Search

Abstract The safety of the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine as used in general practice in England was examined by prescription-event monitoring (PEM). Patients were identified from dispensed National Health Service (NHS) [...]

Abstract Following changes in the safety information on the use of risperidone and olanzapine in elderly patients with dementia, data from prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies of risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine [...]

Background: Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that targets insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by stimulating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma. Pioglitazone belongs to a class of drugs called thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and was launched in the UK in November 2000.Objective: To monitor, using prescription-event monitoring, the post-marketing safety of pioglitazone, which is prescribed in primary care in England.Methods: An observational cohort study in which patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary-care physicians/general practitioners (GPs) between November 2000 and June 2001. Information on demographics, the use of pioglitazone, clinical event data, events suspected as adverse drug reactions, reasons for stopping the drug and cause of death (if appropriate) were collected using questionnaires posted to GPs at least 8 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Event incidence densities (IDs) [number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure] were calculated.Results: The cohort comprised 12 772 patients (median age 62 years); 53.1% were males. The most frequent starting daily dose of pioglitazone was either 15 mg or 30 mg (n = 10 298). Pioglitazone/metformin was the most frequently used combination reported (n = 4029). Of the 3690 patients who stopped treatment, 1143 stopped due to reasons related to poor glycaemic control. 'Oedema/fluid retention' (n = 121) and 'weight gain' (n = 118) also appeared high on the list of reasons for discontinuing. 'Malaise/lassitude' and 'nausea/vomiting' were the most frequently reported suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with pioglitazone. Specific clinical events considered as early onset events with pioglitazone were: 'malaise/lassitude', 'nausea/vomiting', 'dizziness', 'headache/migraine', 'diarrhoea', 'weight gain' and 'abnormal liver function test'.Conclusion: Pioglitazone was considered to be a reasonably well tolerated drug, with the main reasons for discontinuing being related to the drug not being effective. The frequency of individual ADRs reported in this study did not exceed the frequency in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for pioglitazone. However, amongst the frequently reported suspected ADRs, 'nausea/vomiting' and 'diarrhoea' are not listed in the SPC. Further research is required to assess whether the risk of myocardial infarction and deaths due to cardiovascular causes is a class effect of the thiazolidinediones. Results from this study should be taken into account with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses findings of a study which examined the safety profiles of the anti-obesity agents orlistat and sibutramine using prescription-event monitoring. Licensed in Great Britain in December 1998 and May 2001 for the treatment of obesity, orlistat is a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor while sibutramine is a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. Several side effects of orlistat include diarrhea, flatus and oily or fatty stools.

Introduction A modified prescription-event monitoring (PEM) study was conducted to examine the safety of the introduction of the metered dose inhaler (MDI) Flixotide EvohalerTM (fluticasone with the propellant HFA 134a). Methods Patients were identified from the first NHS prescriptions dispensed in England for Flixotide EvohalerTM. Postal questionnaires were sent to the prescribing doctor, requesting information including: demographic characteristics, severity of indication, concomitant medication, event data 3 months prior to and 3 months after the first prescription, and any reasons for stopping Flixotide. Pregnancies, deaths and selected events were followed up. Incidence density ratios (IDRs) were calculated to compare event rates 3 months before and 3 months after the introduction of Flixotide EvohalerTM. Results The cohort comprised 13 413 patients that were prescribed Flixotide EvohalerTM. The response rate was 64.0%. When the pre- and post-exposure periods were compared fewer patients had events in the post-exposure period, and there was no significant difference in the length of courses of oral steroid use. Eighteen patients experienced an event within 1 hour of using Flixotide EvohalerTM; these were minor with the exception of one case of angioneurotic facial oedema. Six of these events were assessed as possibly related to Flixotide EvohalerTM. During the study period there were an additional 13 patients with events assessed as possibly related to Flixotide EvohalerTM, including two reports of allergic reactions. Discussion The results suggest that the transition to Flixotide EvohalerTM was generally well tolerated. The modified methodology has contributed to the risk management of the introduction of this product. