Search

This paper proposes an item selection algorithm that can be used to neutralize the effect of time limits in computer adaptive testing. The method is based on a statistical model for the response-time distributions of the test takers on the items in the pool that is updated each time a new item has been administered. Predictions from the model are used as constraints in a 0-1 linear programming model for constrained adaptive testing that maximizes the accuracy of the ability estimator. The method is demonstrated empirically using an item pool from an operational, large-scale computer adaptive test. (Contains 4 figures and 14 references.) (Author/SLD)

Item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing is implemented by imposing item-ineligibility constraints on the assembly process of the shadow tests. The method resembles J. Sympson and R. Hetter's (1985) method of item-exposure control in that the decisions to impose the constraints are probabilistic. However, the method does not require time consuming simulation studies to set values for control parameters prior to the operational use of the test. Instead, the probabilities of item ineligibility can be set "on the fly" using an adaptive procedure based on the actual item-exposure rates. An empirical study using an item pool from the Law School Admission Test showed that application of the method yielded perfect control of the item exposure rates and had negligible impact on the bias and mean squared error functions of the ability estimates. (Contains 5 figures and 26 references.) (Author/SLD)

A statistical test for the detection of answer copying on multiple-choice tests is presented. The test is based on the idea that answers of examinees to test items may be the results of three possible processes: (1) knowing; (2) guessing; and (3) copying. Examinees who do not have access to the answers of other examinees can arrive at their answers only through the first two processes. This assumption leads to a distribution for the number of matched incorrect alternatives between the examinee suspected of copying and the examinee believed to be the source that belongs to a family of "shifted binomials." Power functions for the tests for several sets of parameter values are analyzed. It is shown that an extension of the test to include matched numbers of correct alternatives would lead to improper statistical hypotheses. (Author/SLD)

Preventing items in adaptive testing from being over- or underexposed is one of the main problems in computerized adaptive testing. Though the problem of overexposed items can be solved using a probabilistic item-exposure control method, such methods are unable to deal with the problem of underexposed items. Using a system of rotating item pools, on the other hand, is a method that potentially solves both problems. In this method, a master pool is divided into (possibly overlapping) smaller item pools that are required to have similar distributions of content and statistical attributes. These pools are rotated among the testing sites to realize desirable exposure rates for the items. In this paper, a test assembly model for the problem of dividing a master pool into a set of smaller pools is presented. The model was motivated by Gullicksen's (1950) matched random subtests method. Different methods to solve the model are proposed. An item pool from the Law School Admission Test was used to evaluate the performances of computerized adaptive tests from systems of rotating item pools constructed using these methods. (Contains 6 figures and 14 references.) (Author/SLD)

Traditionally, error in equating observed scores on two versions of a test is defined as the difference between the transformations that equate the quantiles of their distributions in the sample and in the population of examinees. This definition underlies, for example, the well-known approximation to the standard error of equating by Lord (1982). However, it is argued that if the goal of equating is to adjust the scores of examinees on one version of the test to make them indistinguishable from those on another, equating error should be defined as the degree to which the equated scores realize this goal. Two equivalent definitions of equating error based on this criterion are formulated. These definitions can be used to evaluated existing equating methods and derive new methods if the response data fit an item-response theory model. An evaluation of the traditional equipercentile equating method and two new conditional methods for tests from a previous item pool of the Law School Admission Test showed that, under a variety of conditions, the equipercentile method tends to result in a serious bias in the equated scores, while the new methods are practically free of any bias. (Contains 5 figures and 14 references.) (Author/SLD)

The Sympson and Hetter (SH; J. Sympson and R. Hetter; 1985; 1997) method is a method of probabilistic item exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Setting its control parameters to admissible values requires an iterative process of computer simulations that has been found to be time consuming, particularly if the parameters have to be set conditional on a realistic set of values for the examinees ability parameter. Formal properties of the method are identified that help us explain why this iterative process can be slow and does not guarantee admissibility. In addition, some alternatives to the SH method are introduced. The behavior of these alternatives was estimated for an adaptive test from an item pool from the Law School Admission Test. Two of the alternatives showed attractive behavior and converged smoothly to admissibility for all items in a relatively small number of iteration steps. (Contains 4 figures and 14 references.) (Author/SLD)

