Search

Medical communication is an effective instrument for the medical practice. Due to the low status that medical communication still has within medicine and medical education, many physicians do not know how to use this instrument professionally. Using medical communication in a way that patients are well informed and involved is a prerequisite for them to make self-determined decisions. In this paper I analyze a consultation in an oncology ward to show the pitfalls of medical communication, especially in triadic communication, based on a case study to work out suggestions for optimization from the transcript. Mistakes in conducting conversations, which can be recognized as such in theory, unfortunately still happen in practice, which is why this case study is intended as an invitation to critically reflect on one's own conduct of conversations. The conclusion contains suggestions for the preparation as well as the conduct of the consultation during medical rounds., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The overall frequency of proximal femoral fractures means that we are repeatedly confronted with failed healing and implant failure, despite a relatively low nonunion rate especially in intertrochanteric fractures (< 5%). The aim of this paper is to present our approach to treating these nonunions of the proximal femur and discuss the treatment results., Material and Methods: Between 2009 and 2023, patients with nonunion of the proximal femur were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Age, gender, time to revision, the Weber-Cech classification of pseudarthrosis and radiographic imaging before and after revision were analyzed., Results: A total of 66 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 58 years (range 25-88 years). The overall healing rate was 88% with a mean consolidation time of 8 months (range 2-29 months). The main osteosynthesis procedures were plate osteosynthesis (n = 45, of which 44 were blade plates), and nail replacement (n = 12). Other procedures included augmentative plate osteosyntheses (n = 4), isolated cancellous bone graft (n = 2), nail dynamization (n = 2), and the use of a dynamic hip screw (n = 1)., Discussion: The analysis of our treatment data as well as the current literature, revealed a trend towards intramedullary revision procedures. Implants that can be used to correct the CCD angle, such as the blade plate, remain a predictable option to achieve correction, especially in nonunions with an increased degree of varus. Particularly in the subtrochanteric region, fractures can also be treated in a targeted manner by a combination of mechanical and biological methods with a reamed nail change to a larger caliber implant., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Effective handoffs in the intensive care unit (ICU) are key to patient safety., Purpose: This article aims to raise awareness of the significance of structured and thorough handoffs and highlights possible challenges as well as means for improvement., Materials and Methods: Based on the available literature, the evidence regarding handoffs in ICUs is summarized and suggestions for practical implementation are derived., Results: The quality of handoffs has an impact on patient safety. At the same time, communication in the intensive care setting is particularly challenging due to the complexity of cases, a disruptive work environment, and a multitude of inter- and intraprofessional interactions. Hierarchical team structures, deficiencies in feedback and error-management culture, (technical) language barriers in communication, as well as substantial physical and psychological stress may negatively influence the effectiveness of handoffs. Sets of interventions such as the implementation of checklists, mnemonics, and communication workshops contribute to a more structured and thorough handoff process and have the potential to significantly improve patient safety., Conclusion: Effective handoffs are the cornerstone of high-quality and safe patient care but face particular challenges in ICUs. Interventional measures such as structuring handoff concepts and periodic communication trainings can help to improve handoffs and thus increase patient safety., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The rise in intensive care treatment procedures is accompanied by an increase in the complexity of decisions regarding the selection, administration and duration of treatment measures. Whether a treatment goal is desirable in an individual case and the treatment plan required to achieve it is acceptable for the patient depends on the patient's preferences, values and life plans. There is often uncertainty as to whether a patient-centered treatment goal can be achieved. The use of a time-limited treatment trial (TLT) as a binding agreement between the intensive care unit (ICU) team and the patient or their legal representative on a treatment concept over a defined period of time in the ICU can be helpful to reduce uncertainties and to ensure the continuation of intensive care measures in the patients' best interest., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The tenosynovial giant cell tumor (pigmented villonodular synovitis) is a proliferative, mainly benign soft tissue tumor of the tendon sheaths, bursae and joints arising from the synovia. It can be divided into circumscribed localized and destructive diffuse types. Approximately 1% of all joint diseases are due to this entity. The tumor is considered as a rarity. Mostly case studies exist. For this study the focus was set on the localized type (L-TSRZT), which accounts for 90% of the diagnoses of this tumor. Given its rarity, data are limited. Therefore, the research aim was to provide data on prevalence, primary location and sensitivity of clinical versus histopathological diagnosis in a German sample., Methods: Based on the Histopathological Arthritis Register of the German Society for Orthopedic Rheumatology, the data of the L‑TSRZT were retrospectively analyzed (time frame 1 January 2018-28 December 2020)., Results: This database contained N = 7595 cases of arthropathy. A total of n = 45 patients with the diagnosis L‑TSRZT were identified. The prevalence of the tumor was 0.6%, 95% CI [0.4%, 0.8%], or 5.9 cases per 1000. The primary location involved the finger (48.9%). In 14 of 45 cases the diagnosis was correctly determined from the clinical side, corresponding to a sensitivity of 31.1%, 95% CI [18.2%, 46.7%]., Conclusion: For the first time, this paper was able to provide data on a large sample for Germany. Notably, the low sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis confirms the importance of histopathology for diagnosing L‑TSRZT., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The diagnosis of systemic vasculitis (SV) is a major clinical challenge due to the very different forms of presentation and requires an interdisciplinary approach. Targeted laboratory diagnostics support making the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and classification and are also a key component in the detection of active organ manifestations and treatment complications. The basic laboratory tests include the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‑reactive protein (CRP), blood count, serum creatinine, urinalysis, specific autoantibodies, complement, immunoglobulins, cryoglobulins and hepatitis B and C serology. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), antiglomerular basement membrane antibodies (anti-GBM antibodies) and anti-C1q antibodies are valuable laboratory markers for the diagnosis of the various forms of small vessel vasculitis. There are no specific laboratory tests for the diagnosis of medium and large vessel vasculitis. Despite advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of vasculitis, no biomarkers have yet been identified that can be reliably used to guide treatment or that are useful in distinguishing vasculitis from other inflammatory diseases such as infections or treatment complications., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Comparative experimental pathology is a research field at the interface of human and veterinary medicine. It is focused on the comparative study of similarities and differences between spontaneous and experimentally induced diseases in animals (animal models) compared to human diseases. The use of animal models for studying human diseases is an essential component of biomedical research. Interdisciplinary teams with species-specific expertise should collaborate wherever possible and maintain close communication. Mutual openness, cooperation, and willingness to learn form the basis for a fruitful collaboration. Research projects jointly led by or involving both animal and human pathologists make a significant contribution to high-quality biomedical research. Such approaches are promising not only in oncological research, as outlined in this article, but also in other research areas where animal models are regularly used, such as infectiology, neurology, and developmental biology., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)