exercise interventions as well as individualized physical therapy. The dose of the intervention seems to be of secondary importance, but the establishment of a long-term independent practice after initial supervision seems to be essential; however, for other pain disorders there is still a need for research., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Chronic pain affects around 3 million people in Germany. The drug therapies used are only effective to a limited extent and sometimes have considerable side effects. Methods of mind-body medicine (MBM) including especially mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), meditation and yoga, can significantly reduce the perceived intensity of the pain. Combined with evidence-based complementary medicine, MBM as mind-body medicine in integrative and complementary medicine (MICOM) is an effective instrument for self-efficacy and self-care with very few side effects. The reduction of stress plays a key role in this process., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Pain that persists or recurs over a period of at least 3 months in childhood and adolescence is referred to as chronic pain. The primary localization of pain changes according to age: abdominal pain is more common at a younger age, headache is more common in adolescents and later back pain as well as muscle and joint pain. In the multimodal and interdisciplinary treatment of chronic pain, complementary procedures can expand the treatment spectrum. This article provides an overview of the existing evidence that for childhood and adolescence can at best be evaluated as readily understandable. In addition, the experiences of two children's hospitals show that complementary medicine can be used as a low-threshold and easily implemented therapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Nurses are confronted with patients suffering from acute and/or chronic pain in all nursing care settings and within all target groups. Although national and international guidelines on chronic pain emphasize the importance of non-pharmacological interventions (for example, hot and cold applications) and educational approaches such as teaching self-management strategies to deal with pain, the most common applied intervention for chronic and acute pain is a pharmacological therapy. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the potential of naturopathic nursing interventions for the care of patients with chronic and/or acute pain, focusing on so-called external applications such as wraps and compresses, which are safe, have a low-risk profile and are easy to apply, thus making them suitable for self-application. The use of non-pharmacological interventions as well as the counselling and training of patients in naturopathic applications offer nurses the possibility to work in an autonomous field of nursing promoting nursing as an attractive health profession., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) is an essential element in the treatment of people with chronic pain. Although IMST is defined in terms of content, it is evident that its practical design is very heterogeneous. This refers not only to the composition of the contents of the treatment but also to the concrete distribution of tasks among the professions involved. This article deals with the attribution of the effect of the activities of the three professional groups involved in IMPT: medicine, psychology and physiotherapy. The aim of this work is to examine how the professions of medicine, psychology and physiotherapy assess the effectiveness of their work and the effectiveness of the other two disciplines in the care of chronic pain patients., Material and Methods: A newly designed questionnaire with 19 items was used. Each item describes a possible effect that treatment by the professions of medicine, psychology and physiotherapy can have. Based on factor analysis, items were combined for which the three effect attributions had the same items. The restriction to factor analysis areas was intended to avoid redundancies in the presentation and interpretation of results. The evaluation was carried out by means of a variance analysis for the impact areas with the factors "profession" and "attribution of impact"., Results: A total of 233 participants from the 3 disciplines (medicine, n = 78; psychology, n = 76; physiotherapy, n = 79) answered the questionnaire. The three areas of effect "pain reduction", "strength and movement" and "functional pain coping" could be identified by factor analysis. The impact areas attributed to the different professions are largely reflected in the participants' answers. The variance analysis revealed significant main effects for the two factors "profession" and "attribution of impact" and for their interactions., Conclusion: Professionals in medicine, psychology and physiotherapy have clear expectations of their own and the other professions mentioned here with respect to their effectiveness in certain areas of change. Overall, the three professions agree in their assessment of the contribution of medicine, psychology and physiotherapy to the areas of pain reduction, gain in strength and movement and functional pain coping., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background and Objective: An early treatment of patients who suffer from pain and show risk factors for chronification is meaningful as these patients can benefit from an early interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMST). In view of the insufficient treatment, two outpatient treatment modules for the secondary prevention of pain chronification are developed within the framework of PAIN2020: the educative and accompanying IMST (E‑IMST and B‑IMST)., Material and Methods: The developmental process of both IMSTs is presented. In this context two target groups of patients