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: A prescription event monitoring (PEM) postmarketing surveillance study was carried out to examine the safety of zafirlukast as used in general practice in England. Methods: Exposure data were obtained from the first National Health Service (NHS) prescription dispensed for patients whose prescription details were processed by the Prescription Pricing Authority between August 1998 and December 2000. Outcome data were obtained from ‘green form’ questionnaires sent to general practitioners (GPs) at least 6 months following the first prescription issued. Incidence densities (IDs) were calculated for events reported per 1000 months of patient exposure and ID differences between the first month of treatment and months 2–6 combined were analysed. Events of medical interest were followed up by postal questionnaire sent to GPs. Results: 21 557 green forms were sent to 8051 doctors, of which 9124 (42.3%) were returned. Useful clinical data was obtained for 7976 patients of which 4664 (58.5%) were female and 3265 (40.9%) were male. The patient's sex was not specified in 47 (0.6%) forms. The median age of the cohort was 53 years (interquartile range 38–66 years). The most frequently reported primary indication was the licensed indication of asthma, but for a small proportion of the cohort it was prescribed ‘off label’. A total of 152 events in 120 (1.5%) patients were reported as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by GPs on the green forms. ADRs with the highest reported frequency were headache and nausea. There were 3514 reasons for stopping zafirlukast in 3148 (39.5%) patients, the most frequently reported of which was that the drug was ‘ineffective’ (2008 patients; 25.2%). The most frequently reported specified clinical reason for stopping was headache (82 patients; 1.0%). There were 28 pregnancies reported in this cohort, 20 of which were reported to have exposure to zafirlukast during the first trimester. Nine live births with no recorded congenital abnormalities were reported for pregnancies with exposure in the first trimester. There were 151 deaths reported during the study period (1.9%). The most frequently reported causes of death were related to the respiratory system (57; 37.7%), including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and bronchopneumonia. Conclusion: This study showed that zafirlukast, as used in general practice in England, is a generally well tolerated drug with few associated adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Rosuvastatin is a lipid-lowering drug, the newest of a class of drugs called HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, or 'statins', launched in the UK in March 2003. Our objective was to monitor the post-marketing safety of this drug, prescribed in primary care in England, using prescription-event monitoring.Methods: An observational cohort study in which patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians/general practitioners (GPs) between August and December 2003. Demographic and clinical-event data were collected from questionnaires posted to GPs at least 6 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Stratified analysis of specific events by starting dose of rosuvastatin was conducted. Follow-up and causality assessment of medically significant events was undertaken.Results: The cohort comprised 11,680 patients (median age 64 years); 50.3% were males (5880 of 11,680). The median period of treatment was 9.8 months. Of these patients, 72.7% (n = 8494) were started on rosuvastatin 10 mg/day. A total of 17.5% (n = 2047) of the patients were reported to have stopped treatment with rosuvastatin. Myalgia was the most frequent reason for stopping rosuvastatin and the most frequently reported clinical event. A 2.5-fold increase in the rate of abnormal liver-function tests (LFTs) was observed for patients started on rosuvastatin 40 mg/day compared with those started on 10 mg/day (2.71; 95% CI 1.53, 4.53). No case of rhabdomyolysis was reported in this cohort.Conclusion: Rosuvastatin was considered to be a reasonably well tolerated drug. In the majority of patients, rosuvastatin was prescribed in line with recommendations. Abnormality of LFTs was found to be more frequent with the 40 mg/day dosage of rosuvastatin. Results from this study should be taken into account together with those of other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies of rosuvastatin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following changes in the safety information on the use of risperidone and olanzapine in elderly patients with dementia, data from prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies of risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine were examined. The aim was to compare incidence rates for events reported as cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during the first 180 days of treatment in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics for dementia or other indications, because of the possible association between dementia and stroke in users of atypical antipsychotics. A retrospective analysis of data from the three observational studies was conducted using Poisson regression modelling and survival analysis. Within the risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine cohorts, 23 (0.30%), 6 (0.35%) and 10 (0.11%) patients respectively, were reported to have had a CVA/TIA event. Age, sex and indication (dementia or other) were identified as important confounding variables; age being the most important. The crude rate ratios (RRs) for CVA/TIA for risperidone or quetiapine vs. olanzapine indicated an approximate three-fold relative difference in rate during the first six months but after adjustment for age, sex and indication, the RRs were non-significant (1.2 (95% CI 0.5,3.0) and 2.1 (95% CI 0.6,7.7), respectively). For risperidone vs. quetiapine, crude and adjusted RRs were not significantly different. Of the three