Search

Glioblastoma, the most lethal primary brain cancer, is extremely proliferative and invasive. Tumor cells at tumor/brain-interface often exist behind a functionally intact blood-brain barrier (BBB), and so are shielded from exposure to therapeutic drug concentrations. An ideal glioblastoma treatment needs to engage targets that drive proliferation as well as invasion, with brain penetrant therapies. One such target is the mitotic kinesin KIF11, which can be inhibited with ispinesib, a potent molecularly-targeted drug. Although, achieving durable brain exposures of ispinesib is critical for adequate tumor cell engagement during mitosis, when tumor cells are vulnerable, for efficacy. Our results demonstrate that the delivery of ispinesib is restricted by P-gp and Bcrp efflux at BBB. Thereby, ispinesib distribution is heterogeneous with concentrations substantially lower in invasive tumor rim (intact BBB) compared to glioblastoma core (disrupted BBB). We further find that elacridar—a P-gp and Bcrp inhibitor—improves brain accumulation of ispinesib, resulting in remarkably reduced tumor growth and extended survival in a rodent model of glioblastoma. Such observations show the benefits and feasibility of pairing a potentially ideal treatment with a compound that improves its brain accumulation, and supports use of this strategy in clinical exploration of cell cycle-targeting therapies in brain cancers.

The effective treatment of brain tumors is a considerable challenge in part because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that limits drug delivery. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive and infiltrative primary brain tumor with an extremely poor prognosis after standard-of-care therapy with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. DNA damage response (DDR) pathways play a critical role in DNA repair in cancer cells, and inhibition of these pathways can potentially augment RT and chemotherapy tumor cell toxicity. The ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) kinase is a key regulator of the DDR network and is potently and selectively inhibited by the ATR inhibitor berzosertib. Although in vitro studies demonstrate a synergistic effect of berzosertib in combination with temozolomide, in vivo efficacy studies have yet to recapitulate this observation using intracranial tumor models. In the current study, we demonstrate that delivery of berzosertib to the brain is restricted by efflux at the BBB. Berzosertib has a high binding affinity to brain tissue compared with plasma, thereby leading to low free drug concentrations in the brain. Berzosertib distribution is heterogenous within the tumor, wherein concentrations are substantially lower in normal brain and invasive tumor rim (wherein the BBB is intact) when compared with those in the tumor core (wherein the BBB is leaky). These results demonstrate that high tissue binding and limited and heterogenous brain distribution of berzosertib may be important factors that influence the efficacy of berzosertib therapy in GBM. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study examined the brain delivery and efficacy of berzosertib in patient-derived xenograft models of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Berzosertib is actively effluxed at the blood-brain barrier and is highly bound to brain tissue, leading to low free drug concentrations in the brain. Berzosertib is heterogeneously distributed into different regions of the brain and tumor and, in this study, was not efficacious in vivo when combined with temozolomide. These factors inform the future clinical utility of berzosertib for GBM.

BACKGROUND Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, fatal brainstem tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors, like DMG, at cytotoxic concentrations. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has emerged as a drug delivery technique that bypasses the BBB through a direct interstitial infusion under a pressure gradient. However, drug distribution and clearance from the brain following CED is poorly understood and has been cited as a potential reason for the lack of efficacy observed in prior clinical trials. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to understand how two small molecule inhibitors (alisertib, ponatinib) that inhibit cell growth and proliferation in DMG cells in vitro distribute and clear from the brain following CED to the brainstem. METHODS Sprague-dawley rats underwent a single 60mL CED infusion of drug to the brainstem (200mM alisertib, 10mM ponatinib) and were sacrificed 0.083, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours following the completion of the infusion. Brains were dissected and drug concentration was determined via HPLC analysis. RESULTS No rats showed any clinical or neurological signs of toxicity post-infusion. Both drugs showed significant differences in drug concentration based on anatomical brain region where higher concentrations were observed in the pons and cerebellum compared to the cortex. Drug half-life in the brain was ~0.5 hours for alisertib and ~1 hour for ponatinib, but this was not significantly increased following co-administration of elacridar, a BBB efflux pump inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that elimination of drugs from the brain in a complex, multifactorial mechanism that warrants further preclinical investigation prior to the initiation of a clinical trial.

