Search

Introduction: Chronic low back pain is a public health problem in view of its functional repercussions and the functional rehabilitation is an integral part of its management., Aim: To compare the evolution of muscle strentgh of spinal extensors and flexors in chronic low back pain patients after an isokinetic rehabilitation protocol and a conventional rehabilitation one., Method: This was a prospective and comparative study carried out in the Physical Medicine Department of the Tunis Military Hospital over a period of 7 months. Fifty patients were included, randomly divided into two groups of 25. The first group (G1) benefited from an isokinetic rehabilitation protocol and the second one (G2) from a classic active physiotherapy. We performed a clinical (Sorensen test and Shirado test) and isokinetic evaluation of the trunk muscles before and after rehabilitation., Results: The mean age of the general population was 42±8.6 years old. Clinical evaluation showed a deficit in the extensor and flexor muscles of the spine, more important in the extensors in both groups. After rehabilitation, there was a significant improvement in clinical tests of muscular endurance in G1 and G2. Isokinetic assessment showed a greater muscle deficit in the extensors in both groups. After isokinetic rehabilitation, peak torque for flexors and extensors increased by 21% and 23% respectively, power was 34% and 37% higher, and total work increased by 26% and 47%. On the other hand, the (F/E) ratios were unchanged for all three speeds. In Group 2, peak torque values for flexors and extensors increased by 22 and 15% respectively, power was higher by 31 and 23% and total work was also up by 29 and 17%, while F/E ratios were also unchanged. Group 1 showed the greatest improvement in extensor strength at 60°/s, and in power at 90°/s for the various muscles., Conclusion: In our study, we concluded that endurance and muscular strength improved the most after isokinetic rehabilitation.

