Search

The article deals with various legal cases before the State Social Court of Lower Saxony-Bremen. In the first case, a woman's application for a stationary rehabilitation measure at the Dead Sea was rejected. The second case concerns the question of whether certain individuals were working for the plaintiff within an employment relationship. The third case concerns the widower's pension of a deceased father and the calculation of the pension insurance. The fourth case concerns a liability notice and the question of whether it was lawful. The article also discusses the legal requirements for protection of legitimate expectations in the Social Code X. Various legal aspects and decisions relevant to the respective cases are discussed. [Extracted from the article]

The article deals with various cases related to the entitlement to benefits under the SGB II (Social Code Book II) and the right of residence for foreigners in Germany. In one case, the Social Court decided that a Slovenian citizen is entitled to benefits, even though she is entitled to freedom of movement under the EU Freedom of Movement Act. In another case, the Higher Administrative Court decided that a mother of a German minor child, for whom she exercises parental responsibility together with the German father, cannot be denied subsistence benefits if she has a valid right of residence. Another case deals with the entitlement to unemployment benefits, where the State Social Court decided that the plaintiff did not meet the qualifying period. The text emphasizes the importance of actual payment of wages or at least the entitlement to wages for the fulfillment of qualifying periods. It is also pointed out that short interruptions in the employment relationship are irrelevant for the qualifying period as long as the employment relationship is intended to continue. [Extracted from the article]

The article deals with a legal dispute regarding the insurance status of a trainer who is also the chairman of a club. The State Social Court of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern has ruled that the board of a club is not able to prevent unwanted resolutions of the general assembly. It does not matter whether the trainer is also the chairman. The article also mentions the parties involved and the relevant sections of the Social Code. It concerns the determination of an employment relationship of dependence between the plaintiff and the intervenor 4). The defendant has determined that the intervenor 4) was employed as a sports teacher for the plaintiff's club and is therefore subject to compulsory insurance. The plaintiff's claim was dismissed and the contested decisions of the defendant were declared lawful. The intervenor 4) was subject to compulsory insurance. [Extracted from the article]