Search

Background: Radiocarpal dislocations are rare but potentially devastating injuries. Poorer outcomes are associated with inadequate or lost reduction, such as ulnar translocation, but no consensus exists on the ideal fixation technique. Dorsal bridge plate fixation has been described for various settings in the treatment of complex distal radius fractures and can be fixed distally to the second or third metacarpal, but its application for radiocarpal dislocations has not been established., Aim: To determine whether distal fixation to the second or third metacarpal matters., Methods: Using a cadaveric radiocarpal dislocation model, the effect of distal fixation was studied in two stages: (1) A pilot study that investigated the effect of distal fixation alone; and (2) a more refined study that investigated the effect of described techniques for distal and proximal fixation. Radiographs were measured in various parameters to determine the quality of the reduction achieved., Results: The pilot study found that focusing on distal fixation alone without changing proximal fixation results in ulnar translocation and volar subluxation when fixing distally to the second metacarpal compared with the third. The second iteration demonstrated that anatomic alignment in coronal and sagittal planes could be achieved with each technique., Conclusion: In a cadaveric radiocarpal dislocation model, anatomic alignment can be maintained with bridge plate fixation to the second metacarpal or the third metacarpal if the described technique is followed. When considering dorsal bridge plate fixation for radiocarpal dislocations, the surgeon is encouraged to understand the nuances of different fixation techniques and how implant design features may influence proximal placement., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Tabeayo E, Saucedo JM and Rockwood J performed the research. The cadavers and the wide plate were provided to them through a research grant awarded by Acumed (Hillsborough, Oregon). The narrow plate was provided to them on loan by TriMed (Valencia, California). Plates and screws were returned at the conclusion of the study. Karamanos E, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Shah AR, and Srinivasan RC have no conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the concordance between preoperatively determined implant parameters using CT-based planning software and surgically implanted prostheses. Secondarily, we sought to evaluate the agreement between preoperative plans performed by surgeons at different levels of training., Methods: Patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and had a preoperative CT scan according to Blueprint (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) protocol to be used for preoperative planning were included. A cohort of short-stemmed (SS) and stemless cases performed between October 2017 and December 2018 was randomly selected from an institutional database for the study. Planning was performed separately by four observers at different levels of orthopedic training at a minimum of six months following the actual surgery. Concordance between the surgical decisions during planning and the actually utilized implants was calculated. Additionally, inter-rater agreement was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Implant parameters assessed were glenoid size, backside radius of curvature, and the need for posterior augment, in addition to humeral stem/nucleus size, head size, head height, and head eccentricity., Results: Twenty-one patients were included (10 stemmed and 11 stemless) with a cohort comprising 12 (57%) females with a median age of 62 years (IQR 59.5,67). There was a total of 544 decision possibilities based on the above parameters. The total number of decisions that matched surgical data was 333 (61.2%). Prediction of glenoid component augmentation need and size was the variable that matched most with surgical data (83.3%), whereas nucleus/stem size was the worst (42.9%). Interobserver agreement was excellent in one variable, good in three variables, moderate in one, and poor in two. The best interobserver agreement was with regard to head height., Conclusion: Preoperative planning using CT-based software may be more accurate for the glenoid component when compared to humeral-sided parameters. Specifically, planning may be most helpful in determining the need and the size of glenoid component augmentation. Utilizing computerized software demonstrates high reliability, even among surgeons early in their orthopedic training., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2023, Bedeir et al.)

Objectives: There have been conflicting reports regarding the effects of obesity on both surgical time and blood loss following anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Varying categories of obesity has made comparison amongst existing studies difficult., Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive anatomic shoulder arthroplasty cases (aTSA) was undertaken. Demographic data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), age-adjusted Charleson Comorbidity Index (ACCI), operative time, hospital length of stay (LOS), and both POD#1 and discharge visual analogue score (VAS) was collected. Intra-operative total blood volume loss (ITBVL) and need for transfusion was calculated. BMI was categorized as non-obese (<30 kg/m 2 ), obese (30-40 kg/m 2 ) and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m 2 ). Unadjusted associations of BMI with operative time, ITBVL and LOS were examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with hospital LOS., Results: There were 130 aTSA cases performed, including 45 short stem and 85 stemless implants, of which 23 (17.7%) were morbidly obese, 60 (46.2%) were obese and 47 (36.1%) were non-obese. Median operative time for the morbidly obese cohort was 119.5 minutes (IQR 93.0, 142.0) versus 116.5 minutes (IQR 99.5, 134.5) for the obese cohort versus 125.0 minutes (IQR, 99.0, 146.0) for the non-obese cohort. ( P=0.61 ) The median ITBVL for the morbidly obese cohort was 235.8 ml (IQR 144.3, 329.7) versus 220.1 ml (IQR 147.7, 262.7) for the obese cohort versus 216.3 ml (IQR 139.7, 315.5) for the non-obese cohort. ( P=0.72 ). BMI ≥40kg/m 2 (IRR 1.32, P=0.038 ), age (IRR 1.01, P=0.026 ), and female gender (IRR 1.54, P<0.001 ) were predictive of increased LOS. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital medical complications ( P=0.13 ), surgical complications ( P=1.0 ), need for re-operation ( P=0.66 ) and 30-day return to the ER ( P=0.06 )., Conclusion: Morbid obesity was not associated with increased surgical time, ITBVL and perioperative medical or surgical complications following aTSA, though it was predictive of increased hospital LOS., Competing Interests: KIG is a paid consultant for Stryker Wright Medical. YL, ER, PS, ET, FQ have no financial relationships to report.

Health literacy is defined as the degree to which an individual obtains and processes basic health information and services so as to make appropriate and informed health decisions. Limited health literacy (LHL), as assessed by various validated instruments, remains prevalent amongst older adult patients, non-Caucasian ethnicities, and those of lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Of concern, LHL has been associated with decreased medical knowledge, disuse of preventative medical services, worse chronic disease control and increased use of emergency services. Within orthopedics specifically, LHL has been associated with lower expectations regarding outcomes and ambulation following total hip and knee surgery and fewer questions asked regarding diagnosis and treatment in the outpatient care setting. In some cases, LHL has been independently correlated with worse patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), though this finding may be due in part to the reading level required of the PROMs. There is growing evidence that active intervention by the orthopedic provider and demonstration of empathy improves patient comprehension of the nature of their musculoskeletal complaints, aids informed decision-making and, ultimately, maximizes patient satisfaction. Recognition of the associated factors for LHL will ensure improved physician-patient communication through the implementation of health literate interventions focused on those most at-risk., Competing Interests: The author(s) do NOT have any potential conflicts of interest for this manuscript