Search

Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of heterogeneous hematologic disorders with characteristic histopathological features. CD can present with unicentric or multicentric (MCD) regions of lymph node enlargement. Some cases of MCD are caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), whereas others are HHV-8–negative/idiopathic (iMCD). Treatment of iMCD is challenging, and outcomes can be poor because no uniform treatment guidelines exist, few systematic studies have been conducted, and no agreed upon response criteria have been described. The purpose of this paper is to establish consensus, evidence-based treatment guidelines based on the severity of iMCD to improve outcomes. An international Working Group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network to establish consensus guidelines for the management of iMCD based on published literature, review of treatment effectiveness for 344 cases, and expert opinion. The anti–interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab (or tocilizumab, if siltuximab is not available) with or without corticosteroids is the preferred first-line therapy for iMCD. In the most severe cases, adjuvant combination chemotherapy is recommended. Additional agents are recommended, tailored by disease severity, as second- and third-line therapies for treatment failures. Response criteria were formulated to facilitate the evaluation of treatment failure or success. These guidelines should help treating physicians to stratify patients based on disease severity in order to select the best available therapeutic option. An international registry for patients with CD (ACCELERATE, #NCT02817997) was established in October 2016 to collect patient outcomes to increase the evidence base for selection of therapies in the future.

Advances in treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) have resulted in improved survival. However, patients who have become refractory to novel agents have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of nine months, or as low as three months in the absence of further treatment after failure of

The study of myeloma survival reported by Gahrton et al (2001) in this issue of the British Journal of Cancer is both enlightening and challenging to clinicians managing this condition. Awareness of myeloma has been increased over the last few years as more refined diagnostic criteria (Rajkumar et al, 2007), improved investigational techniques (Ng et al, 2006) and better treatments have become available. Myeloma incidence increases with age, (Phekoo et al, 2004) but even allowing for an increasingly ageing UK population there seems to be an increased incidence in younger patients, the cause of which is unknown.

Background We have investigated a novel nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen in 44 patients with hematological malignancies. The median patient age was 41 years. Many of the patients had high-risk features, including 19 patients with a previous failed transplant. Methods Recipient conditioning consisted of CAMPATH-1H 20 mg/day on Days–8 to–4, fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 on Days–7 to–3 and melphalan 140 mg/m 2 on Day–2. Thirty-six recipients received unmanipulated G-CSF mobilized PBSC from HLA identical siblings and eight received unmanipulated BM from MUD. GvHD prophylaxis was with CYA alone for 38 patients and CYAplus MTX for six sibling recipients. Results Forty-two of the 43 evaluable patients had sustained engraftment. Results of chimerism analysis using microsatelhte PCR indicate that 18 of 31 patients studied were full donor chimeras, while the other patients were mixed chimeras in one or more lineages. At a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 3–29 months) 33 patients remain alive in CR, or with no evidence of disease progression. Seven patients relapsed or progressed post-transplant and four of them subsequently died. Four patients died from regimen-related complications. There were no cases of Grades III–IV acute GvHD. Only two patients developed Grade II acute GvHD and only one had chronic GvHD. The estimated probability of non-relapse mortality at 1 year was 11%. Results Although longer follow-up is needed to establish the long-term remission rates, this study demonstrates that this nonmyeloablative preparative regimen is associated with durable engraftment, minimal toxicity and low incidence of GvHD.

A novel nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen was investigated in 44 patients with hematologic malignancies. The median patient age was 41 years. Many of the patients had high-risk features, including 19 patients with a previous failed transplant. Recipient conditioning consisted of CAMPATH-1H, 20 mg/day on days −8 to −4; fludarabine, 30 mg/m2 on days −7 to −3; and melphalan, 140 mg/m2 on day −2. Thirty-six recipients received unmanipulated granculocyte colony-stimulating factor–mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical siblings, and 8 received unmanipulated marrow from matched unrelated donors. GVHD prophylaxis was with cyclosporine A alone for 38 patients and cyclosporine A plus methotrexate for 6 sibling recipients. Forty-two of the 43 evaluable patients had sustained engraftment. Results of chimerism analysis using microsatellite polymerase chain reaction indicate that 18 of 31 patients studied were full-donor chimeras while the other patients were mixed chimeras in one or more lineages. At a median follow-up of 9 months (range 3 to 29 months), 33 patients remain alive in complete remission or with no evidence of disease progression. Seven patients relapsed or progressed post-transplantation, and 4 of them subsequently died. Four patients died of regimen-related complications. There were no cases of grades III-IV acute GVHD. Only 2 patients developed grade II acute GVHD, and only 1 had chronic GVHD. The estimated probability of nonrelapse mortality was 11%. Although longer follow-up is needed to establish the long-term remission rates, this study demonstrates that this nonmyeloablative preparative regimen is associated with durable engraftment, minimal toxicity, and low incidence of GVHD.