Search

Background: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising technique for effective analgesia. It is still uncertain if ESPB offers the same opioid-sparing effect as thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in midline incision for upper abdominal surgery. Methods: The study is a prospective, bi-center, randomized, controlled, non-inferior trial. One hundred fifty-eight patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery will be randomly assigned to receive bilateral ESPB or PVB before surgery. The primary outcome will be the equivalent cumulative analgesia dosage of sufentanil during the surgery, which is defined as the total dosage of sufentanil from anesthesia induction to tracheal extubation. The main secondary outcomes include postoperative complications and the quality of recovery-15 score at 24 h, 48 h, and 30 days after surgery. Discussion: This study will assess the opioid-sparing efficacy of ESPB and PVB, complications, and the quality of recovery of two blocks. Trial registration: ChiCTR2300073030 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/). Registered on 30 June 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The application of sufentanil of anesthesiology has become a popular research area. However, literature-based bibliometric analyses on sufentanil are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to review the application of sufentanil in anesthesiology, and evaluate the research status and trends in this field. Methods: We searched the SCI-Expanded, SSCI, and CPCI-S databases from the Web of Science core collection as data sources for articles published from 1 January2003, to 31 December2023, and bibliometric and VOSviewer software were used to visualize and analyze the literature in terms of authors, journals, countries, institutions, and their collaborative networks, as well as keyword networks. Results: Our analysis included 1,473 relevant publications on the application of sufentanil in anesthesiology. The overall number of publications is on the rise; the top three countries of study were China, the US and France; the top three universities that published relevant articles were Anhui Medical University, Capital Medical University and Zhejiang University; the largest number of publications focused on Anesthesia and analgesia ; At present, the studies in this field mainly focus on the application scope, mode, and advantages; adverse reactions; and combined effects of sufentanil in combination with other drugs. The adverse factors for the use of sufentanil in anesthesiology and ways to improve its safety and efficacy are hot topics of research. Future research should explore the applicability of population and dose utilization, novel drug combinations, non-opioid adjuncts, and technological innovations. Conclusion: An increasing number of publications indicates that researchers are showing interest in the field of sufentanil use in anesthesiology, and ongoing research is at a relatively mature level. While the international community has established a strong foundation for cooperation, the cooperation among researchers, institutions, and countries needs to be enhanced. Simultaneously, efforts must be made to explore and strengthen personnel cooperation, expand the coverage of funding support, and improve the quality of the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Remimazolam is a newly developed benzodiazepine drug with water-soluble, esterase degradation, and ultra-short-acting properties. The dose for general anesthesia induction in obese patients was not known. This study aimed to determine the optimal dose of remimazolam in combination with sufentanil for the induction of general anesthesia in obese patients. Methods: It was a prospective observational study. We recruited 46 patients scheduled for bariatric surgery from October 2022 to December 2023. One patient refused to provide informed consent, and six patients were receiving psychotropic medication. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale was used to assess the patient's response. The dose of sufentanil was 0.5 µg/kg (lean body weight [LBW]). The initial dose of remimazolam was 0.3 mg/kg (LBW). The dose of remimazolam was modified using the up-and-down allocation technique. Successful sedation (negative group) was characterized by achieving a MOAA/S score ≤ 1 within 3 min of commencing remimazolam infusion. If negative, the next patient received a low-level dose at a ratio of 0.9. Failed sedation (positive group) was defined as a MOAA/S score of >1 within 3 min of commencing remimazolam infusion. The patients in the positive group received propofol 0.5 mg/kg as a remedial measure, and the next dose was increased to a higher level. The primary outcome was to determine the half-effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam in combination with sufentanil 0.5 µg/kg for induction in obese patients. The secondary outcome was to determine the occurrence of adverse effects such as hypotension, hypertension, and intraoperative awareness. Results: The ED50 and ED95 values of remimazolam (LBW) combined with sufentanil (0.5 µg/kg) (LBW) were 0.115 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.072–0.137) and 0.179 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.150–0.434), respectively, and the time of loss of consciousness in the negative group was 120.13 ± 25.03 s. The cardiovascular system was stable during the induction period. The incidence of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was 38.5% in 39 patients. Respiratory depression, allergic reaction, intraoperative awareness, and delayed emergence were not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Remimazolam combined with sufentanil (0.5 µg/kg) (LBW) can be effectively used for general anesthesia induction in obese patients. The ED50 and ED95 values of remimazolam (LBW) were 0.115 mg/kg and 0.179 mg/kg, respectively. Clinical Trial Registration : www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2200065602. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in the prehospital setting. Since trauma-induced pain often accompanies a hemorrhagic insult, the administered pain medication must not interfere with critical autonomic regulation of arterial blood pressure and vital organ perfusion. The purpose of this study was to test two unrelated hypotheses: 1) sublingual sufentanil (Dsuvia) impairs tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia and 2) sublingual sufentanil attenuates pain sensation and the accompanying cardiovascular responses to a noxious stimulus. Twenty-nine adults participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. After sublingual administration of sufentanil (30 μg) or placebo, participants completed a progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) challenge to tolerance (aim 1). After a recovery period, participants completed a cold pressor test (CPT; aim 2). Addressing the first aim, tolerance to LBNP was not different between trials (P = 0.495). Decreases in systolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of LBNP also did not differ between trials (time P < 0.001, trial P = 0.477, interaction P = 0.587). Finally, increases in heart rate from baseline to the end of LBNP did not differ between trials (time P < 0.001, trial P = 0.626, interaction P = 0.424). Addressing the second aim, sufentanil attenuated perceived pain (P < 0.001) in response to the CPT, though the magnitude of the change in mean blood pressure during the CPT (P = 0.078) was not different between trials. These data demonstrate that sublingual sufentanil does not impair tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia. Additionally, sublingual sufentanil attenuates perceived pain, but not the accompanying mean blood pressure responses to the CPT. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Addressing two unique aims, we observed that sublingual sufentanil administration does not impair tolerance or cardiovascular responses to lower-body negative pressure (LBNP)-induced progressive central hypovolemia. Second, despite pain perception being reduced, sublingual sufentanil did not attenuate mean blood pressure responses to a cold pressor test (CPT). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Minor but painful medical procedures are often handled at the operating room. If safe and effective treatment options are available many procedures may be performed outside of the operating room. Objective(s): The objective of this study is to assess the adverse events of intranasal s‐ketamine and/or sufentanil alone or as part of a multimodal analgesic regime for medical procedures outside of the operating room. Secondary outcomes included analgesic effect, doses and indications for use. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary care paediatric hospital. Patients: Children 1 year up till 18 years. Intervention(s): Intranasal (IN) sufentanil (S), intranasal s‐ketamine (K) or the free combination of the two drugs (SK). Main Outcome Measure(s): The frequency of adverse events including serious adverse events reported by intervention. Results: Between 2004 and 2014, 2185 medical procedures were registered, including 652 procedures with IN SK, 1469 procedures with IN S and 64 procedures with IN K. The children's median age was 5.6 years (range 1.0–17.9). Medical procedures with at least one adverse event were 18% with IN SK, 25% with IN K and 18% with IN S. Common adverse events included episodes of vomiting (9%), nausea (8%) and dizziness (3%). In two patients receiving IN S, serious adverse events occurred. One patient had respiratory depression and bronchospasm and another patient with cerebral palsy had a seizure. Both were handled immediately and did not result in any sequelae. The median doses of intranasal sufentanil were 38% lower when combined with s‐ketamine (IN SK free combination: sufentanil dose 0.5 μg/kg (range 0.2–1.3) and s‐ketamine dose 0.5 mg/kg (range 0.2–1.5). IN S monotherapy, sufentanil dose 0.8 μg/kg (range 0.2–2.7)). Similar analgesic effect was reported for S and SK. Conclusions: Intranasal sufentanil and/or s‐ketamine are feasible for the treatment of procedural pain in an ambulatory setting with appropriate per‐ and post‐procedural observations and trained staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We explored the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 195 patients who underwent painless colonoscopy surgery were randomly divided into three groups: the propofol deep sedation group (group DS), the sufentanil combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS1) and the esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS2). The primary outcomes of this study included the incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia and excellent and good rates of anaesthesia during colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes included perioperative changes in vital signs (MAP, HR, and SpO2), anaesthesia induction time, dischargeable time, patient and endoscopist satisfaction scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), drowsiness, dizziness, propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation and vasoactive medications. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 7.081, P = 0.029). The incidence of hypotension in the CS2 group was significantly lower than that in the DS and CS1 groups (χ2 = 16.278, P < 0.001). The risk of hypoxemia was 5.727 times higher in Group DS than in Group CS2 (OR 5.727; 95%CI 1.203–27.273), and the risk of hypotension was 9.864 times higher in Group DS than in Group CS2 (OR 9.864; 95%CI 2.770–35.120). The risk of hypotension in Group CS1 was 5.167 times that in Group CS2 (OR 5.167; 95%CI 1.396–19.117). The incidence of propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation, ephedrine usage and drowsiness in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 57.618, P < 0.001; χ2 = 9.544, P = 0.008; χ2 = 14.820, P = 0.001; χ2 = 37.257, P < 0.001). The incidence of dizziness during recovery in the CS1 group was significantly greater than that in the DS and CS2 groups (χ2 = 6.594, P = 0.037). The dischargeable time in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (F = 53.039, P < 0.001). The satisfaction scores of the endoscopist and patients in the DS group were significantly lower than those in the CS1 and CS2 groups (F = 17.390, P < 0.001; F = 19.282; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation can be safely and effectively used for painless colonoscopy and has fewer complications.It is recommended for painless colonoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Currently, the primary surgical treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The perioperative period is frequently accompanied by severe pain. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can enhance analgesia for abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of bilateral multiple-injection ESPB in patients with PMP. Methods: Fifty patients with PMP were randomly divided into two groups: the ESPB combined with general anesthesia group (Group E) and the general anesthesia alone group (Group C). Prior to the induction, patients in Group E underwent ESPB at the T7 and T11 levels. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during rest at 6 h post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, time for first rescue analgesia, frequency distribution of rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, adverse events associated with ESPB. Results: The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores in Group E were significantly lower compared to Group C at immediate post-extubation (1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.008), and at 2 (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.001), 4 (2.4 ± 1.5 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.001), and 6 h (2.7 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.004) post-extubation during rest. Similarly, the VAS scores in Group E were significantly lower than those in Group C at immediate post-extubation (3.0 ± 1.4 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), and at 2 (3.8 ± 1.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.4, P = 0.019), 4 (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.5, P < 0.001), and 6 h (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.3, P = 0.004) post-extubation during movement. In Group E, the intraoperative remifentanil administration (2319.3 ± 1089.5 vs. 2984.6 ± 796.1, P = 0.017) and the amount of rescue analgesia within 2 h post-extubation (0 vs. 4, P = 0.037) were significantly less than in Group C, and the first rescue analgesia time was shorter as well (231.4 ± 147.5 vs. 668.8 ± 416.7, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to general anesthesia alone, bilateral multiple-injection ESPB with 0.2% ropivacaine can enhance analgesia and reduce opioid administration in patients with PMP. However, the duration of analgesia with ESPB is relatively short due to the low concentration of the local anesthetic used. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300069504, 20/03/2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The application of sufentanil of anesthesiology has become a popular research area. However, literature-based bibliometric analyses on sufentanil are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to review the application of sufentanil in anesthesiology, and evaluate the research status and trends in this field. Methods: We searched the SCI-Expanded, SSCI, and CPCI-S databases from the Web of Science core collection as data sources for articles published from 1 January2003, to 31 December2023, and bibliometric and VOSviewer software were used to visualize and analyze the literature in terms of authors, journals, countries, institutions, and their collaborative networks, as well as keyword networks. Results: Our analysis included 1,473 relevant publications on the application of sufentanil in anesthesiology. The overall number of publications is on the rise; the top three countries of study were China, the US and France; the top three universities that published relevant articles were Anhui Medical University, Capital Medical University and Zhejiang University; the largest number of publications focused on Anesthesia and analgesia; At present, the studies in this field mainly focus on the application scope, mode, and advantages; adverse reactions; and combined effects of sufentanil in combination with other drugs. The adverse factors for the use of sufentanil in anesthesiology and ways to improve its safety and efficacy are hot topics of research. Future research should explore the applicability of population and dose utilization, novel