were defined for which 1 session (E‑IMST) or 10 intervention appointments (B‑IMST) were planned, depending on the chronification, impairment and complexity of the disorder. The conception was carried out in five steps: development of the objectives, development of the main contents, workshop on the content and conceptional design (contents, mediation, exercises), preparation of a time schedule and processing of the results (manual, presentations, worksheets, handbook). The B‑IMST was initially developed from which the contents for the E‑IMST were subsequently extracted. Additionally, a concept for testing the feasibility and a working model for a pilot study were developed., Results: The objectives for both forms of IMST are improvement of the understanding of pain and contributing factors, the increase of the experience of control and self-efficacy and the increase in self-responsibility with respect to strategies to reduce pain. Differences between the two treatment modules arise from the needs and framework conditions. Medical, physiotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic contents and schedules were organized for both IMST modules. The B‑IMST consists of five modules each with two sessions as group interventions (biopsychosocial model, activation planning, regulation of needs, sleep and medication, routine transfer). The 3‑h E‑IMST group intervention mainly intends to mediate knowledge on pain and the biopsychosocial pain model. Theoretical and practical interventions, empirical knowledge and experience-oriented methods are employed., Conclusion: There are now two interdisciplinary structured manuals for the secondary preventive treatment of patients with recurrent pain and a risk profile for chronification. These approaches must now prove themselves with respect to feasibility and effectiveness., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Chronic back pain is one of the most common diseases in Germany. In many cases, no morphological change is found, so that the genesis remains unspecific in over 90% of patients. This article is intended to provide an overview of drug therapy as well as non-drug measures and summarizes the corresponding guideline recommendations., Competing Interests: Erklärung zu finanziellen Interessen Forschungsförderung erhalten: ja, von einer anderen Institution (Pharma- oder Medizintechnikfirma usw.); Honorar/geldwerten Vorteil für Referententätigkeit erhalten: nein; Bezahlter Berater/interner Schulungsreferent/Gehaltsempfänger: ja, von einer anderen Institution (Pharma-oder Medizintechnikfirma usw.); Patent/Geschäftsanteile/Aktien (Autor/Partner, Ehepartner, Kinder) an im Bereich der Medizin aktiven Firma: nein; Patent/Geschäftsanteile/Aktien (Autor/Partner, Ehepartner, Kinder) an zu Sponsoren dieser Fortbildung bzw. durch die Fortbildung in ihren Geschäftsinteressen berührten Firma: nein; Erklärung zu nichtfinanziellen Interessen M Maschke: Mitglied DGN, ALNK, DGKN, AAN., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The interest of patients with chronic pain in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is high. The aim of an accompanying complementary therapy is to strengthen the patient's self-efficacy, the ability to make decisions and the autonomy. The best evidence exists for physical activity and a balanced diet. Exercise combinations of strength and endurance as well as targeted strengthening of the muscles in the area of the pain are particularly suitable. When choosing the form of exercise, low-threshold training options are recommended. There is no reliable evidence for kinesio taping, homeopathy, neural therapy and draining procedures. The extensive data on acupuncture must be interpreted taking methodological limitations into account. Heat applications can support multimodal pain therapy. In the case of anti-inflammatory phytotherapeutic agents, there are good rationales from basic research and reliable empirical knowledge regarding the dosage. The evidence on cannabis is low., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Although psychosocial factors have a profound impact on the experience of pain and pain recovery, the transfer to clinical application has so far been insufficient. With this article, a task force of the special interest group "Psychosocial Aspects of Pain" of the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e. V.) would like to draw attention to the considerable discrepancy between existing scientific evidence on the importance of psychosocial factors in the development of chronic pain disorders and the translation of these findings into the care of pain patients. Our objective is a stronger integration of psychological and psychosomatic expertise in pain treatment and research, as well as the improvement of structural and institutional conditions, to achieve an increased consideration of psychosocial aspects. In this way, modern, integrative and complex pain concepts can reach the patient. Based on these fundamental findings on the importance of psychosocial factors in pain and pain treatment, implications for the transfer to clinic and further research will be shown., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

