Search

Copyright of Oncologie (Tech Science Press) is the property of Tech Science Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Endocrine therapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, non-adherence remains a frequent issue known to negatively impact survival. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this article explores the terminologies employed to describe adherence and methods used for its assessment, the adherence data reported with adjuvant endocrine therapy with targeted therapies, the determinants of adherence or non-adherence, and finally, tested solutions to address it. The results show that a better understanding of the causes of non-adherence would help to better identify patients at risk, and to develop personalized intervention programs capable of improving adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy. In light of the literature, interventions are likely to require a multimodal approach and integration into our future healthcare pathways., (Copyright © 2024 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Women with a high family risk of breast cancer are those with an identified genetic predisposition or those who have a suggestive family history without an identified germinal mutation, particularly for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Among these women with a very high risk of breast cancer, the fear of a potentially increased risk of breast cancer linked to some hormonal contraceptives and to the use of hormone replacement therapy, in connection with the general population data collected in literature, has led to certain reluctance to prescribe them to these women. Moreover, confusion often sets due to poor knowledge of the literature. Furthermore, the monitoring procedures consist of breast screening and strategies of risk reduction, based on recent recommendations. In order to improve the gynaecological monitoring throughout their lives, we offer here a review based on an analysis of recent literature and of the recommendations concerning personalized screening, contraception and hormone replacement therapy among women with a very high risk of breast cancer free from this illness., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Compared with other breast cancer subtypes, patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are younger and have a worst overall survival with a median of 15 to 18 months. These tumors have long suffered from a purely negative definition, but the last few years have witnessed many breakthrough genomic and molecular findings, that could dramatically improve our understanding of the biological heterogeneity of TNBC. Moreover, based on these genomic analyses, new generation of clinical trials, using many innovative therapies directed against novel targets, had been conducted. Some TNBC have DNA damage response defects, particularly linked to germinal BRCA1/2 mutations. At the present time, two poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been approved for patients with germinal BRCA1/2 mutation. Breast cancers are not the more immunogenic solid tumors, but some of them have a high percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), express PD-L1 (about 40%) or have a high tumor mutational burden. These features of TNBC have given a strong rational to investigate the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors. One of them has been approved by FDA in association with a cytotoxic as a first line treatment. At last, targeting surface receptors outside genomic landscape with antibody drug conjugate (ADC) is a new strategy for metastatic TNBC. Sacituzumab-govitecan is the first ADC approved by FDA in advanced TNBC beyond two lines of treatment., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Adjuvant endocrine therapy is highly effective and appropriate for all breast cancer patients with hormone receptor positive tumors, pre and post menopausal women. It's an oral daily pill for many years, after primary treatment. Although this medication dramatically reduces reccurrence rates and risk of death, many breast cancer survivors either fail to take pills with prescribed frequency (adherence) or discontinue therapy (persistence) or even never begin to take it. It's difficult to know exactly the prevalence of adherence and persistence but women age younger than 40 years had the highest risk of discontinuation. Medical literature of the last 15 years in this area has been carefully reviewed considering initiation treatment background, specificity of premenopausal young women population, healthcare provider and patient communication and respective views. It's highlighted that dedicated care, at first and after in follow up, is an essential part for better adherence. Guidelines processing are more and more complicated, expert medical assesment is required, shared decision must be provide. Patients need enhanced knowledge about mode of action, benefits but also potential side effects, and optimized patient provider relationship for empathy and better comprehension. Providers must believe in treatment relevance and convey their convictions., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Objectives: According to the 2004 Bioethics Act, oncofertility counselling must be systematically offered to all women of childbearing age before they are exposed to potentially gonadotoxic treatment. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the proportion of women under 40 years of age treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer in Midi-Pyrénées who have received an oncofertility consultation. A secondary objective was to assess practitioners' knowledge on the subject., Methods: A cross-reference was made between the databases of the oncology network in Midi-Pyrénées and the two approved centres for the preservation of fertility in the region. A computerized practitioner questionnaire was sent to all surgeons and oncologists who could manage these patients., Results: From 2012 and 2017, 667 women aged≤40 years received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy treatment: only 156 (23.4%) had access to an oncofertility consultation and 58 (8.7%) received preservation. This rate (23.4%) varied according to the age of the patients, ranging from 56.9% for those aged 25-29 to 13.4% for those aged 35-39 and the managing institution. Of the 85 practitioners surveyed, 45 (55%) responded to the questionnaire, and of these 20 (44%) knew that ovarian stimulation treatment could be used even in hormone-dependent breast cancer situations and 13 (29%) of practitioners believed that the time required to preserve fertility was more than 1 month., Conclusion: Our study revealed a significant disparity in access to oncofertility consultation. It is essential to set up information and awareness-raising actions on the subject., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

