Search

Copyright of Der Pathologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative diseases (CMPD) are very complex and heterogeneous disorders. They are represented by polycythemia vera (PV), chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET), CMPD/unclassifiable (CMPD-U), chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), and chronic eosinophilic leukemia/hypereosinophilic syndrome (CEL/HES) according to the WHO classification. Before, diagnostics were mainly focused on clinical and morphological aspects, but in recent years cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) found entrance in routine schedules as chromosomal abnormalities are relevant for prognosis and classification. Recently, there is rapid progress in the field of molecular characterization: the JAK2V617F mutation which shows a high incidence in PV, CIMF, and ET already plays a central role and will probably soon be included in follow-up procedures. Due to the detection of mutations in exon 12 of the JAK2 gene or mutations in the MPL gene the variety of activating mutations in the CMPD is still increasing. In CEL/HES the detection of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene and overexpression of PDGFRA and PDGFRB led to targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thus, diagnostics in the CMPD transform toward a multimodal diagnostic concept based on a combination of methods - cyto-/histomorphology, cytogenetics, and individual molecular methods which can be included in a diagnostic algorithm.

So far, the diagnosis in leukemia is based on cytomorphology and cytochemistry, multiparameter flow cytometry, combined with cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This allows classification and definition of biologically defined and prognostically relevant subtypes in nearly all cases. It led also in same subgroups to targeted treatment approaches. Today, microarray technology enables us to quantify simultaneously the expression status of many ten thousands of genes in one single experiment. This novel tool seems able to renew the diagnosis and classification in leukemia and may even become essential for the molecular classification of leukemias in the near future. An ongoing international study (MILE study) is testing the accuracy, sensibility and specificity of gene expression profiling in leukemia diagnostics. First results and future directions will be given in the article.