Search

Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae, a common pathogen leading to pneumonia, is a cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients. Vaccination against this agent can be recommended for immunosuppressed patients, including those with chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome and renal transplant recipients; however, a diminished immune response and loss of protective antibodies have been observed.Patients and methods: In our prospective study, the efficacy and side effects of polyvalent pneumococcal vaccination were investigated in renal transplant recipients. A total of 21 patients (6 female, 15 male) with well-functioning renal allografts, who had transplant surgery at least 2 months before, were included in the study. The patients were stratified according to the immunosuppressive protocol and 8 received double, while 13 received triple, immunosuppresive agents. After obtaining basal serum samples, all cases were vaccinated with the 0.5 mL intramuscular administration of polyvalent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumo 23 Pasteur–Merieux, lot No: K 1131).Results: Following a mean of 6 wk in all patients and also a mean of 12 wk in 12 patients, serum samples were again obtained to measure pneumococcal antibodies. Antibody titers following 6 and 12 wk of vaccination were significantly higher, as compared with basal values in all patients, except one. These titers did not show any statistically significant difference between double and triple therapies. There was no significant difference between the 12th and 6th wk postvaccination antibody titers. No systemic or local adverse effects were observed.Conclusion: Pneumococcal vaccination is safe and effective in patients with well-functioning renal allografts, at least in the short term. This vaccination policy may be useful for preventing invasive pneumococcal disease in immunosuppressed patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Haemophilus influenzae infection is a mild and self-limited disease in the healthy population. However, it may show an aggressive course in the immunocompromised state which underlines the importance of vaccination against this agent. On the other hand, posttranplant immunosuppression may impair immune responses and thus the efficacy of the vaccination. Methods: Forty-three renal transplant recipients with well-functioning allografts were immunized with H. influenzae type b vaccine in order to investigate the immune response. The patients received a double or a triple immunosuppressive protocol. Seven healthy members of the dialysis unit served as controls. After obtaining basal serum samples, the patients and the control subjects were immunized with H. influenzae type b conjugate vaccine. After 6 and 12 weeks, serum samples obtained again to determine H. influenzae type b antibody titers. Results: The antibody titers 6 and 12 weeks after vaccination were significantly higher as compared with the basal values, similar to those of the control subjects. These titers did not show statistically significant differences between the double and triple immunosuppressive therapy groups. After 12 weeks of vaccination, the antibody titers did not show a statistically significant difference as compared with those obtained after 6 weeks. Conclusion: H. influenzae type b vaccination is safe and effective in patients with well-functioning renal allografts and should be recommended to renal transplant recipients who may have the risk of invasive disease on the basis of the immunosuppressive state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]