In order to help the clinician, mathematical models including several clinical and pathological variables are proposed in the literature with the aim to predict the occurrence of an event of interest. Nomograms allow individual prognosis for each patient. When they are developed, validated and correctly used, nomograms can provide important information for patients' care. But, despite the strong interest in nomograms in oncology, statistical methodologies used remain unknown from the medical community. This paper presents the major steps in the development, the validation and the clinical use of nomograms. Examples are given to illustrate these different points and the limits of this methodology. Finally, guidelines on the use of nomograms are proposed for clinicians., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: F. Dalenc déclare avoir participé à des interventions ponctuelles pour les entreprises Roche et Novartis. E. Pons déclare n’avoir aucun lien d’intérêts. H. Roché déclare avoir participé à des interventions ponctuelles pour les entreprises Roche, Biomarin et Sandoz ; et avoir été pris en charge, à l’occasion de déplacements pour congrès, par Roche et Pierre-Fabre.

Competing Interests: F. Dalenc déclare avoir participé à des interventions ponctuelles pour les entreprises Roche et Novartis. E. Pons déclare n’avoir aucun lien d’intérêts. H. Roché déclare avoir participé à des interventions ponctuelles pour les entreprises Roche, Biomarin et Sandoz ; et avoir été pris en charge, à l’occasion de déplacements pour congrès, par Roche et Pierre-Fabre

Radiotherapy's main skin toxicities are now well-separated, acute (acute radiation dermatitis) or chronic complications (chronic radiation dermatitis, induced cutaneous carcinoma, aesthetic sequelae). Exceptionally, radiotherapy may induce, by isomorphic reaction or Koebner's phenomenon, some specific dermatosis. In this article, we report five new observations of these unusual complications of radiation therapy, occurring in very variable time after breast irradiation and remaining strictly localized in the irradiated field (cutaneous mastocytosis, Sweet syndrome, lichen planus, vitiligo). These cases emphasize the need to realize a systematic histological exam if any atypical skin lesion appears after radiotherapy, even long after., (Copyright © 2017 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer remains a potentially lethal disease, which requires aggressive treatments and is associated with long-term consequences. Its prognosis is linked to both tumor biology and burden at diagnosis. Although treatments have allowed important improvements in prognosis over the past 20 years, breast cancer screening remains necessary. Mammographic screening allows earlier stage diagnoses and a decrease of breast cancer specific mortality. However, breast cancer screening modalities should be revised with the objective to address demonstrated limitations of mammographic screening (limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity and specificity, overdiagnoses, radiation-induced morbidity). Furthermore, both objective and perceived performances of screening procedures should be improved. Numerous large international efforts are ongoing, leading to scientific progresses that should have rapid clinical implications in this area. Among them is improvement of imaging techniques performance, development of real time diagnosis, and development of new non radiological screening techniques such as the search for circulating tumor DNA, development of biomarkers able to allow precise risk evaluation and stratified screening. As well, overtreatment is currently addressed by biomarker-based de-escalation clinical trials. These advances need to be associated with strong societal support, as well as major paradigm changes regarding the way health and cancer prevention is perceived by individuals., (Copyright © 2016 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The prognosis of infracentimetric breast cancers (BC) is heterogeneous. The EURISTIC survey describes how French oncology specialists perceive the prognosis of pT1a,b pN0 BCs. A self-administered questionnaire has been sent to over 2000 French BC specialists. Six hundred and sixty-three physicians responded. Fifty-eight percent do not consider tumor size as a key prognostic criterion. They consider that the cutoff for poor prognosis is 22mm, 10mm and 7mm for hormone receptors (HRs)+, HER2+ and triple-negative (TN) tumors respectively. Eighty-three percent of respondents consider that a HR+ pT1a,b tumor has a good prognosis (21% and 8% for HER2+ and TN respectively). Factors perceived as most detrimental are: HER2 overexpression (29% of respondents); HR- (20%); high grade (20%); TN status (14%); high KI67 (5%); presence of lymphovascular invasion (3%); young age (2%) and high mitotic index (1%). For French specialists, immunohistochemical characteristics, in particular hormone and HER2 status, are strong prognostic factors in BCs below 1cm., (Copyright © 2015 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The international phase IIIb study, ATHENA assessed the combination of bevacizumab/taxane-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-life setting. Among the 365 patients included in France, median overall survival (OS) is 28.4 months (CI95% 24.8-33.0), with a median time from treatment start to end of study of 36,5 months (25,1-45,4). Exploratory analyses in three sub-groups show that the median OS in long responder patients (not progressing for at least one year; n = 116) is not reached. In responder patients (n = 308), median OS is 33.0 months (CI95% 28.6-37.4) and 12.4 months (CI95% 11.2-17.4) in non-responders (n = 41). In patients with mBC expressing hormone receptors (HR+), treated with first-line hormone therapy before inclusion (n = 87) median OS in is 23.2 months (CI95% 19.6-28.6), and 35.3 months (CI95% 32.2-not reached); P = 0.004 in patients treated first with chemotherapy + bevacizumab (n = 179). The safety analysis in the various sub-groups of grade 3-5 adverse events of particular interest to bevacizumab of this study was comparable to the safety data of randomized phase III studies.