There is currently an emphasis on the biopsychosocial concept of pain in pain therapy programs. However, the complexity of chronic pain, in particular its importance for those affected by it, can only be insufficiently captured with this concept. This is due to the fact that, to date, one core aspect of the phenomenon chronic pain has only rarely been taken into account: its existential character. Chronic pain can threaten the self-image and the individual's understanding of the world, their wishes and goals in life, and ultimately the entire integrity of those affected. Statements by chronic pain sufferers show that such pain always represents an existential experience and affects the person as a whole. Two aspects make this very clear: the existential despair of the pain on the one hand, as well as questions of meaning and reorientation on the other. Current treatment concepts, however, do not adequately consider the existential character of such challenges. Chronic pain should therefore always be perceived and treated from a holistic perspective. In this context, the aspects of recognizing its uniqueness, helping to express the pain and giving space to the experience are to be given special consideration in order to support chronic pain patients in dealing with their pain., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Cognitive impairments in patients with chronic pain are increasingly attracting interest in scientific research. The consequences of these cognitive impairments on coping with pain, everyday life and the driving ability are rarely included in clinical practice although half of all patients are affected. This article summarizes the current research situation and discusses possibilities of the integration in clinical and therapeutic care., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

How to prevent the onset, maintenance, or exacerbation of pain is a major focus of clinical pain science. Pain prevention can be distinctly organised into primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Primary prevention describes avoiding hurt or pain, secondary prevention describes reducing pain when pain is unavoidable, and tertiary prevention describes preventing or reducing ongoing negative consequences such as high functional disability or distress due to chronic pain. Each poses separate challenges where unique psychological factors will play a role. In this short review article, we highlight psychological factors important to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention and provide direction for the field. We present 2 case studies on secondary prevention in children and adolescents and tertiary prevention in adults with chronic pain. Finally, we provide research directions for progression in this field, highlighting the importance of clear theoretical direction, the identification of risk factors for those most likely to develop pain, and the importance of treatment., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Young adults find themselves in an unstable phase of life with relationship breaks, falling structures and great challenges in life. Chronic pain makes it difficult to cope with this stage of life due to functional, emotional and social limitations. For this age group there are hardly any target group-specific treatment programs., Objective: The aim of the study was to find out what needs the patient group of young adults with chronic pain have with regard to inpatient pain therapy and what need is indicated for a separate therapy concept for this age group., Material and Methods: Within the framework of a qualitative research approach, specific needs of young adults with regard to inpatient pain therapy were surveyed via guideline-based interviews. A total of 66 interviews were conducted with patients and practitioners. The evaluation was carried out using the method of structuring qualitative content analysis., Results: Five main categories regarding the specific treatment needs of young adult pain patients were identified: respect, belonging, special circumstances, locating the pain and specific elements of therapy., Conclusion: Special living conditions and a respectful treatment attitude are of particular importance. A greater number of activation offers, a higher proportion of life counseling and perspective-creating aspects as well as psychotherapeutic offers are a necessity for an efficient therapy. Acceptance and commitment therapy techniques and the positive benefits of peer groups can expand the treatment approach for young adults. Young adults could benefit from a target group-specific and needs-adapted care structure., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

International guidelines recommend involving various professions and disciplines at an early stage in the event of chronic back pain. In connection with this, terms such as multiprofessional or interprofessional interventions are often mentioned without a uniform idea of what they mean. This article is intended to provide an overview of multiprofessional interventions for patients with chronic back pain and the integration into a meaningful interdisciplinary and interprofessional multimodal treatment concept. This is illustrated in a biopsychosocial pillar model, which should be pursued for each patient individually., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: International studies have shown negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mood and levels of distress. Correlations between the pandemic and higher levels of pain as well as greater pain-related disability have also been found; however, studies report ambiguous results about whether elderly people cope differently with the pandemic and its effects., Methods: The University Hospital of Würzburg offers multimodal pain therapy for older adults. The current study performed a retrospective analysis of routine data measured during an interdisciplinary multimodal assessment. We compared n = 75 patients taking part in the therapy during 2018 and 2019 to n = 42 patients assessed in 2020-2021. We measured pain, mental distress and physical functioning using the German Pain Questionnaire, clinical diagnosis, and geriatric tests of physical fitness., Results: Both subgroups did not differ in demographic characteristics, neither did we find significant differences regarding pain intensity, pain-related disability, and mental health; however, patients before the pandemic reported a higher number of days on which they felt