Objectives: To establish the level of maximal aerobic capacity in patients with chronic pain of different etiologies and to compare these results with different parameters of disability., Patients and Methods: A cycloergometer exercise test with VO(2)max measurement, fatigue assessment and objective and subjective disability parameter testing was performed on 155 patients (mean age 42.1 ± 9.9 years) classified into three groups: patients with chronic lower back pain, patients with an upper limb musculoskeletal disorder, and patients with multifocal chronic pain., Results: The mean VO(2)max value was 22.18 mL/min/kg. There was no statistically significant difference in VO(2)max between the three groups. The patients with poorest aerobic condition were older (P<0.007), were on sick leave longer (P<0.03), had weaker Sorensen test (P<0.01) and P.I.L.E. (P<0.004) results, had more perceived fatigue (P<0.04), a higher mean BMI (P<0.0001) and gained more weight during sick leave (P<0.02)., Discussion: Numerous studies have examined loss of aerobic capacity due to chronic low back pain with contradictory results. This is probably due to variability of in the methods used to measure or calculate VO(2)max as well as to the variability in the studied populations., Conclusion: It seems appropriate to offer patients with chronic pain multidisciplinary exercise rehabilitation programs., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Back pain is often attributed to increased tension in the back muscles, regardless of whether the tension is primary or related to a disc/facet pathology. We hypothesized that when either lower back pain or neck pain is unilateral, the muscle tension would be more pronounced on the painful side and could be detected by palpation alone (i.e., without the need to apply pain-triggering manoeuvres)., Methods: Patients with unilateral neck or lower back pain were enrolled in the study. Participants with scoliosis, obesity, a history of spinal surgery or pain radiating below the knee or the elbow were excluded. The patients were examined by comparative muscle palpation only. The examiner was unaware of which body side was painful and the patient was told to remain still and silent. The spinal muscles were examined bilaterally, with superficial and deep palpation. The examiner had to determine on which side the tension was greater. The patients' age, body mass index, time since onset of symptoms and Rolland Morris (lower back pain) and INDIC (neck pain) functional disability questionnaire scores were recorded., Results: Ninety-one patients with unilateral lower back pain (35 males, 56 females; mean±SD age: 45.2±15 yrs) and 94 patients with unilateral neck pain (26 males, 68 females, 49.1±15 yrs) were enrolled in the study. The lower back pain and neck pain were right-sided in 50 (54.9%) and 53 (56.4%) of cases, respectively. The examiners correctly identified the painful side in 64.8% of the cases of lower back pain (a significantly better percentage than chance alone (i.e. 50%), P=0.02) and 58.5% (P=0.10) of the cases of neck pain. In lower back pain patients, the results were better for right-side pain than for left-side pain (70.0% and 58.5% of correct answers, respectively, ns). In neck pain patients, the results were better for left-side pain than right-side pain (61% and 56.6%, respectively, ns). There were no significant differences between the two examiners' respective performance levels. The patients' clinical parameters did not appear to influence successful detection of the painful side., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that palpation can detect increased muscle tension in a limited proportion of cases., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Chronic recurrent pain results in brain reorganization for cortical sensory and motor representation of muscles. This review supports the hypothesis that maladaptive plasticity in chronic low back pain patients could be associated with disorders of volitional activation of trunk/pelvis muscles and alterations of their anticipatory motor patterns for postural control. This is actually observed for the transversus abdominis muscle, an abdominal muscle that stabilizes the lumbosacral spine against external and internal postural perturbations. Indeed, voluntary activation of this muscle is more difficult in low back pain and a posterolateral translation of its cortical motor representation is observed in association with a delay of its anticipatory activation (usually observed in any focal limb movement). During physiotherapy, low back pain patients are trained to hollowing for contracting the transversus abdominis muscle, which normalizes both activation delays and cortical motor representation. This motor rehabilitation could be potentiated by peripheral repetitive magnetic stimulation directly over the nerves/muscles. This review introduces the magnetic stimulation technique and proposes to combine peripheral theta-burst stimulation to conventional therapy for increasing the functional gain. This may facilitate the activation of sensory afferents and modulate cortical plasticity to improve (or even re-activate) the sensorimotor control and possibly influence pain. Peripheral magnetic stimulation as an ancillary treatment adjuvant for promoting motor control in low back pain might also be relevant in any other neurological or musculoskeletal disorder with underlying maladaptive brain reorganization., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To study postural and spinal static modifications associated with chronic low back pain in menopausal women., Methods: Clinical appreciation of static spinal profile in sagittal plane; postural evaluation on the Balance Master Neurocom force platform by the modified clinical test for the sensory interaction on balance (modified CTSIB test); Radiological evaluation of spinal and pelvic parameters as well as the sagittal profile according to the Roussouly classification., Results: Spinal curves clinical measurement and the sway velocity of the pressure center on the Balance Master Neurocom do not show significant difference between the two groups. While the pressure center position in the anteroposterior axis shows significant difference between the two groups (p=0.02) with a more backwards projection found in chronic low back pain subjects. Radiological evaluation shows sagittal shelter significantly superior, sacral slope significantly lower and the type 1 of lumbar lordosis more frequent in chronic low back pain women compared to healthy women., Discussion-Conclusion: In menopausal women, chronic low back pain seems to be associated with lower sacal slope, the type 1 of lumbar lordosis more frequent and behindly projection of pressure center.

