Search

Background & Aims: Colonoscopic polypectomy is considered effective for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC), but the incidence of cancer in patients under colonoscopic surveillance has rarely been investigated. We determined the incidence of CRC in patients under colonoscopic surveillance and examined the circumstances and risk factors for CRC and adenoma with high-grade dysplasia., Methods: Patients were drawn from 3 adenoma chemoprevention trials. All underwent baseline colonoscopy with removal of at least one adenoma and were deemed free of remaining lesions. We identified patients subsequently diagnosed with invasive cancer or adenoma with high-grade dysplasia. The timing, location, and outcome of all cases of cancer and high-grade dysplasia identified are described and risks associated with their development explored., Results: CRC was diagnosed in 19 of the 2915 patients over a mean follow-up of 3.7 years (incidence, 1.74 cancers/1000 person-years). The cancers were located in all regions of the colon; 10 were at or proximal to the hepatic flexure. Although most of the cancers (84%) were of early stage, 2 participants died of CRC. Seven patients were diagnosed with adenoma with high-grade dysplasia during follow-up. Older patients and those with a history of more adenomas were at higher risk of being diagnosed with invasive cancer or adenoma with high-grade dysplasia., Conclusions: CRC is diagnosed in a clinically important proportion of patients following complete colonoscopy and polypectomy. More precise and representative estimates of CRC incidence and death among patients undergoing surveillance examinations are needed.

Background: Laboratory and epidemiologic data suggest that aspirin has an antineoplastic effect in the large bowel., Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind trial of aspirin as a chemopreventive agent against colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 1121 patients with a recent history of histologically documented adenomas to receive placebo (372 patients), 81 mg of aspirin (377 patients), or 325 mg of aspirin (372 patients) daily. According to the protocol, follow-up colonoscopy was to be performed approximately three years after the qualifying endoscopy. We compared the groups with respect to the risk of one or more neoplasms (adenomas or colorectal cancer) at least one year after randomization using generalized linear models to compute risk ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals., Results: Reported adherence to study medications and avoidance of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were excellent. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed at least one year after randomization in 1084 patients (97 percent). The incidence of one or more adenomas was 47 percent in the placebo group, 38 percent in the group given 81 mg of aspirin per day, and 45 percent in the group given 325 mg of aspirin per day (global P=0.04). Unadjusted relative risks of any adenoma (as compared with the placebo group) were 0.81 in the 81-mg group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.96) and 0.96 in the 325-mg group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.13). For advanced neoplasms (adenomas measuring at least 1 cm in diameter or with tubulovillous or villous features, severe dysplasia, or invasive cancer), the respective relative risks were 0.59 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.92) and 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.55 to 1.23)., Conclusions: Low-dose aspirin has a moderate chemopreventive effect on adenomas in the large bowel., (Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Familial risk of colorectal cancer is very common. The high-risk inherited syndromes are well described and much is known about the genetics and the effectiveness of registration, endoscopic surveillance, and appropriate intervention in these patients. The inherited syndromes, however, are extremely rare. There is a large group of patients in our population who can benefit from risk stratification based on the number of their relatives with colon cancer or adenomas and the age at which those relatives developed neoplasm. The GI endoscopist has a vital role in recommending and providing colonoscopic screening for this large group of patients.

Background: Three-year colonoscopic surveillance after initial polypectomy may not be required for all patients. Those with multiple baseline polyps and large adenomas, implicated as predictors of colon cancer, merit close observation. Conversely, patients with single small adenomas may be subjected to early endoscopic surveillance unnecessarily., Methods: From our Adenoma Registry we evaluated patient and adenoma characteristics in 697 patients. All had an adenoma recurrence within 3 years of a positive baseline colonoscopy. Potential risk factors studied were age, gender, number of adenomas, size of largest adenoma and histology. We defined a significant outcome as size of 1 cm or greater, tubulovillous or villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, invasive cancer, or 4 or more adenomas., Results: Having 3 or more adenomas on initial colonoscopy with at least 1 measuring 1 cm or larger greatly increased the chance of a significant finding on the first surveillance colonoscopy. Conversely, patients with 1 or 2 adenomas all measuring less than 1 cm were at extremely low risk of an important outcome within 3 years., Conclusions: Patients with 1 or 2 adenomas all measuring less than 1 cm are an identified low risk group and their first surveillance examination may be delayed beyond the standard 3 years.

Introduction: Duodenal and periampullary cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have undergone colectomy. Endoscopic surveillance of upper gastrointestinal adenomas is recommended for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis but the timing and appropriate treatment of neoplasms is unknown. The purpose of this experiment was to report our experience with endoscopic and surgical treatment of advanced duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis., Methods: The records of all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who had undergone surgical or endoscopic treatment for duodenal adenomas were identified. Data including endoscopic surveillance findings, type of intervention, pathology, and follow-up of the lesions were reviewed., Results: Ten neoplasms >1 cm were treated in eight patients (mean age at the time of diagnosis was 49 years). Nine lesions were histologically advanced. Five lesions involved the papilla. Endoscopic treatment was performed for six lesions. Four lesions recurred, and three were then treated surgically. Local resection was performed for five lesions. Four lesions recurred and two had further operative intervention. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy was performed in three patients. At a mean follow-up period of 45.7 months, there has been no recurrence., Conclusions: Endoscopic eradication is an appropriate initial treatment for histologically advanced, noncancerous neoplasms or for patients who are not surgical candidates. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy may be the treatment of choice for patients with carcinoma and those who have failed endoscopic therapy.