Genotoxic damage induced by radiation triggers a highly coordinated DNA damage response, and molecular inhibitors of key nodes within this complex response network can profoundly enhance the antitumor efficacy of radiation. This is especially true for drugs targeting the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase, which is a core component of the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway, and ataxia telangiectasia mutated, which coordinates cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair functionalities after radiation exposure. Unlike the more modest in vitro radiosensitizing effects seen with classic sensitizing agents such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, or taxanes, DNA-dependent protein kinase or ataxia telangiectasia mutated inhibitors provide much more robust sensitizing effects in vitro, as might be anticipated from targeting these key DNA repair modulators. However, patients with homozygous inactivating mutations of ataxia telangiectasia mutated or mice with homozygous defects in DNA-dependent protein kinase (severe combined immunodeficiency) have profoundly enhanced acute normal tissue radiation reactions. Therefore, there is significant potential that the combination of small molecule inhibitors of these kinases with radiation could cause similar dose-limiting acute normal tissue toxicities. Similarly, although less understood, inhibition of these DNA repair response pathways could markedly increase the risk of late radiation toxicities. Because these potent radiosensitizers could be highly useful to improve local control of otherwise radiation-resistant tumors, understanding the potential for elevated risks of radiation injury is essential for optimizing therapeutic ratio and developing safe and informative clinical trials. In this review, we will discuss 2 straightforward models to assess the potential for enhanced mucosal toxicity in the oral cavity and small intestine established in our laboratories. We also will discuss similar strategies for evaluating potential drug–radiation interactions with regard to increased risks of debilitating late effects.

Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Radio-resistance mechanisms limit the benefit of radiation therapy (RT) for melanoma brain metastases. A key pathway for radiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair is non-homologous end joining, which is critically mediated by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). Here we evaluated radio-sensitizing effects of M3814, a selective oral inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of melanoma brain metastases. In a clonogenic survival assay, M3841 augmented RT-induced killing of M12 cells at concentrations of ≥300 nM, and a minimum of 16 h exposure with ~300 nM M3814 was required for effective sensitization. M3814 inhibited RT-induced (5 Gy) auto-phosphorylation of serine-2056 of DNA-PKcs in primary cultures of M12, M15 and M27 PDX lines. Interestingly, inhibition of RT-induced DNA-PKcs by M3814 coincided with increased KAP1 phosphorylation, a DNA damage signaling regulated via ATM. Persistent γH2AX foci were observed in 28% M12 cells at 24 hours after co-treatment with M3814 and RT as compared to 12% cells following RT alone. In vivo pharmacokinetic analysis after single oral dose of 20 mg/kg M3814, showed reasonably short half-life (~2.44 hours) and poor brain distribution in wild-type FBV mice (Kpuu, 0.027). Consistent with an efflux liability, brain distribution of M3814 in triple knockout mice for BCRP/MDR1A/B was ~11 fold higher (Kpuu, 0.215). Compared to normal brain, much higher M3814 concentrations were detected in intracranially implanted M12 tumors (~23 fold and ~20 fold) 2 and 6 hours after a single oral dose of 50mg/kg respectively. The relative exclusion of M3814 from normal brain as compared to brain metastases suggests that this drug may have a favorable toxicity profile when combined with radiation for treatment of melanoma brain metastases, and this hypothesis is being tested in ongoing efficacy studies.

Therapeutic options for the treatment of glioblastoma remain inadequate despite concerted research efforts in drug development. Therapeutic failure can result from poor permeability of the blood-brain barrier, heterogeneous drug distribution, and development of resistance. Elucidation of relationships among such parameters could enable the development of predictive models of drug response in patients and inform drug development. Complementary analyses were applied to a glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft model in order to quantitatively map distribution and resulting cellular response to the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Mass spectrometry images of erlotinib were registered to histology and magnetic resonance images in order to correlate drug distribution with tumor characteristics. Phosphoproteomics and immunohistochemistry were used to assess protein signaling in response to drug, and integrated with transcriptional response using mRNA sequencing. This comprehensive dataset provides simultaneous insight into pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and indicates that erlotinib delivery to intracranial tumors is insufficient to inhibit EGFR tyrosine kinase signaling., Despite major drug discovery efforts, the therapeutic options for glioblastoma (GBM) remain inadequate. Here they analyze patient-derived xenograft model of GBM to quantitatively map distribution and cellular response to the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib, and report heterogeneous erlotinib delivery to intracranial tumors to be inadequate to inhibit EGFR signaling.

Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, uniformly fatal brain tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), including drug efflux pumps, prevent numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors at cytotoxic concentrations. Alisertib is an aurora kinase inhibitor that was previously identified in a drug screen as a compound of interest. However, its ability to penetrate the BBB is not well established. The goals of this study were two-fold: 1) determine the CNS distribution and clearance rates of alisertib following systemic delivery and if the BBB efflux pumps, Pgp and BCRP, alter distribution and clearance. 2) Compare alisertib distribution and clearance following convection-enhanced delivery to systemic results. WT and Pgp/BCRP knockout mice and Sprague-dawley rats underwent tail vein injection (mice and rats) or convection-enhanced delivery to the brainstem (rats only) of alisertib and sacrificed at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24hours. The plasma and brain were collected and analyzed for alisertib concentration by HPLC-MS/MS. We found that in both mice and rats, alisertib concentration in the plasma and brain decreased biexponentially. Overall, Alisertib was found to be 3.14% brain penetrant. In Pgp/BCRP knockout mice, alisertib concentration in the plasma and brain decreased biexponentially, but was detected at higher concentration at all time points in the brain compared to WT mice. This resulted in a higher brain penetrance (17.26%). Differences based on anatomical brain region were significant in those rats which received convection-enhanced delivery. Alisertib was found in higher concentration in the pons and cerebellum compared to systemic delivery, but lower concentrations in the cortex and plasma. These results suggest that drug clearance may be a general mechanism limiting efficacy of drugs of interest and should be carefully considered during preclinical evaluation.

Glioblastoma, the most common and lethal of brain tumors, is both highly invasive and proliferative. This allows tumor cells to infiltrate into regions of the brain with an intact blood brain barrier and be protected from effective therapeutics. Thus, an ideal glioblastoma therapy needs to target cellular components that drive both invasion and proliferation, with inhibitors that penetrate the blood brain barrier. The mitotic kinesin KIF11 meets these criteria and it can be targeted with ispinesib, a highly specific small molecule inhibitor. However, to be effective, ispinesib needs to cross the blood brain barrier and be retained within brain long enough to target glioblastoma cells when they are vulnerable, during mitosis.. We have examined the factors that affect distribution of ispinesib to both brain and glioblastoma. We find that delivery of ispinesib is limited by P-gp and Bcrp-mediated drug efflux at the blood brain barrier. Consequently, ispinesib levels are significantly lower in the infiltrative tumor margin relative to the tumor core, where the blood brain barrier is defective. We also show that elacridar—an inhibitor of the P-gp and Brcp efflux transporters—enhances delivery of ispinesib, and that co-administration of ispinesib with elacridar markedly slows tumor proliferation and prolongs survival in a mouse model of this disease. These results demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of combining a potentially ideal therapeutic with a compound that enhances brain retention of this therapeutic, and provides support for utilizing this approach in clinical investigations of KIF11 inhibitors in GBM.

