Search

The article evaluates the accuracy of a novel automated allergy intradermal skin test reader, Nexkin DSPT, compared to manual intradermal wheal size measurement. The study found that Nexkin DSPT exhibited high sensitivity and specificity, with potential to streamline skin testing procedures and enhance precision. While the device showed good discrimination capability, there were moderate to low levels of agreement between Nexkin DSPT and manual measurements, possibly due to human factors. Overall, Nexkin DSPT represents a promising advancement in standardizing allergy diagnostic tests. [Extracted from the article]

Summary: Background: Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was one crucial element to overcome the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Even though anaphylaxis to vaccines is rare, 47 patients came to the Allergy Unit at the University Hospital Graz, Austria, reporting immediate anaphylactoid symptoms after administration of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, 29 patients with known drug-induced anaphylaxis wanted to be tested for a possible sensitization against COVID-19 vaccines or excipients, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 (PS80) before the first COVID-19 vaccination. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were performed in all 76 patients, mostly using PEG 2000, and/or PS80. Skin prick tests with COVID-19 vaccines were performed depending on availability. Objective: Our aim was to characterize this patient cohort in terms of patients' anaphylactoid responses, their willingness to future vaccinations against SARS-Cov‑2, and reasons for their decision. Methods: We developed a questionnaire and analyzed 34 completed copies. Results: Of the 47 patients with anaphylactoid reactions to COVID-19 vaccination, most were female (40 female/7 male). The skin tests, even when performed with the respective COVID-19 vaccine, were negative in all but one patient. Most patients who experienced anaphylactoid reactions after a COVID-19 vaccination, did not want another COVID-19 vaccination at the time of answering the questionnaire because of anxiety for another anaphylactoid response at the next shot. Premedication with antihistamines significantly lowered (n = 74 vaccinations) the severity of anaphylactoid responses after COVID-19 vaccinations. Conclusion: Anxiety about another anaphylactoid episode hinders patients to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2 again. Premedication with antihistamines and collaboration of allergologists with psychologists might lower the risk of an anaphylactic/anaphylactoid response as well anxiety in drug-induced anaphylactic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: We aimed to investigate the relationship between serum antidrug antibodies (ADAbs), systemic hypersensitivity, or local injection site reactions to tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs and to detect the role of skin tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) against anti-TNFs. Materials and methods: Sixty-nine ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 46 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), and etanercept (ETN) were enrolled. The demographical data, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and c-reactive protein (CRP) levels of the patients were determined, and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) assessment for AS patients and DAS28 (disease activity score) for RA patients were assessed. Serum levels of anti-TNFs and ADAbs to these agents were measured with ELISA. These blood samples were taken 24 h before the next drug dose. The patients with anti-TNF-associated HSRs were evaluated with a skin-prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT). Readings for the SPT and IDT were conducted after 15 min and 24, 48, and 72 h. Heel diameter of 3 mm or more greater than the negative control was considered positive for SPT, and if the size of the initial wheal had increased by at least 3 mm in diameter and was surrounded by erythema it was considered positive for IDT. Symptoms such as urticaria/angioedema and flushing were considered immediate-type HSRs. Findings developed at the injection site such as swelling and erythema were considered injection-site reactions (ISRs). An overall p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A statistically significant association was found between HSRs (immediate type and ISRs) and IDT reported by patients taking biological drugs (p = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, a statistically significant association was found between ISRs and IDT in those taking ADA and ETN (respectively p = 0.012, p = 0.013). No relationship was found between skin test positivity and the presence of IgG ADAbs to anti-TNFs or disease activity scores. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients who exhibit ISRs to anti-TNFs produce notably positive results to IDT without maintaining a direct relationship to serum levels of ADAbs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a hereditary, generally pruritic and predominantly T‐cell‐driven inflammatory skin disease, involving an interplay between skin barrier abnormalities, allergen sensitisation and microbial dysbiosis. The individual immunological response is predominantly against environmental allergens, including mite antigens; mould spores; and pollen from grasses, trees and weeds. Airborne pollens show fluctuating patterns during the year. Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the influence of local pollen concentrations and weather conditions on the clinical signs of atopic dogs, and to investigate any possible correlations with the results of intradermal testing (IDT). Materials and Methods: Thirty‐seven privately owned atopic dogs in Bavaria were surveyed from 1 April to 30 November 2021. Owners were asked to record pruritus using a validated Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) score and the weekly medication of their dog. Furthermore, weather data, including pollen count, rainfall, relative humidity, hours of sunshine and temperature from the dog's location were collected daily. Results: Of the evaluated parameters, only humidity and medication scores correlated positively with the PVAS scores of the atopic dogs. There was no correlation between specific pollen counts and PVAS scores of dogs with positive IDT reactions to that pollen. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance: The outcome of this study highlights the importance of a careful interpretation of positive IDT results in dogs with cAD and questions the validity of airborne pollen trap methodology in representing pollen exposure for dogs at ground level. Background – Canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a hereditary, generally pruritic and predominantly T‐cell‐driven inflammatory skin disease, involving an interplay between skin barrier abnormalities, allergen sensitisation and microbial dysbiosis. The individual immunological response is predominantly against environmental allergens, including mite antigens; mould spores; and pollen from grasses, trees and weeds. Airborne pollens show fluctuating patterns during the year. Objective – The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the influence of local pollen concentrations and weather conditions on the clinical signs of atopic dogs, and to investigate any possible correlations with the results of intradermal testing (IDT). Conclusion and Clinical Relevance – The outcome of this study highlights the importance of a careful interpretation of positive IDT results in dogs with cAD and questions the validity of airborne pollen trap methodology in representing pollen exposure for dogs at ground level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The skin-prick and intradermal tests are the main diagnostic methods used to identify the causative agent in patients with suspected perioperative anaphylaxis. Although the intradermal test is more sensitive than the skin-prick test, multiple intradermal injections can be painful for children. Here, we present the case of a child with autism and suspected perioperative anaphylaxis. The causative agent was successfully identified using the intradermal test under general anesthesia. Case presentation An 8-year-old boy with autism developed anaphylaxis during general anesthesia for the fourth cleft lip and palate surgery. An allergic workout was performed, but both the skin-prick and basophil activation tests for suspected causative agents yielded negative results. The patient was afraid of multiple injections, and an intradermal test was performed under general anesthesia by anesthesiologists and allergists. Piperacillin was confirmed as the causative agent, and subsequent surgery using the same anesthetic agents without piperacillin was uneventful. Conclusions Concerted efforts should be made to identify the causative agent for diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis.

