Search

In multiple myeloma, disease progresses via seeding to different anatomic sites and clonal expansion. Here, utilising autopsy material, the authors show that systemic seeding accelerates at relapse following treatment.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20978-y.

Abstract Background While the pledget suture technique has been the standard for surgical aortic. valve replacement (AVR), discussion continues regarding the possibility of the nonpledget suture technique to produce superior structural and hemodynamic parameters. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the figure-of-eight suture technique in AVR, as determined by the incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). Methods We reviewed records of patients (N = 629) who underwent a surgical AVR procedure between January 2011 and July 2018 at a single institution. Indexed effective orifice area values and PPM incidence were calculated from implanted valve size and patient body surface area. Incidence of none, moderate, and severe PPM was compared across AVR suture techniques. Results A total of 570 pledget and 59 figure-of-eight patients were compared for incidence of PPM. Patients who received AVR with the pledget suture technique had significantly lower echocardiographic measurements of baseline ejection fraction than patients who had received AVR with the figure-of-eight suture technique (p = 0.003). Patients who received the figure-of eight suture had a 14% decrease in moderate PPM compared to patients who received the pledget suture (p = 0.022). Patients who received the figure-of-eight suture also had a significantly higher rate of no PPM (p = 0.044). Conclusions The use of the figure-of-eight suture technique in AVR can reduce the incidence of moderate PPM. While the pledget suture is the standard technique in AVR, the figure-of-eight suture technique may offer better structural and hemodynamic outcomes, especially for patients with a smaller aortic annulus.

With the increased push for personalized medicine, researchers and clinicians have begun exploring the use of wearable sensors to track patient activity. These sensors typically prioritize device life over robust onboard analysis, which results in lower accuracies in step count, particularly at lower cadences. To optimize the accuracy of activity-monitoring devices, particularly at slower walking speeds, proven methods must be established to identify suitable settings in a controlled and repeatable manner prior to human validation trials. Currently, there are no methods for optimizing these low-power wearable sensor settings prior to human validation, which requires manual counting for in-laboratory participants and is limited by time and the cadences that can be tested. This article proposes a novel method for determining sensor step counting accuracy prior to human validation trials by using a mechanical camshaft actuator that produces continuous steps. Sensor error was identified across a representative subspace of possible sensor setting combinations at cadences ranging from 30 steps/min to 110 steps/min. These true errors were then used to train a multivariate polynomial regression to model errors across all possible setting combinations and cadences. The resulting model predicted errors with an R2 of 0.8 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.044 across all setting combinations. An optimization algorithm was then used to determine the combinations of settings that produced the lowest RMSE and median error for three ranges of cadence that represent disabled low-mobility ambulators, disabled high-mobility ambulators, and healthy ambulators (30–60, 20–90, and 30–110 steps/min, respectively). The model identified six setting combinations for each range of interest that achieved a ±10% error in cadence prior to human validation. The anticipated range of errors from the optimized settings at lower walking speeds are lower than the reported errors of wearable sensors (±30%), suggesting that pre-human-validation optimization of sensors may decrease errors at lower cadences. This method provides a novel and efficient approach to optimizing the accuracy of wearable activity monitors prior to human validation trials.