This paper presents an approach to item pool design that has the potential to improve on the quality of current item pools in educational and psychological testing and thus to increase both measurement precision and validity. The approach consists of the application of mathematical programming techniques to calculate optimal blueprints for item pools. These blueprints can be used to guide the item-writing process. Three different types of design problems are discussed: (1) item pools for linear tests; (2) item pools for computerized adaptive testing (CAT); and (3) systems of rotating pools for CAT. The paper concludes with an empirical example of the problem of designing a system or rotating item pools for CAT. (Contains 2 tables and 22 references.) (Author/SLD)

A model for constrained computerized adaptive testing is proposed in which the information on the test at the ability estimate is maximized subject to a large variety of possible constraints on the contents of the test. At each item-selection step, a full test is first assembled to have maximum information at the current ability estimate fixing the items previously administered. Then the item with maximum information is selected from the test. All test assembly is optimal due to the use of a linear programming model that is automatically updated to allow for the attributes of the items already administered as well as the new value of the ability estimator. A simulation study using a pool of 753 items from the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) shows that for adaptive tests of realistic lengths the ability estimator did not suffer any loss of efficiency from the presence of 433 constraints on the item selection process. (Contains 2 figures, 3 tables, and 35 references.) (Author/SLD)

To reduce the cost of item writing and to enhance the flexibility of item presentation, items can be generated by item-cloning techniques. An important consequence of cloning is that it may cause variability on the item parameters. Therefore, a multilevel item response model is presented in which it is assumed that the item parameters of a three-parameter logistic model describing response behavior are sampled from a multivariate normal distribution associated with a parent item. In this approach to item calibration, only distributions of item parameters are estimated. Therefore, the savings in item calibration costs for the item cloning model are potentially enormous. A marginal maximum likelihood and a Bayesian item calibration procedure are formulated. Further, a two-stage item selection procedure for computerized adaptive testing is presented. First, a set of items cloned from the same parent item is selected to be optimal at the ability estimate. Second, a random item from this set is administered. Simulation studies illustrate the accuracy of the item pool calibration and ability estimation procedures. An appendix describes Bayes model estimates for the item cloning model. (Contains 21 references.) (Author/SLD)

In some areas of measurement item parameters should not be modeled as fixed but as random. Examples of such areas are: item sampling, computerized item generation, measurement with substantial estimation error in the item parameter estimates, and grouping of items under a common stimulus or in a common context. A hierarchical version of the three-parameter normal ogive model is used to model parameter variability in multiple populations of items. Two Bayesian procedures for the estimation of the parameter are given. The first method produces an estimate of the posterior distribution using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method (Gibbs sampler); the second procedure produces a Bayes modal estimate. It is shown that the procedure using the Gibbs sampler breaks down if for some of the random item parameters the sampling design yields only one response. However, in this case, marginalization over the item parameters does result in a feasible estimation procedure. Some numerical examples are given. (Contains 2 tables, 4 figures, and 36 references.) (Author/SLD)

This report contains a review of procedures for computerized assembly of linear, sequential, and adaptive tests. The common approach to these test assembly problems is to view them as instances of constrained combinatorial optimization. For each testing format, several potentially useful objective functions and types of constraints are discussed. (Contains 14 references.) (Author/SLD)

The methods of alpha-stratified adaptive testing and constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests are combined in this study. The advantages are twofold. First, application of the shadow test allows the researcher to implement any type of constraint on item selection in alpha-stratified adaptive testing. Second, the result yields a simple set of constraints that can be used in any application of the shadow test approach to reduce overexposure and underexposure of the items in the pool. An example from the Law School Admission Test is used to demonstrate the advantages. (Contains 20 references and 3 figures.) (Author/SLD)

Presented is an integer-programming approach to item pool design that can be used to calculate an optimal blueprint for an item pool to support an existing testing program. The results are optimal in the sense that they minimize the efforts involved in actually producing the items as revealed by current item writing patterns. Also presented is an adaptation of the models for use as a set of monitoring tools in item pool management. The approach is demonstrated empirically for an item pool designed for the Law School Admission Test. (Contains 2 tables and 30 references.) (Author/SLD)