The water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) is susceptible to bovine tuberculosis (TB), which receives increased attention in areas where buffalo breeding is prevalent, such as in Southern Italy, especially in the Campania region, where 70% of the buffalo stock is bred. Since 2012, TB testing in buffalo herds has been conducted using the Single Intradermal Test (SIT), with the Comparative Intradermal test (CIT) used in cases of inconclusive results. From 2012 to 2016, the interferongamma (IFN-γ) test was occasionally employed experimentally in herds with TB outbreaks to expedite eradication efforts. A local TB eradication program was implemented in officially TB-free buffalo herds between 2017 and 2019. This program involves initial screening with SIT, followed by confirmatory tests, including CIT and IFN-γ, for positive reactions. Since June 2019, the IFN-γ test has replaced the CIT in officially TB-free herds upon positive SIT reactions. Additionally, in suspected and confirmed TB-outbreak herds, the IFN-γ test was used at the discretion of the competent authority. Between 2017 and 2019, approximately 295,000 buffaloes in Campania were screened annually with in vivo tests provided by TB eradication programs. During this period, 32,040 animals from 855 herds were tested using the IFN-γ test and 4,895 tested positive. Since 2020, the use of IFN-γ testing has increased, and has become a prerequisite for the acquisition of TB-free status and is being systematically applied for TB outbreak-extinction procedures. The test was performed in all breeding buffaloes in cases of doubtful SIT results in TB-free herds and when TB lesions are detected at slaughter in animals from TB-free herds. This combined approach helped detect more TB outbreaks, and thereby led to a reduction in the TB prevalence and incidence rates. By 2022, the prevalence had decreased to 1.56%, and the incidence had decreased to 0.73%, after the increased use of the IFN-γ test. This study highlights the effectiveness of implemented strategies in reducing TB in this region. Overall, the data demonstrate the successful impact of TB eradication measures and surveillance activities in reducing bubaline TB prevalence and incidence in the Campania region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The skin-prick and intradermal tests are the main diagnostic methods used to identify the causative agent in patients with suspected perioperative anaphylaxis. Although the intradermal test is more sensitive than the skin-prick test, multiple intradermal injections can be painful for children. Here, we present the case of a child with autism and suspected perioperative anaphylaxis. The causative agent was successfully identified using the intradermal test under general anesthesia. Case presentation: An 8-year-old boy with autism developed anaphylaxis during general anesthesia for the fourth cleft lip and palate surgery. An allergic workout was performed, but both the skin-prick and basophil activation tests for suspected causative agents yielded negative results. The patient was afraid of multiple injections, and an intradermal test was performed under general anesthesia by anesthesiologists and allergists. Piperacillin was confirmed as the causative agent, and subsequent surgery using the same anesthetic agents without piperacillin was uneventful. Conclusions: Concerted efforts should be made to identify the causative agent for diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil (HCO ethoxylates) is a nonionic surfactant used as an excipient for ointments and injections in human and veterinary drugs. Several polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivatives can be obtained depending on the number of moles of ethylene oxide (EO). HCO ethoxylates have the potential to cause anaphylactoid reactions. There is little published information about these types of reactions in dogs. Objective: To determine the potential for HCO‐ethoxylate‐containing drugs to cause anaphylactoid reactions in dogs, employing intradermal testing (IDT) with various concentrations of HCO ethoxylates (HCO‐25, ‐40, ‐60 and ‐80). Animals: Four healthy male laboratory dogs. Materials and Methods: We performed IDT with drugs containing HCO ethoxylates and HCO ethoxylates alone to determine threshold concentrations. The IDT scores and threshold concentrations were compared. Analysis of skin biopsies from IDT sites was used to measure the percentage of degranulated mast cells. The effect of histamine at IDT sites was investigated by pre‐treatment with an antihistamine. Results: All HCO‐ethoxylate‐containing drugs caused a wheal‐and‐flare reaction. The threshold concentrations (0.001% and 0.00001%) of each HCO‐ethoxylate depended on the number of moles of EO (p < 0.05). Mast cell degranulation was enhanced by all HCO ethoxylates. The HCO‐60‐induced reaction was suppressed by an oral antihistamine. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The threshold concentration can serve as a consideration for developing safe new drug formulations and for clinical decision‐making around using drugs containing PEG derivatives. IDT is useful to predict the risk of adverse effects. Antihistamines could demonstrate a prophylactic effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Dulaglutide is a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist, which stimulates insulin release via activation of GLP‐1 receptors on pancreatic beta cells. We report the case of a 45‐year‐old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus who started dulaglutide subcutaneously and developed, a few minutes after the fourth administration, a persistent itchy reaction at the injection site, followed, after two more administrations, by a diffuse itchy delayed urticaria‐like rash, healed in 7 days after drug interruption. Skin test performed after 3 months from the event demonstrated the culprit role of the drug. Given the limited evidence in literature, there is currently no standardised protocol for testing patients sensitised to one or more glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists. Performing skin tests, especially intradermal tests, is pivotal to confirm the aetiological role of the drug in the suspected hypersensitivity reaction, and possibly to identify an alternative to be proposed before precluding the entire drug class. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of systemic hypersensitivity reaction to dulaglutide presenting as a delayed urticaria‐like rash and confirmed by positive skin test.

The water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) is susceptible to bovine tuberculosis (TB), which receives increased attention in areas where buffalo breeding is prevalent, such as in Southern Italy, especially in the Campania region, where 70% of the buffalo stock is bred. Since 2012, TB testing in buffalo herds has been conducted using the Single Intradermal Test (SIT), with the Comparative Intradermal test (CIT) used in cases of inconclusive results. From 2012 to 2016, the interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) test was occasionally employed experimentally in herds with TB outbreaks to expedite eradication efforts. A local TB eradication program was implemented in officially TB-free buffalo herds between 2017 and 2019. This program involves initial screening with SIT, followed by confirmatory tests, including CIT and IFN-γ, for positive reactions. Since June 2019, the IFN-γ test has replaced the CIT in officially TB-free herds upon positive SIT reactions. Additionally, in suspected and confirmed TB-outbreak herds, the IFN-γ test was used at the discretion of the competent authority. Between 2017 and 2019, approximately 295,000 buffaloes in Campania were screened annually with in vivo tests provided by TB eradication programs. During this period, 32,040 animals from 855 herds were tested using the IFN-γ test and 4,895 tested positive. Since 2020, the use of IFN-γ testing has increased, and has become a prerequisite for the acquisition of TB-free status and is being systematically applied for TB outbreak-extinction procedures. The test was performed in all breeding buffaloes in cases of doubtful SIT results in TB-free herds and when TB lesions are detected at slaughter in animals from TB-free herds. This combined approach helped detect more TB outbreaks, and thereby led to a reduction in the TB prevalence and incidence rates. By 2022, the prevalence had decreased to 1.56%, and the incidence had decreased to 0.73%, after the increased use of the IFN-γ test. This study highlights the effectiveness of implemented strategies in reducing TB in this region. Overall, the data demonstrate the successful impact of TB eradication measures and surveillance activities in reducing bubaline TB prevalence and incidence in the Campania region.