Objectives: To describe muscle parameters in healthy teenagers and compare them to teenagers with chronic low back pain., Methods: A comparative study of 276 control teenagers and 51 teenagers with chronic low back pain (CLBP), benefiting from a specific treatment, 14.5 years average age. The control group is made up of teenagers without back pain and teenagers who reported some back pain when we asked them, but without specific treatment. The results to four static tests assessing trunk flexors, trunk extensors, hip extensors and quadriceps endurance are statistically compared. In the control group, associations between different clinical measures and possible back pain are looked for., Results: The two groups are homogeneous, concerning age, weight, standing height, sitting height and BMI (p>0,05). Low back pain is more common in girls, either in the control group (n=48; 69% of girls) or in the group with CLBP (n=51; 78%). CLBP is associated with a poor endurance strength of the trunk extensors (median: 2 min 31 s in the control group to 1 min 45 s in the CLBP), with hip extensors weakness (median: 2 min 20s in the control group to 1 min 24s in the CLBP), and with quadriceps weakness (median: 2 min 39 s in the control group to 1 min 20s in the CLBP), (p=0.000). No significant difference was found between trunk flexors endurance in the two groups (median: 2 min 11s in the control group to 2 min 13s in the CLBP). In the control group, 48 teenagers reported back pain "often", "very often" or "all the time"; no links were found between pain and muscle flexibility, measured with finger-floor distance, heel-cheek distance, and popliteal angle. Only the sitting height was found statistically higher (p=0.003) in the control teenagers who reported back pain (87 cm) related to the ones who have no pain (85 cm). Sport influences global strength in lower limbs and changes the ratio of quadriceps to hip extensors, in favour of quadriceps. Neither pain nor the ratio of trunk flexors to trunk extensors are modified by sport. There is a linear relation between Shirado's and Sorensen's logarithmic values: it is consequently possible to predict the Shirado value when we have the Sorensen one. Trunk extensors, hip extensors and quadriceps endurance is lower in the CLBP group, 14.5 years of age.

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of a functional retraining programme (with or without daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles) in patients with lower-back pain., Method: Two groups of 30 patients took part in the study. The control group (CG) underwent a four-week reconditioning program in a day hospital, whereas a second interventional group (IG) additionally performed daily isokinetic training of the trunk muscles. Three evaluations were carried out: before hospitalization (T1), immediately after hospitalization (T2) and three months postrehabilitation (T3)., Results: We observed an improvement in each parameter after rehabilitation, regardless of the group. A decrease in the DALLAS scores revealed a reduced impact of lower-back pain on the patients' lives. Pain experienced fell by 24%, analgesic treatment was significantly decreased (CG: -53%; IG: -56%), muscle endurance was improved (quadriceps: +30%, abdominal muscles: +20%, paraspinal muscles: +23%, quadratus lumborum: +33%) and the patients were more supple, as revealed by a decrease in the finger-to-ground distance (at T1, CG: 12.9+/-6.1cm; IG: 13.6+/-5.5 cm at T1; CG: 2.2+/-5.4 cm; IG: 2.8+/-5.1cm at T2). The sole difference for CG and IG at T2 resulted from an improvement in the performance of the trunk extensor muscles, which was significantly greater in the IG (CG: +14%; IG: +20%). Three months after rehabilitation, the benefits were still present for the two groups and, indeed, were even greater for certain parameters., Conclusion: Regardless of the protocol, the patients improved in both physical and psychological terms and these improvements were maintained over a short period, at least. Our results confirmed that one functional recovery programme is not superior to another for patients with lower-back pain.

Low back pain is a frequent symptom to consult the general practioner or the osteo-articular specialist. It is important to identify patients with inflammatory back pain (5 to 10 %) because the management and the treatment are different. Spondylarthropathies, especially ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are the most frequently encountered. The inflammatory characteristics of pain give clues for the diagnosis and allow to make appropriate management. Biological tests and imaging from X rays to MRI are used. As therapy is primarily based on NSAID use, in case of unsatifactory response in peripheral arthritis, disease modyfing drugs such as salazopyrine and methotexate (MTX) are used. Anti TNF are used in AS patients unresponsive to previous therapy (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) with a response in 50% of the patients. Etanercept is however not indicated in patients with uveitis.

Unlabelled: Isokinetic dynamometers put subjects in very different conditions from natural movement. Familiarization with the isokinetic device may therefore explain better performance without showing any improvement in strength., Objective: To determine the part of habituation and training in improved trunk isokinetic performance on isometric assessment after a back rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain., Methods: A total of 26 patients with chronic low back pain consecutively admitted to the same rehabilitation department for a 4-week rehabilitation program underwent isometric assessment of the trunk flexors and extensors on the day of admission and 2 days and 21 days after admission. The maximal torque and total work were registered at 30 degrees , 90 degrees and 120 degrees/s., Results: Values for all parameters, except flexor values at 30 degrees/s, were significantly improved between day 0 and day 2 after admission. Between day 2 and day 21 after admission, values for all parameters were improved significantly. Except for flexor values at 30 degrees/s, the parameter values at day 2 showed improvement ranging from 33% to 58% of the improvement seen at day 21., Discussion: The improvement in parameter values found on isokinetic assessment two days after a one-day rehabilitation program for low back pain is probably explained by a habituation effect. We can expect that increase in the maximal torque and total work after 3 weeks of rehabilitation is, at least in part, the consequence of the strengthening program., Conclusion: We should interpret with caution the results of studies involving an isokinetic dynamometer to measure the strength of trunk muscles without a learning training.

