Search

Summary: Background: The World Health Organisation (WHO) has identified a range of symptomatic manifestations to aid in the clinical diagnosis of post-COVID conditions, herein referred to as post-acute COVID-19 symptoms. We conducted an international network cohort study to estimate the burden of these symptoms in North American, European, and Asian populations. Methods: A federated analysis was conducted including 10 databases from the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Norway, Estonia, Spain, France, South Korea, and the United States, between September 1st 2020 and latest data availability (which varied from December 31st 2021 to February 28th 2023), covering primary and secondary care, nationwide registries, and claims data, all mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM). We defined two cohorts for the main analyses: a SARS-CoV-2 infection cohort [positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or rapid lateral flow test (LFT) result or clinical COVID-19 diagnosis] and a general population cohort. Individuals with less than 365 days of prior history or 120 days of follow-up were excluded. We estimated incidence rates (IRs) of the 25 WHO-proposed post-acute COVID-19 symptoms, considering symptoms that occurred ≥90 and ≤365 days after index date, excluding individuals with the respective symptoms 180 days prior to the index event. Stratified analyses were conducted by age and sex. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated comparing rates in the infected cohort versus the general population. Results from the different databases were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Findings: 3,019,408 individuals were included in the infection cohort. 1,585,160 of them were female and 1,434,248 of them male. 929,351,505 individuals were included in the general population group. 461,195,036 of them were female and 466,022,004 of them male. The 1-year IR of any post-acute COVID-19 symptom in the COVID-19 infection cohort varied significantly across databases, from 4.4 (95% CI 3.8–5.1) per 100 person-years to 103.9 (95% CI 103.2–104.7). The five most common symptoms were joint pain (from 1.6 (95% CI 1.3–1.9) to 14.3 (95% CI 14.1–14.6)), abdominal pain (from 0.3 (95% CI 0.1–0.5) to 9.9 (95% CI 9.7–10.1)), gastrointestinal issues (from 0.6 (95% CI 0.4–0.9) to 13.3 (95% CI 13.1–13.6)), cough (from 0.3 (95% CI 0.2–0.5) to 9.1 (95% CI 8.9–9.3)), and anxiety (from 0.8 (95% CI 0.6–1.2) to 11.4 (95% CI 11.2–11.6)); whereas muscle spasms (from 0.01 (95% CI 0.008–0.2) to 1.7 (95% CI 1.6–1.8)), pins and needles (from 0.05 (95% CI 0.03–0.0.9) to 1.5 (95% CI 1.4–1.6)), memory issues (from 0.03 (95% CI 0.02–0.06) to 0.8 (95% CI 0.7–0.8)), cognitive dysfunction (from 0.007 (95% CI 0.004–0.01) to 0.6 (95% CI 0.4–0.8)), and altered smell and/or taste (from 0.04 (95% CI 0.03–0.04) to 0.7 (95% CI 0.6–0.8)) were least common. Incidence rates of any post-acute COVID-19 symptoms generally increased with age, with certain symptoms peaking in middle-aged adults (anxiety, depressive disorders, headache, altered smell and taste) and others in pre-school children (gastrointestinal issues and cough). Females had higher incidence rates for most symptoms. Based on the random-effects model, the infected cohort had a higher incidence of any post-acute COVID-19 symptom than the general population, with a meta-analytic incidence rate ratio (meta-IRR) of 1.4 (1–2). A similar pattern was seen for all individual symptoms. The highest meta-IRRs were depressive disorder, 2.6 (1.7–3.9); anxiety, 2.3 (1.4–3.8); allergy, 2.1 (1.7–2.8) and sleep disorders, 2.1 (1.5–2.6). The meta-IRR for altered smell and/or taste was 1.9 (1.3–2.8). Interpretation: Post-acute COVID-19 symptoms, as listed by the WHO, were commonly observed following COVID-19 infection. However, even after standardising research methods, there was significant heterogeneity in the incidence rates from different healthcare settings and geographical locations. This is the first international study of the epidemiology of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms using the WHO-listed symptoms. Its findings contibute to understand the epidemiology of this condition from a multinational approach. Limitations of this study include the lack of consensus of the post-acute COVID-19 definition, as well as the difficulty to capture the impact on daily life of the post-acute COVID-19 symptoms in the available datasets. Funding: This work has been funded by the European Health Data Evidence Network (EHDEN) through an Evidence Generation Fund Grant and by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).

