Search

Germ cell tumours and ovarian sex cord tumours are extremely rare malignant diseases of the ovaries. Stromal tumours (Leydig cells) and/or sex cord tumours (Sertoli cells) represent approximately 5% of ovarian tumours and develop from the conjunctive tissue (interstitial and nurse cells respectively) of the ovaries. All together, they represented less than 20% of the malignant ovarian tumours in adults. Treatment of rare ovarian tumours is currently as follows: —surgery is the same as that for ovarian adenocarcinomas, with one major difference: conservation of the reproductive function in women of reproductive age is usual for this type of tumour; —chemotherapy, based on data reported in the literature, is the same as that prescribed for testicular germ-cell tumours; —surgery, chemotherapy and possible surgical intervention for residual lesions are highly complex. Also, these rare non epithelial malignant tumours are not very well understood as regards their prognostic factors. Too rare to be included in randomized studies, treatment of these tumours has benefited from the therapeutic advancements made against testicular germ-cell tumours and must be realized in specialized centres. Effectively, some factors such stage, histology and the number of managed patients seems to be prognostic for survival. Because of the rarity of these tumours, a specialized website (www.ovaire-rare.org) was developed in France in 2002. Objectives were to delineate prognostic factors of these very rare diseases; to favour patient inclusion in a clinical trial available online; to provide access to medical expert forums online (disease-related) for complex cases; and finally, to demonstrate the impact of these tools on improving medical practice. The website provides very interesting data for a better knowledge of these rare tumours and will possibly help improve medical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The landscape of uterine sarcomas is becoming more complex with the description of new entities associated with recurrent driver molecular alterations. Uterine sarcomas, in analogy with soft tissue sarcomas, are distinguished into complex genomic and simple genomic sarcomas. Leiomyosarcomas and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas belong to complex genomic sarcomas group. Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, other rare tumors associated with fusion transcripts (such as NTRK, PDGFB, ALK, RET ROS1) and SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma are considered simple genomic sarcomas. The most common uterine sarcoma are first leiomyosarcoma and secondly endometrial stromal sarcomas. Three different histological subtypes of leiomyosarcoma (fusiform, myxoid, epithelioid) are identified, myxoid and epithelioid leiomyosarcoma being more aggressive than fusiform leiomyosarcoma. The distinction between low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is primarily morphological and immunohistochemical and the detection of fusion transcripts can help the diagnosis. Uterine PEComa is a rare tumor, which is distinguished into borderline and malignant, according to a risk assessment algorithm. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix is more common in children but can also occur in adult women. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix is almost always DICER1 mutated, unlike that of the vagina which is wild-type DICER1, and adenosarcoma which can be DICER1 mutated but with less frequency. Among the emerging entities, sarcomas associated with fusion transcripts involving the NTRK, ALK, PDGFB genes benefit from targeted therapy. The integration of molecular data with histology and clinical data allows better identification of uterine sarcomas in order to better treat them., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Even if each rare ovarian tumor (ROT) has a low incidence, the sum of all these entities represents almost the half of all ovarian neoplasms. Thus, development of dedicated clinical trial emerged as a prerequisite to improve their managements. Owing to the spreading of dedicated institutional networks and (supra)national collaborations, the number of clinical trials has increased the past few years, with different types of trials; while some focused on specific molecular features, others assessed innovative molecules. Furthermore, relevant randomized clinical trials were designed as a mean to position new treatment options. Currently, innovative molecular-driven trials, based on master protocol trials are emerging and may shed light towards the improvement of personalized medicine regarding ROT., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Uterine adenosarcoma is a very rare malignancy defined as a biphasic tumor composed of both benign epithelial component and a malignant sarcoma component. The stage of the disease is determined by the presence of myometrial invasion and the extent of extra-uterine disease. The most important histopronostic factors are the existence of a sarcomatous overgrowth defined by a sarcomatous contingent occupying more than 25 % of the volume of the tumor (directly correlated to the grade of the disease), the presence of a heterologous and/or a high-grade component. Stage I adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth have a good prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival of up to 80 %. In localized disease, complete surgical removal is recommended. The role of hormone therapy, chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy is not established. If possible, relapses should be re-treated surgically, with the aim of achieving complete resection. In the advanced inoperable or metastatic setting, hormone therapy is an option for low-grade adenosarcomas with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) overexpression. For high-grade tumors, the standard chemotherapies are doxorubicin-based combinations, although an integrated approach of surgery and medical treatment should also be considered in this setting., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. All rights reserved.)

