Search

Your search keyword '"Randomized controlled trial"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Descriptor "Randomized controlled trial" Topic acute otitis media Language french
2 results on '"Randomized controlled trial"'

1. Antibiothérapie systématique orale ou auriculaire dans l'otorrhée isolée suivant une otite moyenne aiguë chez l'enfant. Revue systématique des méta-analyses d'essais cliniques randomisés.

Author

Blanquart, Siméon, Zorzi, Frédéric, Deplace, Sylvie, Chanelière, Marc, and Boussageon, Rémy

Subjects
*ACUTE otitis media, *ANTIBIOTICS, *ANTI-infective agents, *META-analysis, *DATABASES
Abstract

Otorrhea is a common symptom of acute otitis media (AOM). It is sometimes the first and only symptom of a perforated AOM (absence of fever or pain). National and international recommendations consider it as a noisy symptom or a sign of seriousness of an AOM, justifying systematic oral antibiotic therapy, whatever the age of the child and whatever the symptomatic character (fever or pain). What randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses of RCTs support these recommendations? What is the effectiveness of oral or topical antibiotics in children with isolated otorrhea on AOM? A systematic review of RCTs and meta-analyses of RCTs (MA) concerning the antibiotic treatment of otorrhea isolated on AOM in children was conducted. The Medline and Cochrane databases were consulted until 30/07/2019. Results: No RCT or MA of RCT evaluated the effect of oral or topical antibiotic therapy in children with asymptomatic otorrhea following a perforated AOM. Conclusion: Current recommendations to systematically treat children with isolated otorrhea on AOM with antibiotics are not justified by an RCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Essai clinique randomisé visant à évaluer l’efficacité du lavage des cavités nasales à l’aide d’une solution saline dans la prévention des otites moyennes aiguës à répétition

Author

Stephenson, Marie-France, Lapointe, Annie, and Lacroix, Jacques

Subjects
Solution saline, Prévention, Randomized controlled trial, Prevention, Irrigations nasales, Otitie moyenne aigue, Acute otitis media, Isotonic saline solution, nasal irrigations
Abstract

Introduction: Les instillations nasales de solution saline isotonique (INSS) chez les enfants sont recommandées par les pédiatres et des oto-rhino-laryngologistes de notre institution dans le but de prévenir les otites moyennes aigues à répétition (OMAr). Cependant, aucune étude dans la littérature ne vient corroborer ou infirmer cette pratique. Objectifs: Déterminer l’efficacité des INSS dans la prévention des OMAr. Méthode: Projet pilote d’un essai clinique randomisé. Les enfants diagnostiqués avec des OMAr étaient éligibles. Les patients recrutés ont été randomisés en 2 groupes. Seul le groupe traitement procède aux INSS. L’issue primaire est l’incidence d’OMAr pendant une période de 3 mois. Résultats: Vingt-neuf patients satisfaisant les critères d’inclusion et d’exclusion ont consenti à participer. Le taux d’OMAr était inférieur dans le groupe traitement (p=0.03, chi-carré) Conclusion: Les INSS semblent efficaces dans la prévention des OMAr. Une étude multicentrique est indiquée pour vérifier la validité externe et confirmer la sécurité., Introduction: Normal saline nasal cavity irrigations (NSNI) are commonly recommended by pediatricians and otolaryngologists to prevent recurrent acute otitis media (rAOM). However, no published scientific study corroborates or invalidates this practice. Goal: To determine the efficacy of NSNI to prevent rAOM. Method: Pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of rAOM were eligible. Recruited patients were randomized in 2 groups. Only patients in the treatment group proceeded with NSNI. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of rAOM observed during a 3 month period. Results: Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate. There was a statistically significant lower incidence of rAOM in the treatment group (p=0.003, Fisher exact). Conclusion: Our results suggest that NSNI could effectively prevent rAOM. A larger scale randomized multicentre study is feasible, and it must be done in order to verify for external validity and to properly assess safety issues.

Published
2010

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results