OBJECTIVES Dogma suggests that for brain tumors, regions of enhancement on T1-weighted gadolinium contrast enhanced (T1Gd) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlate with intravenously delivered drug distribution as enhancement indicates a compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, poor response to intravenous therapies highlights the importance of the diffuse disease beyond enhancing regions. This study investigated whether imaging features can provide an accurate prediction of drug distribution. METHODS Eight brain tumor patients (7 gliomas and 1 metastatic adenocarcinoma) were included in this Phase 0 trial. Presurgery T1-weighted, T1Gd, T2-weighted gadolinium contrast enhanced (T2Gd), and T2-weighted Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2FLAIR) MRIs were acquired. All images underwent bias correction using the N4 algorithm, standardization of intensities, and registration. Prior to incision, patients received both an antibiotic cefazolin (6% BBB penetrance) and levetiracetam (80% BBB penetrance), an anti-seizure drug. Subsequently, multiple blood samples and image-guided biopsies were taken and analyzed for drug concentration using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Biopsy drug levels are reported as Brain-Plasma Ratio (BPR), the ratio of biopsy concentration relative to plasma concentration. Mean image intensity was extracted from an 8x8 mm window surrounding each biopsy location. Regression analysis was performed to determine which combination of image types were linearly predictive of BPR for both drugs. Correlations were also analyzed according to the biopsy location radiographic appearance. RESULTS Regression analysis revealed that T2Gd intensity was linearly predictive of cefazolin BPR and FLAIR intensity was linearly predictive of levetiracetam BPR (p=0.009 and 0.041, respectively). Grouping samples according the the radiographic appearance revealed that levetiracetam BPR had a similar pattern of values to that of FLAIR intensities and cefazolin BPR had a similar pattern to T2, further supporting the regression analysis results. CONCLUSIONS Local concentrations of drug may be related to T2-weighted signals (T2Gd and T2FLAIR) rather than the gadolinium distribution on T1Gd images.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have had success in treating EGFR-positive tumors, including non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, developing EGFR inhibitors that can be delivered to the brain remains a challenge. To identify optimal compounds for brain delivery, eight EGFR inhibitors [afatinib, 6-[4-[(4-ethylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]phenyl]-N-(1-phenylethyl)-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-day]pyrimidin-4-amine (AEE788), [4-(3-chloro-2-fluoroanilino)-7-methoxyquinazolin-6-yl] (2R)-2,4-dimethylpiperazine-1-carboxylate (AZD3759), erlotinib, dacomitinib, gefitinib, osimertinib, and vandetanib] were evaluated for distributional kinetics using cassette dosing with the ultimate goal of understanding the brain penetrability of compounds that share the same molecular target in an important oncogenic signaling pathway for both primary brain tumors (glioblastoma) and brain metastases (e.g., NSCLC). Cassette dosing was validated by comparing the brain-to-plasma ratios obtained from cassette-dosing to discrete-dosing studies. The brain-to-blood partition coefficients (K(p,brain)) were calculated following cassette dosing of the eight EGFR inhibitors. The comparison of K(p,brain) in wild-type and transporter-deficient mice confirmed that two major efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB), P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, play a crucial role in the brain distribution of seven out of eight EGFR inhibitors. Results show that the prediction of brain distribution based on physicochemical properties of a drug can be misleading, especially for compounds subject to extensive efflux transport. Moreover, this study informs the choice of EGFR inhibitors, i.e., determining BBB permeability combined with a known target potency, that may be effective in future clinical trials for brain tumors.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common deadly malignant brain cancer of the central nervous system, with a median survival of 12–15 months. Scientific advancements are lacking in developing effective therapies for both primary GBM, as well as secondary GBMs, that typically originate as malignant transformation of lower-grade isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1-mutant tumors. The unique metabolomic profile of IDH1-mutant tumors presents opportunities to develop biomarker signatures of therapeutic efficacy. Microdialysis is an extracellular fluid sampling collection technique utilizing a perfused semipermeable catheter to permit diffusion of molecules between brain interstitium and the perfusate. We hypothesized that microdialysis may identify a metabolomics-based biomarker response to therapy in IDH1-mutant tumors. To test this hypothesis, orthotopic xenografts were generated from patient-derived xenografts (PDX) harboring mutant IDH-1 (R132H). Perfusates were collected from intra-cranial tumors in athymic nude mice sampled at baseline and 72h post treatment with temozolomide (TMZ), an oral alkylating agent used to treat IDH1-mutant gliomas, compared with vehicle treatment. Perfusates were analyzed via untargeted metabolomic profiling using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Tumor specific metabolites such as (D)-2 hydroxyglutarate, were detected in microdialysate from IDH-1 mutant tumor bearing mice compared to non-tumor bearing mice. We also found high levels of metabolites such as 5-methylthioadenosine, and dimethylarginine and wide range of amino acids in microdialysate from IDH-1 mutant tumor bearing mice. TMZ treatment induced changes to metabolites in creatine and histidine metabolism. Our results indicate that microdialysis is a feasible technology to identify metabolomics-based biomarkers in IDH1-mutant gliomas and their response to therapy. We suggest that in vivo intratumoral microdialysis over several days could yield metabolic pharmacodynamic biomarkers of value to therapeutic translation for IDH-mutant gliomas.

This study investigated how differences in drug distribution and free fraction at different tumor and tissue sites influence the efficacy of the multikinase inhibitor ponatinib in a patient-derived xenograft model of glioblastoma (GBM). Efficacy studies in GBM6 flank (heterotopic) and intracranial (orthotopic) models showed that ponatinib is effective in the flank but not in the intracranial model, despite a relatively high brain-to-plasma ratio. In vitro binding studies indicated that flank tumor had a higher free (unbound) drug fraction than normal brain. The total and free drug concentrations, along with the tissue-to-plasma ratio (Kp) and its unbound derivative (Kp,uu), were consistently higher in the flank tumor than the normal brain at 1 and 6 hours after a single dose in GBM6 flank xenografts. In the orthotopic xenografts, the intracranial tumor core displayed higher Kp and Kp,uu values compared with the brain-around-tumor (BAT). The free fractions and the total drug concentrations, hence free drug concentrations, were consistently higher in the core than in the BAT at 1 and 6 hours postdose. The delivery disadvantages in the brain and BAT were further evidenced by the low total drug concentrations in these areas that did not consistently exceed the in vitro cytotoxic concentration (IC50). Taken together, the regional differences in free drug exposure across the intracranial tumor may be responsible for compromising efficacy of ponatinib in orthotopic GBM6.

