Search

Michael Tronnier, Christina Mitteldorf Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Hildesheim GmbH, Hildesheim, Germany Abstract: Whereas thin melanomas have an excellent prognosis after sufficient surgical treatment, melanoma disease in advanced stages is still a therapeutic challenge. After decades of frustrating studies, new therapeutic strategies have come up in the past few years. On the one hand, increasing insights into the molecular aberrations in melanoma have led to specific "targeted" therapies to affect only the mutated tumor cells, as in many other types of cancers. Today there are few "targeted" substances which are already approved and successfully used for single or combination therapy, but many others are under development. While on the other hand, nonpersonalized strategy substances have been developed successfully inducing an immunologic tumor response. Both kinds of therapy have been found to result in an improvement not only of the response rate, but also of the overall survival in metastatic disease, which represents a milestone in melanoma therapy. However, using these therapies there is still much to learn regarding the effects, the side effects, and the limitations of these promising substances. Keywords: melanoma, treatment, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, BRAF, CTLA-4

While the hearing loss recovered completely in the high frequencies from 2 kHz on, moderate sensorineural hearing loss remained in the low and medium frequencies of up to 65 dB. (c) Syphilis was diagnosed due to a positive TPPA, RPR, and positive IgG as well as IgM immunoblot. The patient in this manuscript has given written informed consent to publication of their case details. Interestingly, in up to 90% of patients with otosyphilis CSF reveals no abnormalities.4 Unfortunately, randomized controlled studies regarding the treatment of otosyphilis are not available. [Extracted from the article]

We report the case of a 68-year-old female with reactive angioendotheliomatosis (RAE). This case highlights the benign course of this condition and suggests that this entity might be an intravascular histiocytosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the case of a 70-year-old male who was presented due to a 2-day history of itching striate skin lesions on his trunk and extremities with no general symptoms and was diagnosed with Shiitake dermatitis due to his consumption of Asian meal with shiitake mushrooms.

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in the fair-skinned population and its incidence continues to rise. An update of the S2k guideline with the participation of all specialist societies familiar with the clinical picture and previous literature research is of great importance for the quality of care for affected patients. In addition to epidemiology, diagnostics and histology are discussed. After risk stratification, therapy is divided into topical, systemic and radiation therapy. Surgical removal remains the treatment of first choice in most cases. The approval of anti-PD1 inhibitors for locally advanced and metastatic tumors has opened up a new option in second-line therapy (after hedgehog inhibitors)., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft.)

Background: Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized melanoma treatment, but the high number of non-responders still emphasizes the need for improvement of therapy. One potential avenue for enhancing anti-tumor treatment is through the modulation of coagulation and platelet activity. Both have been found to play an important role in the tumor microenvironment, tumor growth and metastasis. Preclinical studies indicate a beneficial effect, clinical data has been inconsistent., Methods: We examined a cohort of advanced, non-resectable melanoma patients (n = 2419) derived from the German prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg, who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The patients were classified based on whether it was documented that they received platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) (n = 137) (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel), anticoagulation (AC) (n = 185) (direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), phenprocoumon, heparins) at the start of ICI or no antithrombotic medication (n = 2097) at any point during ICI treatment. The study endpoints were best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A significantly improved PFS was observed in patients documented to receive ASA (15.1 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.5 to 0.88, p = 0.0047) as well as in patients to receive AC (15.1 vs. 6.4 months, HR 0.7, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.91, p = 0.01) compared to patients for whom no antithrombotic medication was documented. Multivariate analysis of OS showed significant risk reduction in patients who received DOAC (HR 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.92, p = 0.0170) or phenprocoumon (HR: 0.44, 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.85, p = 0.0301)., Conclusion: Our study indicates a positive prognostic effect of anticoagulant and antiplatelet concomitant medication in melanoma patients receiving ICI. Further studies are needed to confrim the cancer-related benefit of adding anticoagulation or platelet inhibition to ICI treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: JK has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi Genzyme and has received travel support from SUN Pharma and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. GG has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and has research funding from Sanofi Genzyme, outside the submitted work. IsH has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sysmex, outside the submitted work. SU declares research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Serono; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, and Novartis; and meeting and travel support from Almirall, Bristol-Myers Squibb, IGEA Clinical Biophysics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sun Pharma; outside the submitted work. UL declares research support from Merck Sharp & Dohme; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Sanofi, Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Allmiral