Objectives Obesity is associated with lower treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In patients with obesity, abatacept was suggested as a preferable option to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in patients with RA with obesity. Secondarily, we also investigated this in patients with overweight and normal weight for completeness.Design Observational cohort study.Setting Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry (1997–2019).Participants Adult patients with RA from the SCQM registry who received etanercept, infliximab, abatacept or adalimumab as their first biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were classified based on their body mass index (BMI) at the start of that treatment in three cohorts: obese, overweight, normal weight. They were followed for a maximum of 1 year.Exposure The study exposure of interest was the patients’ first biological, particularly: etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary study outcome was remission within 12 months, defined as 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28)

Objectives Treatment response is worse in obese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including patients on weight-adjusted therapies like infliximab. We aimed to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and changes in RA disease activity and radiographic progression over time.Methods We included infliximab users with an RA diagnosis in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases registry (1997–2020). Two cohorts were defined: (1) starting from their first BMI measurement or disease activity score (DAS28-esr), and (2) from their first BMI measurement or radiographic assessment (Rau score). We evaluated the coefficient and 95% CI of BMI with changes in mean DAS28-esr (cohort 1) and mean Rau scores (a structural joint damage score, cohort 2) using generalised estimation equations, overall and stratified by BMI categories.Results Cohort 1 comprised 412 patients (74% women, mean age 53 years, mean BMI 25). We observed no change in mean DAS28-esr with increasing BMI overall (adjusted coefficient: 0.00, 95% CI −0.02 to 0.02), or in BMI categories. Cohort 2 comprised 187 patients highly alike to those in cohort 1. We observed a significant decrease of 1.05 in mean Rau scores for every increase in BMI unit (adjusted coefficient: −1.05, 95% CI −1.92 to −0.19). Results remained statistically non-significant across BMI categories.Conclusions Our longitudinal investigation suggests that BMI increase may not lead to changes in DAS28-esr in patients receiving infliximab, despite the weight-adapted dose. Yet, there may be a decrease in erosions with increasing weight non-limited to obese patients.

Cycling of biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients due to non-response is a problem preventing and delaying disease control. We aimed to assess and validate treatment response of b/tsDMARDs among clusters of RA patients identified by deep learning. We clustered RA patients clusters at first-time b/tsDMARD (cohort entry) in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases registry (SCQM) [1999-2018]. We performed comparative effectiveness analyses of b/tsDMARDs (ref. adalimumab) using Cox proportional hazard regression. Within 15 months, we assessed b/tsDMARD stop due to non-response, and separately a ≥20% reduction in DAS28-esr as a response proxy. We validated results through stratified analyses according to most distinctive patient characteristics of clusters. Clusters comprised between 362 and 1481 patients (3516 unique patients). Stratified (validation) analyses confirmed comparative effectiveness results among clusters: Patients with ≥2 conventional synthetic DMARDs and prednisone at b/tsDMARD initiation, male patients, as well as patients with a lower disease burden responded better to tocilizumab than to adalimumab (hazard ratio [HR] 5.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.76-16.94], and HR 8.44 [3.43-20.74], and HR 3.64 [2.04-6.49], respectively). Furthermore, seronegative women without use of prednisone at b/tsDMARD initiation as well as seropositive women with a higher disease burden and longer disease duration had a higher risk of non-response with golimumab (HR 2.36 [1.03-5.40] and HR 5.27 [2.10-13.21], respectively) than with adalimumab. Our results suggest that RA patient clusters identified by deep learning may have different responses to first-line b/tsDMARD. Thus, it may suggest optimal first-line b/tsDMARD for certain RA patients, which is a step forward towards personalizing treatment. However, further research in other cohorts is needed to verify our results.