Dasatinib is a multikinase inhibitor in clinical trials for glioma, and thus far has failed to demonstrate significant efficacy. We investigated whether the ABC efflux transporters ABCG2 and ABCB1 expressed in the blood–brain barrier (BBB), are limiting the efficacy of dasatinib in the treatment of glioma using genetic and pharmacologic approaches. We utilized a genetic brainstem glioma mouse model driven by platelet-derived growth factor-B and p53 loss using abcg2/abcb1 wild-type (ABC WT) or abcg2/abcb1 knockout mice (ABC KO). First, we observed that brainstem glioma tumor latency is significantly prolonged in ABC KO versus ABC WT mice (median survival of 47 vs. 34 days). Dasatinib treatment nearly doubles the survival of brainstem glioma-bearing ABC KO mice (44 vs. 80 days). Elacridar, an ABCG2 and ABCB1 inhibitor, significantly increases the efficacy of dasatinib in brainstem glioma-bearing ABC WT mice (42 vs. 59 days). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrates that dasatinib delivery into the normal brain, but not into the tumor core, is significantly increased in ABC KO mice compared with ABC WT mice. Surprisingly, elacridar did not significantly increase dasatinib delivery into the normal brain or the tumor core of ABC WT mice. Next, we demonstrate that the tight junctions of the BBB of this model are compromised as assessed by tissue permeability to Texas Red dextran. Finally, elacridar increases the cytotoxicity of dasatinib independent of ABCG2 and ABCB1 expression in vitro. In conclusion, elacridar improves the efficacy of dasatinib in a brainstem glioma model without significantly increasing its delivery to the tumor core. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(5); 819–29. ©2016 AACR.

6-Acetyl-8-cyclopentyl-5-methyl-2-([5-(piperazin-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]amino)pyrido(2,3-d)pyrimidin-7(8H)-one [palbociclib (PD-0332991)] is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and is currently undergoing clinical trials for many solid tumors. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults and has limited treatment options. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 pathway is commonly dysregulated in GBM and is a promising target in treating this devastating disease. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits the delivery of drugs to invasive regions of GBM, where the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein can prevent treatments from reaching the tumor. The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanisms limiting the effectiveness of palbociclib therapy in an orthotopic xenograft model. The in vitro intracellular accumulation results demonstrated that palbociclib is a substrate for both P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein. In vivo studies in transgenic mice confirmed that efflux transport is responsible for the limited brain distribution of palbociclib. There was an ∼115-fold increase in brain exposure at steady state in the transporter deficient mice when compared with wild-type mice, and the efflux inhibitor elacridar significantly increased palbociclib brain distribution. Efficacy studies demonstrated that palbociclib is an effective therapy when GBM22 tumor cells are implanted in the flank, but ineffective in an orthotopic (intracranial) model. Moreover, doses designed to mimic brain exposure were ineffective in treating flank tumors. These results demonstrate that efflux transport in the BBB is involved in limiting the brain distribution of palbociclib and this has critical implications in determining effective dosing regimens of palbociclib therapy in the treatment of brain tumors.

Background Genetic profiling represents the future of neuro-oncology but suffers from inadequate biopsies in heterogeneous tumors like Glioblastoma (GBM). Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) targets enhancing core (ENH) but yields adequate tumor in only ~60% of cases. Further, CE-MRI poorly localizes infiltrative tumor within surrounding non-enhancing parenchyma, or brain-around-tumor (BAT), despite the importance of characterizing this tumor segment, which universally recurs. In this study, we use multiple texture analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze multi-parametric MRI, and produce new images indicating tumor-rich targets in GBM. Methods We recruited primary GBM patients undergoing image-guided biopsies and acquired pre-operative MRI: CE-MRI, Dynamic-Susceptibility-weighted-Contrast-enhanced-MRI, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Following image coregistration and region of interest placement at biopsy locations, we compared MRI metrics and regional texture with histologic diagnoses of high- vs low-tumor content (≥80% vs

