33 results on '"Worthy, Doug"'
Search Results
2. Author Correction: Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods
- Author
-
Liggio, John, Li, Shao-Meng, Staebler, Ralf M., Hayden, Katherine, Darlington, Andrea, Mittermeier, Richard L., O’Brien, Jason, McLaren, Robert, Wolde, Mengistu, Worthy, Doug, and Vogel, Felix
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions inventory for the Greater Toronto Area (FLAME-GTA)
- Author
-
Mostafavi Pak, Nasrin, Heerah, Sajjan, Zhang, Junhua, Chan, Elton, Worthy, Doug, Vogel, Felix, and Wunch, Debra
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Estimation of Canada's methane emissions: inverse modelling analysis using the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) measurement network.
- Author
-
Ishizawa, Misa, Chan, Douglas, Worthy, Doug, Chan, Elton, Vogel, Felix, Melton, Joe R., and Arora, Vivek K.
- Subjects
GLOBAL warming ,FOSSIL fuel industries ,NATURAL gas production ,CLIMATE change mitigation ,ATMOSPHERIC temperature - Abstract
Canada has major sources of atmospheric methane (CH4), with the world's second-largest boreal wetland and the world's fourth-largest natural gas production. However, Canada's CH4 emissions remain uncertain among estimates. Better quantification and characterization of Canada's CH4 emissions are critical for climate mitigation strategies. To improve our understanding of Canada's CH4 emissions, we performed an ensemble regional inversion for 2007–2017 constrained with the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) surface measurement network. The decadal CH4 estimates show no significant trend, unlike some studies that reported long-term trends. The total CH4 estimate is 17.4 (15.3–19.5) TgCH4yr-1 , partitioned into natural and anthropogenic sources at 10.8 (7.5–13.2) and 6.6 (6.2–7.8) TgCH4yr-1 , respectively. The estimated anthropogenic emission is higher than inventories, mainly in western Canada (with the fossil fuel industry). Furthermore, the results reveal notable spatiotemporal characteristics. First, the modelled differences in atmospheric CH4 among the sites show improvement after inversion when compared to observations, implying the CH4 observation differences could help in verifying the inversion results. Second, the seasonal variations show slow onset and a late-summer maximum, indicating wetland CH4 flux has hysteretic dependence on air temperature. Third, the boreal winter natural CH4 emissions, usually treated as negligible, appear quantifiable (≥ 20 % of annual emissions). Understanding winter emission is important for climate prediction, as the winter in Canada is warming faster than the summer. Fourth, the inter-annual variability in estimated CH4 emissions is positively correlated with summer air temperature anomalies. This could enhance Canada's natural CH4 emission in the warming climate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric mercury concentrations
- Author
-
Jiskra, Martin, Sonke, Jeroen E., Obrist, Daniel, Bieser, Johannes, Ebinghaus, Ralf, Myhre, Cathrine Lund, Pfaffhuber, Katrine Aspmo, Wängberg, Ingvar, Kyllönen, Katriina, Worthy, Doug, Martin, Lynwill G., Labuschagne, Casper, Mkololo, Thumeka, Ramonet, Michel, Magand, Olivier, and Dommergue, Aurélien
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods
- Author
-
Liggio, John, Li, Shao-Meng, Staebler, Ralf M., Hayden, Katherine, Darlington, Andrea, Mittermeier, Richard L., O’Brien, Jason, McLaren, Robert, Wolde, Mengistu, Worthy, Doug, and Vogel, Felix
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Estimation of Canada's methane emissions: inverse modelling analysis using the ECCC measurement network.
- Author
-
Ishizawa, Misa, Chan, Douglas, Worthy, Doug, Chan, Elton, Vogel, Felix, Melton, Joe R., and Arora, Vivek K.
- Abstract
Canada has major sources of atmospheric methane (CH
4 ), with the world second-largest boreal wetland and the world fourth-largest natural gas production. However, Canada's CH4 emissions remain uncertain among estimates. Better quantification and characterization of Canada's CH4 emissions are critical for climate mitigation strategies. To improve our understanding of Canada's CH4 emissions, we performed an ensemble regional inversion (2007-2017) constrained with the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) surface measurement network. The decadal CH4 estimates show no significant trend, unlike some studies that reported long-term trends. The total CH4 estimate is 17.4 (15.3-19.5) Tg CH4 year-1, partitioned into natural and anthropogenic sources, 10.8 (7.5-13.2) and 6.6 (6.2-7.8) Tg CH4 year-1, respectively. The estimated anthropogenic emission is higher than inventories, mainly in western Canada (with the fossil fuel industry). Furthermore, the results reveal notable spatiotemporal characteristics. First, the modelled gradients of atmospheric CH4 show improvement after inversion when compared to observations, implying the CH4 gradients could help verify the inversion results. Second, the seasonal variations show slow onset and late summer maximum, indicating wetland CH4 flux has hysteretic dependence on air temperature. Third, the boreal winter natural CH4 emissions, usually treated as negligible, appear quantifiable (≥ 20 % of annual emissions). Understanding winter emission is important for climate prediction, as the winter in Canada is warming faster than the summer. Fourth, the inter-annual variability in estimated CH4 emissions is positively correlated with summer air temperature anomalies. This could enhance Canada's natural CH4 emission in the warming climate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Variability and Quasi-Decadal Changes in the Methane Budget over the Period 2000-2012
- Author
-
Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Ben, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell, Josep G, Dlugokencky, Edward J, Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello, Francesco N, Castaldi, Simona, Jackson, Robert B, Alexe, Mihai, Arora, Vivek K, Beerling, David J, Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake, Donald R, Brailsford, Gordon, Bruhwiler, Lori, Crevoisier, Cyril, Crill, Patrick, Covey, Kristofer, Frankenberg, Christian, Gedney, Nicola, Höglund-Isaksson, Lena, Ishizawa, Misa, Ito, Akihiko, Joos, Fortunat, Kim, Heon-Sook, Kleinen, Thomas, Krummel, Paul, Lamarque, Jean-François, Langenfelds, Ray, Locatelli, Robin, Machida, Toshinobu, Maksyutov, Shamil, Melton, Joe R, Morino, Isamu, Naik, Vaishali, O’Doherty, Simon, Parmentier, Frans-JanW, Patra, Prabir K, Peng, Changhui, Peng, Shushi, Peters, Glen P, Pison, Isabelle, Prinn, Ronald, Ramonet, Michel, Riley, William J, Saito, Makoto, Santini, Monia, Schroeder, Ronny, Simpson, Isobel J, Spahni, Renato, Takizawa, Atsushi, Thornton, Brett F, Tian, Hanqin, Tohjima, Yasunori, Viovy, Nicolas, Voulgarakis, Apostolos, Weiss, Ray, Wilton, David J, Wiltshire, Andy, Worthy, Doug, Wunch, Debra, Xu, Xiyan, Yoshida, Yukio, Zhang, Bowen, Zhang, Zhen, and Zhu, and Qiuan
- Subjects
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
Following the recent Global Carbon Project (GCP) synthesis of the decadal methane (CH4) budget over 2000- 2012, we analyse here the same dataset with a focus on quasi-decadal and inter-annual variability in CH4 emissions. The GCP dataset integrates results from top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry), inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven approaches. The annual global methane emissions from top-down studies, which by construction match the observed methane growth rate within their uncertainties, all show an increase in total methane emissions over the period 2000-2012, but this increase is not linear over the 13 years. Despite differences between individual studies, the mean emission anomaly of the top-down ensemble shows no significant trend in total methane emissions over the period 2000-2006, during the plateau of atmospheric methane mole fractions, and also over the period 2008-2012, during the renewed atmospheric methane increase. However, the top-down ensemble mean produces an emission shift between 2006 and 2008, leading to 22 [16-32] Tg CH4 yr(exp -1) higher methane emissions over the period 2008-2012 compared to 2002-2006. This emission increase mostly originated from the tropics, with a smaller contribution from mid-latitudes and no significant change from boreal regions. The regional contributions remain uncertain in top-down studies. Tropical South America and South and East Asia seem to contribute the most to the emission increase in the tropics. However, these two regions have only limited atmospheric measurements and remain therefore poorly constrained. The sectorial partitioning of this emission increase between the periods 2002-2006 and 2008-2012 differs from one atmospheric inversion study to another. However, all top-down studies suggest smaller changes in fossil fuel emissions (from oil, gas, and