Search

Factors affecting the evolution of plumage conspicuousness in females are nowadays the focus of debate, and here we explore the possibility that the conspicuousness of female plumage and male participation in nest building are associated in birds. We hypothesize that males that participate in nest building will gain higher fecundity from high-quality ornamented females, whereas ornamented females will adjust fecundity to the costly nest-building behaviour of males. Large-sized species might experience higher costs of nest building and, thus, body size should affect the scenario described above. We used information on male contribution to nest construction (yes/no), male and female conspicuousness (conspicuous or cryptic plumage) and body size of Western Palaearctic passerines. In accordance with the hypothesis, we found that female conspicuousness, in interaction with body mass, was strongly associated with male participation in nest building. For large-sized species, female conspicuousness was positively associated with male participation in nest building. Discrete analyses of correlated evolution rendered evidence of female conspicuousness determining the evolution of male contributions to nest building, with the loss of female conspicuousness occurring more frequently before the loss of male participation in nest building. We discuss possible adaptive scenarios explaining the detected evidence because of mutual sexual selection in males and females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Albeit there is growing evidence that males prefer to mate with ornamented females, it has been suggested that the production of costly ornaments may reduce female fecundity, hence favoring males with a preference for females with average ornamentation. In the rock sparrow, Petronia petronia, males and females possess a sexually selected patch of yellow feathers on the breast (a carotenoid-based trait). To test whether males prefer females with the largest ornament or average ornamented females, male rock sparrows were simultaneously faced with 3 conspecific females differing in breast patch size and a female house sparrow as a control. We found that the house sparrow and rock sparrow female with the smallest patch were least preferred, and males showed a clear proximity preference for the females with the above average–sized patch. Our results demonstrate that, contrary to theoretical predictions, a directional preference for female ornament was observed. Directional male preference may arise as consequence of a male's sensory bias or may be associated with indirect (genetic) benefits of choosing ornamented females, if ornament size is correlated with female genetic quality. Clearly, more work is necessary to identify the conditions under which directional preference for female ornament arises. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Many conspicuous ornamental traits in animals are expressed in both males and females. Despite this, most research has focused on sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Mutual ornamentation has often been viewed as a result of either a nonadaptive genetic correlation between the sexes or similar selection pressures in both sexes. Here, we review the theoretical underpinning and empirical evidence for these ideas. Few studies have attempted to test empirically whether a genetic correlation between the sexes can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and the results have been mixed. By contrast, there is good evidence that mutual ornaments can have a signal function in both sexes, especially in terms of mate choice. Other possible signalling functions have received little attention. Social status signalling is especially likely to be important, because competition over nonsexual resources is more balanced between the sexes than sexual competition. There is a need for experimental studies that explicitly test these hypotheses simultaneously in both sexes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]