limited due to pain. In the physical performance test, we even found significantly better results during the COVID-19 pandemic., Discussion: The current data do not support an aggravation of pain or mental and physical well-being. Possible explanations could be better resilience in elderly people due to their experience of life, financial security or less change in their daily life., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: A graded therapeutic concept for the treatment of chronic pain patients in Germany is only available to a limited extent. Following the onset of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), care for these patients has become even worse., Aim: To develop and establish a cross-sector therapeutic concept for chronic pain patients as part of a selective contract., Methods: Embedded in existing therapeutic procedures, we define seven clinical pathways (CPs) into which patients are directed, after an interdisciplinary assessment according to refined criteria., Organization: In CP I, patients remain in standard therapy. In CP II, patients have the opportunity to participate in an additional inter-profession education program. In CP III, patients get a specialized outpatient treatment. CP IV is a partial inpatient treatment, where multiple inpatient attendance days are replaced by tele-medical treatment, via a rehabilitation app. CP V and VI are inpatient treatments over 8 and 15 days each. If patients need further psychotherapeutic support after an inpatient treatment, they can be treated by clinical psychotherapists for another six months in CP VII., Evaluation: The evaluation takes place 3, 6 and 12 months after initial assessment and includes the German Pain Questionnaire with different psychometric tests., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Chronic pain, with a prevalence of at least 17%, is a costly health problem associated with a high burden of disease. Musculoskeletal chronic pain is particulary common, which in many cases is treated with physiotherapy., Aim: The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of innovative, promising physiotherapy interventions in pain management, to present their effectiveness and to discuss their implementation in healthcare., Methods: A narrative review was conducted. The Cochrane, Medline (via PubMed) and PEDro databases were searched using the search terms chronic pain, physiotherapy, prevention, pain education, behavioural intervention, eHealth, and systematic review as well as chronic pain, guideline and relevant synonyms., Results: One guideline review, two guidelines and ten systematic reviews were included. Chronic pain prevention, digital health apps, lifestyle interventions and behavioural approaches were identified as promising and effective interventions for people with chronic pain, showing the potential to meaningfully complement pain physiotherapy and improve quality of care., Conclusions: Despite the predominantly positive results from systematic reviews, implementation in everyday care is difficult due to conditions of care and the contemporary education system for physiotherapists in Germany. Health services research can play an important role in accelerating the transfer of innovations into practice., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Between 8 and 16 million people in Germany are affected by chronic pain, causing costs of up to 28.7 billion euros annually. Chronic pain is complex and has biopsychosocial aspects. Physiotherapeutic care requires special knowledge, skills and competencies. A publicly accessible description of these requirements does not currently exist in Germany., Aim: The aim of the work was to establish a consensus among experts working in Germany regarding the necessary knowledge, skills and competencies of physiotherapists in the care of people with chronic pain., Methods: Two-stage Delphi procedure with 15 experts. In the first round of questions, knowledge, skills and competencies that had previously been identified in a systematic literature review were assessed and supplemented. In the second round of questions, the experts evaluated the additions made in the first round of questions with regard to their relevance., Results: Of 219 evaluated statements, 124 were classified as absolutely relevant. In addition to anatomical and physiological pain knowledge, mainly educational and communication skills were rated as important., Conclusion: This overview may provide a basis for the development of a competency profile that can be used to develop contents for the modular design and standardisation of curricula in courses of study or training., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Chronic low back pain is a serious persistent illness with profound personal and socioeconomic impact. Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is one of the few evidence-based treatment options for chronic pain. Although it is known that pain perception, as well as its chronification and treatment are affected by patient expectations, only few clinical interventions or guidelines on how to modulate these effects exist., Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the impact of expectancy as a predictor for pain and related outcomes. To this end, we will present explorative pilot data from an observational cohort at our clinic., Methods: The study shows preliminary data of a prospective longitudinal observational study of up to 41 chronic back pain patients who followed an IMPT at the back pain center in Essen. Data were collected at admission (T0), at discharge (T1), and 3 months after discharge (T2). Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. Additionally, we measured treatment expectancy at admission. We used linear regression to analyze the impact of pretreatment expectancy on the primary outcome measures., Results: IMPT led to a significant improvement in pain intensity and disability. The effect on pain intensity was stable over three months after discharge and disability declined even further. Expectancy was a significant predictor of improvement in pain intensity and explained approximately 15% of the variance., Discussion: Expectancy is an important predictor of treatment outcome in IMPT. In clinical practice, valid methods should therefore be established to reduce negative and promote positive expectations., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: Recurrent pain in childhood and adolescence is a common health problem. Pediatricians are usually the patients' first contact person. The current study investigated patients' and parents' expectations when consulting a pediatrician and their rating of the treatment., Materials and Methods: In 36 pediatric practices, 224 patients with recurrent pain and 273 parents participated in this cross-sectional tablet survey. The collected data included the motivation for arranging a physician consultation, pain concept, treatment expectations, and assessment of treatment. Additionally, the patients' age was investigated as an influencing factor., Results: The patients' and parents' predominant motivation for arranging a consultation was the clarification of the cause of pain. Older patients were additionally motivated by frequent but ineffective drug use. Predominantly in older patients, a biopsychosocial pain explanation was identified. Approximately half of all patients and parents indicated biological and psychological influencing factors. The most frequent expectation of the consultation was obtaining information on pain management. Overall, consultations were rated very positively, especially when patients and parents felt understood and taken seriously., Conclusions: Information about the cause of pain and pain management are essential for patients and parents. Besides good communication, sufficient time resources of the practitioner are required., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) was added to the German Pain Questionnaire (DSF) as a self-report measure of health-related quality of life in 2016, replacing the previously used SF-12, which required a license. Both measures have 12 items and include a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). Evaluations with a larger sample on characteristic values and on the test-statistical goodness of the VR-12 in patients with chronic pain are so far missing. Data on the VR-12 and other procedures of the DSF were evaluated from 11,644 patients from 31 centers participating in KEDOQ pain. The patients filled out the DSF before starting a pain therapy treatment. Change sensitivity was determined for 565 patients for whom the VR-12 was available from a follow-up questionnaire of the DSF several months after the initial survey.The reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of the PCS was r tt  = 0.78 and for the MCS r tt  = 0.84. The MCS had significant relationships with the depression, anxiety and stress scales (r = -0.51 to r = -0.72), and the PCS correlated more highly with areas of pain-related impairment (r = -0.48 to r = -0.52). Patients with higher pain chronicity, those with higher pain severity, and those with evidence of high psychological distress described significantly lower health-related quality of life in PCS and MCS. The effect size (ES) of change in terms of improvement in health-related quality of life was ES = 0.33 in the MCS and ES = 0.51 in the PCS.The results are in agreement with the findings of the SF-36 and SF-12 in patient collectives with chronic pain. In summary, they show that the VR-12 is an adequate substitute for the SF-12 in the German pain questionnaire., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen is the property of Elsevier GmbH, Urban & Fischer Verlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Chronic pain is a worldwide problem of healthcare along with social and economic factors. The Center for Pain Medicine (CPM) Nottwil offers individualized, interdisciplinary, multimodal pain rehabilitation based on the biopsychosocial approach. The aim of this study was to obtain a real-life analysis of chronic pain patients who were treated at the CPM Nottwil, to understand how they were treated and to analyze the long-term effects of the treatment., Methods: In a retrospective cohort study data of all patients who underwent a first medical examination at the CPM Nottwil in 2011 were included in the study. The effectiveness of the treatment was analyzed in a 3-year follow-up measurement. The main outcome was the general well-being of the patient., Results: In 2011, 628 chronic pain patients underwent a first medical examination at the CPM Nottwil. They showed low values in the dimension of general well-being and a high impairment due to severely limiting pain intensity. Although the power analysis suggested a sample size of 170 patients for the follow-up measurement, only 46 participants (responders) were included in the final analysis. Baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders of the follow-up-group showed statistically significant differences for health-related quality of life (SF-12) and the anxiety and depression scale (HADS), but not for other sample characteristics. Improvement from pretreatment to follow-up emerged in the dimension of well-being, physical well-being and pain intensity. At follow-up 30% reported being pain-free., Conclusion: Individualized, interdisciplinary, multimodal and mostly outpatient pain programs are an effective treatment for patients suffering from chronic pain in the long term. For the first time this effect has been proven in a clinically representative cohort. Limitations of this study are low response rates in the follow-up group and differences in