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), the most frequent and aggressive form of epithelial ovarian cancer is characterized in half of cases by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This molecular alteration is defined by distinct causes and consequences. The main and most characterized cause is the presence of an alteration affecting BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Regarding consequences, a specific genomic instability leads to increased sensitivity to platinum salts and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi) inhibitors. This latter point enabled the advent of PARPi in first and second line maintenance. As such, the initial and rapid evaluation of HRD status with molecular tests is a key step in the management of HGSOC. Until recently, the range of tests offered proved to be very limited and suffered from technical and medical limitations. This has recently led to the development and validation of alternatives, including academic ones. This "state of the art" review will bring a synthesis concerning the assessment of HRD status in HGSOCs. After a brief introduction of HRD (including main causes and consequences) and of its predictive value regarding PARPi, we will discuss the limitations of current molecular tests and the existing alternatives. Finally, we will contextualize this to the situation in France, with special consideration concerning the positioning and the financial coverage of these tests, with the perspective of optimizing patient management ., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Ovarian cancers express highly immunogenic tissue-specific antigens. The resulting immune infiltration is a major prognostic factor. There is therefore a strong biological rationale for the development of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. However, based on Phase I and II clinical trials data, the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) remains limited in monotherapy in heavily pre-treated patients. Currently, the identification of predictive biomarkers of response and resistance is one of the major areas of research. Identifying effective combination of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 with other anticancer agents is another clinical need. Several combinations were evaluated. The association of ICPIs with chemotherapy (anthracyclines or carboplatin+paclitaxel) is disappointing (JAVELIN studies). The association with PARP inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents and CTLA-4 inhibitors seems promising. Other immune therapies such as cell therapies (adoptive transfer of intra-tumor lymphocytes, CAR T cells or vaccines from dendritic cells) could be the future of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer but only early phase studies clinical data is available at this time., (Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Faced to an undetermined ovarian mass on ultrasound, an MRI is recommended and the ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can be proposed (grade A). In case of suspected early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, omentectomy (at least infracolonic), appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C) and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are recommended (grade B) for all histological types, except for the expansive mucinous subtype where lymphadenectomy may be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early stage ovarian cancer, if there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian or Fallopian tube cancers, stage FIGO I-IIA (grade A). In case of ovarian, Fallopian tube or primitive peritoneal cancer of FIGO III-IV stages, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan with injection (grade B) is recommended. Laparoscopic exploration for multiple biopsies (grade A) and to evaluate carcinomatosis score (at least using the Fagotti score) (grade C) are recommended to estimate the possibility of a complete surgery (i.e. no macroscopic residue). Complete medial laparotomy surgery is recommended for advanced cancers (grade B). It is recommended in advanced cancers to perform para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in case of clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic lymph node (grade B). In the absence of clinical or radiological lymphadenopathy and in case of complete peritoneal surgery during an initial surgery for advanced cancer, it is possible not to perform a lymphadenectomy because it does not modify the medical treatment and the overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery is recommended when no tumor residue is possible (grade B). After a complete first surgery, it is recommended to deliver 6 cycles of intravenous (grade A) or to propose intraperitoneal (grade B) chemotherapy, to be discussed with patient, according to the benefit/risk ratio. After a complete interval surgery for a FIGO III stage, the hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed in the same conditions of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In case of tumor residue after surgery or FIGO stage IV, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A)., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Expression IV survey evaluated the patients' expectations to a maintenance therapy., Methods: From January 2015 to March 2016, 401 French patients, in first line or recurrent disease, answered a 24-items anonymous questionnaire. The results were specifically analyzed according to the demographic characteristics and treatment lines., Results: Among the patients, 62% had already been informed about maintenance therapy. Thirty-seven percent of patients received a maintenance treatment: 111 patients during first line and 39 patients in relapse. Expectations of patients were: 1) the chance of cure (73%), 2) the tumor shrinkage (36%), 3) quality of life improvement (35%) and 4) tumor growth reduction (27%). Among the responders, 42% were willing to take the treatment for 6-24 months, 20% for 24-60 months and 38% until tumor progression. 