drug combinations, non-opioid adjuncts, and technological innovations. Conclusion: An increasing number of publications indicates that researchers are showing interest in the field of sufentanil use in anesthesiology, and ongoing research is at a relatively mature level. While the international community has established a strong foundation for cooperation, the cooperation among researchers, institutions, and countries needs to be enhanced. Simultaneously, efforts must be made to explore and strengthen personnel cooperation, expand the coverage of funding support, and improve the quality of the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Remimazolam is a newly developed benzodiazepine drug with water-soluble, esterase degradation, and ultra-short-acting properties. The dose for general anesthesia induction in obese patients was not known. This study aimed to determine the optimal dose of remimazolam in combination with sufentanil for the induction of general anesthesia in obese patients. Methods: It was a prospective observational study. We recruited 46 patients scheduled for bariatric surgery from October 2022 to December 2023. One patient refused to provide informed consent, and six patients were receiving psychotropic medication. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. The Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale was used to assess the patient’s response. The dose of sufentanil was 0.5 µg/kg (lean body weight [LBW]). The initial dose of remimazolam was 0.3 mg/kg (LBW). The dose of remimazolam was modified using the up-and-down allocation technique. Successful sedation (negative group) was characterized by achieving a MOAA/ S score ≤ 1 within 3 min of commencing remimazolam infusion. If negative, the next patient received a low-level dose at a ratio of 0.9. Failed sedation (positive group) was defined as a MOAA/S score of >1 within 3 min of commencing remimazolam infusion. The patients in the positive group received propofol 0.5 mg/kg as a remedial measure, and the next dose was increased to a higher level. The primary outcome was to determine the half-effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam in combination with sufentanil 0.5 µg/kg for induction in obese patients. The secondary outcome was to determine the occurrence of adverse effects such as hypotension, hypertension, and intraoperative awareness. Results: The ED50 and ED95 values of remimazolam (LBW) combined with sufentanil (0.5 µg/kg) (LBW) were 0.115 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.072–0.137) and 0.179 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.150–0.434), respectively, and the time of loss of consciousness in the negative group was 120.13 ± 25.03 s. The cardiovascular system was stable during the induction period. The incidence of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was 38.5% in 39 patients. Respiratory depression, allergic reaction, intraoperative awareness, and delayed emergence were not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Remimazolam combined with sufentanil (0.5 µg/kg) (LBW) can be effectively used for general anesthesia induction in obese patients. The ED50 and ED95 values of remimazolam (LBW) were 0.115 mg/kg and 0.179 mg/kg, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A combination of remimazolam and propofol could produce more stable sedation. A good medication regimen should consider not only efficacy but also safety, especially hypotension. The aim of the current study was to compare the incidence and amount of hypotension by propofol versus remimazolam-propofol combinations in day-surgery hysteroscopy. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (Group P, n = 125) or remimazolam-propofol combinations (Group RP, n = 125) at a 1:1 ratio. Intravenous injection of sufentanil 0.1ug/kg were administered before sedative medication. In group P, a bolus of 2.5 mg/kg propofol was administered. In group RP, intravenous anesthesia was commenced with 0.125 mg/kg remimazolam and 1 mg/kg propofol. After loss of consciousness, propofol was maintained at 6 mg/kg/h. The primary outcomes were the incidence and amount of hypotension during surgery. Hypotension was defined as a MAP less than 65mmHg for at least 1 min. The amount of hypotension was assessed by time-weighted average intraoperative MAP under a threshold of 65 mmHg. The secondary outcomes were various anesthesia related parameters and some adverse events. Results: In group P, 25 patients (20.0%) experienced hypotension during hysteroscopy compared with 9 patients (7.2%) in group RP, for a difference of 12.8% (RR 2.778, 95%CI [1.352–5.709]). The combination of remimazolam and propofol resulted in significantly lower TWA (Time Weighted Average) threshold 0.14 (0.10–0.56) mmHg in group RP compared to 0.31 (0.15–0.67) mmHg in group P. The total dose of propofol was nearly double in group P compared to group RP. A significantly higher frequency of injection pain and low oxygen saturation was observed in the group P than that of the group RP. Hiccup was observed only in group RP. The incidences of body movement, bradycardia and vomiting were no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: The incidence and amount of hypotension by remimazolam-propofol combinations was significantly less than that by propofol sedation in day-surgery hysteroscopy. The optimization of medication regimen would attenuate the harm of hypotension and contribute to patients' rapid recovery in day surgery. Trial registration : Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400079888 (date: 15/01/2024), [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the effect of alfentanil in combination with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (PGE) in elderly patients. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from 200 elderly patients who underwent PGE at The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China from June 2021 to December 2022. The patients were divided into study (n = 108) and control groups (n = 92). The study group received anesthesia with alfentanil (10 µg/kg) and propofol (1 - 2 mg/kg), while the control group was anesthetized with sufentanil (0.1 µg/kg) combined with propofol (1 - 2 mg/kg). Results: Study group consumed significantly less propofol compared to control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in baseline values of mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood oxygen saturation (BOS), and heart rate (HR) between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, during the examination, the control group showed significantly lower mean values of MAP, BOS, and HR compared to study group (p < 0.05). Additionally, study group experienced significantly shorter recovery time from anesthesia, time to recovery of consciousness, and time to orientation recovery compared to control group (p < 0.05). The incidence of patients rated with excellent or good anesthetic effects was significantly higher in study group compared to control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Alfentanil in combination with propofol offers stable vital signs and superior anesthetic effect in elderly patients undergoing PGE, with fewer adverse reactions compared to sufentanil and propofol combination. Applicability of these findings requires further validation with more data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sufentanil is frequently used as an anesthetic agent in cardiac surgery owing to its cardiovascular safety and favorable pharmacokinetics. However, the pharmacokinetics profiles of sufentanil in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery remain less understood, which is crucial for achieving the desired level of anesthesia and mitigating surgical complications. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of sufentanil in patients undergoing CPB surgery and elucidate the clinical factors affecting its pharmacokinetic profile. Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB and were administered sufentanil for anesthesia were enrolled. Arterial blood samples were collected to quantify plasma concentrations of sufentanil and clinical laboratory parameters, including inflammatory cytokines. A population pharmacokinetic model was established using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling. Simulations were performed using the pharmacokinetic parameters of the final model. Overall, 20 patients were included in the final analysis. Sufentanil pharmacokinetics were modeled using a two‐compartment model, accounting for CPB effects. Sufentanil clearance increased 2.80‐fold during CPB and warming phases, while the central compartment volume increased 2.74‐fold during CPB. CPB was a significant covariate affecting drug clearance and distribution volume. No other significant covariates were identified despite increased levels of the inflammatory cytokines, including IL‐6, IL‐8, and TNF‐α during CPB. The simulation indicated a 30 μg loading dose and 40 μg/h maintenance infusion for target‐controlled infusion. Additionally, a bolus dose of 60 μg was added at CPB initiation to adjust for exposure changes during this phase. Considering the target sufentanil concentrations, a uniform dosing regimen was acceptable for effective analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of Esketamine combining Sufentanil in labor analgesia and their impacts on postpartum depression. Methods: This was a retrospective study. One hundred and fifty primiparae with spontaneous labor were selected at SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City from July 10, 2021 to May 10, 2022 as the research objects and randomly divided into two groups (each n=75). While the control group underwent epidural infusion of Sufentanil for analgesia, the study group was administered Esketamine combining Sufentanil. Compared analgesic effects, time of birth course, adverse reactions, pain intensity, scores assigned to depression and anxiety before analgesia and after delivery were made for pregnant women in both groups. Results: The response rates of the study and control groups reached 100% and 93%, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p=0.02). The time of the first, second, and third stages of labor in the study group were all significantly lower than that of the control group; showing statistical significance (p=0.00). Regarding adverse reactions showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.44). Moreover, the study group showed noticeably lower pain intensity than those of the control group during delivery, 20 minutes and one hour after delivery; and their differences were statistically significant (p=0.00). After delivery, both the SAS and SDS of the study group were respectively lower than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences as well (p=0.00). Conclusions: Applying Esketamine combining Sufentanil in epidural painless delivery produces rather favorable analgesic effects, shortens the time of the birth process, and improves postpartum anxiety and depression without leading to more adverse reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study evaluated the impact of intraoperative opioid use