Background: Local anesthetic (LA) drugs are commonly used in clinical practice to provide effective analgesia, including in dentistry and minor surgical procedures. The perception of a high risk of allergy in daily applications leads to the referral of atopic patients and those with other drug allergies to allergy clinics for the evaluation of allergic reactions to LA. The aim of this study was to determine who should be referred to the allergy clinic for LA allergy testing, assess the frequency of LA allergy in pediatric patients, and identify the negative predictive value of skin tests in diagnosis. Methods: January 2017–July 2023, the clinical and laboratory data, as well as the results of drug allergy tests, of patients referred to our pediatric allergy clinic by dentists and physicians performing minor surgical procedures with suspected LA allergy were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Our study included a total of 153 patients, comprising 84 girls (54.9%) and 69 boys (45.1%), with a mean age of 8.9 (±3.3) years. The most common reason for referral was a history of non‐LA drug allergies (n = 66, 43.2%), followed by asthma (n = 25, 16.3%). Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) with LA were most commonly associated with articaine (n = 7, 4.8%), followed by lidocaine (n = 6, 4.1%). When intradermal tests were evaluated, 17 patients (11.1%) had a positive test result. The positivity for lidocaine was 70.6% (n = 12), and prilocaine was 29.4% (n = 5). Subcutaneous provocation was administered to 109 patients (71.2%), and one patient exhibited local erythema and swelling with prilocaine. Conclusion: Although LA allergy is a rare occurrence, consultations of this nature are frequently requested from allergy clinics in real life. Considering the negative predictive value of skin tests performed with LA drugs, the reaction rate appears to be low in patients with atopy or other drug allergies. It is crucial for all relevant healthcare professionals to be knowledgeable about the appropriate approach to suspected LA allergies to avoid unnecessary tests. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the most comprehensive work in the literature that evaluates the results of diagnostic tests in children referred with a suspicion of LA allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 41-year-old female patient presents to the dermatology department with a 3-year history of a monthly relapsing pruritic eruption. These lesions appear 5-7 days before the onset of menses and resolve 3-4 days after menstruation. During her two previous pregnancies, she had no symptoms. She had been previously treated with antihistamines and oral corticosteroids with only temporary relief. On examination, during the luteal phase, the patient presented multiple maculopapular pruritic wheals distributed throughout the body. Several laboratory studies were performed and were all normal or negative, including auto-antibodies tests and hormonal analysis. Patch tests with the standard series of the Portuguese Contact Dermatitis Group, corticosteroid series, and metal series revealed positive reactions to nickel sulfate (++) and palladium chloride (+) at 72 h. An intradermal test with medroxyprogesterone at concentrations of 0.1 and 10 mg/ mL was performed on the 7th day of the menstrual cycle. The test was positive 2 h after the injection and persisted for 24 h. The diagnosis of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis was made and the patient started tamoxifen 40 mg/day, with almost complete clinical clearing. Four months after, the dose was reduced, with no relapsing. Six months later, the patient remains free of symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Aeroallergens have been discussed as potential triggers for feline asthma (FA), which can be induced experimentally by allergen sensitization. To date, only few studies have investigated reactions to environmental allergens in cats with naturally occurring feline lower airway disease (FLAD). The aim of the study was to compare results of intradermal testing (IDT) and serum allergen-specific immunoglobulin E-(IgE) testing (SAT) in cats with FLAD, and to investigate possible associations with allergen exposure. Material and methods: Eight cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation (EI), ten cats with mixed inflammation (MI), six with neutrophilic inflammation (NI), and 24 healthy cats (HC) were included. Cats diagnosed with FLAD were assigned to the different inflammatory groups based on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) cytology. SAT was performed in all cats; IDT was only carried out in cats with FLAD. Information about the cats' environment and potential allergen exposure was obtained using an owner questionnaire. Results: In comparison to 83% of HC with positive reactions on SAT only 52% of cats with FLAD had positive responses (p = 0.051). Significantly more positive reactions per cat were detected on IDT than on SAT (p = 0.001). No significant difference was found for positive reactions per cat on SAT when compared between HC, NI, EI, and MI (p = 0.377). Only “slight” agreement was found for most allergens when reactions obtained in both tests in cats with FLAD were compared, except for “moderate” agreement for English plantain (k = 0.504) and Alternaria alternata (k = 0.488). Overall, no clear association between the cats' environment and allergen reactions were detected. Conclusions and clinical importance: Interpretation of allergy test results in cats with FLAD should be done in the context of clinical signs and individual factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of in vivo and ex vivo tests for identifying adverse drug reactions to non-beta lactam antibiotics. The study found that patient history alone has a high misdiagnosis rate for non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions. The researchers conducted intradermal tests, ELISpot assays, and oral provocation tests on 26 participants with a history of non-severe hypersensitivity to non-beta lactam antibiotics. The combined use of intradermal tests and ELISpot assays had a higher positive rate than either test alone, and the oral provocation test identified additional positive cases. The study suggests that integrating these tests can accurately diagnose non-immediate hypersensitivity to non-beta lactam antibiotics. [Extracted from the article]

ObjectivesAeroallergens have been discussed as potential triggers for feline asthma (FA), which can be induced experimentally by allergen sensitization. To date, only few studies have investigated reactions to environmental allergens in cats with naturally occurring feline lower airway disease (FLAD). The aim of the study was to compare results of intradermal testing (IDT) and serum allergen-specific immunoglobulin E-(IgE) testing (SAT) in cats with FLAD, and to investigate possible associations with allergen exposure.Material and methodsEight cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation (EI), ten cats with mixed inflammation (MI), six with neutrophilic inflammation (NI), and 24 healthy cats (HC) were included. Cats diagnosed with FLAD were assigned to the different inflammatory groups based on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) cytology. SAT was performed in all cats; IDT was only carried out in cats with FLAD. Information about the cats' environment and potential allergen exposure was obtained using an owner questionnaire.ResultsIn comparison to 83% of HC with positive reactions on SAT only 52% of cats with FLAD had positive responses (p = 0.051). Significantly more positive reactions per cat were detected on IDT than on SAT (p = 0.001). No significant difference was found for positive reactions per cat on SAT when compared between HC, NI, EI, and MI (p = 0.377). Only “slight” agreement was found for most allergens when reactions obtained in both tests in cats with FLAD were compared, except for “moderate” agreement for English plantain (k = 0.504) and Alternaria alternata (k = 0.488). Overall, no clear association between the cats' environment and allergen reactions were detected.Conclusions and clinical importanceInterpretation of allergy test results in cats with FLAD should be done in the context of clinical signs and individual factors.

