Search

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses proposed legislation to amend the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Civil Code, BGB) of Germany concerning parental rights and parental consent for male circumcision in infants and young boys for religious reasons. The author outlines the legal uncertainties that surrounded such procedures if they were not medically necessary until a decision by the Landgericht (District Court) of Cologne, Germany, on May 7, 2012, which effectively outlawed male circumcision for religious reasons and caused protest particularly from Jewish and Muslim communities in the country. The relationship between the proposed changes in civil law and extant criminal law is considered, as are the consequences of the amendment for child welfare legislation.