coal industries) compared to the mean of the bottom-up inventories included in this study. This difference is partly driven by a smaller emission change in China from the top-down studies compared to the estimate in the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGARv4.2) inventory, which should be revised to smaller values in a near future. We apply isotopic signatures to the emission changes estimated for individual studies based on five emission sectors and find that for six individual top-down studies (out of eight) the average isotopic signature of the emission changes is not consistent with the observed change in atmospheric 13CH4. However, the partitioning in emission change derived from the ensemble mean is consistent with this isotopic constraint. At the global scale, the top-down ensemble mean suggests that the dominant contribution to the resumed atmospheric CH4 growth after 2006 comes from microbial sources (more from agriculture and waste sectors than from natural wetlands), with an uncertain but smaller contribution from fossil CH4 emissions. In addition, a decrease in biomass burning emissions (in agreement with the biomass burning emission databases) makes the balance of sources consistent with atmospheric 13CH4 observations. In most of the top-down studies included here, OH concentrations are considered constant over the years (seasonal variations but without any inter-annual variability). As a result, the methane loss (in particular through OH oxidation) varies mainly through the change in methane concentrations and not its oxidants. For these reasons, changes in the methane loss could not be properly investigated in this study, although it may play a significant role in the recent atmospheric methane changes as briefly discussed at the end of the paper.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The Global Methane Budget 2000-2012
- Author
-
Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Benjamin, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell, Josep G, Dlugokencky, Edward J, Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello, Francesco N, Castaldi, Simona, Jackson, Robert B, Alexe, Mihai, Arora, Vivek K, Beerling, David J, Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake, Donald R, Brailsford, Gordon, Brovkin, Victor, Bruhwiler, Lori, Crevoisier, Cyril, Crill, Patrick, Covey, Kristofer, Curry, Charles, Frankenberg, Christian, Gedney, Nicola, Hoglund-Isaksson, Lena, Ishizawa, Misa, Ito, Akihiko, Joos, Fortunat, Kim, Heon-Sook, Kleinen, Thomas, Krummel, Paul, Lamarque, Jean-Francois, Langenfelds, Ray, Locatelli, Robin, Machida, Toshinobu, Maksyutov, Shamil, McDonald, Kyle C, Marshall, Julia, Melton, Joe R, Morino, Isam, Naik, Vaishali, O'Doherty, Simon, Parmentier, Frans-Jan W, Patra, Prabir K, Peng, Changhui, Peng, Shushi, Peters, Glen P, Pison, Isabelle, Prigent, Catherine, Prinn, Ronald, Ramonet, Michel, Riley, William J, Saito, Makoto, Santini, Monia, Schroeder, Ronny, Simpson, Isobel J, Spahni, Renato, Steele, Paul, Takizawa, Atsushi, Thornton, Brett F, Tian, Hanqin, Tohjima, Yasunor, Viovy, Nicolas, Voulgarakis, Aposolos, van Weele, Michiel, van der Werf, Guido R, Weiss, Ray, Wiedinmyer, Christine, Wilton, David J, Wiltshire, Andy, Worthy, Doug, Wunch, Debra, Xu, Xiyan, Yoshida, Yukio, Zhang, Bowen, Zhang, Zhen, and Zhu, Qiuan
- Subjects
Geophysics - Abstract
The global methane (CH4) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH4 over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH4 sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH4 by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (approximately biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio-economists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modeling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories and data-driven approaches (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations).For the 2003-2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by top-down inversions at 558 TgCH4 yr(exp -1), range 540-568. About 60 of global emissions are anthropogenic (range 50-65%). Since 2010, the bottom-up global emission inventories have been closer to methane emissions in the most carbon-intensive Representative Concentrations Pathway (RCP8.5) and higher than all other RCP scenarios. Bottom-up approaches suggest larger global emissions (736 TgCH4 yr(exp -1), range 596-884) mostly because of larger natural emissions from individual sources such as inland waters, natural wetlands and geological sources. Considering the atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget, it is likely that some of the individual emissions reported by the bottom-up approaches are overestimated, leading to too large global emissions. Latitudinal data from top-down emissions indicate a predominance of tropical emissions (approximately 64% of the global budget, less than 30deg N) as compared to mid (approximately 32%, 30-60deg N) and high northern latitudes (approximately 4%, 60-90deg N). Top-down inversions consistently infer lower emissions in China (approximately 58 TgCH4 yr(exp -1), range 51-72, minus14% ) and higher emissions in Africa (86 TgCH4 yr(exp -1), range 73-108, plus 19% ) than bottom-up values used as prior estimates. Overall, uncertainties for anthropogenic emissions appear smaller than those from natural sources, and the uncertainties on source categories appear larger for top-down inversions than for bottom-up inventories and models. The most important source of uncertainty on the methane budget is attributable to emissions from wetland and other inland waters. We show that the wetland extent could contribute 30-40% on the estimated range for wetland emissions. Other priorities for improving the methane budget include the following: (i) the development of process-based models for inland-water emissions, (ii) the intensification of methane observations at local scale (flux measurements) to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scale (surface networks and satellites) to constrain top-down inversions, (iii) improvements in the estimation of atmospheric loss by OH, and (iv) improvements of the transport models integrated in top-down inversions. The data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GLOBAL_ METHANE_BUDGET_2016_V1.1) and the Global Carbon Project.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Analysis of atmospheric CH4 in Canadian Arctic and estimation of the regional CH4 fluxes
- Author
-
Ishizawa, Misa, Chan, Douglas, Worthy, Doug, Chan, Elton, Vogel, Felix, and Maksyutov, Shamil
- Subjects
lcsh:Chemistry ,lcsh:QD1-999 ,lcsh:Physics ,lcsh:QC1-999 - Abstract
The Canadian Arctic (> 60∘ N, 60–141∘ W) may undergo drastic changes if the Arctic warming trend continues. For methane (CH4), Arctic reservoirs are large and widespread, and the climate feedbacks from such changes may be potentially substantial. Current bottom-up and top-down estimates of the regional CH4 flux range widely. This study analyzes the recent observations of atmospheric CH4 from five arctic monitoring sites and presents estimates of the regional CH4 fluxes for 2012–2015. The observational data reveal sizeable synoptic summertime enhancements in the atmospheric CH4 that are distinguishable from background variations, which indicate strong regional fluxes (primarily wetland and biomass burning CH4 emissions) around Behchoko and Inuvik in the western Canadian Arctic. Three regional Bayesian inversion modelling systems with two Lagrangian particle dispersion models and three meteorological datasets are applied to estimate fluxes for the Canadian Arctic and show relatively robust results in amplitude and temporal variations across different transport models, prior fluxes, and subregion masking. The estimated mean total CH4 flux for the entire Canadian Arctic is 1.8±0.6 Tg CH4 yr−1. The flux estimate is partitioned into biomass burning of 0.3±0.1 Tg CH4 yr−1 and the remaining natural (wetland) flux of 1.5±0.5 Tg CH4 yr−1. The summer natural CH4 flux estimates clearly show inter-annual variability that is positively correlated with surface temperature anomalies. The results indicate that years with warmer summer conditions result in more wetland CH4 emissions. More data and analysis are required to statistically characterize the dependence of regional CH4 fluxes on the climate in the Arctic. These Arctic measurement sites will aid in quantifying the inter-annual variations and long-term trends in CH4 emissions in the Canadian Arctic.
- Published
- 2019
11. Author Correction: Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods.
- Author
-
Liggio, John, Li, Shao-Meng, Staebler, Ralf M., Hayden, Katherine, Darlington, Andrea, Mittermeier, Richard L., O’Brien, Jason, McLaren, Robert, Wolde, Mengistu, Worthy, Doug, and Vogel, Felix
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Sensitivity of biomass burning emissions estimates to land surface information.