Background: Adverse drug reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) have risen due to their increasing use in x‐ray‐based imaging modalities. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions are mainly caused by nonionic monomeric compounds and represent an issue impacting the diagnostic–therapeutic pathways of cancer, cardiology and surgery patients. Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the usefulness of skin tests in delayed hypersensitivity reactions to ICM and to evaluate the tolerability of iobitridol, a monomeric nonionic low osmolality compound, as a possible safe alternative. Methods: Patients with delayed hypersensitivity reactions to ICM referred to us from 2020 to 2022 were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent patch test and, if negative, intradermal test with the culprit ICM and iobitridol as alternative. Results: A total of 37 patients (females 24, 64.9%) were enrolled in the study. Iodixanol and iomeprol were the most frequently involved ICM (48.5% and 35.2%, respectively); 62.2% of patients presented maculopapular eruption, while 37.8% reported delayed urticaria‐like rash. Skin tests resulted positive to the culprit ICM in 19 patients (51.4%), 16 to patch test and 3 to intradermal test. Skin tests with iobitridol, tested as alternative, resulted positive in 3/19 patients (15.8%). All 16 patients with negative results to iobitridol were administered this ICM and tolerated it. Conclusions: In at least half of patients, delayed‐type hypersensitivity was demonstrated by skin tests, particularly by patch test. This diagnostic approach resulted simple, cost‐effective and safe, not only to confirm the culprit ICM but also to identify iobitridol as feasible alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Remimazolam besylate, a newly developed drug, is linked to various anaphylaxis cases. We present a case of remimazolam anaphylaxis confirmed using a provocation test. Case: A 51-year-old female patient was scheduled for humeral pinning. General anesthesia was induced using remimazolam, rocuronium, and remifentanil. After tracheal intubation, the patient experienced decreased blood pressure, increased heart rate, and a systemic rash. Epinephrine was administered repeatedly, and the patient's vital signs stabilized. Acute phase tryptase levels were within normal limits. After four weeks, intradermal test results were negative. When remimazolam was administered intravenously for the provocation test, facial swelling, flushing, and coughing occurred, which improved with epinephrine. The culprit drug was identified as remimazolam using a provocation test. Conclusions: When anaphylaxis occurs during anesthesia induction, remimazolam should not be ruled out as the causative drug. If the skin test result for remimazolam is negative, a provocation test should be considered. The provocation test should be initiated cautiously at a low dose under careful patient monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post‐orgasmic illness syndrome (POIS) is a rare disease characterized by flu‐like symptoms persisting for 2–7 days after ejaculation. POIS has been chiefly attributed to allergic reactions to autologous seminal plasma. However, the exact pathophysiology remains unclear, and there is no effective treatment. We present the case of a 38‐year‐old man with a 10‐year history of recurrent episodes of flu‐like symptoms of 1‐week duration after ejaculation. The patient was diagnosed with irritating bowel syndrome because of fatigue, myalgia, and lateral abdominal pain. After starting infertility treatment and increasing the frequency of intercourse with his wife, the patient noticed these symptoms after ejaculation. Based on these episodes and symptoms, POIS was suspected. To diagnose POIS, a skin prick test and an intradermal test were performed using his seminal fluid, with the latter yielding a positive result. The patient was diagnosed with POIS, and treatment with antihistamines was continued. Due to its rarity, POIS is often underdiagnosed and underreported; however, the skin test can be a valid diagnostic tool. In this case, the intradermal test result was positive according to the broadly accepted criteria for POIS. Although quality of life is often severely affected in patients with POIS, a lack of a clear understanding of the pathogenesis of POIS prevents early diagnosis. To make diagnoses earlier, it is undoubtedly important to take a detailed medical history and perform skin allergy tests, although the latter requires further validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate identification of a culprit drug involved in an immediate hypersensitivity adverse reaction has critical consequences on antibiotic stewardship and patient quality of life, therefore simple reliable diagnostic skin tests are of great importance. Succinct information on the use of positive and negative controls and nonirritating concentrations of antibiotics, according to recent international guidelines, used for skin prick tests and intradermal tests for the allergy workup is required to avoid false negative or false positive results. The method used, the appropriate drug concentrations, and the criteria for positive skin testing influence the specificity and sensitivity of allergy skin tests.

Background: The basis for qualification for venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the fulfilment of both the clinical and immunological criteria. Diagnostic tests that confirm the immunological criterion of an IgE-mediated sensitization include skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal tests (IDT), and serum specific IgE (sIgE) for the culprit venom. Objective: This study aimed to assess the usefulness of SPT as the immunological marker in the diagnosis of insect venom sensitization in children with history of systemic reaction (SR) to insect sting evaluated by means of I-IV-grades Mueller's scale. There are no such studies in children. Methods: This cross-sectional study sample consisted of 416 children aged 3–18 years (mean age 10.6 ± 3.8), 76% males, all with the history of a systemic reaction (SR) after a Hymenoptera sting (48% of grade III/IV according to Mueller scale), diagnosed between 1999 and 2019 in the tertiary referral centre. The standard diagnostic tests were used. Specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed to assess the diagnostic properties of the clinical tests to distinguish between mild and severe SR. To assess the relative value of an individual test in predicting the qualification to VIT we incorporated the Shapley value (SV). Results: Positive SPT results were found in up to no more than 3% of children; among them less than 1% had only positive SPT and were negative for sIgE and IDT. Approximately 85% of the children had detectable venom sIgE, followed by positive IDT (75%). Almost 70% of children had positive both sIgE and IDT results. In children with grade III/IV reaction, about 80% of children had positive results of both of these tests. sIgE and IDT had sensitivity >0.80, whereas SPT had high specificity (>0.97) in differentiating between mild and severe SR. Relative value of diagnostic tests in predicting qualification to VIT varied between venoms. Bee venom IDT had higher SV (0.052) than sIgE (0.041). In contrast, wasp venom sIgE had higher SV (0.075) than IDT (0.035). Conclusion: SPTs are not an useful immunological marker of venom sensitization in children, and eliminating SPT does not result in a loss of diagnostic accuracy. Limiting diagnostics to venom sIgE and IDT would shorten the procedure and reduce costs. Future studies are needed to determine if venom sIgE as the first line diagnostic test, with IDT added only if the venom sIgE is undetectable, is an optimal diagnostic process.

Background: Skin local reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to the use of vaccine excipients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of skin testing excipients in delayed skin reactions due to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: Skin testing among a group of healthcare workers with skin reactions due to mRNA vaccines was performed. Patch testing and intradermal testing (IDT) with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-400, PEG-2000, trometamol, and 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine were performed. Healthcare workers without skin reactions to vaccines were used for skin testing as controls. Results: Thirty-one healthcare workers (from a total of 4315 vaccinated healthcare workers) experienced cutaneous adverse vaccine reactions. Skin testing was performed in sixteen of the healthcare workers (11 delayed large local reactions (DLLR) and 5 widespread reactions). Positive IDT for PEG-2000 1% in DLLR was seen in 10 (90.9%) patients, in comparison with one (16.6%) individual with a delayed widespread reaction. Delayed positive IDT reactions for PEG-2000 1% on day 2 were observed in three (27.3%) patients with DLLR. Patch testing of the excipients was negative. Among 10 controls, only one exhibited a transient positive IDT reaction to PEG-2000 1%. Conclusions: Immediate and delayed reactions to IDT are frequently detected in patients with DLLR. The observation of positive delayed intradermal reactions to PEG disclosed only in patients with DLLR reinforces a possible role of PEG in the development of these reactions. Skin testing of other excipients is of little importance in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Skin rash often occurs upon oral administration of amoxicillin in children, due to non-immediate hypersensitivity. However, information on delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin is scarce. Moreover, the appropriate diagnostic method and actual diagnostic rate of delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin among Japanese children are unclear. We conducted intradermal tests (IDTs) and drug provocation tests (DPTs) and retrospectively investigated the proportion of children with a definitive diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. We then evaluated the characteristics of patients with a positive allergic workup. Methods: We enrolled children referred for suspected findings of mild or moderate non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin between August 2018 and March 2020. If the IDT in the delayed phase was negative, DPT with amoxicillin (60–90 mg/kg/day) was performed for 7 days. Non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin was defined when IDT or DPT was positive. We evaluated the potential of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) to reveal hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. Results: This study enrolled 27 children. Fourteen children (52%) had hypersensitivity to amoxicillin, of whom 12 had positive IDTs and two had positive DPTs. No differences in age, sex, history of allergic disease, days from oral use to symptom onset, type of rash at symptom onset, generalized rash, and DLST results were observed between the hypersensitivity and non-hypersensitivity groups. Conclusions: Examination should be performed for children with mild or moderate reactions because positive cases have no significant features and half of the suspected cases are negative.

