Search

Background: Patient-centered outcome measures should be evaluated postoperatively as the recovery after surgery varies between patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and trajectory of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients who underwent elective cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries. The primary outcome was the QoR-15, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.8, assessed on postoperative days (POD) 2, 4, and 7. The final analysis included patients with at least one valid outcome. Feasibility and reliability were assessed by the successful completion rate on each POD and using Cronbach’s alpha of the QoR-15 on POD 4. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the trajectory of the postoperative QoR-15 scores. Results: Of the 36 eligible patients, 30 with a mean age of 70 years were included in the final analysis. The successful completion rates on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 72.7%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively. The mean QoR-15 scores on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 89.9, 98.0, and 108.3, respectively. The QoR-15 scores on POD 2 and 4 were not statistically different (P = 0.06) but were clinically significant. The QoR-15 score on POD 7 was statically (P < 0.001) and clinically higher than the QoR-15 score on POD 2. Cronbach’s alpha for the QoR-15 score measured on POD 4 was 0.85. Conclusion: The QoR-15 is a feasible and valid measurement after elective cardiothoracic surgery, which increases significantly over time after surgery.

Recent reports document a high rate of readmission after hospitalization for acute aortic syndromes (AAS) that include acute aortic dissections, intramural hematomas, or penetrating aortic ulcers. We examined the rate of return to the emergency department (ED) to better understand the utilization of emergent health care services after AAS. Consecutive patients with AAS admitted to the vascular surgery service from 2004 to 2020 were included. Patients with type A dissections, arch involvement, or chronic aortic pathology were excluded. The primary outcome was ED visits within 90 days of the original hospitalization. The study included 79 subjects (62% men, 38% women; mean age: 64 ± 14 years) with AAS (82% aortic dissections, 11% intramural hematomas, and 6% penetrating aortic ulcers). A total of 54 ED visits related to the AAS occurred within 90 days of the original discharge, each of which incurred a computed tomography angiogram. Twenty-eight (35%) subjects had a mean of 2 ± 2 ED visits, whereas 51 (65%) subjects had no ED visits. Ninety percent (25 of 28) of the first ED visits occurred within 1 month of discharge and 53% (15 of 28) within 1 week. A total of 17 (61%) subjects were readmitted to the hospital from the ED. Four subjects were found to have progression of AAS on imaging studies and underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair during readmission. Comparing subjects who returned to the ED with those who did not, there were no significant differences in demographics, atherosclerotic risk factors except coronary artery disease, type of AAS, number of antihypertensive medications at admission or discharge, operative intervention, length of initial hospital stay, or discharge status. The chief complaints at the first ED visit were pain (n = 17), uncontrolled hypertension (n = 5), syncope (n = 3), and other (n = 3). These data show that one in three patients with AAS returned to the ED within 90 days of initial discharge. Although returning subjects had a higher number of readmissions, few had progression of AAS that required intervention. Because the vast majority were readmitted for medical therapy, early and frequent clinic follow-up may help decrease ED visits and readmissions after AAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesIndication for Reduction of Ascending Aortoplasty (RAA) and long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study analyzed the outcomes after nonreinforced RAA in two Austrian centers.MethodsPatients with RAA at two Austrian centers between 6/2,009 and 6/2,017 were retrospectively analyzed. Aortic diameters were measured by CT pre- and post-operatively. Patients were assigned according to valve morphology and imaging modality.ResultsOverall, 253 patients underwent RAA [women: 30.8%; median age 74 (63–79) years] with a mean preoperative ascending diameter of 44.7 (±3.5) mm. RAA-related postoperative adverse events occurred in 1.2% (n = 3) over a follow-up of a median of 3.8 (2.4–5.5) years: One type A aortic dissection, one lethal aortic rupture at the suture line, and one suture line bleeding with cardiac tamponade and need of surgical revision. The overall survival rate was 89.7%. Aortic valve morphology itself was no risk factor for mortality (Log-Rank: 0.942). One hundred and forty patients had a tricuspid [TAV: (55.3%)] aortic valve and 113 patients had a bicuspid aortic valve [BAV: (44.7%)]. Redilatation to a diameter >50 mm according to CT follow-up occurred in 5.7% (n = 5 of 87). One patient needed reoperation with RAA and aortic valve replacement due to a prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement and aortic redilatation.ConclusionNon-reinforced RAA is a safe, feasible, and reproducible procedure with low rates of perioperative complications in selected patients primarily undergoing aortic valve repair with a dilated ascending aorta. Aortic valve morphology has no impact on mortality after RAA.