Background: Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) because of the high prevalence of duodenal adenomas and the risk of periampullary cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the natural history of untreated duodenal and ampullary adenomas in FAP patients during surveillance., Methods: One hundred fourteen FAP patients who had 2 or more surveillance examinations were followed for a mean of 51 months (range, 10 to 151 months)., Results: Duodenal polyps progressed in size in 26% (25 of 95), number in 32% (34 of 106), and histology in 11% (5 of 45) of patients. Morphology and histology of the main duodenal papilla progressed in 14% (15 of 110) and 11% (12 of 105) of patients, respectively. The histologic progression was mild except for one patient who developed a periampullary cancer., Conclusions: A minority of FAP patients had progression of endoscopic features and histology of duodenal polyps or the main duodenal papilla when followed over 4 years. An endoscopic surveillance interval of at least 3 years may be appropriate for the majority of untreated patients with FAP. Factors that stratify patients as being at the highest risk of periampullary cancer and thus requiring more intensive surveillance are yet to be determined.

Background and Methods: Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic evidence suggests that calcium may help prevent colorectal adenomas. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of supplementation with calcium carbonate on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 930 subjects (mean age, 61 years; 72 percent men) with a recent history of colorectal adenomas to receive either calcium carbonate (3 g [1200 mg of elemental calcium] daily) or placebo, with follow-up colonoscopies one and four years after the qualifying examination. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects in whom at least one adenoma was detected after the first follow-up endoscopy but up to (and including) the second follow-up examination. Risk ratios for the recurrence of adenomas were adjusted for age, sex, lifetime number of adenomas before the study, clinical center, and length of the surveillance period., Results: The subjects in the calcium group had a lower risk of recurrent adenomas. Among the 913 subjects who underwent at least one study colonoscopy, the adjusted risk ratio for any recurrence of adenoma with calcium as compared with placebo was 0.85 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.98; P=0.03). The main analysis was based on the 832 subjects (409 in the calcium group and 423 in the placebo group) who completed both follow-up examinations. At least one adenoma was diagnosed between the first and second follow-up endoscopies in 127 subjects in the calcium group (31 percent) and 159 subjects in the placebo group (38 percent); the adjusted risk ratio was 0.81 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.99; P=0.04). The adjusted ratio of the average number of adenomas in the calcium group to that in the placebo group was 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.96; P=0.02). The effect of calcium was independent of initial dietary fat and calcium intake., Conclusions: Calcium supplementation is associated with a significant - though moderate - reduction in the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas.

Experimental and observational findings suggest that calcium intake may protect against colorectal neoplasia. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of colorectal adenoma recurrence. Nine hundred thirty patients with a recent history of colorectal adenomas were randomly given calcium carbonate (3 gm daily; 1200 mg elemental calcium) or placebo, with follow-up colonoscopies one and four years after the qualifying examination. The main analysis focused on new adenomas found after the first follow-up endoscopy, up to (and including) the second follow-up examination. Risk ratios of at least one recurrent adenoma and ratios of the average numbers of adenomas were calculated as measures of calcium effect. There was a lower risk of recurrent adenomas in subjects assigned calcium. Eight hundred thirty-two patients had two follow-up examinations and were included in the main analysis; the adjusted risk ratio of one or more adenomas was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99); the adjusted ratio of the average numbers of adenomas was 0.76 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.96). Among subjects who had at least one follow-up colonoscopy, the adjusted risk ratio of one or more recurrent adenomas was 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.98). The effect of calcium seemed independent of initial dietary fat and calcium intake. No toxicity was associated with supplementation. These findings indicate that calcium supplementation has a modest protective effect against colorectal adenomas, precursors of most colorectal cancers.

Sulindac sulfone (Exisulind), a metabolite of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, sulindac, was evalauted for its effects on the development of rectal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Three cohorts of 6 patients each were given doses of 200, 300, or 400 mg Exisulind twice daily. Hepatotoxicity, shown by elevation in blood transaminase levels, was the dose-limiting toxicity and occurred at the 400 mg bid dose. Due to this toxicity, all patients treated with the 400 mg dose were subsequently reduced to the 200 mg dose level. Subsequently, 2 of the 6 patients were dose-escalated to 400 mg bid dose. The patients were treated with Exisulind for a period of six months. Sixteen of 18 patients had regression of small polyps (> or = 6 mm in diameter) characterized by a flattening of the polyps and a macular "halo" appearance. Histopathologic examination of the polyp biopsy specimens showed a marked increase in the proportion of mucin producing cells in the glands after treatment with Exisulind at all dose levels. Ki-67 staining, a measure of cell proliferation, was higher in the polyps than in normal mucosa. There was no significant change in the proliferation index between baseline and six month values in any of the groups treated with Exisulind or in normal tissues. The median apoptotic labeling index, as determined by the TUNEL technique, was higher in the polyps than in normal-appearing mucosa. Overall, there was no significant change in the apoptotic labeling index between base-line and 6 months in normal-appearing mucosa however, the index in polyps was increased. These results suggest that treatment of FAP patients with Exisulind for a period of six months may lead to regression of small polyps, and that the mechanisms of Exisulind--induced regression appear to be through stimulation of mucus differentiation and apoptosis in glandular epithelium.