Background: Remimazolam besylate, a newly developed drug, is linked to various anaphylaxis cases. We present a case of remimazolam anaphylaxis confirmed using a provocation test. Case: A 51-year-old female patient was scheduled for humeral pinning. General anesthesia was induced using remimazolam, rocuronium, and remifentanil. After tracheal intubation, the patient experienced decreased blood pressure, increased heart rate, and a systemic rash. Epinephrine was administered repeatedly, and the patient’s vital signs stabilized. Acute phase tryptase levels were within normal limits. After four weeks, intradermal test results were negative. When remimazolam was administered intravenously for the provocation test, facial swelling, flushing, and coughing occurred, which improved with epinephrine. The culprit drug was identified as remimazolam using a provocation test. Conclusions: When anaphylaxis occurs during anesthesia induction, remimazolam should not be ruled out as the causative drug. If the skin test result for remimazolam is negative, a provocation test should be considered. The provocation test should be initiated cautiously at a low dose under careful patient monitoring.

Background: The development of vaccines against SARS‐CoV2 has been a key public health response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. However, since their introduction, there have been reports of anaphylactic reactions to vaccines in individuals with history of allergic reactions to other vaccines, excipients or to COVID vaccines. Aim: A dedicated adult COVID vaccine allergy clinic with a standardised allergy testing protocol was set up to investigate safety and suitability of available COVID vaccines in Australia. Methods: Patients referred to a state‐wide COVID‐19 vaccine allergy clinic between March and August 2021 with a history of allergy underwent skin‐prick testing and intradermal testing to both available vaccine formulations (BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1‐S), excipients (polyethylene glycol and polysorbate 80), excipient‐containing medications and controls. Basophil activation testing was conducted in few subjects with convincing history of immediate type reactions. Results: Fifty‐three patients underwent testing for possible excipient allergy (n = 19), previous non–COVID vaccine reaction (n = 13) or previous reaction to dose 1 of COVID‐19 vaccine (n = 21). Patients were predominantly female (n = 43, 81%), aged 18–83 (median 54) years. Forty‐four patients tested negative and 42 of these received at least their first dose of a COVID‐19 vaccine. Nine patients tested positive to excipients or excipient‐containing medication only (n = 3), or vaccines (n = 6). Five patients were positive to just BNT162b2, 3/5 have been vaccinated with ChAdOx1‐S. One who was skin test positive to both vaccines, but negative BAT to ChAdOx1‐S was successfully vaccinated with ChAdOx1‐S. Conclusion: Even in a high‐risk population, most patients can be vaccinated with available COVID‐19 vaccines. This paper reports local experiences using a combined allergy testing protocol with skin testing and BAT during the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Identification of culprit drug causing adverse cutaneous drug reactions may not be possible clinically due to the intake of more than one drug. Aim: To compare the sensitivity of skin tests with gold standard oral rechallenge test to detect adverse cutaneous drug reactions. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective interventional hospital-based study of patients with adverse cutaneous drug reactions attending the outpatient department of dermatology and venereology at a tertiary care center over a 12-month period. Skin prick tests, intradermal tests, and oral rechallenge tests were performed in these patients and their sensitivities were compared. The data of quantitative nature is presented in mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables are presented in number and percentage. The sensitivity of skin tests is compared with the gold standard oral rechallenge test. Results: A total of 49 patients with adverse cutaneous drug reactions were evaluated. Clinical spectrum of adverse cutaneous drug reactions ranged from mild to severe, with fixed drug eruption being the commonest (55.1%) followed by maculopapular exanthem (32.7%). The highest incidence was with fluoroquinolones (43.8%) followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Fluoroquinolones were the major cause of fixed drug eruption followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The sensitivity of skin prick test and intradermal tests were 49% and 73%, respectively and the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). The difference in sensitivity in skin prick test versus oral rechallenge test and intradermal test versus oral rechallenge test was also highly significant (P < 0.001). Limitations: Small sample size was a major limitation. Histopathological examinations and human leukocyte antigen associations could not be done. Conclusion: Predominant causative drugs were fluoroquinolones followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Sensitivities of skin prick test and intradermal test were quite good and these skin tests should be performed before oral rechallenge test in cases of adverse cutaneous drug reactions.