BACKGROUND: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity is heterogeneous in GBM, and controversy surrounds whether associated heterogeneous delivery may limit efficacy for otherwise highly active drugs. Using a MDM2-amplified patient-derived xenograft model, the small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor SAR405838 was tested for both heterotopic and orthotopic efficacy under BBB-intact and disrupted conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A panel of 55 patient-derived GBM xenograft lines was screened for MDM2 expression. Four p53 wild-type lines were selected for in vitro testing with SAR405838. Treatment with 100 nM of SAR405838 induced a significantly higher reduction in neurosphere formation for MDM2 over-expressed lines (GBM108, 143) when compared with lines without MDM2 over-expression (GBM10, 102). SAR405838 also profoundly suppressed flank tumor growth in GBM108 but not GBM102 during in vivo testing. GBM108 tumors regressed to undetectable and remained undetectable for over 3 weeks after cessation of therapy. In contrast to the profound efficacy observed in flank models, the identical SAR405838 dosing regimen was ineffective in GBM108 orthotopic tumors. The impact of the BBB was subsequently tested by over-expressing VEGFA in GBM108 via lentiviral transduction. Consistent with a leakier vasculature, orthotopic GBM108-VEGFA exhibited markedly more pronounced accumulation of Texas Red-3 kDa dextran and extent of contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging when compared to GBM108-EV(empty-vector). Using MALDI-MS, SAR405838 delivery into orthotopic GBM108-VEGFA tumors was also found to be more homogeneous and significantly higher than corresponding GBM108-EV controls. Enhanced drug delivery in GBM108-VEGFA models translated into a marked enhancement in orthotopic treatment efficacy in comparison to GBM108-EV with a median survival prolongation of 37 vs 4 days (p = 0.0055.) CONCLUSIONS: SAR405838 provided remarkable efficacy in heterotopic but not orthotopic tumors. BBB disruption by VEGFA expression markedly enhanced drug delivery and treatment efficacy in orthotopic tumors, demonstrating the critical importance of BBB penetration for targeted therapies in gliomas.

Following the first CNS Anticancer Drug Discovery and Development Conference, the speakers from the first 4 sessions and organizers of the conference created this White Paper hoping to stimulate more and better CNS anticancer drug discovery and development. The first part of the White Paper reviews, comments, and, in some cases, expands on the 4 session areas critical to new drug development: pharmacological challenges, recent drug approaches, drug targets and discovery, and clinical paths. Following this concise review of the science and clinical aspects of new CNS anticancer drug discovery and development, we discuss, under the rubric "Accelerating Drug Discovery and Development for Brain Tumors," further reasons why the pharmaceutical industry and academia have failed to develop new anticancer drugs for CNS malignancies and what it will take to change the current status quo and develop the drugs so desperately needed by our patients with malignant CNS tumors. While this White Paper is not a formal roadmap to that end, it should be an educational guide to clinicians and scientists to help move a stagnant field forward.

Purpose: Wee1 regulates key DNA damage checkpoints, and in this study, the efficacy of the Wee1 inhibitor MK-1775 was evaluated in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenograft models alone and in combination with radiation and/or temozolomide. Experimental Design: In vitro MK-1775 efficacy alone and in combination with temozolomide, and the impact on DNA damage, was analyzed by Western blotting and γH2AX foci formation. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in orthotopic and heterotopic xenografts. Drug distribution was assessed by conventional mass spectrometry (MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS imaging. Results: GBM22 (IC50 = 68 nmol/L) was significantly more sensitive to MK-1775 compared with five other GBM xenograft lines, including GBM6 (IC50 >300 nmol/L), and this was associated with a significant difference in pan-nuclear γH2AX staining between treated GBM22 (81% cells positive) and GBM6 (20% cells positive) cells. However, there was no sensitizing effect of MK-1775 when combined with temozolomide in vitro. In an orthotopic GBM22 model, MK-1775 was ineffective when combined with temozolomide, whereas in a flank model of GBM22, MK-1775 exhibited both single-agent and combinatorial activity with temozolomide. Consistent with limited drug delivery into orthotopic tumors, the normal brain to whole blood ratio following a single MK-1775 dose was 5%, and MALDI-MS imaging demonstrated heterogeneous and markedly lower MK-1775 distribution in orthotopic as compared with heterotopic GBM22 tumors. Conclusions: Limited distribution to brain tumors may limit the efficacy of MK-1775 in GBM. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1916–24. ©2015 AACR.

