Search

Necrotic symptoms of aerial parts of European and Asian pear trees (Pyrus communis L. and Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) are often related to a well known bacterial disease of Maloideae: fire blight caused by E. amylovora (8). Nevertheless, Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae causes pear blast on blossoms. Enterobacter pyrinus has been isolated in Korea (4) from necrotic leaf spots and shoots.

The recently described pathogen Erwinia pyrifoliae, isolated from Nashi pear fruit trees in Korea, resembles the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora in some of its properties. The two pathogens were classified into different species by DNA hybridization kinetics and microbiological criteria. From the nucleotide sequences of the 16S rRNA and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as well as extracellular polysaccharide (EPS)-encoding genes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were designed that specifically detect E. pyrifoliae but not the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora, and these primers were also applied to identify E. pyrifoliae in necrotic plant material. The genomes of several strains were digested with the restriction enzyme SpeI, and the DNA fragments were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Three groups of patterns could be distinguished for the isolated E. pyrifoliae strains, all different from various E. amylovora strains, which produce a relatively homogeneous PFGE pattern after SpeI digests. Typical fire blight host plants were assayed in a growth chamber or an experimental field for their susceptibility to E. pyrifoliae. A strong preference was found for pear varieties, whereas apple, cotoneaster, hawthorn, or raspberry rarely produced necrotic symptoms. E. pyrifoliae was readily detected in samples from pear orchards in South Korea during 1995 to 1998; however, the Asian pear pathogen was not recovered in necrotic plant tissue from 1999 and 2000.

A DNA sequence with dyad symmetry upstream of the transcriptional start of the Rhodobacter capsulatus puf operon, which encodes pigment-binding proteins of the light-harvesting I complex and of the reaction center, has previously been shown to be a protein-binding site (G. Klug, Mol. Gen. Genet. 226:167-176, 1991). When a low-copy-number plasmid with a base pair transition at position -43 within this dyad symmetry in front of the puf structural genes was transferred into a Rhodobacter strain with the puf operon deleted, different phenotypes occurred during cultivation of the transconjugants and the kinetics of the loss of the wild-type phenotype was dependent on the oxygen tension in the culture. After growth for 150 generations, the different phenotypes were stably inherited. The strains having the wild-type phenotype carried the wild-type puf DNA sequence. The original mutation was still present in the strains that showed lighter color. These strains had less light-harvesting II complex in the membrane and showed lower rates of transcription of the puc operon, which encodes the proteins of this complex. This deregulation of puc expression was due to one or more chromosomally located, secondary mutations, not directly to the mutation present on the plasmid. Thus, a single-base-pair transition in the puf upstream region can result in a deregulation of puc expression, suggesting a direct or indirect transcriptional coregulation of both these operons by a common factor.