Search

Objective: To evaluate the impact of screening and treating asymptomatic pregnant women for Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis and Neisseria (N.) gonorrhoeae infections on the frequency of preterm birth or low birthweight infants in Botswana., Design: Non-randomised, cluster-controlled trial., Setting: Four antenatal care clinics in Gaborone, Botswana., Population: Pregnant women aged ≥15 years, attending a first antenatal care visit, ≤27 weeks of gestation and without urogenital symptoms were eligible., Methods: Participants in the intervention clinics received screening (GeneXpert®, Cepheid) during pregnancy and at the postnatal visit. Participants in the standard-of-care clinics received screening at the postnatal visit only. We used multivariable logistic regression and post-estimation predictive margins analysis. Post-hoc analysis was conducted among sub-samples stratified by parity., Main Outcome Measures: Preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation) and low birthweight (<2500 g)., Results: After controlling for parity, hypertension, antenatal care visits and clinic site, the predicted prevalence of preterm birth or low birthweight was lower in the intervention arm (11%) compared with the standard-of-care arm (16%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.24). In post-hoc analysis, the intervention was more effective than the standard-of-care (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.07-0.64) among nulliparous participants., Conclusion: A C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection screening and treatment intervention among asymptomatic pregnant women may have reduced preterm birth or low birthweight outcomes, but results were not statistically significant. Post-hoc analysis found that the intervention reduced adverse outcomes among nulliparous participants., (© 2024 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections are critical to prevent reinfection and reduce transmission. However, partner treatment rates are low globally. Expedited partner therapy (EPT), in which the patient delivers treatment directly to their partner, may result in more partners treated. We assessed partner notification and treatment outcomes among pregnant women in Gaborone, Botswana, including EPT intent, uptake, and effectiveness., Methods: The Maduo study was a cluster-controlled trial evaluating the effect of antenatal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection screening in pregnant women. The intervention arm received screening at first antenatal care (ANC), third-trimester, and postnatal care visits. The standard-of-care arm received screening postnatally. Participants screening positive were given options for partner treatment: contact slips, in-clinic treatment, or EPT. Self-reported partner notification and treatment outcomes were assessed at test-of-cure visit., Results: Of 51 women who screened positive for C. trachomatis / N. gonorrhoeae at first ANC and returned for test of cure, 100% reported notifying their partner and 48 (94.1%) reported their partner received treatment. At third trimester 100% (n = 5), reported partners were treated. Before testing, EPT intent was lower than EPT uptake at all time points (first ANC: 17.9% vs. 80.4%; third-trimester: 57.1% vs. 71.4%; postnatal care: 0% vs. 80.0%). Partner treatment success was 100% among EPT users compared with 70% among nonusers ( P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Partner notification and treatment success was high in this population. Despite low pretest intent to use EPT, uptake was high and associated with greater partner treatment success. Our findings suggest that EPT may be a successful partner treatment strategy to pursue in low- and middle-income countries., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: The authors have no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis ( C. trachomatis ) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae ( N. gonorrhoeae ) are curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that cause adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Most countries, including Botswana, do not offer C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae screening during antenatal care (ANC) and instead use a syndromic approach for management of STIs., Methods: The Maduo Study is a prospective, cluster-controlled trial in Botswana evaluating the impact of diagnostic screening for antenatal C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes. Using baseline data from the Maduo Study (March 2021-March 2022), we determined the prevalence of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection among asymptomatic pregnant women in Botswana and correlates of infection using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Of 251 women who underwent C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae screening at first ANC visit, 55 (21.9%, 95%CI 17.0-27.5) tested positive for C. trachomatis , 1 (0.4%, 95%CI 0-2.2) for N. gonorrhoeae ; and 2 (0.8%, 95%CI 0-2.8) for dual C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection. Older age was associated with lower odds (aOR 0.93; 95%CI 0.88-0.98; p = 0.011) while any alcohol use during pregnancy was associated with higher odds (aOR = 3.53; 95%CI 1.22-10.16; p = 0.020) of testing positive for C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae ., Conclusions: A high frequency of C. trachomatis infections was detected among asymptomatic pregnant women in Botswana indicating that many antenatal STIs are missed by the syndromic management approach. Our results highlight the need for diagnostic C. trachomatis screening during ANC in Botswana and other low- and middle-income countries that rely solely on the syndromic approach for management of STIs.

Introduction: Uninterrupted access to HIV and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is essential, particularly in high HIV prevalence settings, to prevent unintended pregnancy and vertical HIV transmission. Understanding the challenges that COVID-19 and associated social distancing measures (SDMs) posed on health service access is imperative for future planning., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Botswana between January-February 2021. A web-based questionnaire was disseminated on social media as part of the International Sexual Health and REproductive Health (I-SHARE) Survey. Respondents answered questions on SRH, before and during COVID-19 SDMs. Subgroup analysis and comparison of descriptive data was performed for people living with HIV (PLWH)., Results: Of 409 participants, 65 were PLWH (80% female, 20% male). During SDMs, PLWH found it more difficult to access condoms and treatment for HIV and STIs; attend HIV appointments; and maintain adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Compared to HIV-negative women, a higher proportion of women living with HIV used condoms as their primary method of contraception (54% vs. 48%), and had lower use of long-acting reversible contraception (8% vs. 14%) and dual contraception (8% vs. 16%)., Discussion: Mirroring global trends, COVID-19 disrupted HIV and SRH service access in Botswana. However, in high HIV-prevalence settings, disruption may more severely impact population health with disproportionate effects on women. Integration of HIV and SRH services could build health system capacity and resilience, reduce missed opportunities for delivering SRH services to PLWH and limit the consequences of future restrictions that may cause health system disruption., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Ensor, Mechie, Ryan, Mussa, Bame, Tamuthiba, Moshashane and Morroni.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: This research is supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R21 HD100821-01. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study, data collection, analysis, reporting, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no competing interests.