64% of patients expected more than a 6 months progression-free survival. Patients older than 70 years were less informed than their younger counterparts (48% vs 66%) and had lesser hope for cure with maintenance treatment (60% vs 77%). Patients in relapse had more expectation than patients in remission (tumor shrinkage: 47% vs 22%, slowing of tumor growth: 37% vs 15%, improving the progression-free survival of more than 6 months: 71% vs 53%, respectively). Among patients, 48% in relapse consented to take a treatment until progression vs 24% of patients in remission., Conclusion: This sub-analysis in French patients demonstrate a gap between the efficacy of maintenance therapy and the patients' expectations in ovarian cancer, particularly in relapsing disease justifying better information and explanations., (Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Rare ovarian tumors include complex borderline ovarian tumors, sex-cord tumors, germ cell tumors, and rare epithelial tumors. Indications and modalities of fertility preservation, infertility management and contraindications for hormonal contraception or menopause hormone therapy are frequent issues in clinical practice. A panel of experts from the French national network dedicated to rare gynaecological cancers, and of experts in reproductive medicine and gynaecology have worked on guidelines about fertility preservation, contraception and menopause hormone therapy in women treated for ovarian rare tumors., Methods: A panel of 39 experts from different specialties contributed to the preparation of the guidelines, following the DELPHI method (formal consensus method). Statements were drafted after a systematic literature review, and then rated through two successive rounds., Results: Thirty-five recommendations were selected, and concerned indications for fertility preservation, contraindications for ovarian stimulation (in the context of fertility preservation or for infertility management), contraceptive options (especially hormonal ones), and menopause hormone therapy for each tumor type. Overall, prudence has been recommended in the case of potentially hormone-sensitive tumors such as sex cord tumors, serous and endometrioid low-grade adenocarcinomas, as well as for high-risk serous borderline ovarian tumors., Discussion: In the context of a scarce literature, a formal consensus method allowed the elaboration of guidelines, which will help clinicians in the management of these patients., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Brca Mutated Ovarian Carcinomas: GENETIC COUNSELING AND PARP INHIBITORS PRESCRIPTION: Upon the availability of the PARP inhibitors in relapsed ovarian carcinoma, the pathways of the oncogenetic counseling were modified. Any research for a constitutional alteration of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes must be accompanied by an oncogenetic counseling. BRCA testing is recommended from the diagnosis to every woman with an ovarian or fallopian tube or peritoneum of high grade adenocarcinoma, whatever the age at the diagnosis and her family history. In case of sensitive relapse or potential inclusion in a clinical trial and in the absence of preliminary constitutional research, the oncogenetic counseling is organized according to a fast track pathway and a somatic analysis can be realized in parallel. Today, olaparib is indicated for patients with a high grade serous ovarian or fallopian tube or peritoneum adenocarcinoma, with deleterious mutation of BRCA genes (constitutional or somatic), and in sensitive platinum relapse, and in maintenance therapy after a response to chemotherapy including platinum. The indication of a treatment with olaparib can be discussed in multidisciplinary staff for the other non-serous high grade ovarian carcinoma if all other criteria are gathered. Olaparib is prescribed in monotherapy, to start at the latest 8 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle, under narrow surveillance, because of its gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities., (© 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Malignant epithelial tumors (carcinomas) are the most common ovarian cancers and the most lethal gynecological malignancies. Based on their heterogeneous morphology, a dualistic model of carcinogenesis was proposed in 2004. Type I carcinomas, composed of low grade serous, endometrioid, mucinous, clear cell carcinomas and malignant Brenner tumors, were distinct from type II carcinomas (high grade serous, undifferentiated carcinomas and carcinosarcomas). However, clinical studies failed to demonstrate the prognostic value of such a classification. The main reproach to this dualistic model was that it lumped together in type I tumors, heterogeneous lesions such as clear cell and mucinous carcinomas. Recent advances on molecular genetic alterations and precursor lesions favor the classification of ovarian carcinomas as five distinct diseases. The dualistic model of carcinogenesis in type I and II can finally be applied only to serous ovarian carcinomas (low grade and high grade)., (Copyright © 2016 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The potential prognostic value of hypertension and proteinuria of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs has not been assessed in routine clinical practice so far in breast cancer. The objectives of the MARS study were to assess the prevalence of proteinuria and hypertension at baseline, their incidence under anti-VEGF treatment, and to evaluate a possible link with overall survival., Methods: Patients from 8 centres were included between 2009 and 2011 with a follow-up of 1 year. They were naive of any previous anti-VEGF treatment and planned to be started on one. The results of the group of patients with breast cancer receiving bevacizumab are presented., Results: Four hundred and two patients with breast cancer and treated with bevacizumab were included. At inclusion, hypertension prevalence was 12.4%, proteinuria 23.9%. The incidence of de novo proteinuria and hypertension during the follow-up was 61.7% and 16.8%, respectively. Among patients with de novo proteinuria, 62.2% afterwards improved/normalized. No thrombotic microangiopathy was reported. Baseline or de novo proteinuria/hypertension were not associated with overall survival in breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab., Discussion: These results on the renovascular safety of bevacizumab in breast cancer patients showed that the prevalence of hypertension and proteinuria was high at baseline and, moreover, patients treated with bevacizumab frequently developed de novo hypertension and/or proteinuria. Finally, neither hypertension, nor proteinuria, neither at baseline, nor de novo, were associated with overall survival in our cohort of "real-life'' patients