Hypersensitivity reactions to radiocontrast media seem to be rare in children. Furthermore, the use of radiocontrast media in children remains quite safe in terms of the severity of reactions. Since pediatric guidelines are lacking, the diagnostic workup employed in adults could be adapted to children, taking into account that results have not yet been validated in this age group. Specific protocols for risk stratification and management of severe reactions have been proposed so far. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug allergies, specifically antibiotic allergies, are frequently encountered in obstetrics and gynecology, with 10% of the US population reporting a penicillin allergy. This poses a particular challenge to the obstetrician-gynecologist, as beta-lactam antibiotics are indicated as first-line therapy for the treatment and prevention of most specialty-specific infections. Alternative antibiotic use in the setting of a reported allergy is not benign and has been associated with increased cesarean delivery, endometritis, wound complication, length of hospital stay in pregnant patients, Group B Streptococcus sepsis, neonatal length of stay, neonatal laboratory draw in neonates born to patients with allergies, and surgical site infection in gynecologic patients. Furthermore, alternative antibiotic use leads to increased antibiotic resistance, toxicity, and healthcare cost. In addition, the administration of antibiotics in a patient with a history of type I immediate hypersensitivity reaction poses a risk of anaphylaxis with repeat exposure. Fortunately, >90% of patients who report a penicillin allergy are not truly allergic and would tolerate penicillins if administered. This can be due to either mislabeling of the index reaction as an allergy (when it was due to a drug intolerance or a viral exanthem) or waning immunoglobulin E-mediated immunity over time. Given this, allergy evaluation is widely recommended, even in pregnancy. Allergy evaluation involves detailed patient history and allergy testing with skin testing and/or oral challenge, as appropriate. These tools have been found to be safe and effective in gravid and nongravid individuals and to result in increased use of first-line antibiotics when used appropriately. Furthermore, even in the setting of a true penicillin allergy, cross-reactivity with cephalosporins is extremely low and estimated at 2% to 3% among patients with a verified penicillin allergy and considerably lower than this among patients with an unverified penicillin allergy. Guidelines support the routine use of cephalosporins without testing or additional precautions in patients with an unverified nonanaphylactic penicillin allergy and the routine use of structurally dissimilar cephalosporins (specifically Ancef) even in patients with an anaphylactic penicillin allergy. In cases in which there is no appropriate alternative antibiotic than that for which the patient is allergic, such as syphilis in a pregnant patient with penicillin allergy, desensitization can be performed. This process involves temporary induction of drug tolerance through exposure to small amounts of the allergen until a therapeutic dose is achieved and has been safely performed in pregnancy. Desensitization requires expert supervision and is most often performed in the intensive care setting with a multidisciplinary team. The other 2 most common antibiotic allergies encountered in the field of obstetrics and gynecology are cephalosporin and metronidazole allergies. Cephalosporin allergies are managed similarly to penicillin allergies with readily available skin testing and oral challenge. Skin testing for metronidazole allergy lacks sensitivity and specificity, and thus, oral challenge or desensitization procedure is the preferred approach for low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. When it comes to drug allergies, specifically antibiotic allergies, the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist is to identify patients with reported allergies and to refer patients to a specialist for further evaluation as soon as possible. Allergy evaluation using a detailed patient history and allergy testing (skin testing and/or oral challenge) when indicated has been shown to be safe and effective and is an important part of antibiotic stewardship., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clarithromycin hypersensitivity is reported as the most common cause of non‐β‐lactam antibiotic allergy in children. Clarithromycin is frequently prescribed in cases of suspected β‐lactam hypersensitivity. Oral provocation tests stand as the gold standard to confirm drug hypersensitivity as diagnostic value of skin tests is variable. We analyzed the frequency of true clarithromycin hypersensitivity ratio and its relationship with β‐lactam allergy among children with suspected clarithromycin hypersensitivity and evaluated the diagnostic value of skin tests. Methods: The study included 160 children referred with suspected clarithromycin hypersensitivity. Clinical history and allergy workups including skin tests or/and oral provocation tests were retrieved from medical records. Results: Oral provocation test confirmed clarithromycin hypersensitivity rate was 5.6% (n = 9/160). Skin tests with clarithromycin showed positivity in 32.6% (n = 29/89) of the tested patients. The sensitivity of clarithromycin skin tests was negligible, and specificity was 73.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.7–81.8). Eighty‐eight of the patients (55%) reported that they had previously tolerated a β‐lactam antibiotic. β‐lactam hypersensitivity was suspected in 40% (n = 64/160) of the patients (simultaneous [n = 10], sequential [n = 19], distant form [n = 35]) in relation with clarithromycin usage. β‐lactam hypersensitivity (95% CI, 2.1–70.6, p =.005) and sequential usage of clarithromycin after the development of a rash with amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid (95% CI, 2.0–96.4, p =.007) were found as risk factors for confirmed clarithromycin hypersensitivity. Conclusion: The frequency of confirmed clarithromycin hypersensitivity was found low among suspected patients. Oral provocation test is crucial for definite diagnosis. Confirmed β‐lactam allergy may be attributed as a risk factor for clarithromycin hypersensitivity, particularly clarithromycin treatment after a developing rash with amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid in sequential usage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Skin local reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to the use of vaccine excipients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of skin testing excipients in delayed skin reactions due to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: Skin testing among a group of healthcare workers with skin reactions due to mRNA vaccines was performed. Patch testing and intradermal testing (IDT) with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-400, PEG-2000, trometamol, and 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine were performed. Healthcare workers without skin reactions to vaccines were used for skin testing as controls. Results: Thirty-one healthcare workers (from a total of 4315 vaccinated healthcare workers) experienced cutaneous adverse vaccine reactions. Skin testing was performed in sixteen of the healthcare workers (11 delayed large local reactions (DLLR) and 5 widespread reactions). Positive IDT for PEG-2000 1% in DLLR was seen in 10 (90.9%) patients, in comparison with one (16.6%) individual with a delayed widespread reaction. Delayed positive IDT reactions for PEG-2000 1% on day 2 were observed in three (27.3%) patients with DLLR. Patch testing of the excipients was negative. Among 10 controls, only one exhibited a transient positive IDT reaction to PEG-2000 1%. Conclusions: Immediate and delayed reactions to IDT are frequently detected in patients with DLLR. The observation of positive delayed intradermal reactions to PEG disclosed only in patients with DLLR reinforces a possible role of PEG in the development of these reactions. Skin testing of other excipients is of little importance in clinical practice.

Évaluer une prise en charge simplifiée d'une suspicion d'allergie aux bêtalactamines prises par voie orale chez l'enfant. Nous avons réalisé une étude rétrospective basée sur des données collectées prospectivement entre février 2016 et mars 2019. Tous les patients ont bénéficié d'un prick-test et d'un dosage des IgE spécifiques. Un test de provocation orale (TPO) d'une durée de 3 jours a ensuite été réalisé chez les enfants rapportant des réactions bénignes et/ou non immédiates. Les intradermoréactions (IDR) n'ont été réalisées que lorsque la réaction était sévère ou après un TPO positif. Les patients considérés comme non allergiques ont été contactés un an plus tard pour déterminer s'ils avaient repris et toléré l'antibiotique depuis le bilan. Cent vingt cinq patients de moins de 17 ans ont été inclus dans l'étude, et un TPO a été réalisé chez 124 patients. Le prick-test n'a été positif que chez un seul patient qui rapportait une réaction anaphylactique de grade 2 et tous les dosages d'IgE sériques spécifiques se sont révélés négatifs. Des IDR ont été effectuées chez 7 patients, dont seulement 2 ont réagi. Le TPO a été positif pendant ou dans les heures suivant le TPO chez 2 patients. Cent dix-sept patients considérés comme non allergiques ont été contactés 1 an plus tard, dont 56 avaient repris l'antibiotique, et dont 4 rapportaient une récidive d'éruption. Sur ces 4 patients, 3 ont repris le même antibiotique par la suite et l'ont bien toléré. De nombreux enfants présentent une suspicion d'allergie aux bêtalactamines. Cependant, cette allergie est très souvent réfutée après un TPO. Les IDR ne devraient être réalisées que dans certaines situations à risque élevé. To evaluate a simplified management for suspected allergy to oral beta-lactams in children. We carried out a retrospective study based on data collected prospectively from February 2016 to March 2019. Prick-tests and specific IgE determinations were performed in all children. Subsequently, a 3-day oral challenge test (OCT) was performed in children reporting benign and/or delayed reactions. Intradermal tests (IDT) were performed only when the reaction was severe or after a positive OCT. Subsequently, the patient was recalled one year later to determine if he had taken again and tolerated the drug since the work-up. One hundred and twenty five patients younger than 17 years were included in the study, 124 of whom completed an OCT. The prick-test was positive in one child only with a grade 2 anaphylactic reaction and the specific IgE determinations were all negative. IDT were performed in 7 children, but were positive in only 2 patients. OCT was positive during or within a few hours of the test in only 2 patients. One hundred and seventeen patients diagnosed non allergic to beta-lactams were recalled 1 year later. Fifty-six had taken again the antibiotic, 4 of whom reported a relapse of eruption. However, 3 of these 4 patients tolerated a subsequent treatment with the suspected beta-lactam. Beta-lactam allergy is suspected in numerous children. However, this allergy is rarely confirmed after OCT. IDT should be performed only in some cases with higher risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AX-CL) is the most consumed ß-lactam antibiotic worldwide. We aimed to establish the different phenotypes of ß-lactam allergy in patients reporting a reaction to AX-CL and to investigate the differences between immediate and nonimmediate onset., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study at Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Madrid and Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (HRUM), Málaga, Spain. We included patients reporting reactions with AX-CL who underwent the allergy workup between 2017 and 2019. Data on the reported reaction and allergy work-up were collected. Reactions were classified as immediate and nonimmediate with a 1-hour cut-off., Results: The study population comprised 372 patients (HCSC 208, HRUM 164). There were 90 immediate reactions (24.2%), 252 nonimmediate reactions (67.7%), and 30 reactions with unknown latency (8.1%). Allergy to ß-lactams was ruled out in 266 patients (71.5%) and confirmed in 106 patients (28.5%). The final main diagnosis in the overall population was allergy to aminopenicillins (7.3%), to CL (7%), to penicillin (6.5%), and to ß-lactams (5.9%). Allergy was confirmed in 77.2% and 14.3% of immediate and nonimmediate reactions, respectively, with a relative risk of 5.06 (95%CI, 3.64-7.02) for an allergy diagnosis in those reporting immediate reactions. Only 2/54 patients with a late-positive intradermal test (IDT) result for CL were diagnosed with CL allergy., Conclusion: Allergy was diagnosed in a minority of the study population. However, given that it was diagnosed 5 times more frequently in patients reporting immediate reactions, this classification proved useful for risk stratification. Late-positive IDT results for CL have no diagnostic value. Therefore, the late IDT reading for CL could be removed from the diagnostic work-up.