Low back pain is a major burden for health care. According to the International Classification of Function, it is a disability of complex origin. Risk factors for chronification are of psychosocial and not physical nature. Primary targets of treatment should be physical fitness and the self-management of problem by the patient. Awareness of the psychosocial factors (yellow, blue and black flags) which can disturb occupational reintegration should be developed. Rehabilitation is based on measures to modify patient's beliefs and fitness. The prescribed treatment should aim to relieve pain, correct disability, prevent relapses, inform and educate the patient. Every low back pain sufferer which does not improve in 1 month should be sent to a team skilled in handling this kind of problem.

Objectives: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Spinal Mouse model to assess lumbar spine flexion., Material and Methods: For the validity study, patients with low-back pain underwent radiography to produce 2 lateral radiographs, first from the neutral position, and then with full trunk flexion. The correlation between mobility as assessed by radiography and the Spinal Mouse were evaluated by use of Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) for segmental mobility (L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1) and global mobility (L1-L5 and L1-S1). Reliability was studied in healthy volunteers by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: A total of 20 patients (8 women) aged 41.6+/-8.6 (range 24-63), were included in the validity study. The SCC between radiography and Spinal Mouse measures were 0.55; 0.64; 0.69; 0.54; 0.19; 0.7; and 0.86 for flexion mobility of the L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, L1-L5 and L1-S1, respectively. A total of 45 subjects aged 24.2+/-3.7 (range 20-29) were included for the reliability study. For intrarater reliability, the ICC was 0.84; 0.89; 0.96; 0.97; 0.63; 0.95 and 0.83 for the L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, L5-S1, L1-L5 and L1-S1, respectively. For interrater reliability, the ICC was 0.75; 0.81; 0.79; 0.60; 0.83; 0.85, respectively., Conclusion: The Spinal Mouse has acceptable metrological properties to assess segmental and global lumbar mobility during trunk flexion. Its metrological properties are not acceptable to assess mobility of L5-S1.

Objective: To translate into Arabic and validate the Oswestry index for low back pain in an Arab population., Background: No functional disability index to assess low back pain written in the Arabic language and validated in an Arab population is available., Design: Arabic translation of the Oswestry index was obtained by the "forward translation/backward translation" method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study involving ten patients aged 18 to 65 years old. Impairment outcome measures (pain as measured on a visual analog scale [VAS], Schober-McRae, index, duration of morning stiffness and number of night awakenings), disability (Quebec index, Waddell index), handicap (as measured on a VAS) and Beck depression scale scores were recorded. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by use of the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was investigated with use of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (convergent and divergent validity), and factor analysis was performed. Internal consistency was assessed by use of the Cronbach alpha coefficient., Results: Eighty Tunisian patients with low back pain were included in the validation study. Two items were excluded. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.98). Expected divergent and convergent validity results suggested good construct validity. Two main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 58.19% of the cumulative variance: the first factor represented discomfort in dynamic activities, the second discomfort in static activities. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.76 for factor 1 and 0.70 for factor 2., Conclusion: We translated into and adapted the Oswestry index for the Arabic language in a population of Tunisian women? with low back pain. The 8-item version is reliable and valid. Although the scale was validated in a Tunisian population, we expect that it is suitable for other Arab populations, especially North Africans. Further study is needed to confirm such a hypothesis.