- Author
-
Saito, Makoto, Shiraishi, Tomohiro, Hirata, Ryuichi, Niwa, Yosuke, Saito, Kazuyuki, Steinbacher, Martin, Worthy, Doug, and Matsunaga, Tsuneo
- Subjects
BIOMASS burning ,ATMOSPHERIC transport ,CARBON monoxide ,LAND cover ,REMOTE sensing ,INPUT-output analysis - Abstract
Emissions from biomass burning (BB) are a key source of atmospheric tracer gases that affect the atmospheric carbon cycle. We developed four sets of global BB emissions estimates (named GlcGlob, GlcGeoc, McdGlob, and McdGeoc) using a bottom-up approach and by combining the remote sensing products related to fire distribution with two aboveground biomass (AGB) and two land cover classification (LCC) distributions. The sensitivity of the estimates of BB emissions to the AGB and LCC data was evaluated using the carbon monoxide (CO) emissions associated with each BB estimate. Using the AGB and/or LCC data led to substantially different spatial estimates of CO emissions, with a large (factor of approximately 3) spread of estimates for the mean annual CO emissions: 526±53 , 219±35 , 624±57 , and 293±44 Tg CO yr -1 for GlcGlob, GlcGeoc, McdGlob, and McdGeoc, respectively, and 415±47 Tg CO yr -1 for their ensemble average (EsmAve). We simulated atmospheric CO variability at an approximately 2.5 ∘ grid using an atmospheric tracer transport model and the BB emissions estimates and compared it with ground-based and satellite observations. At ground-based observation sites during fire seasons, the impact of intermittent fire events was poorly defined in our simulations due to the coarse resolution, which obscured temporal and spatial variability in the simulated atmospheric CO concentration. However, when compared at the regional and global scales, the distribution of atmospheric CO concentrations in the simulations shows substantial differences among the estimates of BB emissions. These results indicate that the estimates of BB emissions are highly sensitive to the AGB and LCC data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Sensitivity of biomass burning emissions estimates to land surface information.
- Author
-
Makoto Saito, Tomohiro Shiraishi, Ryuichi Hirata, Yosuke Niwa, Kazuyuki Saito, Steinbacher, Martin, Worthy, Doug, and Tsuneo Matsunaga
- Subjects
BIOMASS burning ,ATMOSPHERIC transport ,CARBON cycle ,CARBON monoxide ,LAND cover - Abstract
Emissions from biomass burning (BB) are a key source of atmospheric tracer gases that affect the atmospheric carbon cycle. We estimated four types of global BB emissions using a bottom-up approach and by combining the remote sensing products related to fire distribution with two aboveground biomass (AGB) and two land cover classification (LCC) distributions. The sensitivity of the estimates of BB emissions to the AGB and LCC data was evaluated using the carbon monoxide (CO) emissions associated with each BB estimate. We found a substantial spatial difference in CO emissions for both the AGB and LCC data, which resulted in a large (factor of approximately three) spread of estimates for the mean annual CO emissions. We simulated atmospheric CO variability using an atmospheric tracer transport model and the BB emissions estimates and compared it with ground-based and satellite observations. At ground-based observation sites during fire seasons, statistical comparisons indicated that the impact of differences in the BB emissions estimates on atmospheric CO variability was poorly defined in our simulations. However, when compared at the regional and global scales, the distribution of atmospheric CO concentrations in the simulations show substantial differences among the estimates of BB emissions. These results indicate that the estimates of BB emissions are highly sensitive to the AGB and LCC data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Influences of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on top-down estimates of the global and regional methane budgets.
- Author
-
Zhao, Yuanhong, Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Lin, Xin, Berchet, Antoine, Hegglin, Michaela I., Canadell, Josep G., Jackson, Robert B., Dlugokencky, Edward J., Langenfelds, Ray L., Ramonet, Michel, Worthy, Doug, and Zheng, Bo
- Subjects
HYDROXYL group ,TROPOSPHERIC chemistry ,ATMOSPHERIC methane ,METHANE ,BUDGET ,CARBON cycle ,CHEMICAL models ,ESTIMATES - Abstract
The hydroxyl radical (OH), which is the dominant sink of methane (CH4), plays a key role in closing the global methane budget. Current top-down estimates of the global and regional CH4 budget using 3D models usually apply prescribed OH fields and attribute model–observation mismatches almost exclusively to CH4 emissions, leaving the uncertainties due to prescribed OH fields less quantified. Here, using a variational Bayesian inversion framework and the 3D chemical transport model LMDz, combined with 10 different OH fields derived from chemistry–climate models (Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative, or CCMI, experiment), we evaluate the influence of OH burden, spatial distribution, and temporal variations on the global and regional CH4 budget. The global tropospheric mean CH4 -reaction-weighted [OH] ([OH] GM-CH4) ranges 10.3– 16.3×105 molec cm -3 across 10 OH fields during the early 2000s, resulting in inversion-based global CH4 emissions between 518 and 757 Tg yr -1. The uncertainties in CH4 inversions induced by the different OH fields are similar to the CH4 emission range estimated by previous bottom-up syntheses and larger than the range reported by the top-down studies. The uncertainties in emissions induced by OH are largest over South America, corresponding to large inter-model differences of [OH] in this region. From the early to the late 2000s, the optimized CH4 emissions increased by 22±6 Tg yr -1 (17–30 Tg yr -1), of which ∼25 % (on average) offsets the 0.7 % (on average) increase in OH burden. If the CCMI models represent the OH trend properly over the 2000s, our results show that a higher increasing trend of CH4 emissions is needed to match the CH4 observations compared to the CH4 emission trend derived using constant OH. This study strengthens the importance of reaching a better representation of OH burden and of OH spatial and temporal distributions to reduce the uncertainties in the global and regional CH4 budgets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Influences of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on top-down estimates of the global and regional methane budgets.
- Author
-
Yuanhong Zhao, Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Xin Lin, Berchet, Antoine, Hegglin, Michaela I., Canadell, Josep G., Jackson, Robert B., Dlugokencky, Edward J., Langenfelds, Ray L., Ramonet, Michel, Worthy, Doug, and Bo Zheng
- Abstract
The hydroxyl radical (OH), which is the dominant sink of methane (CH
4 ), plays a key role to close the global methane budget. Previous research that assessed the impact of OH changes on the CH4 budget mostly relied on box modeling inversions with a very simplified atmospheric transport and no representation of the heterogeneous spatial distribution of OH radicals. Here using a variational Bayesian inversion framework and a 3D chemical transport model, LMDz , combined with 10 different OH fields derived from chemistry-climate models (CCMI experiment), we evaluate the influence of OH burden, spatial distribution, and temporal variations on the global CH4 budget. The global tropospheric mean CH4 -reaction-weighted [OH] ([OH]GM-CH4 ) ranges 10.3–16.3 × 105 molec cm−3 across 10 OH fields during the early 2000s, resulting in inversion-based global CH4 emissions between 518 and 757 Tg yr−1 . The uncertainties in CH4 inversions induced by the different OH fields are comparable to, or even larger than the uncertainty typically given by bottom-up and top-down estimates. Based on the LMDz inversions, we estimate that a 1 %-increase in OH burden leads to an increase of 4 Tg yr−1 in the estimate of global methane emissions, which is about 25 % smaller than what is estimated by box-models. The uncertainties in emissions induced by OH are largest over South America, corresponding to large inter-model differences of [OH] in this region. From the early to the late 2000s, the optimized CH4 emissions increased by 21.9 ± 5.7 Tg yr−1 (16.6–30.0 Tg yr−1 ), of which ~ 25 % (on average) is contributed by −0.5 to +1.8 % increase in OH burden. If the CCMI models represent the OH trend properly over the 2000s, our results show that a higher increasing trend of CH4 emissions is needed to match the CH4 observations compared to the CH4 emission trend derived using constant OH. This study strengthens the importance to reach a better representation of OH burden and of OH spatial and temporal distributions to reduce the uncertainties on the global CH4 budget. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Monitoring Urban Greenhouse Gases Using Open-Path Fourier Transform Spectroscopy.
- Author
-
Byrne, Brendan, Strong, Kimberly, Colebatch, Orfeo, You, Yuan, Wunch, Debra, Ars, Sebastien, Jones, Dylan B. A., Fogal, Pierre, Mittermeier, Richard L., Worthy, Doug, and Griffith, David W. T.