Because the majority of patients present advanced disease at diagnosis, the management of epithelial ovarian cancer needs specialist multidisciplinary teamwork. Expertise in surgery, chemotherapy, imaging and histopathology is essential to achieve optimum outcomes. Computed tomography scans are routinely used to determine the extent of disease and to aid in surgical planning. The histologic classification is crucial to plan the best therapeutic strategy and to define the prognosis of disease. Pathological prognostic factors, such as degree of differentiation, FIGO-stage, and histological type have to be described. This report is fundamental to assessing prognosis and selection of appropriate treatment strategy. An adequate staging procedure is an extensive staging by an experienced gynecological oncologist, exploring the entire upper abdomen, and the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node regions to define the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI). The final assessment is the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, which is an assessment of residual disease after a maximal surgical effort. Initial management of advanced ovarian cancer is best provided by a specialist multidisciplinary team, including a radiologist, a pathologist, a gynecologic oncologist and a medical oncologist., (Copyright © 2015 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Cancers can now be classified by multidimensional criteria including tumour site, histology, primary - "driver" - molecular alterations, secondary molecular alterations, characteristics of the immune stroma, and genetic profile of the patient. The development of tools for the characterisation of the cancers, as well as novel molecular and immune therapeutics are evolving at an unprecedented pace. In 2012, a list of future challenges was identified at the occasion of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 50(th) anniversary. Three years after, it is interesting to look back at the questions addressed then and to assess the progress of these questions. We propose here a novel set questions which have emerged from the recent publications in this area., (Copyright © 2015 Société Françise du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a set of very heterogeneous tumors with numerous histological categories. The development of the molecular biology allowed identifying recurring molecular anomalies in certain subgroups of sarcomas, being able to represent diagnostic, prognosis and therapeutic tools. The molecular classification of STS includes until today 5 main groups of abnormalities: sarcomas with "simple genomic profile" showing reciprocal (1) chromosomal translocations, (2) activating mutation, (3) inhibitive mutation or (4) simple amplification; (5) sarcomas with "complex genomic profile" can include several tens of molecular abnormalities. The development of new-targeted therapies is based on the identification of a target, specific of a tumors subgroup and involved in carcinogenesis mechanisms and/or tumoral growth. Then, the aim of clinical research is to establish the proof of the concept through clinical trials, demonstrating the benefit brought to the patient and ending in the marketing of the drug. This proof of the concept was clearly established for imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, for imatinib in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and pigmented vilo-nodular synovitis, for denosumab in giant cell tumors of the bone, ending in the authorization to use these new therapies in these indications. It is in progress and promising for anti-IGF-1R in Ewing sarcomas, for crizotinib in myofibroblastic inflammatory tumors, for mTOR inhibitor in PEComas... The role of molecular abnormalities identified in the mechanisms of tumoral progress for sarcomas and their potential therapeutic impact will be detailed., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Rare cancer issues have not been much explored yet because of their low incidence. That is why epidemiological studies have difficulties in identifying indisputable etiological risk factors. An expert opinion, mainly concentrated in some establishments, is required for these cancers' management. However, on account of the potential remoteness of these therapeutic resources, the patients' way of care remains also unstudied. By means of a geographical analysis of a regional exhaustive cohort of sarcoma, diagnosed in 2006 and 2007 and followed during five years at least, we can make progress on these different issues. Gastro-Intestinal and Stromal Tumors (GIST) occur more frequently in privileged territories while liposarcomas arise in more deprived areas. The association between liposarcomas and areas deprivation is significant (P=0.05). Moreover, pre-operative biopsy and some clinical patient characteristics, age, grade or tumor localization, are associated with an increase in the distance covered by patients for the first-line treatment (p ≤ 0,001). In the scope of an interdisciplinary collaboration, the geographical approach develops some hypothesis for rare cancers research, which must be tested by other larger scale studies.