PARP inhibition can enhance the efficacy of temozolomide and prolong survival in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) xenografts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib with temozolomide and to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies with efficacy in patient-derived GBM xenograft models. The combination of rucaparib with temozolomide was highly effective in vitro in short-term explant cultures derived from GBM12, and, similarly, the combination of rucaparib and temozolomide (dosed for 5 days every 28 days for 3 cycles) significantly prolonged the time to tumor regrowth by 40% in heterotopic xenografts. In contrast, the addition of rucaparib had no impact on the efficacy of temozolomide in GBM12 or GBM39 orthotopic models. Using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) II cells stably expressing murine BCRP1 or human MDR1, cell accumulation studies demonstrated that rucaparib is transported by both transporters. Consistent with the influence of these efflux pumps on central nervous system drug distribution, Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/− knockout mice had a significantly higher brain to plasma ratio for rucaparib (1.61 ± 0.25) than wild-type mice (0.11 ± 0.08). A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation after a single dose confirmed limited accumulation of rucaparib in the brain is associated with substantial residual PARP enzymatic activity. Similarly, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging demonstrated significantly enhanced accumulation of drug in flank tumor compared with normal brain or orthotopic tumors. Collectively, these results suggest that limited drug delivery into brain tumors may significantly limit the efficacy of rucaparib combined with temozolomide in GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(12); 2735–43. ©2015 AACR.

This paper, for the first time, demonstrates that exposure of cells to the poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer, Pluronic P85, results in a substantial decrease in ATP levels selectively in MDR cells. Cells expressing high levels of functional P-glycoprotein (MCF-7/ADR, KBv; LLC-MDR1; Caco-2, bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells [BBMECs]) are highly responsive to Pluronic treatment, while cells with low levels of P-glycoprotein expression (MCF-7, KB, LLC-PK1, human umbilical vein endothelial cells [HUVECs] C2C12 myoblasts) are much less responsive to such treatment. Cytotoxicity studies suggest that Pluronic acts as a chemosensitizer and potentiates cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin in MDR cells. The ability of Pluronic to inhibit P-glycoprotein and sensitize MDR cells appears to be a result of ATP depletion. Because many mechanisms of drug resistance are energy dependent, a successful strategy for treating MDR cancer could be based on selective energy depletion in MDR cells. Therefore, the finding of the energy-depleting effects of Pluronic P85, in combination with its sensitization effects is of considerable theoretical and practical significance. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

The current study presents a Bayesian approach to non-compartmental analysis (NCA), which provides the accurate and precise estimate of AUC 0 (∞) and any AUC 0 (∞) -based NCA parameter or derivation.In order to assess the performance of the proposed method, 1,000 simulated datasets were generated in different scenarios. A Bayesian method was used to estimate the tissue and plasma AUC 0 (∞) s and the tissue-to-plasma AUC 0 (∞) ratio. The posterior medians and the coverage of 95% credible intervals for the true parameter values were examined. The method was applied to laboratory data from a mice brain distribution study with serial sacrifice design for illustration.Bayesian NCA approach is accurate and precise in point estimation of the AUC 0 (∞) and the partition coefficient under a serial sacrifice design. It also provides a consistently good variance estimate, even considering the variability of the data and the physiological structure of the pharmacokinetic model. The application in the case study obtained a physiologically reasonable posterior distribution of AUC, with a posterior median close to the value estimated by classic Bailer-type methods.This Bayesian NCA approach for sparse data analysis provides statistical inference on the variability of AUC 0 (∞) -based parameters such as partition coefficient and drug targeting index, so that the comparison of these parameters following destructive sampling becomes statistically feasible.