- Abstract
Copyright of Atmosphere -- Ocean (Taylor & Francis Ltd) is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Spacio-temporal distributions of atmospheric nitrous oxide and its isotopocules in the Arctic region
- Author
-
Toyoda, Sakae, Machida, Toshinobu, Tohjima, Yasunori, Morimoto, Shinji, Worthy, Doug, Ishijima, Kentaro, and Yoshida, Naohiro
- Abstract
第6回極域科学シンポジウム分野横断セッション:[IA] 急変する北極気候システム及びその全球的な影響の総合的解明―GRENE北極気候変動研究事業研究成果報告2015―11月19日(木) 国立極地研究所1階交流アトリウム
- Published
- 2015
18. Analysis of atmospheric CH4 in Canadian Arctic and estimation of the regional CH4 fluxes.
- Author
-
Misa Ishizawa, Chan, Douglas, Worthy, Doug, Chan, Elton, Vogel, Felix, and Maksyutov, Shamil
- Abstract
The Canadian Arctic has the potential for enhanced atmospheric methane (CH
4 ) source regions as a response to the ongoing global warming. Current bottom-up and top-down estimates of the regional CH4 flux range widely. This study analyses the recent observations of atmospheric CH4 from five arctic monitoring sites and presents estimates of the regional CH4 fluxes for 2012-2015. The observational data reveal sizeable synoptic summertime enhancements in the atmospheric CH4 that are clearly distinguishable from background variations, which indicate strong regional fluxes (mainly wetland and biomass burning CH4 emissions) around Behchoko and Inuvik in the western Canadian Arctic. Multiple regional Bayesian inversion modelling systems are applied to estimate fluxes for the entire Canadian Arctic and show relatively robust results in amplitude and temporal variations even across different transport models, prior fluxes and sub-region masking. The estimated mean total CH4 annual flux for the Canadian Arctic is 1.8 ± 0.6 Tg CH4 yr-1 . The flux estimate in this study is partitioned into biomass burning, 0.3 ± 0.1 Tg CH4 yr-1 , and the remaining natural (wetland) flux 1.5 ± 0.5 Tg CH4 yr-1 . The estimated summertime natural CH4 fluxes show clear inter-annual variability that is positively correlated with surface temperature anomalies. This indicates that the hot summer weather conditions stimulate the wetland CH4 emissions. More data and analysis are required to statistically characterise the dependence of regional CH4 fluxes on climate in the Arctic. These Arctic measurement sites should help quantify the inter-annual variations and long-term trends in CH4 emissions in the Canadian Arctic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Quantification of methane sources in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Alberta by aircraft mass balance.
- Author
-
Baray, Sabour, Darlington, Andrea, Gordon, Mark, Hayden, Katherine L., Leithead, Amy, Li, Shao-Meng, Liu, Peter S. K., Mittermeier, Richard L., Moussa, Samar G., O'Brien, Jason, Staebler, Ralph, Wolde, Mengistu, Worthy, Doug, and McLaren, Robert
- Subjects
METHANE & the environment ,OIL sands -- Environmental aspects ,EMISSIONS (Air pollution) ,METHANE - Abstract
Aircraft-based measurements of methane (CH
4 ) and other air pollutants in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) were made during a summer intensive field campaign between 13 August and 7 September 2013 in support of the Joint Canada--Alberta Implementation Plan for Oil Sands Monitoring. Chemical signatures were used to identify CH4 sources from tailings ponds (BTEX VOCs), open pit surface mines (NOy and rBC) and elevated plumes from bitumen upgrading facilities (SO2 and NOy ). Emission rates of CH4 were determined for the five primary surface mining facilities in the region using two mass-balance methods. Emission rates from source categories within each facility were estimated when plumes from the sources were spatially separable. Tailings ponds accounted for 45% of total CH4 emissions measured from the major surface mining facilities in the region, while emissions from operations in the open pit mines accounted for ~50 %. The average open pit surface mining emission rates ranged from 1.2 to 2.8 t of CH4 h-1 for different facilities in the AOSR. Amongst the 19 tailings ponds, Mildred Lake Settling Basin, the oldest pond in the region, was found to be responsible for the majority of tailings ponds emissions of CH4 (>70 %). The sum of measured emission rates of CH4 from the five major facilities, 19.2±1.1 tCH4 h-1 , was similar to a single mass-balance determination of CH4 from all major sources in the AOSR determined from a single flight downwind of the facilities, 23.7±3.7 tCH4 h-1 . The measured hourly CH4 emission rate from all facilities in the AOSR is 48±8% higher than that extracted for 2013 from the Canadian Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, a legislated facility-reported emissions inventory, converted to hourly units. The measured emissions correspond to an emissions rate of 0.17±0.01 TgCH4 yr-1 if the emissions are assumed as temporally constant, which is an uncertain assumption. The emission rates reported here are relevant for the summer season. In the future, effort should be devoted to measurements in different seasons to further our understanding of the seasonal parameters impacting fugitive emissions of CH4 and to allow for better estimates of annual emissions and year-to-year variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Quantification of Methane Sources in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Alberta by Aircraft Mass-Balance.
- Author
-
Baray, Sabour, Darlington, Andrea, Gordon, Mark, Hayden, Katherine L., Leithead, Amy, Shao-Meng Li, Liu, Peter S. K., Mittermeier, Richard L., Moussa, Samar G., O'Brien, Jason, Staebler, Ralph, Wolde, Mengistu, Worthy, Doug, and McLaren, Robert
- Abstract
Aircraft-based measurements of methane (CH
4 ) and other air pollutants in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) were made during a summer intensive field campaign between August 13 and September 7 2013, in support of the Joint Canada-Alberta Implementation Plan for Oil Sands Monitoring. Chemical signatures were used to identify CH4 sources from tailings ponds (BTEX VOC's), open-pit surface mines (NOy and rBC) and elevated plumes from bitumen upgrading facilities (SO2 and NOy ). Emission rates of CH4 were determined for the five primary surface mining facilities in the region using two mass balance methods. Emission rates from source categories within each facility were estimated when plumes from the sources were spatially separable. Tailings ponds accounted for 45 % of total CH4 emissions measured from the major surface mining facilities in the region while emissions from operations in the open pit mines accounted for ~ 50 %. The average open pit surface mining emission rates ranged from 1.2 to 2.8 tonnes of CH4 hr-1 for different facilities in the AOSR. Amongst the 19 tailings ponds, Mildred Lake Settling Basin, the oldest pond in the region, was found to be responsible for the majority of tailings ponds emissions of CH4 (> 70 %). The sum of measured emission rates of CH4 from the five major facilities, 19.2 ± 1.1 tonnes CH4 hr-1 , was similar to a single mass balance determination of CH4 from all major sources in the AOSR determined from a single flight downwind of the facilities, 23.7 ± 3.7 tonnes CH4 hr-1 . The measured hourly CH4 emission rate from all facilities in the AOSR is 48 ± 8 % higher than that extracted for 2013 from the Canadian Green House Gas Reporting Program, a legislated facility-reported Emissions Inventory, converted to hourly units. The measured emissions correspond to an emissions rate of 0.17 ± 0.01 Tg CH4 yr-1 , if the emissions are assumed temporally constant, an uncertain assumption. The emission rates reported here are relevant for the summer season. In future, effort should be devoted to measurements in different seasons to further our understanding of seasonal parameters impacting fugitive emissions of CH4 and to allow better estimates of annual emissions and year to year variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Detectability of Arctic methane sources at six sites performing continuous atmospheric measurements.