baseline characteristics (anxiety, depression and quality of life) between responders and non-responders., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Parental cognitive-affective and behavioural responses impact on the chronification of the child's pain. Whether mothers and fathers differ in their responses and whether top-down variables (parental somatization, anxiety symptoms) and bottom-up variables (child's pain-related disability, anxiety symptoms) impact on parental responses remains unresolved., Objectives: (1) A comparison of maternal and paternal somatization, anxiety, symptoms and their responses (parental catastrophizing, solicitousness) to children with chronic pain; (2) an analysis of the impact of top-down variables (parental somatization, anxiety symptoms) and bottom-up variables (child's pain-related disability, anxiety symptoms) on parental maladaptive responses., Methods: Pediatric chronic pain and anxiety symptoms, parental somatization and anxiety symptoms, as well as parental responses in N =21 parent-child triads (child, mother, father; N = 21 each, total-N = 63; children: 50% female, 11-19 years, ∅15.14 years) were assessed via validated questionnaires during child and adolescent psychiatric treatment for child chronic pain., Results: Mothers and fathers did not differ in somatization, anxiety symptoms and responses. Parental catastrophizing was higher if the child suffered from anxiety symptoms and from pain-related disability. Parental solicitousness was higher if parents reported more own anxiety symptoms. Younger children and girls received more solicitous responses., Conclusion: As shown by previous studies, parental and child anxiety symptoms, but not parental gender, play a pivotal role in modulating parental maladaptive pain-related responses. This should be taken into account in prevention as well as in the treatment of children with chronic pain and their caregivers., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Noninvasive Treatments for Acute and Chronic Back Pain Abstract. The therapy of back pain - especially the medication with opioids - can be challenging for the treating physician. Specific back pain can often be diagnosed by imaging and successfully treated by surgery or medication. In contrast, nonspecific back pain can be worsened by inappropriate imaging, questionable surgical indications and uncontrolled drug use. For the therapy of nonspecific back pain, maintaining daily activity and exercise therapy is central. Opioids are effective drugs for short-term use. However, long-term use often leads to opioid-induced hyperalgesia and hormonal dysfunction with decreased quality of life and libido. Furthermore, opioids can lead to abuse and addiction. After an ineffective treatment with non-opioids, opioids may be given for a limited time period (if possible shorter than four weeks) according to international guidelines.

Chronic pain in older adults should be explained and treated on the basis of the biopsychosocial model. With its interdisciplinary and interprofessional approach, multimodal pain therapy is the method of choice. In old age freedom from pain is usually not the primary goal. It is more important to restore the quality of life of those affected and to maintain independence and autonomy with a versatile treatment offer. This article explains the basics of multimodal pain therapy and its special features in old age., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Studies on the psychodynamics of Chronic Orofacial Pain Disorder Objectives: Psychodynamic factors play an important role in its emergence and development of Chronic Orofacial Pain Disorder (COP), which is also known as Chronic Primary Orofacial Pain. This factors form the basis for differentiated psychotherapy. Methods: Seven female and two male patients with COP who had visited the Dental School, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, and the dental surgery of a practising dentist over the year were included in the study. Following a detailed dental examination, a psychodynamic interview was videotaped, reconstructing the connections between the life history and the development of the illness. Psychosomatic data were assessed by 3 psychotherapists based on a consensus model with regard to symptom trigger mechanisms such as conflicts and pressure, the development of symptoms, and the personality structure. Pathogenetically, we differentiated among conversion, somatization and projection. Results: The patients had a mean age of 57 years (range: 44-67) and an average illness duration of three (1-5) years. The average age where the illness had manifested was 54 (43-64). All patients showed clear psychodynamic factors in the development and course of the illness. The symptoms developed mainly during transitional situations during the life history, predominately in midlife. During this phase, dental treatment undertaken for whatever reason could trigger the chronic symptoms, which could then be further exacerbated by further dental interventions. The mode of symptom development by equal number of patients related to a somatoform disorder, such as a somatization of affect, a conversion with conflict symbolism and a projective-hypochondriac disorder. In the remaining patients, COP was an accompanying symptom of depressive disorder or the consequence of a posttraumatic stress disorder with self-mutilating tendencies. Conclusion: The consideration of psychosomatic connections and pathogenetic differentiation is helpful for the understanding and management of COP. This diagnostic differentiation could serve as a basis for prognosis and for specific therapeutic indications. Despite numerous general researches about chronic pain syndromes, there is a lack of intervention studies which take into account the specific conditions of COP on a larger sample.