OBJECTIVES: In Brazil, descending thoracic aorta disease, including aneurysms and dissections, is managed preferentially by endovascular treatment, owing to its feasibility and good results. In this study, we analyzed endovascular treatment of isolated descending thoracic aortic disease cases in the Brazilian public health system over a 12-year period. METHODS: Public data from procedures performed from 2008 to 2019 were extracted using web scraping techniques to assess procedure type frequency (elective or urgency), mortality, and governmental costs. RESULTS: A total of 5,595 procedures were analyzed, the vast majority of which were urgent procedures (61.82% vs. 38.18%). In-hospital mortality was lower for elective than for urgent surgeries (4.96 vs.10.32% p=0.008). An average of R$16,845.86 and R$20,012.04 was paid per elective and emergency procedure, respectively, with no statistical difference (p=0.095). CONCLUSION: Elective procedures were associated with lower mortality than urgent procedures. There was no statistically significant difference between elective and urgent procedures regarding costs.

Objective: To determine the phase that facilitates flap observation of the ascending aorta in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection with perfused false lumen. Methods: We reconstructed retrospective Electrocardiogram-gated Computed Tomography Angiography images of the ascending aorta of all 20 patients to 20 phases of curved-multiplanar reconstruction in 5% increment. One radiologist created and randomized 10 cross-sectional images of each phase for every patient and two radiologists scored these images on a 5-point scale depending on the degree of flap stoppage. We calculated the average score for each phase of each case and compared them among the three groups. Results: Image scores were significantly better in the 65 %–100 % R-R interval group than those in the 5%–30 % (p < 2e-16) and 35 %–60 % R-R interval groups(p = 7.2e-10). Similar scores were observed in the Heart Rate > 70 group (p = 0.00039, 2.2e-14). Moreover a similar tendency was observed in the arrhythmia group (p = 0.0035, 0.294). No difference was found in the degree of flap stoppage in the 65 %–100 % R-R interval group between the Heart Rate > 70 and Heart Rate ≤ 70 groups (p = 0.466) and between the arrhythmia and non-arrhythmia groups (p = 0.1240). Conclusion: In observing the ascending aorta, We obtained a good image at 65 %–100 % R-R interval and similar tendency was observed in the patients with arrhythmia.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the orientation of the heart, measured as an angle between the long axis of the heart and ascending aorta midline (heart-aorta-angle, HAA), associates with ascending aortic (AA) dilatation. Furthermore, the association between HAA and wall shear stress (WSS) was studied.Methods: HAA was retrospectively measured in 1000 consecutive coronary artery computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) images in patients with low-to-moderate pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD). To evaluate the effects of HAA on AA flow, 4D flow MRI was performed for 28 patients with AA dilatation (> 40 mm) and WSS was analyzed.Results: The mean age of patients undergoing CCTA was 52.9 ± 9.8 years; 66.5% were women. Their median HAA was 128.7° and interquartile range 123.3-134.1°. HAA was significantly smaller in patients with dilated AA (median 126.7° [121.3-130.8°]) compared with the patients with normal AA (median 129.5° [124.3-135.3°], p < 0.001). HAA was smaller in males (p < 0.001) and in patients with diabetes (p = 0.016), hypertension (p = 0.001), CAD (p = 0.003), hypercholesterolemia (p < 0.001), and bicuspid aortic valve (p = 0.025) than without these factors. In a subpopulation without any of these underlying diseases (n = 233), HAA was still significantly smaller in the patients with dilated AA (median 127.9° [124.3-134.3°]) compared with patients with normal AA (median 131.9° [127.6-136.9°], p = 0.013). In 4D flow MRI, a smaller HAA correlated with increased total WSS in the outer curvature of the proximal AA (r = - 0.510, p = 0.006).Conclusion: A smaller HAA associates with AA dilatation and affects the blood flow in the proximal AA.Key Points: • A smaller angle between the long axis of the heart and ascending aorta midline associated with ascending aortic dilatation. • A smaller heart-aorta-angle correlated with increased total wall shear stress in the outer curvature of the proximal ascending aorta. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJETIVO: Avaliar as complicações decorrentes do uso da aprotinina em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de aneurisma ou dissecção da aorta torácica, que utilizaram hipotermia profunda e parada circulatória. MÉTODO: Realizou-se uma revisão sistemática da literatura, com uma estratégia de busca de baixa especificidade, nas bases de dados da Medline® e LILACS®. Dois pesquisadores independentes realizaram a seleção de artigos, seguindo os critérios adotados para inclusão de estudos, agrupando-os em dois grupos, um em que foi empregada baixa dose de aprotinina e outro alta dose. Os resultados foram apresentados como risco relativo para as variáveis dicotômicas, e como diferença de média ponderada para as variáveis contínuas, ambos com 95% de intervalo de confiança. RESULTADOS: Sete artigos compuseram a revisão sistemática, selecionados a partir de 2044 estudos revisados. A metanálise do único ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado não evidenciou riscos no uso da aprotinina, e apresentou uma redução significativa no sangramento e requerimento de transfusão de sangue. A metanálise dos estudos que empregaram baixa dose de aprotinina foi similar. Por outro lado, a metanálise dos estudos que adotaram alta dose de aprotinina não apresentou significância estatística em nenhuma variável estudada. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar de os resultados não evidenciarem riscos efetivos do uso da aprotinina, o poder estatístico da metanálise é baixo. Portanto, novos ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados são requeridos, a fim de detectar possíveis malefícios do uso da aprotinina nesse tipo de operação.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate complications involved in the use of aprotinin in patients after thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection surgeries associated with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was carried out, with a search strategy of low specificity, in the Medline® and LILACS® databases. Two independent researchers carried out article selection following the criteria adopted for inclusion of studies, grouping them into two groups, one where low doses of aprotinin were employed and the other with high doses. The results are presented as relative risk for the dichotomy variable, and as weighted mean differences for continuous variables, both with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Seven articles were included in the systematic review selected from 2044 revised studies. Meta-analysis of the only randomized controlled trial did not demonstrate risks with the use of aprotinin, and presented a significant reduction in bleeding and blood transfusion requirements. Meta-analysis of the studies that used low doses of aprotinin was similar. On the other hand, meta-analysis of the studies that adopted high doses of aprotinin did not present statistical significance in any of the studied variables. CONCLUSION: Despite of the results not showing any effective risks with the use of aprotinin, the statistical power of the meta-analysis is low. Therefore, new randomized controlled trials are required, in order to detect possible complications in the use of aprotinin in this type of operation.