and Novartis; and meeting and travel support from Pierre Fabre, and Sun Pharma; outside the submitted work. CB declares honoraria as speaker and/or advisory board member from Almirall Hermal, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Delcath, Immunocore, InflaRx, Leo Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. RG received honoraria for lectures/ advisory boards from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dohme, Novartis, Merck-Serono, Amgen, Almirall Hermal, Pierre-Fabre, Sun Pharma, Immunocore, 4SC, Delcath, Sanofi/ Regeneron; Meeting support SUN Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, PierreFabre; Research support (to institution) Novartis, Sanofi/ Regeneron, Merck Serono, Amgen, SUN Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Almirall Hermal. DS Honoraria: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Array BioPharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, Regeneron, 4SC, Sanofi/Regeneron, NeraCare GmbH, Sun Pharma, InflarxGmbH, Ultimovacs, Sandoz. Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, 4SC, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi/Regeneron, Nektar. Speakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi/Regeneron, Merck KGaA. Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Roche (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Array BioPharma/Pfizer (Inst). Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi/Regeneron. LZ served as consultant and has received honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Sunpharma and travel support from MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sunpharma and Novartis, outside the submitted work. EL served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, Sunpharma, Takeda and travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre- Fabre, Sunpharma and Novartis, outside the submitted work. IvW received honorairia as speaker from Novartis, BMS, MSD, Sanofi, Stemline, Kyowa Kirin and as consultant or advisory from BMS, MSD, Sanofi; travel, accommodations and expenses from Novartis, BMS, MSD, Sanofi, Stemline and Kyowa Kirin. FriM has received travel support or/and speaker’s fees or/and advisor’s honoraria by Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and Immunocore. SH declares speakers and advisory board honoraria and/or travel support from BMS, MSD, Immunocore, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma outside the submitted work. KD received financial support (speaker’s honoraria, advisory boards, travel expense reimbursements or grants) from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers-Squib, Novartis, and Pierre-Fabre. JU is on the advisory board or has received honoraria and travel support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Immunocore, LeoPharma, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi outside the submitted work. SAW received honoria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis and Sun Pharma, outside the submitted work. CP served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, Sunpharma, Pierre Fabre, AbbVie, Kyona Kirin and Amgen and received travel support from Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma and Novartis, outside the submitted work. PT served as consultant and/or received honoraria form Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biofrontera, Kyowa Kirin, L′Oréal, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, 4SC, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. JeU is on the advisory board or has received honoraria and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi and SUN Pharma outside the submitted work. FraM served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma and travel support from Novartis, Sun Pharma, Pierre Fabre and Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside the submitted work. JW has received honoraria and travel support from Abbvie, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Infectopharm Leo, Lilly, Mibe, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi. BS received honoraria from SUN Pharma, Allmiral, Novartis; Advisory Board for Pierre Fabre Pharma, Sanofi, Immunocore; travel support from Novartis, Pierre Fabre Pharma; Research Funding from Novartis; all outside the submitted work. FZ declares speakers and advisory board honoraria and/or travel support from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma outside the submitted work. AK received honoraria as speaker from InfectoPharm, Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V., Almirall Hermal, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen-Cilag. LH declares speaker and advisory board honoraria from BMS, Immunocore, Novartis and Therakos. CL received honoraria for advisory board from BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Immunocore, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Almirall Hermal, Kyowa Kirin, Biontech, Boehriner Ingelheim; speakers fee from BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Immunocore, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Almirall Hermal, Kyowa Kirin, Biontech, Lilly and travel reimbursement from BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Immunocore, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Almirall Hermal, Kyowa Kirin, Biontech, Pfizer. GS has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd. outside the submitted work. SG declares honoraria for advisory boards, oral presentations and/ or travel expenses from Roche, Novartis, MSD, BMS, Sun Pharma, Klinge Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Pierre Fabre, Guidepoint Global and UCB and research funds from Novartis and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. ND received honoraria from BMS and MSD outside the submitted work. RH and IK are employee of Helios Klinikum Erfurt GmbH. CS reports support from Kyowa Kirin, BMS, Novartis, Roche, SunPharma in context of dermatooncology as well as from Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotest AG and Janssen Cilag in other medical fields. AE is on advisory board or has received honoraria from Agenus, BioInvent, BioNTech, Boeringer Ingelheim GmbH, Brenus, CatalYm, Eurobio. IO Biotech, IQVIA, Merck&Co, MSD, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sairopa BV, SkylineDX BV, Trained ImmunoTherapeutics Discovery and has Equity in IO Biotech, Sairopa BV and SkylineDX BV. MVH received honoraria from MSD, BMS, Roche, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Almirall, Biofrontera, Galderma, Immunocore, InfectoPharm. CG is on the advisory board or has received honoraria from Almirall, Amgen, Beiersdorf, BioNTech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Janssen, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre Pharma, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, SUN Pharma and Sysmex, research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Regeneron and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. C.G. is co-founder of Dermagnostix and Dermagnostix R&D. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The subcellular distribution of CD30 on mast cells and the presence of eosinophils in cutaneous mastocytosis require further investigation, especially as the cell surface expression of CD30 is critical for the therapeutic response of systemic mastocytosis to brentuximab vedotin., Objective: Investigation of 147 biopsy specimens from 143 patients with cutaneous mastocytosis for mast cell density and distribution, frequency of CD30 expression, CD30 staining patterns, and presence and distribution of eosinophils. Correlation with clinical patterns., Methods: Retrospective multicenter immunohistochemical study of CD30 expression, eosinophils and basic clinical data in cutaneous mastocytosis., Results: CD30 expression was found in all samples (cut-off: ≥1%), whereby the staining was predominantly cytoplasmic in 99% of the samples. Additional membrane staining was detected in 62% of the samples. Surface expression of CD30 was more common in biopsy specimens with a high mast cell burden and in biopsy specimens with a higher CD30 expression rate. Eosinophils were admixed in 58% of the samples. Females and older patients showed a trend of a lower mast cell burden., Limitations: Retrospective study on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue without functional analysis., Conclusion: Most cases of cutaneous mastocytosis show cell surface expression of CD30 expression and is, therefore, in principle, accessible for therapy with antibodies against CD30, provided the overall situation of the patient warrants., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cutaneous Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The temporal dynamics of the perception of within-word coarticulatory cues remain a subject of ongoing debate in speech perception research. This behavioral gating study sheds light on the unfolding predictive use of anticipatory coarticulation in onset fricatives. Word onset fricatives (/f/ and /s/) were split into four gates (15, 35, 75 and 135 milliseconds). Listeners made a forced choice about the word they were listening to, based on the stimulus gates. The results showed fast predictive use of coarticulatory lip rounding during /s/ word onsets, as early as 15 ms from word onset. For /f/ onsets, coarticulatory backness and height began to be used predictively after 75 ms. These findings indicate that onset times of the occurrence and use of coarticulatory cues can be extremely fast and have a time course that differs depending on fricative type., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Lulaci, Söderström, Tronnier and Roll.)

Background: Adjuvant therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy (TT) improves recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients with advanced, BRAF V600-mutant ( BRAF mut) resected melanoma. However, 40% of these patients will develop distant metastases (DM) within 5 years, which require systemic therapy. Little data exist to guide the choice of upfront adjuvant therapy or treatment management upon DM. This study evaluated the efficacy of subsequent treatments following tumor recurrence upon upfront adjuvant therapy., Methods: For this multicenter cohort study, we identified 515 BRAF mut patients with resected stage III melanoma who were treated with PD-1 inhibitors (anti-PD1) or TT in the adjuvant setting. Disease characteristics, treatment regimens, details on tumor recurrence, subsequent treatment management, and survival outcomes were collected within the prospective, real-world skin cancer registry ADOReg. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) following DM and best tumor response to first-line (1L) treatments., Results: Among 515 eligible patients, 273 patients received adjuvant anti-PD1 and 242 adjuvant TT. At a median follow-up of 21 months, 54.6% of anti-PD1 patients and 36.4% of TT patients recurred, while 39.6% (anti-PD1) and 29.3% (TT) developed DM. Risk of recurrence was significantly reduced in patients treated with TT compared with anti-PD1 (adjusted HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.68, p<0.001). Likewise, median RFS was significantly longer in TT-treated patients (31 vs 17 months, p<0.001). Patients who received TT as second adjuvant treatment upon locoregional recurrence had a longer RFS2 as compared with adjuvant CPI (41 vs 6 months, p=0.009). Patients who recurred at distant sites following adjuvant TT showed favorable response rates (42.9%) after switching to 1L ipilimumab+nivolumab (ipi+nivo). Patients with DM during adjuvant anti-PD1 achieved response rates of 58.7% after switching to 1L TT and 35.3% for 1L ipi+nivo. Overall, median PFS was significantly longer in patients who switched treatments for stage IV disease (median PFS 9 vs 5 months, p=0.004)., Conclusions: BRAF mut melanoma patients who developed DM upon upfront adjuvant therapy achieve favorable tumor control and prolonged PFS after switching treatment modalities in the first-line setting of stage IV disease. Patients with locoregional recurrence benefit from complete resection of recurrence followed by a second adjuvant treatment with TT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors declare no conflicts of interest affecting this study. Conflicts of interest outside the submitted work are: PM declares research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis and Merck Sharp & Dome; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Almirall