Mediocre functional prognosis In industrialised countries, chronic low back pain is the most common cause of disability and work stoppage. Conventional treatments have not reduced the impact of chronic low back pain. Hence new solutions have been searched for. FUNCTIONAL RESTORATION PROGRAMS: These programs consist in heavy and expensive multidisciplinary treatment schedules, lasting from 3 to 6 weeks. The key concepts of these programs are acceptance of pain, treatment of the problem by the patients themselves and a progression contract. POSITIVE RESULTS: Controlled studies published on the percentage of patients returning to work are positive. Maintenance of a job-attached status to the pre-injury employer is often best accomplished by the provision of suitable modified duties. Finally, results of functional restoration programs in term of return-to-work rate probably strongly depend on the social security system of the country in which such programs have been developed.

Non specific low back pain (NSLBP) is commonly a persistent or recurrent problem. In general the longer a worker is off work with NSLBP, the more disabling the condition becomes, the less successful any form of treatment, and the greater the probability of long term sickness absence. The obstacles to return to work are diverse. Scientific evidence shows that the development of chronic low back pain and disability depends more on individual and work-related psychosocial issues than on physical or clinical features. There is strong empirical evidence that treatment at the subacute stage (NSLBP lasting for approximately 5-12 weeks) is more effective at preventing chronic pain and disability than attempts to treat chronic intractable pain and disability once it is established. Active rehabilitation programmes should be interdisciplinary, adapted to the local socioeconomic context and include education toward overcoming fear avoidance beliefs and promoting self-care, some kind of active exercises, some behavioural principles of pain management, and some intervention at the workplace to help and assist the worker in early return to work. Some of these programs have produced desirable occupational outcomes when all the stakeholders in the disability problem (worker, employer, insurer, attending physician) worked together.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to validate an evaluation test of the gesture behaviour for patients with chronic low back pain., Method: Forty-four patients (19 females and 25 males) (45.7 +/- 10.8 years) with chronic low back pain (delay of pain: 9.8 +/- 9.0 years) took part in an educational back school program. They performed 3 tests at the beginning (pre-test), at the end (post-test) and three months after the back school program (control): a visual analogic scale, the Dallas questionnaire and a gesture evaluation test that is composed of three tasks for the pre-test and five tasks for the post-test and the control session., Results: Our gesture test was reproducible and sensible. The mean gesture result increased significantly after the back school program (39.6 +/- 23.2 % in the pre-test and 73.4 +/- 12.5 % in the post-test, p < 0.05) and was stabilized at this high level (69 +/- 18.8 %) for the control session. The patients demonstrated abilities to transfer an appropriate gesture behaviour to new tasks., Discussion and Conclusion: This study validated a gesture behaviour test for the patient with chronic low back pain. The use of this test during a back school program demonstrated an immediate and long lasting effect on the appropriate gesture behaviour. However the algo-functional status was increased more belatedly and more modestly.

Surgical treatment of the low-back pain remains controversial in term of efficacy. Surgical treatment is advocated only when conservative management fails, a clearly identifiable cause of lumbar pain is identified, worker's compensations are detected, psychological disorders are treated and disability and pain are still present. In addition, we used a preoperative external diagnostic immobilisation with hip spica cast to select the patients. Posterior instrumented fusion is more often used, however several studies demonstrated the interest of interbody fusion when an inflammatory signal of the disc was detected on the MRI. Spinal fusion provide 50-93% of clinical success in the literature, spondylolisthesis remains the better indication. Only 30% returning to work were obtained.

The main risk factors for developing chronic low back pain are related to comorbidity, the social circle of the patient and family status, the patient's concept of his health status, the patient's profession and the interval before medical treatment. For patients undergoing surgery, the same risk factors for chronic low back pain are found, with a predominance of professional status and age of the patient. On the contrary, the initial handicap and the type of management are of little importance in patient outcome. It is important to detect early the factors that risk to favour the transition to chronicity of low back pain. The effectiveness of both medical and socio-professional approaches to prevention remains to be evaluated and defined in prospective studies.