Objectives: Indication for Reduction of Ascending Aortoplasty (RAA) and long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study analyzed the outcomes after nonreinforced RAA in two Austrian centers., Methods: Patients with RAA at two Austrian centers between 6/2,009 and 6/2,017 were retrospectively analyzed. Aortic diameters were measured by CT pre- and post-operatively. Patients were assigned according to valve morphology and imaging modality., Results: Overall, 253 patients underwent RAA [women: 30.8%; median age 74 (63-79) years] with a mean preoperative ascending diameter of 44.7 (±3.5) mm. RAA-related postoperative adverse events occurred in 1.2% ( n = 3) over a follow-up of a median of 3.8 (2.4-5.5) years: One type A aortic dissection, one lethal aortic rupture at the suture line, and one suture line bleeding with cardiac tamponade and need of surgical revision. The overall survival rate was 89.7%. Aortic valve morphology itself was no risk factor for mortality (Log-Rank: 0.942). One hundred and forty patients had a tricuspid [TAV: (55.3%)] aortic valve and 113 patients had a bicuspid aortic valve [BAV: (44.7%)]. Redilatation to a diameter >50 mm according to CT follow-up occurred in 5.7% ( n = 5 of 87). One patient needed reoperation with RAA and aortic valve replacement due to a prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement and aortic redilatation., Conclusion: Non-reinforced RAA is a safe, feasible, and reproducible procedure with low rates of perioperative complications in selected patients primarily undergoing aortic valve repair with a dilated ascending aorta. Aortic valve morphology has no impact on mortality after RAA., (Copyright © 2022 Szalkiewicz, Gökler, Dietl, Ehrlich, Holzinger, Laufer and Wiedemann.)