- Author
-
Thonat, Thibaud, Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Pison, Isabelle, Worthy, Doug E. J., Zeli Tan, Qianlai Zhuang, Crill, Patrick M., Thornton, Brett F., Bastviken, David, Dlugokencky, Ed J., Zimov, Nikita, Laurila, Tuomas, Hatakka, Juha, and Hermansen, Ove
- Subjects
METHANE analysis ,EMISSIONS (Air pollution) ,METHANE & the environment ,CLIMATE change ,ATMOSPHERIC models - Abstract
Understanding the recent evolution of methane emissions in the Arctic is necessary to interpret the global methane cycle. Emissions are affected by significant uncertainties and are sensitive to climate change, leading to potential feedbacks. A polar version of the CHIMERE chemistry-transport model is used to simulate the evolution of tropospheric methane in the Arctic during 2012, including all known regional anthropogenic and natural sources, in particular freshwater emissions which are often overlooked in methane modelling. CHIMERE simulations are compared to atmospheric continuous observations at six measurement sites in the Arctic region. In winter, the Arctic is dominated by anthropogenic emissions; emissions from continental seepages and oceans, including from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, can contribute significantly in more limited areas. In summer, emissions from wetland and freshwater sources dominate across the whole region. The model is able to reproduce the seasonality and synoptic variations of methane measured at the different sites. We find that all methane sources significantly affect the measurements at all stations at least at the synoptic scale, except for biomass burning. In particular, freshwater systems play a decisive part in summer, representing on average between 11 and 26 % of the simulated Arctic methane signal at the sites. This indicates the relevance of continuous observations to gain a mechanistic understanding of Arctic methane sources. Sensitivity tests reveal that the choice of the land-surface model used to prescribe wetland emissions can be critical in correctly representing methane mixing ratios. The closest agreement with the observations is reached when using the two wetland models which have emissions peaking in August–September, while all others reach their maximum in June–July. Such phasing provides an interesting constraint on wetland models which still have large uncertainties at present. Also testing different freshwater emission inventories leads to large differences in modelled methane. Attempts to include methane sinks (OH oxidation and soil uptake) reduced the model bias relative to observed atmospheric methane. The study illustrates how multiple sources, having different spatiotemporal dynamics and magnitudes, jointly influence the overall Arctic methane budget, and highlights ways towards further improved assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Methane fluxes in the high northern latitudes for 2005-2013 estimated using a Bayesian atmospheric inversion.
- Author
-
Thompson, Rona L., Sasakawa, Motoki, Machida, Toshinobu, Aalto, Tuula, Worthy, Doug, Lavric, Jost V., Myhre, Cathrine Lund, and Stohl, Andreas
- Subjects
ALIPHATIC hydrocarbons ,METHANE ,WETLANDS ,EMISSIONS (Air pollution) ,BAYESIAN analysis - Abstract
We present methane (CH
4 ) flux estimates for 2005 to 2013 from a Bayesian inversion focusing on the high northern latitudes (north of 50° N). Our inversion is based on atmospheric transport modelled by the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART and CH4 observations from 17 in situ and five discrete flask-sampling sites distributed over northern North America and Eurasia. CH4 fluxes are determined at monthly temporal resolution and on a variable grid with maximum resolution of 1° x 1°. Our inversion finds a CH4 source from the high northern latitudes of 82 to 84 Tg yr-1 , constituting ~15% of the global total, compared to 64 to 68 Tg yr-1 (~12 %) in the prior estimates. For northern North America, we estimate a mean source of 16.6 to 17.9 Tg yr-1 , which is dominated by fluxes in the Hudson Bay Lowlands (HBL) and western Canada, specifically the province of Alberta. Our estimate for the HBL, of 2.7 to 3.4 Tg yr-1 , is close to the prior estimate (which includes wetland fluxes from the land surface model, LPX-Bern) and to other independent inversion estimates. However, our estimate for Alberta, of 5.0 to 5.8 Tg yr-1 , is significantly higher than the prior (which also includes anthropogenic sources from the EDGAR-4.2FT2010 inventory). Since the fluxes from this region persist throughout the winter, this may signify that the anthropogenic emissions are underestimated. For northern Eurasia, we find a mean source of 52.2 to 55.5 Tg yr-1 , with a strong contribution from fluxes in the Western Siberian Lowlands (WSL) for which we estimate a source of 19.3 to 19.9 Tg yr-1 . Over the 9-year inversion period, we find significant year-to-year variations in the fluxes, which in North America, and specifically in the HBL, appear to be driven at least in part by soil temperature, while in the WSL, the variability is more dependent on soil moisture. Moreover, we find significant positive trends in the CH4 fluxes in North America of 0.38 to 0.57 Tg yr-2 , and northern Eurasia of 0.76 to 1.09 Tg yr-2 . In North America, this could be due to an increase in soil temperature, while in North Eurasia, specifically Russia, the trend is likely due, at least in part, to an increase in anthropogenic sources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Methane fluxes in the high northern latitudes for 2005-2013 estimated using a Bayesian atmospheric inversion.
- Author
-
Thompson, Rona L., Motoki Sasakawa, Machida, Toshinobu, Aalto, Tuula, Worthy, Doug, Lavric, Jost V., Myhre, Cathrine Lund, and Stohl, Andreas
- Abstract
We present methane (CH
4 ) flux estimates for 2005 to 2013 from a Bayesian inversion focusing on the high northern latitudes (north of 50° N). Our inversion is based on atmospheric transport modelled by the Lagrangian particle dispersion model, FLEXPART, and CH4 observations from 17 in-situ and 5 discrete flask-sampling sites distributed over northern North America and Eurasia. CH4 fluxes are determined at monthly temporal resolution and on a variable grid with maximum resolution of 1° × 1°. Our inversion finds a CH4 source from the high northern latitudes of 82 to 84 Tg y-1 , constituting ~15% of the global total, compared to 64 to 68 Tg y-1 (~12%) in the prior estimates. For northern North America, we estimate a mean source of 16.6 to 17.9 Tg y-1 , which is dominated by fluxes in the Hudson Bay Lowlands (HBL) and western Canada, specifically, the province of Alberta. Our estimate for the HBL, of 2.7 to 3.4 Tg y-1 , is close to the prior estimate (which includes wetland fluxes from the land surface model, LPX-Bern) and to other independent inversion estimates. However, our estimate for Alberta, of 5.0 to 5.8 Tg y-1 is significantly higher than the prior (which also includes anthropogenic sources from the EDGAR-4.2FT2010 inventory). Since the fluxes from this region persist throughout the winter, this may signify that the anthropogenic emissions are underestimated. For North Eurasia, we find a mean source of 52.2 to 55.5 Tg y-1 , with a strong contribution from fluxes in the Western Siberian Lowlands (WSL) for which we estimate a source of 19.3 to 19.9 Tg y-1 . Over the 9-year inversion period, we find significant year-to-year variations in the fluxes, which in North America and, specifically, in the HBL appear to be driven at least in part by soil temperature, while in the WSL, the variability is more dependent on soil moisture. Moreover, we find significant positive trends in the CH4 fluxes in North America of 0.38 to 0.57 Tg y-1 per year, and North Eurasia of 0.76 to 1.09 Tg y-1 per year. In North America, this could be due to an increase in soil temperature, while in North Eurasia, specifically, Russia, the trend is likely due, at least in part, to an increase in anthropogenic sources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Evaluation of wetland methane emissions across North America using atmospheric data and inverse modeling.
- Author
-
Miller, Scot M., Commane, Roisin, Melton, Joe R., Andrews, Arlyn E., Benmergui, Joshua, Dlugokencky, Edward J., Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Michalak, Anna M., Sweeney, Colm, and Worthy, Doug E. J.
- Subjects
METHANE ,WETLANDS ,SPATIAL variation ,REMOTE sensing - Abstract
Existing estimates of methane (CH
4 ) fluxes from North American wetlands vary widely in both magnitude and distribution. In light of these differences, this study uses atmospheric CH4 observations from the US and Canada to analyze seven different bottom-up, wetland CH4 estimates reported in a recent model comparison project. We first use synthetic data to explore whether wetland CH4 fluxes are detectable at atmospheric observation sites. We find that the observation network can detect aggregate wetland fluxes from both eastern and western Canada but generally not from the US. Based upon these results, we then use real data and inverse modeling results to analyze the magnitude, seasonality, and spatial distribution of each model estimate. The magnitude of Canadian fluxes in many models is larger than indicated by atmospheric observations. Many models predict a seasonality that is narrower than implied by inverse modeling results, possibly indicating an oversensitivity to air or soil temperatures. The LPJ-Bern and SDGVM models have a geographic distribution that is most consistent with atmospheric observations, depending upon the region and season. These models utilize land cover maps or dynamic modeling to estimate wetland coverage while most other models rely primarily on remote sensing inundation data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Observational constraints on the distribution, seasonality, and environmental predictors of North American boreal methane emissions.