Antifolates, in particular methotrexate (MTX), have been widely used in the treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Pemetrexed (PMX) is a novel antifolate that also exhibits potent antitumor activity against CNS malignancies. Studies have shown that brain distribution of both antifolates is significantly restricted, possible due to active efflux transport at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This study characterizes the brain-to-blood transport of PMX and MTX and examines the role of several efflux transporters in brain distribution of the antifolates by use of the intracerebral microinjection technique (brain efflux index). The results from this study show that both PMX and MTX undergo saturable efflux transport across the BBB, with elimination half-lives of approximately 39 minutes and 29 minutes, respectively. Of the various efflux transporters this study investigated, multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) does not play an important role in the brain distribution of the two antifolate drugs. Interestingly, breast-cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) makes a significant contribution to the brain elimination of MTX but not PMX. In addition, the brain-to-blood transport of both antifolates was inhibited by probenecid and benzylpenicillin, suggesting the involvement of organic anion transporters in the efflux of these compounds from the brain, with organic anion transporter 3 (Oat3) being a possibility. Our results suggest that one of the underlying mechanisms behind the limited brain distribution of PMX and MTX is active efflux transport processes at the BBB, including a benzylpenicillin-sensitive transport system and/or the active transporter Bcrp.

The study objective was to develop a formulation of elacridar to overcome its dissolution-rate-limited bioavailability. Elacridar is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitor that has been used to improve the brain distribution of drugs that are substrates of P-gp and BCRP. The chronic use of elacridar is restricted because of the poor solubility leading to poor oral bioavailability. A microemulsion formulation using Cremophor EL, Carbitol, and Captex 355 (6:3:1) was developed. The elacridar microemulsion was effective in the inhibition of P-gp and Bcrp in Madin-Darby canine kidney II-transfected cells. Friend Leukemia Virus Strain B (FVB) mice were used to determine the bioavailability of elacridar after a 10 mg/kg dose of elacridar in the microemulsion, intraperitoneally (i.p.) and orally (p.o.); and the absolute bioavailability was determined to be 1.3 and 0.47, respectively. Coadministration of elacridar microemulsion i.p. with p.o. erlotinib in FVB mice improved the erlotinib brain penetration threefold. The current study shows that a microemulsion formulation of elacridar is effective in improving the bioavailability of elacridar and is an effective inhibitor of P-gp and Bcrp, in vitro and in vivo. It offers an alternative to the suspension and allows a decrease in the dose required to achieve a significant inhibitory effect at the blood-brain barrier.

The objective of this study was to quantitatively examine the protein expression of relevant transporters and other proteins in the brain capillary endothelial cells isolated from wild-type mice and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp), and P-gp/Bcrp knockout mice. After the isolation of brain capillary endothelial cells, a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method with multiple reaction monitoring was used to determine the quantitative expression of membrane transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) of the various mouse genotypes. Quantitative expression of 29 protein molecules, including 12 ATP-binding cassette transporters, 10 solute carrier transporters, five receptors, and two housekeeping proteins, was examined by quantitative proteomics in the four mouse genotypes. There was no significant difference in the expression of P-gp between the wild-type and Bcrp1(−/−) mice. Likewise, Bcrp expression was not significantly different between the wild-type and Mdr1a/b(−/−) mice. There was no significant difference in the expression of any of the measured proteins in the brain capillary endothelial cells across the genotypes, except for the lack of expression of the corresponding protein in the mice that had a genetic deletion of P-gp or Bcrp. In conclusion, using a quantitative proteomic approach, we have shown that there are no changes in the expression of several relevant transporters in brain capillary endothelial cells isolated from single and combination knockout mice. These data suggest that the mechanism behind the functional compensation between P-gp and Bcrp at the BBB is not related to compensatory changes in transporter expression.

AAPS-FDA workshop white paper : Microdialysis principles, application, and regulatory perspectives report from the joint AAPS-FDA workshop, November 4-5, 2005, Nashville, TN

In individuals with brain tumors, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies of therapeutic agents have historically used analyses of drug concentrations in serum or cerebrospinal fluid, which unfortunately do not necessarily reflect concentrations within the tumor and adjacent brain. This review article introduces to neurological and medical oncologists, as well as pharmacologists, the application of microdialysis in monitoring drug metabolism and delivery within the fluid of the interstitial space of brain tumor and its surroundings. Microdialysis samples soluble molecules from the extracellular fluid via a semipermeable membrane at the tip of a probe. In the past decade, it has been used predominantly in neurointensive care in the setting of brain trauma, vasospasm, epilepsy, and intracerebral hemorrhage. At the first Carolyn Frye-Halloran Symposium held at Massachusetts General Hospital in March 2002, the concept of microdialysis was extended to specifically address its possible use in treating brain tumor patients. In doing so we provide a rationale for the use of this technology by a National Cancer Institute consortium, New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy, to measure levels of drugs in brain tissue as part of phase 1 trials.