drugs, the time to event was shortest for risperidone and also shortest for risperidone or quetiapine users where the indication was dementia. The age and sex adjusted RR of CVA/TIA in patients prescribed risperidone for dementia vs. other indications was 6.7 (95% CI 2.4,18.9). The adjusted RRs for quetiapine, according to indication, could not be calculated due to missing information on age and sex. There were no cases of CVA/TIA with dementia for olanzapine, thus the RRs and time to event curves according to indication could not be examined. This study revealed no significant difference in the adjusted RR of CVA/TIA events in the first 180 days of treatment in patients prescribed risperidone or quetiapine when compared with olanzapine. However, dementia appears to be an important risk factor. These results should be considered alongside other pharmacoepidemiological, studies on this topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) reported in a prescription event monitoring study of Yasmin®, an oral contraceptive. Reports of DVT/PE and events suggestive of DVT/PE were followed up by questionnaire. Thirteen cases (DVT five; PE eight), each with possible risk factor(s), were identified in 15 645 females using Yasmin®. Applying complete case analysis, the crude incidence rate was 13.7 cases per 10 000 woman-years (95% confidence interval 7.3, 23.4). Yasmin is associated with venous thromboembolism. An incidence rate has been calculated, but this may be subject to bias and should be interpreted with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mirtazpine is the first noradrenaline and serotonin specific antidepressant. We monitored the safety of mirtazapine as reported in primary practice in England. The exposure data were provided by monitoring the dispensed prescriptions issued between September 1997 and February 1999. Questionnaires sent to GPs provided outcome data. Drowsiness/sedation and malaise/lassitude were the most frequent ADRs (116, 71 respectively) and had the highest incidence density (per 1000 patient-months) in the first month of treatment (58.1, 27.8 respectively). Agitation (73), aggression (70), rash (20), hallucinations (13) and abnormal dreams (31 were unlabelled AES while abnormal liver function tests (12), syncope (8), abnormal behaviour (4) and visual disturbance (3) were labelled AES possibly due to mirtazapine use. Serious suspected ADRs reported were facial oedema (5), allergy (3), bone marrow toxicity (2) and myelodysplasia (1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Olanzapine is an 'atypical' antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia. We analysed adverse events (AEs) reported in primary practice in England. Dispensed prescriptions issued between December 1996 and May 1998 provided exposure data. Questionnaires sent to general practitioners provided outcomes. Frequently reported AEs were: drowsiness/sedation (n = 19), extrapyramidal disorder (n = 13) and unspecified side-effects (n = 33). Events with highest incidence density in first month and reason for stopping were: drowsiness/sedation [n = 153, incidence density (ID)1 18.9], weight gain (n = 117, ID1 8.9) and malaise/lassitude (n = 65, ID1 5.2). Extrapyramidal disorders were more common in elderly population (>70 years, ID1 3.6, risk 26.0 per 1000 patients) compared to< 70 YEARS (ID1 1.1, RISK 8.4 PER 1000 PATIENTS). SERIOUS SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS WERE NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME (N = 1) AND ANGIONEUROTIC OOEDEMA (N = 2). THERE WERE EIGHT REPORTS OF DIABETES MELLITUS ASSESSED AS POSSIBLY DUE TO OLANZAPINE. DIABETES MELLITUS WAS AN UNLABELLED AE AND POSSIBLE SIGNAL GENERATED BY PRESCRIPTION-EVENT MONITORING. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sertindole (Serdolect), an atypical antipsychotic, was voluntarily suspended in the European Union in 1998 following regulatory concerns over reports of serious cardiac dysrhythmias and sudden unexpected deaths. The reported causes of death, their frequency, prolongation of the rate corrected QT interval (QTc) and cardiac dysrhythmias in patients prescribed sertindole were compared with those for patients treated with two other atypical antipsychotics. All patients in England, prescribed atypical antipsychotics by general practitioners during each drug's immediate post-marketing period, were identified using an observational cohort technique, prescription-event monitoring. Mortality rates in the sertindole cohort were compared with those in a comparator cohort using standardized mortality ratios and incidence rate ratios. Cardiovascular events were reviewed and followed up to identify cases of prolongation of QTc interval. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between sertindole and the comparator cohort, although confidence intervals (CI) were wide due to small numbers in the sertindole cohort. A much smaller number of patients were prescribed sertindole than the other antipsychotics. Six cases of prolongation of QTc interval were identified in 462 patients (1.3%, 95% CI 0.5-2.8) treated with sertindole and one with unspecified electrocardiogram changes in the comparator cohort of 16,542 patients. This study contributes to the understanding of the occurrence of prolongation of QTc interval during clinical use of sertindole, the incidence of which was similar to that in clinical trials. Although no statistically significant difference was shown in mortality rates between sertindole and comparator cohort, the sertindole cohort was too small to rule out an association between the use of this drug and cardiovascular deaths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]