and anesthesia type on outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Data from 508 patients treated between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. Most (82%) received combined intravenous and epidural anesthesia, while the rest received intravenous-only anesthesia. Results showed that combined anesthesia was linked to better overall survival and fewer intensive care unit admissions. However, opioid dosage and type did not significantly affect survival, recurrence rates, or major perioperative outcomes. The findings are limited by the study's single-center, retrospective nature, and further research is needed to confirm the safety of opioids in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Background: An increased intraoperative opioid dose seems to lead to worse outcomes in several types of cancer. We assessed the effect of intraoperatively administered opioids as well as the type of anesthesia on survival, recurrence rates and major perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Methods: We included patients who underwent open RC at our center between 2015 and 2022. The role of the type and dosage of intraoperative opioid agents, such as remifentanil, sufentanil and morphine milligram equivalents (MME), as well as the type of anesthesia (intravenous only versus intravenous/epidural), was assessed regarding perioperative and long-term outcomes after RC. Results: A total of 508 patients with a median age of 73 years (IQR: 64–78) were included. Overall, 92 (18%) patients received intravenous anesthesia, whereas 416 (82%) received combined anesthesia. At a median follow-up of 270 days (IQR: 98–808), 108 (21%) deaths and 106 (21%) recurrences occurred. Combined anesthesia was associated with better survival (HR:0.63, 95% CI: 0.4–0.97, p = 0.037) and lower intensive care unit admission rates (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31–0.77, p = 0.002) in the univariate analysis (unadjusted). The type and dosage of intraoperative opioid agents did not affect long-term survival and recurrence rates, as well as major perioperative outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings of our study were limited by its single-center, retrospective design. Conclusion: The use of intraoperative opioids was not associated with worse outcomes in our cohort, while the use of additional epidural anesthesia seems to be beneficial in terms of overall survival and intensive care unit admissions. Nevertheless, further research is mandatory to validate the safety of opioids in patients undergoing RC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect and adverse events of hydromorphone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) without background dose versus sufentanil PCIA with background dose in patients after surgery. A retrospective analysis. From June 2020 to May 2021, 1,594 eligible postoperative patients who received PCIA were included in this study. According to the types of opioids, patients were divided into two groups: the sufentanil group and the hydromorphone group. The Numerical Rating Scale, Functional Activity Scale, and Level of Sedation were used to evaluate the analgesic effects between the two groups. In addition, total patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use, effective number of PCA compressions, and adverse effects of PCIA were compared between the two groups. At 24 hours (h) after surgery, the Functional Activity Scale score in the sufentanil group was higher than that in the hydromorphone group (P <.05). Compared with the sufentanil group, total PCA use, total number of PCA compressions and effective number of PCA consumptions were significantly decreased in the hydromorphone group during a 48 hours period (P <.05). There were no statistical differences in Numerical Rating Scale score, Level of Sedation score, and adverse events between two groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. Compared with sufentanil PCIA with a background dose, under a similar analgesic effect, hydromorphone PCIA without a background dose provided lower PCA use. Our findings may provide useful evidence for more future studies related to postoperative analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzed the application effect of remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil on percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Forty elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) were randomly divided into sufentanil (A group) and remimazolam besylate + sufentanil groups (B group). A group was given sufentanil anesthesia, B group was given remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), saturation of pulse oxygen (SpO2) and Ramsay sedation score were recorded at different time points, including T0 (before administration), T1 (beginning of surgery), T2 (perfusion of bone cement) and T3 (end of surgery). HR, MAP, SpO2 were continuously monitored by electrocardiogram monitor. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of the two groups were recorded at before anesthesia and immediately after surgery. The adverse reactions (AR) were observed, including respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, and restlessness during the recovery period. Compared with group A, MAP was increased at T2 and T3 time points in group B. Ramsay sedation scores at T2 time points in group B were higher than that in group A. The VAS score of immediately after operation and incidence of AR of group B was lower than that of group A. In elderly patients undergoing PVP, remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil has no obvious effect on patients' respiratory parameters, with clear analgesic and sedative effects and low incidence of AR, which is worthy of promotion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Depression is a prevalent perioperative psychiatric complication among elderly hip fracture patients. Esketamine has rapid and robust antidepressant effects. However, it is unknown whether it can alleviate depressive symptoms in elderly patients who undergo hip fracture surgery. This study aimed to explore whether the adjunctive esketamine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) could improve depressive symptoms in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: A single-center, prospective, double-blind and randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out from July 2022 to August 2023 at the Wenzhou People's Hospital among 90 patients, aged ≥ 65 years with hip fracture undergoing elective surgery. Participants were randomly allocated to either the esketamine group (group S) or the control group (group C). In Group S, patients were administered 0.5 mg/kg of esketamine as a PCIA adjuvant for 48 h, while the control group received saline. The primary outcome was the assessment of depressive symptoms using the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) on postoperative day 2. The secondary outcomes were assessments of depressive symptoms on postoperative day 7 and postoperative day 30, serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), postoperative pain intensity, the number of effective PCIA presses, sufentanil consumption, and adverse events. Results: The prevalence and GDS-15 scores of depression were significantly lower in group S on postoperative day 2 (28.6% vs. 53.5%; 3.5 ± 1.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.7, P < 0.05). In group S, the number of effective PCIA presses was significantly lower on postoperative day 2 than that in group C [2(1–4) vs. 1(0–2), P<0.05]. Higher levels of BDNF (23.8 ± 1.7 ng/mL vs. 25.3 ± 2.0 ng/mL, P < 0.05) and 5-HT (219.5 ± 19.5 ng/mL vs. 217.0 ± 22.2 ng/mL, P < 0.05) in the blood were observed on postoperative day 2 in group S. Conclusion: In elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years undergoing hip fracture surgery, the administration of adjunctive esketamine in PCIA could improve depressive symptoms and increase levels of BDNF and 5-HT in the blood. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061956 (Date: 13/07/2022). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thoracoscopic-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TG-TPVB) and thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block (TG-INB) are two postoperative analgesia technology for thoracic surgery. This study aims to compared the analgesic effect of TG-TPVB and TG-INB after uniportal video-asssited thoracic surgery (UniVATS). Methods: Fifty-eight patients were randomly allocated to the TG-TPVB group and the TG-INB group. The surgical time of nerve block, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the consumption of sufentanil and the number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesic (PCIA) presses within 24 h after surgery, the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: The VAS scores were significantly lower during rest and coughing at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h in the TG-TPVB group than in the TG-INB group (P < 0.05). The consumption of sufentanil and the number of PCIA presses within 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the TG-TPVB group than in the TG-INB group (P < 0.001).The surgical time of nerve block was significantly shorter in the TG-TPVB group than in the TG-INB group (P < 0.001). The incidence of bleeding at the puncture point was lower in the TG-TPVB group than that in the TG-INB group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: TG-TPVB demonstrated superior acute pain relieve after uniVATS, shorter surgical time and non-inferior adverse effects than TG-INB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: For several years, ropivacaine has been the standard-of-care for establishing postoperative femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) setting and is still widely in use but new approaches such as the patient-controlled administration of sublingual sufentanil tablets system (SSTS) seem to offer good clinical results. Our aim is to compare the SSTS to single shot peri-nervous injection of ropivacaine (single shot) after TKA in terms of effectiveness in pain management and of time to recovery. Materials and methods: A total of 165 patients undergoing TKA were enrolled. Eighty-four patients were randomly allocated in the SSTS group and 81 patients in the single shot group. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate performance of Timed Up and Go test. Secondary objectives were to measure the length of stay, NRS pain scale, the adherence to the prescribed plan, the joint mobility, the frequency of rescue analgesic use, side effects and patients' satisfaction. Results: Of all patients of the single shot group, 64 were withdrawn from the study as they unable to achieve pain control; only one patient was withdrawn from the SSTS group. Times for the "Timed Up and Go" test on the 3rd postoperative day were 8.4 ± 1.6 and 11.8 ± 3.6 in the SSTS group (n = 83) and single shot group (n = 17), respectively (p <.001). Conclusions: SSTS provides better pain management when compared to peri-nervous ropivacaine single shot injection after TKA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]