The utility of adjuvant chemotherapy is clearly demonstrated because she significantly improved relapse and mortality. Globally, we report a one-third breast cancer mortality reduction. Nevertheless, the absolute or individual benefit is uncertain and the final decision depends on benefit-risk balance, integrating tumor biologic characteristics and comorbidities. The most effective regimen must contain an anthracycline and a taxane. This regimen must be proposed if chemotherapy indication is considered: this concerns the majority of triple-negative and HER2-positive cancer For hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer, the decision of adjuvant or not (in addition to hormonal therapy) is most difficult, particularly for grade 2 tumors. The trastuzumab is an essential treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, because this tailored therapy has considerably improved the prognosis.

The efficacy of the combination bevacizumab-chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) was demonstrated in several randomized clinical trials. However, limited safety data is available in daily medical practice. ATHENA is an international phase-IIIb study conducted in 2,251 patients with locally advanced or mBC, treated in first-line with bevacizumab combined with taxanes-based chemotherapy. The primary objective is safety assessment. In France, 365 patients were included. Their median age was 56 years (24-93 years) and ECOG performance status was 0 or 1 in 93.9% of patients. Bevacizumab was essentially combined with a taxanes monotherapy: docetaxel (37.3%) or paclitaxel (28.8%) or taxanes-based combination therapy (9.4%). The most frequent grade superior or equal to 3 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (34.5%). Grade superior or equal to 3 AEs of special interest related to bevacizumab were arterial and venous thromboembolism (5.1%), high blood pressure (4.2%), proteinuria (2.3%) and hemorrhage (2%). Median time to progression was 9.5 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.4). The safety profile and the efficacy of the combination bevacizumab-taxanes in a population more representative of daily oncology practice in France are comparable to those reported in clinical trials in mBC.

These past few years, neoadjuvant strategy has taken an increasing place in the management of breast cancer patients. This strategy is mainly indicated to obtain a tumour bulk regression allowing a breast conserving surgery in patients that otherwise would have undergone mastectomy. Of note, development of new chemotherapy agents and targeted therapies has critically helped in the progress of neoadjuvant strategy as it is currently associated with better pathological response rates. In this context, the pathologist is at the crossroad of this multidisciplinary process. First, he provides on the initial core needle biopsy the tumour pathological characteristics that are critical for the choice of treatment strategy, i.e. histological type, histological grade, proliferative activity (mitotic count and Ki67/MIB1 index labeling), hormone receptor status (oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and HER2 status. Secondly, the pathologist evaluates the pathological response and the status of surgical margins with regards to the residual tumour on the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant treatment. These parameters are important for the management of the patient, since it has been shown that complete pathological response is associated with improved disease free survival. Several grading systems are used to assess the pathological response in breast and axillary lymph nodes. The most frequently used in France are currently the systems described by Sataloff et al. and Chevallier et al. In this review, we detail the different steps involving the pathologist in neoadjuvant setting, with special regards to the quality process and future perspectives such as emerging predictive biomarkers., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

New molecular classification is one of the cornerstones of current and future progress in research and patient care for breast carcinoma. For the larger hormone-receptor positive and Her-2 negative subgroup, which concerns 75% of the patients, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy may be considered. Looking toward new-targeted therapies, this paper reviews the current use of these two treatment modalities in adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic settings of this disease.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a very attractive therapeutic alternative in the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma, due to its intraperitoneal spreading. Pharmacokinetic rational was described 30 years ago: a drug administered within the peritoneal cavity diffuse through the peritoneum towards the plasmatic compartment, depending on both its molecular weight and its lipid solubility. A slow output of the drug from the peritoneal cavity and a high plasma clearance are associated with a great pharmacokinetic advantage, illustrated by the area under the concentration time curve ratio. Then it is possible to increase the amount of drug directly delivered at the tumor site, while controlling the systemic toxicity. The agent administered in a large fluid volume come into direct contact with the tumor nodules, into which it penetrates from the free surface while it also reaches them by blood flow. The peripheral penetration being however limited to the first cellular layers, this way of delivery is interesting only for small residual disease. The most active drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer, paclitaxel and platinum agents, are particularly convenient for this way of administration. The most optimal administration modality still remains to be defined and the development of the targeted therapies still opens new perspectives.