Natural trunk movements and back muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity are seldom studied but are pertinent to daily life activities, which can lead to low-back pain. In this study, ten normal subjects performed trunk flexion/extensions (F/E) without any restraining apparatus. Duration of the F/E was either free, or at 3, 2.25 and 1.5 s. A fatiguing task consisted of continuous F/E movements accomplished at 1.5 s intervals during 90 s. Photodiodes were placed on the skin to obtain kinematics of the trunk. EMG signals of the back were recorded with 10 pairs of surface electrodes located at 3 levels of the erector spinae. It was found that the F/E movement duration chosen by the subjects varied between 4.07 and 2.07 s and the flexion amplitude varied between 55 degrees and 118 degrees. Similar variations in the amplitude of flexions were found for the tasks realized at fixed periods. The level of fatigue induced in the fatigue task was evaluated by comparing the energy of its EMG signals with those of the 1.5 s task. With this index, fatigue was detected in a few subjects only. Due to the length of the fatigue task (90 s long), it would seem that most of the subjects became adapted to the movements and could produced them more effectively (i.e. with less EMG) than during the 1.5 s task which was repeated only for few seconds.

Despite Low Back Pain (LBP) major health impact, its nosology, etiology and natural history remain ill defined in most cases. The studies of our team explored the clinical and psychological features of non specific low back pain on unselected populations of patients. Our first study was conducted in a department of rheumatology. Using multivariate statistical methods we were able to identify three major groups of subjects: --a first group called "purely organic", --a second group called "purely psychiatric", --a third group with both organic and psychiatric features. These last two groups gathered 41% of the subjects. An other complementary study was conducted in primary care practice. Using the General Health Questionnaire 38% patients--a close to the above reported percentage--were classified as having a psychological disorder. In order to describe the natural course of acute low back pain an inception cohort study was conducted in primary care practice. A high rate of fast recovery was found. A critical look of the present knowledge on Low Back Pain shows several unsatisfactory chapters. Further studies on the natural history of LBP, studies on the precise etiology of each variety and researches on their pathophysiology are needed to complete the description of nosologically well defined entities and to pave the way for relevant well designed therapeutic trials.

Current knowledge on the association between back pain and idiopathic scoliosis is often contradictory. The presence, localisation and importance of pain was evaluated for a cohort of 426 adolescents with AIS. Patients were recruited from a scoliosis clinic in a pediatric hospital. A questionnaire and an analogue visual scale graduated from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain) were used in order to verify more precisely, the importance of the association between AIS and back pain. Chisquare, linear regression and Student T-test were used for statistical analysis. 239 patients with right thoracic and left lumbar curves (RTLL) had a prevalence of pain of 54%. The mean of maximum pain intensity was 49 mm +/- 20. No relation was found between the severity of the scoliosis and back pain. The two groups (with and without pain) were comparable. Cobb angles were about the same for the thoracic and lumbar regions, as well as kyphosis and lordosis, weight, height and age. Risser sign, sex, brace and pelvic tilt were the only variables associated with pain (p < 0.0001). Association between AIS and pain is more frequent than generally reported. Pain appears to be more related with pelvic tilt than severity of the scoliosis.

Recurrent painful locking of the lower back is suggested as an appropriate term for designating sudden episodes of jabbing low back pain with locking of the spine occurring in the absence of unusual exertion, resolving within one or two minutes, and recurring many times over several weeks or months. This retrospective study included 20 outpatients classified as having recurrent painful locking of the lower back between 1978 and 1992. Inclusion criteria were availability of roentgenograms taken at the time of the acute symptoms and a follow-up of at least two years. Two typical cases are reported with diagrams to show the timing of recurrent painful locking of the lower back with respects to other low back symptoms. Mean age at onset was 56 years. Seventy per cent of patients were females. A 10-year to 30 year history of lumbago was found in every case. Recurrent painful locking of the lower back occurred substantially later than lumbago suggesting that it denoted more advanced damage to the lumbar spine. Pathophysiologic hypotheses are discussed: the causative lesion may be a mobile flap at the posterior aspect of the anulus. In most patients, the symptoms resolved within six months.