Search

Background: The authors' objective was to provide a glossary of terminology related to the surgical treatment of invasive vulvar carcinoma. There is currently no consensus in the literature regarding the names of the surgical procedures used to treat this disease., Methods: A surgical glossary should be supported by clear definitions and acceptance of notions related to topographic anatomy that are specific to the surgical practice. A critical review of the classic, chiefly used Italian, French, German, and English textbooks of anatomy revealed some discrepancies and lack of uniformity in descriptions of vulvar and inguinal fascial structures and lymph nodes, which represent the principal landmarks of surgical treatment. In the proposed glossary, the descriptions of these anatomic landmarks integrate classic anatomic knowledge, data from recent gynecologic studies of inguinal anatomy, and the clinical experiences of the authors., Results: The glossary is composed of 16 surgical definitions, which are divided into 3 main sections of terminology describing the surgical treatment of the: 1) vulva, 2) inguinal lymph nodes, and 3) pelvic lymph nodes. The fundamental objective behind the glossary is to describe the area and the depth of the surgical procedure. Three determinants of the area (local, partial, and total) and three determinants of the depth of surgery (superficial, simple, and deep) were used to arrive at the fully articulated definitions in the glossary., Conclusions: The authors are aware that the proposed glossary should not be considered a definitive one; however, it could serve as a good basis for further debate. The terms employed in the glossary are accompanied by anatomic and descriptive references to help avoid confusion and promote better understanding among gynecologic oncologists who are involved in the treatment of vulvar carcinoma.

The authors reviewed 21 cases of "mild vulvar atypia" diagnosed from 1981 to 1990. The first 16 cases were diagnosed as hyperplastic dystrophy with mild atypia according to the 1976 ISSVD Classification of Vulvar Disease, while the last five cases were diagnosed as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (VIN I). The review of the specimens was made by the same pathologist who gave the initial diagnosis and by a dermatopathologist unaware of the initial diagnosis. Both reviewers used the 1986 and 1989 ISSVD terminologies. The presence of "mild atypia" was confirmed in only four of the 21 specimens, that is in 19% of the cases, and two of them were found in the context of patients suffering from a lichen planus. These findings show that the diagnosis of mild atypia in vulvar tissues is a challenge and that mild vulvar atypia cannot be automatically considered a VIN I.