Background: Screening sigmoidoscopy is an underutilized method for detecting early colorectal cancer, and patient discomfort is one reason for poor compliance in the general population. The possible benefit of a well-tolerated, low-cost antispasmodic medication, sublingual hyoscyamine, used before flexible sigmoidoscopy was assessed in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial., Methods: One hundred fifty patients were enrolled and randomized to receive two sublingual hyoscyamine tablets (0.125 mg/tablet) or the placebo 10 minutes before sigmoidoscopy. Patient comfort and the endoscopist's perception of the ease of insertion were measured using a 100 mm visual analog scale. The depth of sigmoidoscope insertion was measured in centimeters, and complications were recorded., Results: The median age was 55 years (range 25 to 83 years). There were 100 men (66.7%) and 50 women (33.3%). Approximately half (n = 76, 50.7%) had a prior sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. No statistical differences were found between treatment group means for age, gender, pain score, ease of insertion, or depth of insertion. The hyoscyamine group tended to have lower mean pain (32.4 vs. 37.7, p = 0.18) and difficulty (29.9 vs. 33.7, p = 0.31) scores and greater depth of sigmoidoscope insertion (51.3 vs. 47.7, p = 0.07); however, the differences were not statistically significant. The treatment groups differed with a higher percentage of the hyoscyamine group having a previous endoscopy (60.0% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.02); however, no significant differences were detected between mean pain scores as related to treatment when controlling for previous experience with endoscopy (p = 0.31)., Conclusions: In this study, hyoscyamine administered in the sublingual route did not significantly improve patient comfort, ease of insertion, or the depth of sigmoidoscope insertion during screening sigmoidoscopy. The search for alternative methods to improve patient comfort during screening endoscopy should continue.

Background & Aims: All patients with colorectal adenomas may not require identical follow-up. We aimed to determine if adenoma characteristics at initial colonoscopy could predict adenoma recurrence or characteristics at follow-up., Methods: The number of adenomas and the size, type, and degree of atypia in 479 patients in a polyp prevention trial were evaluated as predictors of the same characteristics at follow-up using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if several baseline characteristics were simultaneously associated with outcome., Results: Although several characteristics were significant predictors of recurrence univariately, by multivariate analysis, multiple adenomas at follow-up were more likely when patients had > or = 3 baseline adenomas (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.20-4.21) or at least 1 tubulovillous adenoma (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.12-4.02). No specific characteristic was associated with recurrence of high-risk polyps (> or = 1 cm, villous, severe atypia). Seventy percent of patients with 1 or 2 baseline adenomas had no recurrence, and only 3.3% had any adenomas of clinical concern., Conclusions: Number and type of baseline adenomas predict recurrent adenomas, but the recurrence is rarely of clinical concern. Patients with 1 or 2 tubular adenomas constitute a low-risk group for whom follow-up might be extended beyond 3 years.

Upper gastrointestinal polyps are rare but common in the gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Although the majority of upper gastrointestinal polyps have no prognostic importance, they must be distinguished from the minority with an associated cancer risk.

Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is characterized by an abdominal inflammatory reaction and mesenteric fat necrosis. Clinically, MP manifests as recurrent abdominal pain, pyrexia, and space-occupying peritoneal masses. We report a patient with MP, severe enough to require immunosuppressant treatment, who developed a recurrent pleural effusion. Malignant mesothelioma was identified in the pleural space 3 yr after initial pleural investigation. This case is the second report of pleural effusion associated with MP. It is the first report in which thoracic mesothelioma and MP occurred together. MP has been associated with other malignancies.

A preoperative induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of two monthly courses of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was given to 13 patients with nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal ultrasound examination was performed both before chemotherapy and again before surgery. Induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated with 10 of the 13 patients experiencing at least one episode of severe neutropenia. Two of the 13 patients refused the second course of treatment. A symptomatic response to chemotherapy, defined as a reduction in the presenting symptom, was noted in 10 of the 13 patients (77%). Endoscopic improvement occurred in 9 of the 13 patients (69%). Esophageal ultrasound evidence of a reduction in either T or N stage was noted in only 2 of the 13 patients (15%), however, and neither of these responses was confirmed pathologically. Clinical evidence of disease progression was noted in 4 patients during chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the relapse-free and overall survivals are 25% and 31%, respectively. Despite significant toxicity, our chemotherapy regimen would be considered successful if assessed by symptomatic or esophagoscopic improvement. Esophageal ultrasound, careful pathologic staging, and our disappointing survival rates, however, suggest limited, if any, value for this approach.