Background: Chronic pain patients represent the population with the highest use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current data on the usage, prescription and reasons for using CAM in Germany remain unclear and have not yet been published., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate details regarding interest and use as well as reasons for using CAM in chronic pain patients., Methods: In all, 60 of 64 consecutive patients referred to the multimodal pain therapy program in a specialized day hospital participated in the study. In addition to the German Pain Questionnaire, patients answered a self-developed questionnaire on CAM use. CAM was defined according to the guidelines of the NCCIH (National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health)., Results: The study showed that 96.7% of patients were interested in CAM and all 60 participants had used CAM to influence pain (3-26 different CAM modalities, median: 12). The most frequently used were massage (95%), acupuncture (73%), nutriceuticals and vitamin preparations (72% each). The success of the therapies was predominantly evaluated as short-lasting. CAM was often prescribed by a specialist (61.7%) or family doctor (60%). For most patients, the greatest motivation for using CAM was the desire to become active themselves (76.7%). Greater impairment due to pain was associated with increased use of biological CAM methods, while higher pain intensity was associated with decreased use of biological and alternative CAM methods., Conclusions: The high use of CAM in chronic pain patients highlights the need for physicians to have adequate medical knowledge about each CAM modality and to communicate competently with the patients about them., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Introduction and Objective: Experiential avoidance is a core process variable in the concept of Acceptance and Commitment Theory (ACT) and has been connected to various disorders. A widely used instrument for the measurement of experiential avoidance is the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II). Recently, a pain-specific version for chronic pain patients was introduced in the Netherlands (AAQ-II‑P). High scores indicate strong pain-related experiential avoidance. The aim of the current study was to measure pain-related experiential avoidance in a sample of chronic pain patients using the German translation of the AAQ-II‑P and to analyze its psychometric qualities., Methods: After a forward-backward translation procedure of the AAQ-II and adaptation to the pain context, a sample of N = 168 patients from a multidisciplinary pain center answered the German version of the AAQ-II‑P. Additional questionnaires were administered to measure specific constructs of interest: chronic pain grade (CPG), pain catastrophizing (PCS), health-related quality of life (SF-12), psychopathology (HADS-D), personality (BFI‑K) and mindfulness (KIMS-S). Reliability, factorial validity and construct validity of the AAQ-II‑P were identified., Results: The AAQ-II‑P had high internal consistency (α = 0.89) and the one-factor solution explained 61% of the total variance. Correlations to personality and mindfulness subscales were low (maxima: r = 0.44 with neuroticism and r = -0.43 with acceptance). High correlations were shown for catastrophizing (r = 0.75), depression (r = 0.73) and anxiety (r = 0.66). Also, there was a substantial correlation to health-related quality of life, specifically the psychological total scale (r = -0.58)., Discussion and Conclusion: The German AAQ-II‑P has good reliability. Regarding factorial structure and construct validity, it is highly comparable to the original version. Direction and magnitude of the relationship to adjacent constructs mostly measure up to our expectations. Chronic pain patients inclined to pain-related experiential avoidance tend to indicate more pain catastrophizing and show restricted quality of life regarding psychological variables. Apparently, pain-related experiential avoidance can be relevant for popular target variables in psychotherapy., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Pain prevalence rates of up to 53% are found among older home-care recipients (aged ≥ 60 years). Of people affected by pain in Germany, care recipients comprise a relevant group with prevalence rates of around 70%. The available information on gender-specific pain experience shows a range of differing findings., Objective: Our objective was to determine pain parameters of older care receivers in the big city environment who are capable of self-reporting, taking into account gender differences and relevant aspects of medical care and medication., Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study (structured interviews) was carried out among older (≥65 years) home-care recipients (German Social Security Code SGB XI) in Berlin, with chronic pain (n = 225), capable of self-reporting (MMST ≥ 18). Pain parameters were determined using the German version of the brief pain inventory (BPI-NHR). Multiple regression analysis was applied to test and explain how the severest pain was influenced by sociodemographic and medical parameters, mental and physical restrictions, and analgesic provision., Results: Analyses showed an average pain intensity of 5.3 (SD ± 2.0). The severest pain averaged 7.0 (SD ± 2.2). Few indications of significant gender-based differences were found (e.g. pain location, number of medications). The final model identified the number of pain locations (≥14), everyday abilities, and pain medication (as needed, none) as being associated with the severest pain. Treatment achieved pain relief of over 70% in only 24.6% of cases among pain-affected care receivers., Conclusion: The findings indicate a significant level of pain experienced by older home-care recipients. Interdisciplinary care concepts are urgently needed., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Chronic pain affects all aspects of human life, which raises spiritual questions that should be included within the framework of multimodal care., Objectives: We investigated the perspective of patients with chronic pain around spiritual concerns and their potential integration into care., Materials and Methods: We conducted five focus group interviews and two small group interviews. In total, 42 patients with chronic pain in outpatient or inpatient pain care at the time of the study participated. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed., Results: Three themes emerged: (1) Chronic pain permeates the entity of a person's existence. (2) Spiritual resources are potentially supportive in living with chronic pain. (3) Patients appreciate the opportunity to engage with health care professionals in a dialog that encompasses spiritual concerns. For participants, these concerns have considerable relevance. In many cases participants associated them with religious convictions, but not exclusively. They often related feeling that their pain experience was dismissed., Conclusion: Finding strategies for effectively dealing with chronic pain represents a turning point in life. Open discussion with health care professionals that allow for spiritual issues facilitates this process., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The number of non-surgical patients in the hospital setting with pain due to medical conditions or comorbidities and/or invasive procedures or treatments is high. Compared to perioperative pain management, the portion of patients and/or conditions that require more than an approach focused on pharmacological treatment of nociceptive pain is considerably higher. Rather, treatment often requires the differentiated use of co-analgesics, non-pharmacological treatments, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychological assessment and interventsions and educational approaches, ideally in the form of closely coordinated interdisciplinary treatment. The assessment and treatment of acute and especially chronic pain should follow the biopsychosocial concept of pain, especially if risk factors for chronification have been identified, if patients receive high-dose therapy with analgesics or have preexisting a chronic pain disorder., Competing Interests: Erklärung zu finanziellen Interessen Forschungsförderung erhalten: ja, von einer anderen Institution (Pharma- oder Medizintechnikfirma usw.); Honorar/geldwerten Vorteil für Referententätigkeit erhalten: ja, von einer anderen Institution (Pharma- oder Medizintechnikfirma usw.); Bezahlter Berater/interner Schulungsreferent/Gehaltsempfänger: nein; Patent/Geschäftsanteile/Aktien (Autor/Partner, Ehepartner, Kinder) an im Bereich der Medizin aktiven Firma: nein; Patent/Geschäftsanteile/Aktien (Autor/Partner, Ehepartner, Kinder) an zu Sponsoren dieser Fortbildung bzw. durch die Fortbildung in ihren Geschäftsinteressen berührten Firma: nein. Erklärung zu nichtfinanziellen Interessen Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: The concept of chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPC) is relatively unknown in German pain medicine., Aims: Definition, prevalence, shared etiological and pathophysiological mechanisms of COPC. Summary of recommendations of the interdisciplinary S2k guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of endometriosis relevant for pain physicians., Methods: Selective search of literature in PubMed and selection of recommendations of the S2k guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of endometriosis., Results: According to the US National Institutes of Health, COPCs comprise chronic fatigue syndrome, chronic (unspecific) low back pain, chronic tension headache, endometriosis, fibromyalgia syndrome, migraine, painful bladder syndrome, temporomandibular disorder and vulvodynia. Shared etiological factors are family aggregation, childhood adversities and major or traumatic life events. A major shared pathophysiological mechanism is altered processing of stimuli in the central nervous system. Patients with endometriosis should be screened for other chronic pain conditions and psychological distress. The physical examination should check for local (myofascial trigger points) and generalized signs of hyperalgesia and allodynia indicating central sensitization. In cases of endometriosis with COPCs repeated surgery for pain relief should be avoided. Amitriptyline and duloxetine can be considered as pharmacological treatment options., Discussion: Pain physicians can play a role in the management of patients with endometriosis and COPCs. A multimodal therapy should include physiotherapy and pain-related psychological treatment and possibly centrally acting pain modulation medication.