A method based on 0-1 linear programming (LP) is presented to stratify an item pool optimally for use in "alpha"-stratified adaptive testing. Because the 0-1 LP model belongs to the subclass of models with a network-flow structure, efficient solutions are possible. The method is applied to a previous item pool from the computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Graduate Record Examinations Quantitative Test. The results indicate that the new method performs well in practical situations. It improves item exposure control, reduces the mean squared error in the theta estimates, and increases test reliability. (Contains 2 figures and 25 references.) (Author/SLD)

In judgmental standard setting experiments, it may be difficult to specify subjective probabilities that adequately take the properties of the items into account. As a result, these probabilities are not consistent with each other in the sense that they do not refer to the same borderline level of performance. Methods to check standard setting data for intrajudge inconsistencies are thus of paramount importance to setting meaningful standards. This paper presents a method of consistency analysis for standard setting experiments in which judges specify probabilities for each response alternative of the items. The method is based on a residual diagnosis of the subjective probabilities under the hypothesis of a consistent judge to the probabilities. An empirical example shows how the method can be used to identify sources of inconsistency in response alternatives, items, or judges. (Contains 19 references.) (SLD)

A method of item pool design is proposed that uses an optimal blueprint for the item pool calculated from the test specifications. The blueprint is a document that specifies the attributes that the items in the computerized adaptive test (CAT) pool should have. The blueprint can be a starting point for the item writing process, and it can be used to assemble item pools in a system of rotating pools from a master pool. The blueprint is also useful for item pool maintenance. Designing the blueprint begins with analyzing the specifications for the CAT, a step amounting to the formation of a classification table involving categorization of quantitative item attributes. Using this table, an integer programming model for the assembly of the shadow tests in the CAT simulation is constructed. An estimate of the ability distribution of the identified population of examinees is obtained, and the CAT simulation is carried out using the integer programming model for the shadow tests and sampling simulees from the ability distribution. The blueprint is then calculated from the counts of the number of items from the cells in the classification table. The best way to implement the blueprint is in a sequential fashion recalculating the blueprint after a certain portion of the items has actually been written and tested so that their attribute values are known. (Contains 16 references and a list of University of Twente research reports.) (SLD)

A constrained computerized adaptive testing (CAT) algorithm is presented that automatically equates the number-correct scores on adaptive tests. The algorithm can be used to equate number-correct scores across different administrations of the same adaptive test as well as to an external reference test. The constraints are derived from a set of conditions on item response functions that guarantees the observed number-correct score distributions on two forms to be identical (W. van der Linden and R. Luecht, 1998). An item pool from the Law School Admission Test is used to compare the results of the algorithm with those for traditional observed-score equating of ability estimates to number-correct scores as well as the transformation to predicted number-correct scores through the test characteristic function. The effects of the constraints on the statistical properties of the ability estimator are examined. (Contains 18 references, 4 figures, and a list of University of Twente research reports.) (Author/SLD)

A popular design in large-scale educational assessments is the balanced incomplete block design. The design assumes that the item pool is split into a set of blocks of items that are assigned to assessment booklets. This paper shows how the technique of 0-1 linear programming can be used to calculate a balanced incomplete block design. Several structural as well as practical constraints on this type of design are formulated as linear (in)equalities. In addition, possible objective functions to optimize the design are discussed. The technique is demonstrated using an item pool from the 1996 Grade 8 Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress Project. (Contains 2 tables and 16 references.) (Author/SLD)

An integer programming approach to item pool design is presented that can be used to calculate an optimal blueprint for an item pool to support an existing testing program. The results are optimal in the sense that they minimize the efforts involved in actually producing the items as revealed by current item writing patterns. Also, an adaptation of the models for use as a set of monitoring tools in item pool management is presented. The approach is demonstrated empirically for an item pool designed for the Law School Admission Test (LSAT). (Contains 2 tables and 30 references.) (Author)

Six methods for assembling tests from a pool with an item-set structure are presented. All methods are computational and based on the technique of mixed integer programming. The methods are evaluated using such criteria as the feasibility of their linear programming problems and their expected solution times. The methods are illustrated for two item pools with a set structure from the Law School Admission Test (LSAT). The methods are: (1) simultaneous selection of items and sets; (2) simultaneous selection with pivot items; (3) all items per set selected; (4) decision variables for subsets (power set approach); (5) two-stage selection; and (6) two-stage selection (alternative version). (Contains 3 tables, 2 figures, and 12 references.) (Author/SLD)