Background: Intradermal tests (IDTs) are performed and interpreted differently in drug allergy centers making valid comparison of results difficult.Objective: To reduce method-related and intercenter variability of IDTs by the introduction of a standardized method.Materials and methods: In 11 centers of the European Network for Drug Allergy, IDTs were prospectively performed with saline and with amoxicillin (20 mg/ml) using (1) the local method and (2) the standardized European Network in Drug Allergy (ENDA) method (0.02 ml). The diameters of the initial injection wheal (Wi) for the different volumes and sites injected obtained from each center were analyzed.Results: The most reproducible method was to fill a syringe with test solution, then expel the excess fluid to obtain exactly 0.02 ml. The median Wi diameter with 0.02 ml injection using the standardized method was 5 mm [range 2–10 mm; interquartile range (IQR) 5–5 mm; n = 1,096] for saline and 5 mm (range 2–9 mm; IQR = 4.5–5 mm; n = 240) for amoxicillin. IDT injection sites did not affect the Wi diameter. Training improved precision and reduced the variability of Wi diameters.Conclusion: Using the standardized IDT method described in this multicenter study helped to reduce variability, enabling more reliable comparison of results between individuals and centers.

Hypersensitivity reactions to radiocontrast media seem to be rare in children. Furthermore, the use of radiocontrast media in children remains quite safe in terms of the severity of reactions. Since pediatric guidelines are lacking, the diagnostic workup employed in adults could be adapted to children, taking into account that results have not yet been validated in this age group. Specific protocols for risk stratification and management of severe reactions have been proposed so far.

Background Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are a leading cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. However, the performance of systematic screening skin tests to detect reactions for NMBAs prior to general anesthesia is not recommended. We retrospectively examined intradermal tests (IDTs) for rocuronium and cisatracurium in patients with a history of allergy. Methods We reviewed the records of patients who underwent IDTs for NMBAs between January 1 and December 31, 2016. We analyzed the patients’ allergy histories and skin test results for NMBAs. Results The overall prevalence of positive IDTs was 5.8% (26/451), and there was no significant difference in prevalence among allergy types (P = 0.655). In logistic regression analysis, there was no allergy history that had a significant effect on positive IDT for NMBAs. Conclusions We found no association between allergy history and positive skin test for NMBAs. Therefore, a systematic screening test for NMBAs or other anesthetic agents before anesthesia is not considered necessary even in patients with an allergy history.

Case report, drug hypersensitivity, injection site reaction, intradermal test, nonimmediate, fremanezumab 6 Szkutnik-Fiedler D. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug-drug interactions of new anti-migraine drugs-lasmiditan, gepants, and calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibodies. Keywords: case report; drug hypersensitivity; fremanezumab; injection site reaction; intradermal test; nonimmediate EN case report drug hypersensitivity fremanezumab injection site reaction intradermal test nonimmediate 308 310 3 03/16/22 20220401 NES 220401 CONTACT POINT Fremanezumab is a humanized anti-IgG2 a/kappa monoclonal antibody that inhibits the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), indicated for the prophylaxis of chronic migraine in adults.1-3 To date, hypersensitivity reactions confirmed with skin tests have not been reported.4 CASE REPORT A 52-year-old female with a 20-year history of chronic refractory migraines started a treatment with subcutaneous fremanezumab injections (AJOVY, TEVA GmbH, Ulm Germany) initiated at a dose of 225 mg every 4 weeks. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Identification of culprit drug causing adverse cutaneous drug reactions may not be possible clinically due to the intake of more than one drug. Aim: To compare the sensitivity of skin tests with gold standard oral rechallenge test to detect adverse cutaneous drug reactions. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective interventional hospital-based study of patients with adverse cutaneous drug reactions attending the outpatient department of dermatology and venereology at a tertiary care center over a 12-month period. Skin prick tests, intradermal tests, and oral rechallenge tests were performed in these patients and their sensitivities were compared. The data of quantitative nature is presented in mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables are presented in number and percentage. The sensitivity of skin tests is compared with the gold standard oral rechallenge test. Results: A total of 49 patients with adverse cutaneous drug reactions were evaluated. Clinical spectrum of adverse cutaneous drug reactions ranged from mild to severe, with fixed drug eruption being the commonest (55.1%) followed by maculopapular exanthem (32.7%). The highest incidence was with fluoroquinolones (43.8%) followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Fluoroquinolones were the major cause of fixed drug eruption followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The sensitivity of skin prick test and intradermal tests were 49% and 73%, respectively and the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). The difference in sensitivity in skin prick test versus oral rechallenge test and intradermal test versus oral rechallenge test was also highly significant (P < 0.001). Limitations: Small sample size was a major limitation. Histopathological examinations and human leukocyte antigen associations could not be done. Conclusion: Predominant causative drugs were fluoroquinolones followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Sensitivities of skin prick test and intradermal test were quite good and these skin tests should be performed before oral rechallenge test in cases of adverse cutaneous drug reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autoerythrocyte sensitization syndrome (Gardner Diamond syndrome or GDS) is a rare syndrome characterized by painful and spontaneous purpura commonly affecting adult women, and is mostly associated with psychiatric illness. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical presentation, exclusion of other simulating diseases, and psychiatric evaluation. Only few cases have been reported till date. We report five cases of spontaneous purpura with a normal investigation profile, except for iron deficiency anemia in 1 patient, of which three had associated underlying psychiatric illness. Autoerythrocyte sensitization test was positive in all our cases. Patients presenting with painful bruises without significant medical history such as underlying bleeding disorder or drug history or history of trauma should be considered for autoerythrocyte sensitization syndrome, and managed accordingly. The present study is a case series of patients with characteristic features of autoerythrocyte sensitization syndrome, considering the rarity of the reports on its clinical spectra.

Different types of skin testing with a suspected drug have been reported to be helpful in determining the cause of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). It is of utmost importance for practicing dermatologists to have a first hand knowledge of different types of skin tests available in a case of CADR. In each suspected case, a detailed investigation with the suspected agent and correlation of the positive skin reaction with clinical variant of CADR is advocated. Drug skin tests are performed 6 weeks to 6 months after complete healing of the CADR. Drug patch tests are performed similar to the methods used in patch testing in studying contact dermatitis. The commercialized form of the drug used by the patient is tested at 30% dilution. The pure drug is tested at 10% dilution. In severe CADR, drug patch tests should be performed at lower concentrations. It is also of value to test on the most affected site of the initial CADR.