- Author
-
Miller, Scot M., Worthy, Doug E. J., Michalak, Anna M., Wofsy, Steven C., Kort, Eric A., Havice, Talya C., Andrews, Arlyn E., Dlugokencky, Edward J., Kaplan, Jed O., Levi, Patricia J., Tian, Hanqin, and Zhang, Bowen
- Subjects
WETLANDS ,ATMOSPHERIC methane ,SPATIAL distribution (Quantum optics) ,SOIL temperature - Abstract
Wetlands comprise the single largest global source of atmospheric methane, but current flux estimates disagree in both magnitude and distribution at the continental scale. This study uses atmospheric methane observations over North America from 2007 to 2008 and a geostatistical inverse model to improve understanding of Canadian methane fluxes and associated biogeochemical models. The results bridge an existing gap between traditional top-down, inversion studies, which typically emphasize total emission budgets, and biogeochemical models, which usually emphasize environmental processes. The conclusions of this study are threefold. First, the most complete process-based methane models do not always describe available atmospheric methane observations better than simple models. In this study, a relatively simple model of wetland distribution, soil moisture, and soil temperature outperformed more complex model formulations. Second, we find that wetland methane fluxes have a broader spatial distribution across western Canada and into the northern U.S. than represented in existing flux models. Finally, we calculate total methane budgets for Canada and for the Hudson Bay Lowlands, a large wetland region (50-60°N, 75-96°W). Over these lowlands, we find total methane fluxes of 1.8±0.24 Tg C yr
−1 , a number in the midrange of previous estimates. Our total Canadian methane budget of 16.0±1.2 Tg C yr−1 is larger than existing inventories, primarily due to high anthropogenic emissions in Alberta. However, methane observations are sparse in western Canada, and additional measurements over Alberta will constrain anthropogenic sources in that province with greater confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. IMPLICATIONS FOR DERIVING REGIONAL FOSSIL FUEL CO2 ESTIMATES FROM ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONS IN A HOT SPOT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 14CO2 EMISSIONS.
- Author
-
Vogel, Felix R., Levin, Ingeborg, and Worthy, Doug E. J.
- Subjects
FOSSIL fuels ,ATMOSPHERIC carbon dioxide ,LASER atmospheric observations ,NUCLEAR power plants ,CARBON dioxide mitigation ,CARBON isotopes ,RADIOCARBON dating - Abstract
Using Δ
14 C observations to infer the local concentration excess of CO2 due to the burning of fossil fuels (ΔFFCO2 ) is a promising technique to monitor anthropogenic CO2 emissions. A recent study showed that14 CO2 emissions from the nuclear industry can significantly alter the local atmospheric14 CO2 concentration and thus mask the Δ14 C depletion due to ΔFFCO2 . In this study, we investigate the relevance of this effect for the vicinity of Toronto, Canada, a hot spot of anthropogenic14 CO2 emissions. Comparing the measured emissions from local power plants to a global emission inventory highlighted significant deviations on interannual timescales. Although the previously assumed emission factor of 1.6 TBq(GWa)-1 agrees with the observed long-term average for all CANDU reactors of 1.50 ± 0.18 TBq(GWa)-1. This power-based parameterization neglects the different emission ratios for individual reactors, which range from 3.4 ± 0.82 to 0.65 ± 0.09 TBq(GWa)-1. This causes a mean difference of -14% in14 CO2 concentrations in our simulations at our observational site in Egbert, Canada. On an annual time basis, this additional14 CO2 masks the equivalent of 27-82% of the total annual FFCO2 offset. A pseudo-data experiment suggests that the interannual variability in the masked fraction may cause spurious trends in the ΔFFCO2 estimates of the order of 30% from 2006-2010. In addition, a comparison of the modeled Δ14 C levels with our observational time series from 2008-2010 underlines that incorporating the best available14 CO2 emissions significantly increases the agreement. There were also short periods with significant observed Δ14 C offsets, which were found to be linked with maintenance periods conducted on these nuclear reactors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods.
- Author
-
Liggio, John, Li, Shao-Meng, Staebler, Ralf M., Hayden, Katherine, Darlington, Andrea, Mittermeier, Richard L., O'Brien, Jason, McLaren, Robert, Wolde, Mengistu, Worthy, Doug, and Vogel, Felix
- Abstract
The oil and gas (O&G) sector represents a large source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. However, estimates of O&G emissions rely upon bottom-up approaches, and are rarely evaluated through atmospheric measurements. Here, we use aircraft measurements over the Canadian oil sands (OS) to derive the first top-down, measurement-based determination of the their annual CO
2 emissions and intensities. The results indicate that CO2 emission intensities for OS facilities are 13–123% larger than those estimated using publically available data. This leads to 64% higher annual GHG emissions from surface mining operations, and 30% higher overall OS GHG emissions (17 Mt) compared to that reported by industry, despite emissions reporting which uses the most up to date and recommended bottom-up approaches. Given the similarity in bottom-up reporting methods across the entire O&G sector, these results suggest that O&G CO2 emissions inventory data may be more uncertain than previously considered. Evaluating GHG emissions reported to inventories for the oil and gas (O&G) sector is important for countries with resource-based economies. Here the authors provide a top-down assessment of GHG emissions from the Canadian oil sands and find previous inventory reports underestimate emissions, by as much as 64% for surface mining facilities and 30% for the entire oil sands compared with their assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. The global methane budget 2000--2012
- Author
-
Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Ben, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell, Josep G., Dlugokencky, Edward J., Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello, Francesco N., Castaldi, Simona, Jackson, Robert B., Alexe, Mihai, Arora, Vivek K., Beerling, David J., Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake, Donald R., Brailsford, Gordon, Brovkin, Victor, Bruhwiler, Lori, Crevoisier, Cyril, Crill, Patrick, Covey, Kristofer, Curry, Charles, Frankenberg, Christian, Gedney, Nicola, Höglund-Isaksson, Lena, Ishizawa, Misa, Ito, Akihiko, Joos, Fortunat, Kim, Heon-Sook, Kleinen, Thomas, Krummel, Paul, Lamarque, Jean-François, Langenfelds, Ray, Locatelli, Robin, Machida, Toshinobu, Maksyutov, Shamil, McDonald, Kyle C., Marshall, Julia, Melton, Joe R., Morino, Isamu, Naik, Vaishali, O'Doherty, Simon, Parmentier, Frans-Jan W., Patra, Prabir K., Peng, Changhui, Peng, Shushi, Peters, Glen P., Pison, Isabelle, Prigent, Catherine, Prinn, Ronald, Ramonet, Michel, Riley, William J., Saito, Makoto, Santini, Monia, Schroeder, Ronny, Simpson, Isobel J., Spahni, Renato, Steele, Paul, Takizawa, Atsushi, Thornton, Brett F., Tian, Hanqin, Tohjima, Yasunori, Viovy, Nicolas, Voulgarakis, Apostolos, Van Weele, Michiel, Van Der Werf, Guido R., Weiss, Ray, Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, David J., Wiltshire, Andy, Worthy, Doug, Wunch, Debra, Xu, Xiyan, Yoshida, Yukio, Zhang, Bowen, Zhang, Zhen, and Zhu, Qiuan
- Subjects
13. Climate action ,530 Physics ,11. Sustainability ,550 Earth sciences & geology ,15. Life on land ,7. Clean energy - Abstract
The global methane (CH₄) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH₄ over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH₄ are continuing to increase, making CH₄ the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH₄ sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH₄ by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (~biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio- conomists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observa- tions within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories and data-driven approaches (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations). For the 2003–2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by top-down inversions at 558 Tg CH₄ yr⁻¹, range 540–568. About 60 % of global emissions are anthropogenic (range 50–65 %). Since 2010, the bottom-up global emission inventories have been closer to methane emissions in the most carbon-intensive Representative Concentrations Pathway (RCP8.5) and higher than all other RCP scenarios. Bottom-up approaches suggest larger global emissions (736 Tg CH₄ yr⁻¹range 596–884) mostly because of larger natural emissions from individual sources such as inland waters, natural wetlands and geological sources. Considering the atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget, it is likely that some of the individual emissions reported by the bottom-up approaches are overestimated, leading to too large global emissions. Latitudinal data from top-down emissions indicate a predominance of tropical emissions (~64 % of the global budget, < 30°N) as compared to mid (~32 %, 30–60°N) and high northern latitudes (~4 %, 60–90°N). Top-down inversions consistently infer lower emissions in China (~58 Tg CH₄ yr⁻¹, range 51–72, - 14 %) and higher emissions in Africa (86 Tg CH₄ yr⁻¹, range 73–108, +19 %) than bottom-up values used as prior estimates. Overall, uncertainties for anthropogenic emissions appear smaller than those from natural sources, and the uncertainties on source categories appear larger for top-down inversions than for bottom-up inventories and models. The most important source of uncertainty on the methane budget is attributable to emissions from wetland and other inland waters. We show that the wetland extent could contribute 30–40 % on the estimated range for wetland emissions. Other priorities for improving the methane budget include the following: (i) the development of process-based models for inland-water emissions, (ii) the intensification of methane observations at local scale (flux measurements) to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scale (surface networks and satellites) to constrain top-down inversions, (iii) improvements in the estimation of atmospheric loss by OH, and (iv) improvements of the transport models integrated in top-down inversions. The data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GLOBAL_ METHANE_BUDGET_2016_V1.1) and the Global Carbon Project.
29. Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012
- Author
-
Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Ben, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell, Josep G., Dlugokencky, Edward J., Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello, Francesco N., Castaldi, Simona, Jackson, Robert B., Alexe, Mihai, Arora, Vivek K., Beerling, David J., Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake, Donald R., Brailsford, Gordon, Bruhwiler, Lori, Crevoisier, Cyril, Crill, Patrick, Covey, Kristofer, Frankenberg, Christian, Gedney, Nicola, Höglund-Isaksson, Lena, Ishizawa, Misa, Ito, Akihiko, Joos, Fortunat, Kim, Heon-Sook, Kleinen, Thomas, Krummel, Paul, Lamarque, Jean-François, Langenfelds, Ray, Locatelli, Robin, Machida, Toshinobu, Maksyutov, Shamil, Melton, Joe R., Morino, Isamu, Naik, Vaishali, O&Apos;Doherty, Simon, Parmentier, Frans-Jan W., Patra, Prabir K., Peng, Changhui, Peng, Shushi, Peters, Glen P., Pison, Isabelle, Prinn, Ronald, Ramonet, Michel, Riley, William J., Saito, Makoto, Santini, Monia, Schroeder, Ronny, Simpson, Isobel J., Spahni, Renato, Takizawa, Atsushi, Thornton, Brett F., Tian, Hanqin, Tohjima, Yasunori, Viovy, Nicolas, Voulgarakis, Apostolos, Weiss, Ray, Wilton, David J., Wiltshire, Andy, Worthy, Doug, Wunch, Debra, Xu, Xiyan, Yoshida, Yukio, Zhang, Bowen, Zhang, Zhen, and Zhu, Qiuan
- Subjects
13. Climate action ,530 Physics ,7. Clean energy - Abstract
Following the recent Global Carbon Project (GCP) synthesis of the decadal methane (CH₄) budget over 2000–2012 (Saunois et al., 2016), we analyse here the same dataset with a focus on quasi-decadal and inter-annual variability in CH₄ emissions. The GCP dataset integrates results from topdown studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry), inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven approaches. The annual global methane emissions from top-down studies, which by construction match the observed methane growth rate within their uncertainties, all show an increase in total methane emissions over the period 2000–2012, but this increase is not linear over the 13 years. Despite differences between individual studies, the mean emission anomaly of the top-down ensemble shows no significant trend in total methane emissions over the period 2000–2006, during the plateau of atmospheric methane mole fractions, and also over the period 2008–2012, during the renewed atmospheric methane increase. However, the top-down ensemble mean produces an emission shift between 2006 and 2008, leading to 22 [16–32] Tg CH₄ yr⁻¹ higher methane emissions over the period 2008–2012 compared to 2002–2006. This emission increase mostly originated from the tropics, with a smaller contribution from mid-latitudes and no significant change from boreal regions. The regional contributions remain uncertain in top-down studies. Tropical South America and South and East Asia seem to contribute the most to the emission increase in the tropics. However, these two regions have only limited atmospheric measurements and remain therefore poorly constrained. The sectorial partitioning of this emission increase between the periods 2002–2006 and 2008–2012 differs from one atmospheric inversion study to another. However, all topdown studies suggest smaller changes in fossil fuel emissions (from oil, gas, and coal industries) compared to the mean of the bottom-up inventories included in this study. This difference is partly driven by a smaller emission change in China from the top-down studies compared to the estimate in the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGARv4.2) inventory, which should be revised to smaller values in a near future. We apply isotopic signatures to the emission changes estimated for individual studies based on five emission sectors and find that for six individual top-down studies (out of eight) the average isotopic signature of the emission changes is not consistent with the observed change in atmospheric ¹³CH₄. However, the partitioning in emission change derived from the ensemble mean is consistent with this isotopic constraint. At the global scale, the top-down ensemble mean suggests that the dominant contribution to the resumed atmospheric CH₄ growth after 2006 comes from microbial sources (more from agriculture and waste sectors than from natural wetlands), with an uncertain but smaller contribution from fossil CH₄ emissions. In addition, a decrease in biomass burning emissions (in agreement with the biomass burning emission databases) makes the balance of sources consistent with atmospheric ¹³CH₄ observations. In most of the top-down studies included here, OH concentrations are considered constant over the years (seasonal variations but without any inter-annual variability). As a result, the methane loss (in particular through OH oxidation) varies mainly through the change in methane concentrations and not its oxidants. For these reasons, changes in the methane loss could not be properly investigated in this study, although it may play a significant role in the recent atmospheric methane changes as briefly discussed at the end of the paper.
30. Can we assess Greenhouse Gas Emission trends in Canada's largest population center?
- Author
-
Vogel, Felix, Worthy, Doug, Pugliese, Stephanie, Elton Chan, Douglas Chan, Murphy, Jennifer, and Lin Huang
- Subjects
- *
GREENHOUSE gases , *POPULATION - Published
- 2018
31. Evaluation of wetland methane emissions across North America using atmospheric data and inverse modeling
- Author
-
Worthy, Doug [Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto (Canada)]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. The global methane budget 2000-2012
- Author
-
Akihiko Ito, Philippe Ciais, Peter Bergamaschi, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, David J. Beerling, Cyril Crevoisier, Philippe Bousquet, Julia Marshall, Simona Castaldi, Isabelle Pison, Heon Sook Kim, Yasunori Tohjima, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Atsushi Takizawa, Charles L. Curry, Debra Wunch, Kyle C. McDonald, Michel Ramonet, David Bastviken, Simon O'Doherty, Josep G. Canadell, Robin Locatelli, Francesco N. Tubiello, Prabir K. Patra, P. Steele, Brett F. Thornton, Catherine Prigent, Sander Houweling, Toshinobu Machida, David J. Wilton, Joe R. Melton, Ronald G. Prinn, William J. Riley, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Monia Santini, Giuseppe Etiope, Doug Worthy, Guido R. van der Werf, Christian Frankenberg, Shushi Peng, Vivek K. Arora, Patrick M. Crill, Ray F. Weiss, Nicolas Viovy, Michiel van Weele, Anna Peregon, Shamil Maksyutov, Vaishali Naik, Zhen Zhang, Thomas Kleinen, Lori Bruhwiler, Yukio Yoshida, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Kristofer R. Covey, Fortunat Joos, Misa Ishizawa, Bowen Zhang, Christine Wiedinmyer, Ronny Schroeder, Nicola Gedney, Hanqin Tian, Changhui Peng, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Mihai Alexe, Victor Brovkin, Ray L. Langenfelds, Isamu Morino, Glen P. Peters, Xiyan Xu, Andy Wiltshire, Isobel J. Simpson, Ben Poulter, Marielle Saunois, Qiuan Zhu, Donald R. Blake, Paul B. Krummel, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Makoto Saito, Gordon Brailsford, Robert B. Jackson, Renato Spahni, Earth and Climate, Hydrology and Geo-environmental sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Ben, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell Josep, G, Dlugokencky Edward, J., Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello Francesco, N., Castaldi, Simona, Jackson Robert, B., Alexe, Mihai, Arora Vivek, K., Beerling David, J., Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake Donald, R., Brailsford, Gordon, Brovkin, Victor, Bruhwiler, Lori, Crevoisier, Cyril, Crill, Patrick, Covey, Kristofer, Curry, Charle, Frankenberg, Christian, Gedney, Nicola, Höglund Isaksson, Lena, Ishizawa, Misa, Ito, Akihiko, Joos, Fortunat, Kim Heon, Sook, Kleinen, Thoma, Krummel, Paul, Lamarque Jean, Françoi, Langenfelds, Ray, Locatelli, Robin, Machida, Toshinobu, Maksyutov, Shamil, McDonald Kyle, C., Marshall, Julia, Melton Joe, R., Morino, Isamu, Naik Vaishali, Oapo, Doherty, Simon, Parmentier Frans Jan, W., Patra Prabir, K., Peng, Changhui, Peng, Shushi, Peters Glen, P., Pison, Isabelle, Prigent, Catherine, Prinn, Ronald, Ramonet, Michel, Riley William, J., Saito, Makoto, Santini, Monia, Schroeder, Ronny, Simpson Isobel, J., Spahni, Renato, Steele, Paul, Takizawa, Atsushi, Thornton Brett, F., Tian, Hanqin, Tohjima, Yasunori, Viovy, Nicola, Voulgarakis, Apostolo, van Weele, Michiel, van der Werf Guido, R., Weiss, Ray, Wiedinmyer, Christine, Wilton David, J., Wiltshire, Andy, Worthy, Doug, Wunch, Debra, Xu, Xiyan, Yoshida, Yukio, Zhang, Bowen, Zhang, Zhen, Zhu, Qiuan, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Modélisation INVerse pour les mesures atmosphériques et SATellitaires (SATINV), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), ICOS-ATC (ICOS-ATC), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, The Department of Thematic Studies - Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University (LIU), SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON), European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC), LM, Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma), Environment and Climate Change Canada, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield [Sheffield], JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) (LMD), Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Tropospheric sounding, assimilation, and modeling group [JPL], Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)-NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Climate and Environmental Physics [Bern] (CEP), Physikalisches Institut [Bern], Universität Bern [Bern] (UNIBE)-Universität Bern [Bern] (UNIBE), Atmospheric Chemistry Division [Boulder], National Center for Atmospheric Research [Boulder] (NCAR), Oceans and Atmosphere, CSIRO, Strathom Energie, Centre Européen de Réalité Virtuelle (CERV), École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest (ENIB), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), ICOS-RAMCES (ICOS-RAMCES), Laboratoire d'Etude du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique (LERMA), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Shandong Agricultural University (SDAU), Modélisation des Surfaces et Interfaces Continentales (MOSAIC), Department of Physics [Imperial College London], Imperial College London, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences [Amsterdam] (FALW), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO - UC San Diego), University of California [San Diego] (UC San Diego), University of California (UC)-University of California (UC), Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Change (MOHC), United Kingdom Met Office [Exeter], Climate Research Division [Toronto], California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Laboratoire de Physique et d'Etude des Matériaux (UMR 8213) (LPEM), Ecole Superieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris (ESPCI Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), USC Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California (USC), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Prinn, Ronald G, Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-École polytechnique (X)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), Universität Bern [Bern]-Universität Bern [Bern], Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO), and University of California-University of California
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Naturgeografi ,TRACE GASES ,010501 environmental sciences ,Atmospheric sciences ,7. Clean energy ,01 natural sciences ,Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience ,Methane ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Natural gas ,11. Sustainability ,SDG 13 - Climate Action ,Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences ,Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ,Greenhouse effect ,lcsh:Environmental sciences ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,lcsh:GE1-350 ,[PHYS]Physics [physics] ,GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ,methane ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,Geology ,PAST 2 DECADES ,Carbon project ,Atmospheric chemistry ,Physical Sciences ,hydroxyl ,Earth and Related Environmental Sciences ,Wetland methane emissions ,BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS ,NATURAL-GAS ,PROCESS-BASED MODEL ,TROPOSPHERIC METHANE ,530 Physics ,methane sources ,Climate change ,Atmospheric Sciences ,ATMOSPHERIC HYDROXYL RADICALS ,SDG 14 - Life Below Water ,ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION ,550 Earth sciences & geology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,global model ,Science & Technology ,business.industry ,Environmental engineering ,Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap ,15. Life on land ,methane budget ,lcsh:Geology ,Climate Action ,Geochemistry ,chemistry ,Physical Geography ,13. Climate action ,Greenhouse gas ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science ,business ,[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph] ,INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT ACCMIP - Abstract
The global methane (CH4) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH4 over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH4 sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH4 by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (similar to biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio-economists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories and data-driven approaches (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations). For the 2003-2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by top-down inversions at 558 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 540-568. About 60% of global emissions are anthropogenic (range 50-65 %). Since 2010, the bottom-up global emission inventories have been closer to methane emissions in the most carbon-intensive Representative Concentrations Pathway (RCP8.5) and higher than all other RCP scenarios. Bottom-up approaches suggest larger global emissions (736 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 596-884) mostly because of larger natural emissions from individual sources such as inland waters, natural wetlands and geological sources. Considering the atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget, it is likely that some of the individual emissions reported by the bottom-up approaches are overestimated, leading to too large global emissions. Latitudinal data from top-down emissions indicate a predominance of tropical emissions (similar to 64% of the global budget, amp;lt;30 degrees N) as compared to mid (similar to 32 %, 30-60 degrees N) and high northern latitudes (similar to 4 %, 60-90 degrees N). Top-down inversions consistently infer lower emissions in China (similar to 58 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 51-72, -14 %) and higher emissions in Africa (86 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 73-108, + 19 %) than bottom-up values used as prior estimates. Overall, uncertainties for anthropogenic emissions appear smaller than those from natural sources, and the uncertainties on source categories appear larger for top-down inversions than for bottom-up inventories and models. The most important source of uncertainty on the methane budget is attributable to emissions from wetland and other inland waters. We show that the wetland extent could contribute 30-40% on the estimated range for wetland emissions. Other priorities for improving the methane budget include the following: (i) the development of process-based models for inland-water emissions, (ii) the intensification of methane observations at local scale (flux measurements) to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scale (surface networks and satellites) to constrain top-down inversions, (iii) improvements in the estimation of atmospheric loss by OH, and (iv) improvements of the transport models integrated in top-down inversions. The data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GLOBAL_METHANE_BUDGET_2016_V1.1) and the Global Carbon Project. Funding Agencies|Swiss National Science Foundation; NASA [NNX14AF93G, NNX14AO73G]; National Environmental Science Program - Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub; European Commission [283576, 633080]; ESA Climate Change Initiative Greenhouse Gases Phase 2 project; US Department of Energy, BER [DE-AC02-05CH11231]; FAO member countries; Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [2-1502]; ERC [322998]; NERC [NE/J00748X/1]; Swedish Research Council VR; Research Council of Norway [244074]; NSF [1243232, 1243220]; National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC); Chinas QianRen Program; CSIRO Australia; Australian Bureau of Meteorology; Australian Institute of Marine Science; Australian Antarctic Division; NOAA USA; Meteorological Service of Canada; National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) [NAG5-12669, NNX07AE89G, NNX11AF17G, NNX07AE87G, NNX07AF09G, NNX11AF15G, NNX11AF16G]; Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC, UK) [GA01081]; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO Australia); Bureau of Meteorology (Australia); Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Enhanced North American carbon uptake associated with El Niño.
- Author
-
Hu L, Andrews AE, Thoning KW, Sweeney C, Miller JB, Michalak AM, Dlugokencky E, Tans PP, Shiga YP, Mountain M, Nehrkorn T, Montzka SA, McKain K, Kofler J, Trudeau M, Michel SE, Biraud SC, Fischer ML, Worthy DEJ, Vaughn BH, White JWC, Yadav V, Basu S, and van der Velde IR
- Abstract
Long-term atmospheric CO
2 mole fraction and δ13 CO2 observations over North America document persistent responses to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. We estimate these responses corresponded to 0.61 (0.45 to 0.79) PgC year-1 more North American carbon uptake during El Niño than during La Niña between 2007 and 2015, partially offsetting increases of net tropical biosphere-to-atmosphere carbon flux around El Niño. Anomalies in derived North American net ecosystem exchange (NEE) display strong but opposite correlations with surface air temperature between seasons, while their correlation with water availability was more constant throughout the year, such that water availability is the dominant control on annual NEE variability over North America. These results suggest that increased water availability and favorable temperature conditions (warmer spring and cooler summer) caused enhanced carbon uptake over North America near and during El Niño.- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.