Search

All biological risk factors that have been previously identified to increase the risk of thrombosis in adults, have also been studied in neonates with arterial Ischemic Stroke (NAIS), but most studies were retrospective and included relatively low numbers of affected children. We therefore could not suggest recommendations with a strong level of evidence and only expert proposals potentially useful for clinical practice will be presented in this text. Despite these limitations, the extensive analysis of published data supported that factor V Leiden (FVL) and increased levels of Lp(a) could be significant risk factors for NAIS. Importantly, these 2 risk factors cannot be considered as having provoked NAIS, and moreover, they do not influence the prognosis and the immediate treatment. However, since the FVL may have an impact for the prescription of a thromboprophylaxis when the neonate will become adult, to look for its presence in affected patients may be justified. For clinical practice, the following propositions can be applied: 1. Routine testing for thrombophilia (AT, PC PS deficiency, FV Leiden or FII20210A) or for detecting other biological risk factors such as antiphospholipid antibodies, high FVIII, homocystein or Lp(a) levels, MTHFR thermolabile variant, should not be considered in neonates with NAIS. 2. Testing for FV Leiden can be performed in case of documented family history of venous thromboembolic disease. 3. Testing neonates for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) is mandatory in case of clinical events suggesting antiphospholipid syndrome in the mother (vascular thrombosis, and/or pregnancy morbidity). 4. Routine testing for thrombophilia is not proposed in both parents in case of early death of the neonate, apart from APA in the mother.

International audience; Neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) is a rare event that occurs in approximately one in 5000 term or close-to-term infants. Most affected infants will present with seizures. Although a well-recognized clinical entity, many questions remain regarding diagnosis, risk factors, treatment, and follow-up modalities. In the absence of a known pathophysiological mechanism and lack of evidence-based guidelines, only supportive care is currently provided. To address these issues, a French national committee set up by the French Neonatal Society (Société française de néonatologie) and the national referral center (Centre national de référence) for arterial ischemic stroke in children drew up guidelines based on an HAS (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]; French national authority for health) methodology. The main findings and recommendations established by the study group are: (1) among the risk factors, male sex, primiparity, caesarean section, perinatal hypoxia, and fetal/neonatal infection (mainly bacterial meningitis) seem to be the most frequent. As for guidelines, the study group recommends the following: (1) the transfer of neonates with suspected NAIS to a neonatal intensive care unit with available equipment to establish a reliable diagnosis with MRI imaging and neurophysiological monitoring, preferably by continuous video EEG; (2) acute treatment of suspected infection or other life-threatening processes should be addressed immediately by the primary medical team. Persistent seizures should be treated with a loading dose of phenobarbital 20mg/kg i.v.; (3) MRI of the brain is considered optimal for the diagnosis of NAIS. Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient is considered the most sensitive measure for identifying infarct in the neonatal brain. The location and extent of the lesions are best assessed between 2 and 4 days after the onset of stroke; (4) routine testing for thrombophilia (AT, PC PS deficiency, FV Leiden or FII20210A) or for detecting other biological risk factors such as antiphospholipid antibodies, high FVIII, homocysteinemia, the Lp(a) test, the MTHFR thermolabile variant should not be considered in neonates with NAIS. Testing for FV Leiden can be performed only in case of a documented family history of venous thromboembolic disease. Testing neonates for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies should be considered only in case of clinical events arguing in favor of antiphospholipid syndrome in the mother; (5) unlike childhood arterial ischemic stroke, NAIS has a low 5-year recurrence rate (approximately 1 %), except in those children with congenital heart disease or multiple genetic thrombophilia. Therefore, initiation of anticoagulation or antithrombotic agents, including heparin products, is not recommended in the newborn without identifiable risk factors; (6) the study group recommends that in case of delayed motor milestones or early handedness, multidisciplinary rehabilitation is recommended as early as possible. Newborns should have physical therapy evaluation and ongoing outpatient follow-up. Given the risk of later-onset cognitive, language, and behavioral disabilities, neuropsychological testing in preschool and at school age is highly recommended.; L’accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique artériel néonatal (AVCian) est une pathologie rare. Afin d’actualiser les connaissances sur ce sujet, un groupe de travail multidisciplinaire s’est constitué sous l’égide de la Société française de néonatologie et le Centre national de référence de l’AVC de l’enfant afin de proposer des recommandations sur les facteurs de risque, les modalités de transfert et de prise en charge pré-hospitalière, les modalités diagnostiques et thérapeutiques, le traitement, le pronostic et la prise en charge à court et moyen terme. Ces recommandations ont été réalisées selon la méthodologie de la Haute autorité de santé et en fonctions des thématiques proposées par un comité d’experts. Les principales recommandations issues de ce travail sont : (1) l’orientation du patient vers une unité de réanimation ou de soins intensifs néonatals disposant d’une imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) facilement accessible et de la possibilité de réaliser une surveillance continue par électro-encéphalogramme ; (2) le phénobarbital est le médicament de première ligne pour le traitement des crises convulsives ; (3) l’IRM réalisée entre j2 et j4 après la survenue de l’AVCian est la meilleure technique pour confirmer le diagnostic et préciser son extension ; (4) un facteur biologique de risque thrombotique ne doit pas être systématiquement recherché après un AVCian, sauf en cas d’antécédent thrombotique veineux familial ; (5) un traitement thrombolytique n’est pas recommandé ; (6) une prise en charge rééducative précoce est recommandée en cas de déficience motrice évidente.

Neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) is a rare event that occurs in approximately one in 5000 term or close-to-term infants. Most affected infants will present with seizures. Although a well-recognized clinical entity, many questions remain regarding diagnosis, risk factors, treatment, and follow-up modalities. In the absence of a known pathophysiological mechanism and lack of evidence-based guidelines, only supportive care is currently provided. To address these issues, a French national committee set up by the French Neonatal Society (Société française de néonatologie) and the national referral center (Centre national de référence) for arterial ischemic stroke in children drew up guidelines based on an HAS (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]; French national authority for health) methodology. The main findings and recommendations established by the study group are: (1) among the risk factors, male sex, primiparity, caesarean section, perinatal hypoxia, and fetal/neonatal infection (mainly bacterial meningitis) seem to be the most frequent. As for guidelines, the study group recommends the following: (1) the transfer of neonates with suspected NAIS to a neonatal intensive care unit with available equipment to establish a reliable diagnosis with MRI imaging and neurophysiological monitoring, preferably by continuous video EEG; (2) acute treatment of suspected infection or other life-threatening processes should be addressed immediately by the primary medical team. Persistent seizures should be treated with a loading dose of phenobarbital 20mg/kg i.v.; (3) MRI of the brain is considered optimal for the diagnosis of NAIS. Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient is considered the most sensitive measure for identifying infarct in the neonatal brain. The location and extent of the lesions are best assessed between 2 and 4 days after the onset of stroke; (4) routine testing for thrombophilia (AT, PC PS deficiency, FV Leiden or FII20210A) or for detecting other biological risk factors such as antiphospholipid antibodies, high FVIII, homocysteinemia, the Lp(a) test, the MTHFR thermolabile variant should not be considered in neonates with NAIS. Testing for FV Leiden can be performed only in case of a documented family history of venous thromboembolic disease. Testing neonates for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies should be considered only in case of clinical events arguing in favor of antiphospholipid syndrome in the mother; (5) unlike childhood arterial ischemic stroke, NAIS has a low 5-year recurrence rate (approximately 1 %), except in those children with congenital heart disease or multiple genetic thrombophilia. Therefore, initiation of anticoagulation or antithrombotic agents, including heparin products, is not recommended in the newborn without identifiable risk factors; (6) the study group recommends that in case of delayed motor milestones or early handedness, multidisciplinary rehabilitation is recommended as early as possible. Newborns should have physical therapy evaluation and ongoing outpatient follow-up. Given the risk of later-onset cognitive, language, and behavioral disabilities, neuropsychological testing in preschool and at school age is highly recommended.

The reasons for 50 requests for reversal of tubal sterilisation were studied prospectively. Our results agree with those in the rest of the literature and show that within a population of women who have been sterilised there is a group who have "a strong likelihood to ask for reversal of sterilisation". These results make one think of the role of the doctor and can help by using scores that have been worked out previously to improve the indications for sterilisation in case legislation will be forthcoming.

In this review paper the respective places of microsurgery and in vitro fertilization in the treatment of tubal infertility are evaluated. The best and current results of the two methods are compared and their future is considered. Most of the indications for microsurgery remain, while some (e.g. poor prognosis salpingostomy, repeated tuboplasty, tubal transplantation) require discussion and new ones are appearing. The advent of in vitro fertilization has introduced some technical changes in surgery of the ovaries and surrounding tissues and has given rise to new techniques. It has also modified the initial investigations in infertile women and the use of pre-operative and second-look laparoscopy. It has exerted little influence on microsurgeons specialized in problems of reproduction but has obliged their teams to be reorganized on a multidisciplinary basis in order to cope with new techniques.

Two hundred and twenty-three cases notes of patients with toxaemia of pregnancy were analysed in order to try to establish the ability to predict through clinical and biological assessments of the mother the prognosis for the fetus. Statistical analysis methods were chosen to work out the classification of the parameters and to lead to an index of severity that could be established by a multifactorial discriminating analysis. This study confirms that there is an inversion in the circadian rhythm of arterial blood pressure, with an increase in the evening and at night. It shows how bad prognostically blood pressure instability is. On the other hand oedema of the legs is of no significance. Contrary to the view that has been held for a long time, an increase in weight is directly proportional to fetal parameters. As far as parameters are concerned as a whole (both clinical and biological) a rise in blood urea is more discriminating at every stage of the illness and precedes an increase in the platelet count, the changes in creatinine clearance and night blood pressure. Maternal changes are better correlated with fetal variability before the 35th week of the pregnancy whereas after that date the prognostic value of these readings is of little importance.

With reference to an observation of porphyria variegata, which was complex and unusual as all such observations are, the direct responsibility of rifampicin is underscored. Porphyria variegata should be considered in two situations. The first of these is a dramatic acute neuroabdominal picture: the diagnosis of acute hepatic porphyria is established by the measurement of urinary porphyrins; the second step is to distinguish between the three acute hepatic porphyrias by looking for cutaneous manifestations and determining the respective proportions of coproporphyrins and protoporphyrins in the stools. In porphyria variegata, fecal protoporphyrins are significantly increased. The second situation is cutaneous involvement suggestive of late-onset cutaneous porphyria: porphyria variegata as well as hereditary coproporphyria in the cutaneous phase must be considered. Diagnosis can be established only through measuring fecal porphyrins. Porphyria variegata is a genetic enzymatic disorder inherited on an autosomal dominant basis. A study of the family is required in all cases, but the conventional methods for detecting heterozygotes for porphyria variegata are not satisfactory. Carriers will be unequivocally distinguished from healthy subjects only through measuring the defective enzyme activity.