Anemia in oncology is no longer seen only as a side effect of chemotherapies. This comorbidity may be multifactorial, clinically and, for example, may be rather chronic when the patient has chronic renal failure associated, resulting in renal anemia. Similarly, the presence of iron deficiency, which can be solely responsible or contributing factor of anemia, is also a factor to be taken into account in both the diagnosis and exploration of anemia and in its treatment, requiring the use of injectable iron complexes for treatment, if necessary in combination with an erythropoiesis agent stimulating.

Each year, 13,000 newly gynecologic cancers are diagnosed in France. Gynecologic cancers were specifically heterogeneous (localisations, histologic subgroups, age class, etc). This work was delineated for a national call dedicated to gynecologic cancers. This review reports the major needs in terms of scientific research dedicated to gynecologic cancers in the biologic, epidemiology, human and sociologic fields. For example, medico-economic strategies adapted to ethnosociologic context, specifically for cervix cancer, took important part of the epidemiologic research. Impact of gynecologic cancer in terms of symptoms and late effects, quality of life after treatments and fertility needs to be specifically explored. For fundamental research, molecular characterisation, biologic markers, impact of immunology and genetics represent the major part of the field need to be explored. Finally, therapeutic and diagnosis innovations, optimization of treatments strategies and development of predictive models in order to perform individual prediction taking into account several risk factors (clinical and molecular) to offer help in management of gynecologic cancers are required.

Anticancer drug management is complicated especially in renal insufficiency patients, a frequent situation in oncology. Several aspects need to be taken into account: first, the dosage. In this population, the kidney fails to eliminate drugs. Consequently, dosage adjustment can be necessary for drugs with pharmacokinetic profile altered by renal insufficiency in order to avoid dose-related side effects due to accumulation of the drug. Secondly, renal tolerance is an important aspect of anticancer drug management as renal insufficiency is a risk factor for developing renal side effects. Prevention of renal side effects is essential and means to limit this toxicity should be used, especially with hydration. Finally, it is essential to consider all the treatments prescribed in renal insufficiency patients in order to avoid accumulation of nephrotoxic drugs.

The Renal Insufficiency and Anticancer Medications (IRMA) study is a French national, observational study, which demonstrated the high prevalence of abnormal renal function in a population of 4,684 solid tumour patients, treated in 15 cancer centers. Among them, 7.2% had a SCR level ≥ 110 mmol/L. In the 1,898 patients with breast cancer, only 31 patients (1.63%) had a SCR level ≥ 110 mmol/L. Nevertheless, respectively 51.8 and 50.8% had a creatinine clearance estimated with the Cockcroft-Gault and aMDRD formulae, below 90 mL/min. Even if the most used medications (anthracyclins, taxanes, trastuzumab, hormone therapies) are not nephrotoxic, these results are important because bevacizumab modifies the need for renal management. In case of renal insufficiency, some other treatments such biphosphonates IV, capecitabin and platin salts need drug dosage adjustment or interruption.

Hormonal dependence of breast cancer has been known for a long time, yet about half of breast cancers with estrogen receptor will not respond to antihormonal therapy. Now, we know that this resistance may be related to a dysfunction of the estrogen pathway, or that of growth factors and particularly the pathway of cell activation PI3K/Akt/mTOR. Prevention of these different mechanisms of resistance could involve combination therapies such as anti-estrogens (SERMs, aromatase inhibitors) with inhibitors of the activity of growth factors that are particularly temsirolimus and everolimus for the activation pathway cell PI3K/Akt/mTOR.

Recent progress made in the field of sarcoma biology has shed new light on the pathophysiology of these numerous but rare diseases. Soft tissue sarcomas can be divided into 6 sub-types based on the underlying molecular biology of the disease: 1) translocation leading to fusion proteins involving transcription factors or growth factors (Ewing sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans); 2) tyrosine kinase receptor mutations (gastrointestinal stromal tumors); 3) tumor-suppressor gene deletion (type 1 neurofibromatosis, rhabdoid tumors); 4) genetic alteration such as amplification of chromosomal regions (well differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma); 5) sarcomas with more complex genetic alterations (leiomyosarcoma) and 6) abnormalities involving the cell-adhesion pathways (aggressive fibromatosis). Together with the current development of numerous targeted therapies, these recent progress are the basis of tomorrow's personalised medicine for patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, initiated following surgery, aims at controlling "microscopic" metastatic disease before its progression to a "clinical" recurrence. Its efficiency in localized breast cancer was officially demonstrated in 1992 in the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group meta-analysis. This analysis helped clarify the benefits of therapeutic interventions according to progression stage, age and tumour biological features, especially in the presence of hormone receptors. Later on, new trials further defined the benefits of modern therapies, and especially trastuzumab in patients overexpressing HER2. The assessment of the theoretical benefits of adjuvant therapies takes into account the risk of individual recurrence and the potential decrease of the latter following a given therapeutic intervention--this decrease depending on tumor biological features. Deciding whether an adjuvant therapy should be initiated is difficult since benefits (observed in the long term) are often moderate while toxicities (immediately observed) are significant. The development of national and regional therapeutic guidelines markedly diminished the arbitrary aspect of the decision. Developing tools which could help implying the patient in this therapeutic decision is a priority.