Objective: To determine the phase that facilitates flap observation of the ascending aorta in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection with perfused false lumen., Methods: We reconstructed retrospective Electrocardiogram-gated Computed Tomography Angiography images of the ascending aorta of all 20 patients to 20 phases of curved-multiplanar reconstruction in 5% increment. One radiologist created and randomized 10 cross-sectional images of each phase for every patient and two radiologists scored these images on a 5-point scale depending on the degree of flap stoppage. We calculated the average score for each phase of each case and compared them among the three groups., Results: Image scores were significantly better in the 65 %-100 % R-R interval group than those in the 5%-30 % (p < 2e-16) and 35 %-60 % R-R interval groups(p = 7.2e-10). Similar scores were observed in the Heart Rate > 70 group (p = 0.00039, 2.2e-14). Moreover a similar tendency was observed in the arrhythmia group (p = 0.0035, 0.294). No difference was found in the degree of flap stoppage in the 65 %-100 % R-R interval group between the Heart Rate > 70 and Heart Rate ≤ 70 groups (p = 0.466) and between the arrhythmia and non-arrhythmia groups (p = 0.1240)., Conclusion: In observing the ascending aorta, We obtained a good image at 65 %-100 % R-R interval and similar tendency was observed in the patients with arrhythmia., Competing Interests: The authors reported no declarations of interest., (© 2020 The Authors.)

OBJECTIVES: The effect of performing aortic valve repair in combination with valve-sparing operation on the length of time for which patients are free from reoperation is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if the performance of aortic valve repair during valve-sparing operation modified the freedom from reoperation time. METHODS: From January 2003 to July 2014, 78 patients with a mean age of 49±15 years underwent valve-sparing operation. Sixty-eight percent of these patients were male. Twenty-two (28%) aortic valve repair procedures were performed in this patient population. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 77.3% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 58.6% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency (ns = not significant). Additionally, 13.6% of patients in the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV, while 14.2% of patients in the valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV (ns). RESULTS: The in-hospital and late mortality rates, for the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation and valve-sparing operation groups were similar, as they were 4.5% and 3.6%; and 0% and 1.8%, respectively. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients presented moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during late follow-up, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 14.2% of patients presented with moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during this period (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 5.3% of patients presented with functional class III/IV, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 4.2% of patients presented with functional class III/IV (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients required reoperation, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 3.6% of patients required reoperation over a mean follow-up period of 1621±1156 days (75 patients). CONCLUSION: Valve-sparing operation is a safe and long-lasting procedure and performance of aortic valve repair when necessary does not increase risk of reoperation on the aortic valve.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar e comparar a resposta tecidual de uma endoprótese biosintetica implantada na aorta torácica descendente e veia cava inferior de suínos. MÉTODO: Foi implantada uma endoprótese auto-expansível composta de aço inoxidável, revestida por veia jugular de bovino, processada pelo método L-hydro, com auxilio de uma bainha de liberação Taheri-Leonhardt (Flórida, EUA) na aorta torácica descendente, e a veia cava infra-renal de 10 suínos. Sessenta dias após, as endopróteses foram retiradas e analisadas sob o ponto de vista macro e microscópicos. Foram observados: perviedade, grau de incorporação a parede do vaso, tipo de reação inflamatória, e local de maior resposta, tanto em relação a camada do vaso quanto ao local de contato com o anel de aço RESULTADOS: Todas as endopróteses encontravam-se pérvias, e incorporadas à parede. No setor venoso, seis apresentaram traves fibrosas em sua luz, e quatro apresentaram fibrose perivascular. No setor arterial somente uma prótese apresentou discreta estenose, sem fibrose perivascular. A reação inflamatória crônica tipo corpo estranho ocorreu em 100% das peças, a camada média foi a mais acometida no setor venoso, enquanto a íntima foi mais constante na artéria, o grau de incorporação foi mais firme na veia em comparação a artéria. A reação tecidual mostrou maior tendência nas áreas em intimo contato com o anel de aço (intra-anelar), mais intensa na artéria do que na veia. CONCLUSÃO: A prótese apresentou baixa trombogenicidade em ambos os sistemas, houve maior reação tecidual e baixa biocompatibilidade no setor venoso.