Objective To assess the impact of elevated body mass index (BMI) in the achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA) and several definitions of remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Switzerland. Secondarily, to assess the overlapping across the study outcomes.Methods This observational cohort study in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry included patients with PsA starting their first biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) from 1997 to 30 June 2018. Exposure was BMI category at b/tsDMARD start: overweight, obese, and normal weight (reference). Logistic regression was used to assess the achievement of MDA and remission at ≤12 months, as well as treatment persistence at 1 year, in overweight patients and patients with obesity compared with the normal weight group. Remission was defined by Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Additionally, overlapping across study outcomes was investigated.Results The study included 306 (39.5%) normal weight patients, 285 (36.8%) overweight patients and 183 (23.6%) patients with obesity. Compared with the normal weight group, patients with obesity had lower odds of achieving MDA at ≤12 months (adjusted OR (ORadj) 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.82). This was consistent with the observed reduced odds of achieving DAPSA-remission (ORadj 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.85), cDAPSA-remission (ORadj 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96) and DAS28-remission (ORadj 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81) in patients with obesity versus normal weight patients. Among the 125 patients achieving MDA, the majority (81.8% normal weight, 80.0% overweight, 78.9% obese) achieved cDAPSA-remission. No differences were observed in the odds to achieving treatment persistence between the BMI strata.Conclusions Obesity halved the likelihood of achieving MDA and remission in patients with PsA with b/tsDMARDs compared with those with normal weight, while it did not impact treatment persistence. High overlapping of patients achieving the outcomes MDA and cDAPSA-remission was observed across every BMI group.

Objective: To investigate the associations between bariatric surgery and hip or knee arthroplasty, and secondary care hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: We performed cohort studies using data from Swedish nationwide healthcare registries. Patients aged 18–79 years who underwent bariatric surgery between 2006 and 2019 were matched on their propensity score (PS) to up to 2 obese patients (“unexposed episodes”) in risk-set sampling. After a 1-year run-in period, episodes were followed in an “as-treated” approach. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hip or knee arthroplasty overall and in subgroups of age, sex, joint location, arthroplasty type, bariatric surgery type, and by duration of follow-up if proportional hazard assumptions were violated. In a secondary cohort, we assessed the outcome incident secondary care hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). Results: Among 39‘392 bariatric surgery episodes when compared to 61’085 ​PS-matched unexposed episodes (47′594 unique patients), the risk of hip or knee arthroplasty was strongest increased within the first three years of follow-up (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.56–2.07), decreased thereafter, but remained elevated throughout follow-up. In a secondary cohort of 37′929 exposed when compared to 58′600 ​PS-matched unexposed episodes, the risk of hip or knee osteoarthritis was decreased (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.90). Conclusion: Bariatric surgery is associated with increased risks of hip or knee arthroplasty, but also with decreased risks of secondary care OA. This contradiction supports the hypothesis that bariatric surgery may act as an enabler for hip or knee arthroplasty.

Objectives To identify differing patient characteristics at the time of stop and restart of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), stratified by stop reason.Design Explorative descriptive cohort study.Setting Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (1999–2018).Participants Patients with RA who stopped their first b/tsDMARD.Outcome measures We assessed patient characteristics at b/tsDMARD stop and restart, stratified by stop reason (non-response, adverse event, remission, other).Results Among 2526 eligible patients, most patients (38%) stopped their b/tsDMARD due to non-response. At treatment stop, most characteristics did not differ by stop reason, yet some differed significantly (p

Objective To compare the likelihood of achieving remission between men and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after starting their first biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). Methods This cohort study in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry included RA patients starting their first b/tsDMARD (1997-31/04/2018). The odds of achieving remission at ≤12-months, defined by disease activity score 28-joints (DAS28) Results The study included 2839 (76.3%) women and 883 (23.7%) men with RA. Compared to women, men were older at diagnosis and b/tsDMARD start, but had shorter time from diagnosis to b/tsDMARD (3.4 versus 5.0 years, pConclusion Men started b/tsDMARD earlier than women, particularly regarding disease duration and disease activity (DAS28), and had higher odds of reaching remission. This highlights the importance of early initiation of second line treatments, and suggests to target an earlier stage of disease in women to match the benefits observed in men.