Hermal, Beiersdorf, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dome, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Medac, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma and Roche, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pierre Fabre. KCK declareds speakers and advisory board Honoria from Novartis and BMS, as well as travel support from Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Kyowa Kirin and Sun Pharma. FMeier has received travel support or/and speaker’s fees or/and advisor’s honoraria by Novartis, Roche, BMS, MSD and Pierre Fabre and research funding from Novartis and Roche. GL has received travel support for congress participation by Sun Pharma, Pierre-Fabre and research funding from Novartis. SU declares research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Serono; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Roche, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Pierre Fabre. LZ served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Sunpharma and travel support from MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma and Novartis, outside the submitted work. RG served as consultant or/and has received Honoria from Roche Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Almirall-Hermal, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Merck-Serono, Sun Pharma, Sanofi/Regeneron, Immunocore, 4SC, Delcath, received travel support from Sun Pharma, Pierre Fabre, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. AH received consultancy and advisory board fees from Agenus Bio, Almirall Hermal, Amgen, Beiersdorf, BMS, Dermagnostix, Eisai, Highlight Therapeutics, Incyte, IO Biotech, Immunocore, MSD/Merck, MerckPfizer, NeraCare, Novartis, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Replimune, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Seagen and Xenthera. UL served as consultant to Roche, Novartis, MSD, Almirall Hermal, Sanofi and Sun Pharma; received travel support from Sun Pharma and Pierre-Fabre, received speaker fees from Roche, Novartis, MSD, Sun Pharma and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. She reports institutional research grants from MSD. KCK has served as consultant or/and has received honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pierre Fabre, and Novartis, and received travel support from Amgen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Medac and Novartis. DD has been on the advisory board or has received honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. IvW declares speakers and advisory board honoraria from Almirall Hermal, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dome, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma and Roche. RH reports speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Immunocore, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Roche and SUN pharma outside the submitted work. JCH received research grants from BMS, Sanofi and Sunpharma and served as a consultant and/or received honoria from Amgen, BMS, GSK, Immunocore, MSD, Novartis, Onkowissen, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and Sunpharma, outside of the submitted work. MVH reports honoraria from MSD, BMS, Roche, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Almirall, Biofrontera, Galderma, Pierre Fabre, Immunocore. BS is on the advisory board or has received honoraria from Immunocore, Almirall, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche, BMS and MSD, research funding from Novartis and Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, and travel support from Novartis, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pierre Fabre Pharma, outside the submitted work. CP received honoraria (speaker honoraria or honoraria as a consultant) and travel support from: Novartis, BMS, Roche, Merck Serono, MSD, Celgene, AbbVie, SUNPHARMA, UCB, Allergy Therapeutics, Pierre Fabre, Kyowa Kirin and LEO. KCK has served as consultant or/and has received honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pierre Fabre, and Novartis, and received travel support from Amgen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Medac and Novartis. PT served as consultant and/or received honoraria form Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biofrontera, Curevac, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, 4SC, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. FZ served as consultant and/or has received honoria from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma. AF served as consultant to Roche, Novartis, MSD, BMS, Pierre-Fabre; received travel support from Roche, Novartis, BMS, Pierre-Fabre, received speaker fees from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD and CeGaT, outside the submitted work. She reports institutional research grants from BMS Stiftung Immunonkologie. FMeiss served as a consultant and/or has received honoraria from Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma and travel support from Novartis, Sun Pharma, Roche, Pierre Fabre and MSD. SG declares honoraria for advisory boards, oral presentations, and travel expenses from Roche, Novartis, MSD, and BMS outside the submitted work. CL declares speakers, advisory board honoraria, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Kiowa Kirin, Sanofi, Biontech, and Almirall Hermal outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Dermatopathology has been an integral part of dermatology for more than 100 years and is essential for high quality patient care. In German-speaking countries, dermatologists can acquire an additional qualification in dermatopathology after appropriate further training. For many years, dermatopathological diagnostics has advanced far beyond morphology. Immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology are nowadays an essential part and a prerequisite for the preservation of our discipline. Due to the increasing implementation of digitalization and artificial intelligence, dermatopathology is forward-looking and offers an attractive working environment for young colleagues. Dermatopathology is also indispensable for research, and this fact should also be taken into account by creating academic positions and professorships in the future., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft.)