Objective: Identification of allergens by intradermal test in patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. Materials and Methods: Intradermal test was performed in 100 patients of Ambala over an 8-year period to identify the common allergens. A total of 197 allergens including 50 types of pollen, 19 fungi, 17 insects, 14 types of dust, 6 animal dander, 7 types of fabric and feather and 82 types of foods, dust mite, and parthenium were tested. Results: In this study, the major allergens were pollen (51%) followed by foods (28.9%), insects (26.9%), fungus (12.6%), dusts (6.7%). Among pollen allergens, Brassica campestris (8%) was a major allergen followed by Ageratum conyzoides (7%) and Artemisia scoparia (6%) Cannabis sativa, Cynodon dactylon and Maerua arenaria (5%). Among the fungal group, Alternaria tenuis, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigates, Candida albicans, Penicillium sp., Rhizopus nigricans (3%), Fusarium solani (2%) were found. In the insect group, mosquito (7%), ant (6%), grasshopper (5%), locust (male), moth, and house fly (4%) were the major allergens. Among the dust allergens, grain dust rice (3%), straw dust, house dust, and grain dust bajra (2%) were found. Among the food allergens, prawn (5%), almonds, Baker's yeast, Bengal gram (3%) and mushroom, mango ripe, rajma, cinnamon, chocolate, beans fresh, and areca nut (2%) were found. Conclusion: It can be said that the knowledge may help to create a mapping of allergens in this area and help to treat patients by immunotherapy or avoidance strategy.

Keywords: delayed hypersensitivity; intradermal test; Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; sweet syndrome EN delayed hypersensitivity intradermal test Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine SARS-CoV-2 sweet syndrome 3194 3196 3 10/04/21 20211001 NES 211001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors acknowledge the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) which provided some data presented in the present study. IDT with PEG alone could not be performed because it was not a sterile compound so prick tests were undertaken with PEG 3350 and the SARS-CoV-2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Sweet syndrome induced by SARS-CoV-2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. [Extracted from the article]

Abstract New techniques in equine veterinary allergy testing include multiple allergen simultaneous tests (MASTs) that cover insect bite hypersensitivity (IBH), respiratory and atopic allergic diseases. The in vivo intradermal test (IDT) method is one of the most widely used techniques in veterinary practice, but recently, in vitro methods have been introduced as possible alternatives. This study was designed to assess the correlation between IDTs and MASTs based on IgE determination in serum. The study was performed on Malopolski breed horses with IBH (n = 26). IDTs were performed, and allergen-specific IgE serum concentrations were measured using a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody during the years 2008–2016. An allergen panel containing Tabanus spp., Culicoides nubeculosus , mosquito (Culex spp.), Simulium equinum , and Stomoxys calcitrans was used. This study shows good agreement and correlation (correlation coefficient rho, 0.413–0.589) between the two tests for four (Tabanus spp, Culicoides nubeculosus , Culex spp., Simulium equinum) of the five tested allergens in horses with IBH. The overall sensitivity (Se) of the allergen-specific IgE insect horse panel was 72.6% (range, 30.8%–91.3%), the specificity (Sp) was 63.6% (range, 50%–70.1%), and the accuracy (Acc) was 73.3% (range, 48%–88.5%) compared with IDTs. This study found good agreement and correlation between IDTs and serological MASTs based on monoclonal antibodies for most of the determined allergens for horses with IBH. Highlights • New serological techniques in equine veterinary allergy testing and in vivo intradermal test in horses with insect bite hypersensitivity were compared. • Immunoenzymatic multiple allergen simultaneous test shows good correlation with intradermal test for Tabanus spp, Culicoides nubeculosus , Culex spp., and Simulium equinum. • Multiple allergen simultaneous test has a moderate accuracy, high sensitivity, and moderate specificity for diagnosing insect sensitization in horses. • Multiple simultaneous allergen test can be used in the causative diagnosis of insect allergy to select the relevant allergens for specific immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many women experience some skin reaction or trouble in their monthly menstrual cycle, including the exacerbation of pre‐existing diseases and skin eruptions directly associated with sex hormones. We herein report a Japanese woman who experienced repeated systemic urticaria in her premenstrual period, and was diagnosed as having estrogen dermatitis based on a positive result of intradermal estrogen skin test. Of note, the expression of estrogen receptor‐β was increased in small dermal vessels of this case as well as in those of patients with other inflammatory skin diseases. These results suggest that inflammation may induce estrogen receptor‐β expression in small dermal vessels, which potentially modifies the pathological skin inflammation during the menstrual period, leading to the development of estrogen dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Skin tests in urticaria/angioedema and flushing to Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: Limits of intradermal testing The Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna vaccines contain messenger RNA (mRNA) encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, which encodes the SARS-CoV-2 viral spike (S) protein, inducing both antibody and cell-mediated responses. Keywords: adverse drug reaction; intradermal test; SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; skin test EN adverse drug reaction intradermal test SARS-CoV-2 vaccine skin test 2605 2607 3 07/19/21 20210801 NES 210801 To the Editor, Vaccination seems the most effective public health tools to contrast the spreading of Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: AGEP; case report; cross-allergy; heparins; intradermal test EN AGEP case report cross-allergy heparins intradermal test 280 282 3 03/22/21 20210401 NES 210401 Delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reactions to heparins are frequent (7.5% of patients treated), occurring mainly as eczematous lesions at injection sites and, very rarely, as severe cutaneous adverse reactions.1 We report two cases of enoxaparin-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and discuss cross-reactivity between heparins. AGEP, case report, cross-allergy, heparins, intradermal test Patient 1 reported a similar previous diffuse desquamative rash occurring 13 years earlier after surgery, in which heparin administration was probable, and patient 2, a rash occurring 3 years earlier, when enoxaparin was among the culprit drugs, but had not been tested at the time. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: Identification of allergens by intradermal test in patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. Materials and Methods: Intradermal test was performed in 100 patients of Ambala over an 8-year period to identify the common allergens. A total of 197 allergens including 50 types of pollen, 19 fungi, 17 insects, 14 types of dust, 6 animal dander, 7 types of fabric and feather and 82 types of foods, dust mite, and parthenium were tested. Results: In this study, the major allergens were pollen (51%) followed by foods (28.9%), insects (26.9%), fungus (12.6%), dusts (6.7%). Among pollen allergens, Brassica campestris (8%) was a major allergen followed by Ageratum conyzoides (7%) and Artemisia scoparia (6%) Cannabis sativa, Cynodon dactylon and Maerua arenaria (5%). Among the fungal group, Alternaria tenuis, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigates, Candida albicans, Penicillium sp., Rhizopus nigricans (3%), Fusarium solani (2%) were found. In the insect group, mosquito (7%), ant (6%), grasshopper (5%), locust (male), moth, and house fly (4%) were the major allergens. Among the dust allergens, grain dust rice (3%), straw dust, house dust, and grain dust bajra (2%) were found. Among the food allergens, prawn (5%), almonds, Baker's yeast, Bengal gram (3%) and mushroom, mango ripe, rajma, cinnamon, chocolate, beans fresh, and areca nut (2%) were found. Conclusion: It can be said that the knowledge may help to create a mapping of allergens in this area and help to treat patients by immunotherapy or avoidance strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]