4 results on '"Stephen Harman"'
Search Results
2. Towards Fully Autonomous Drone Tracking by a Reinforcement Learning Agent Controlling a Pan–Tilt–Zoom Camera
- Author
-
Mariusz Wisniewski, Zeeshan A. Rana, Ivan Petrunin, Alan Holt, and Stephen Harman
- Subjects
drone detection ,drone tracking ,pan–tilt–zoom ,reinforcement learning ,deep learning ,machine learning ,Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics ,TL1-4050 - Abstract
Pan–tilt–zoom cameras are commonly used for surveillance applications. Their automation could reduce the workload of human operators and increase the safety of airports by tracking anomalous objects such as drones. Reinforcement learning is an artificial intelligence method that outperforms humans on certain specific tasks. However, there exists a lack of data and benchmarks for pan–tilt–zoom control mechanisms in tracking airborne objects. Here, we show a simulated environment that contains a pan–tilt–zoom camera being used to train and evaluate a reinforcement learning agent. We found that the agent can learn to track the drone in our basic tracking scenario, outperforming a solved scenario benchmark value. The agent is also tested on more complex scenarios, where the drone is occluded behind obstacles. While the agent does not quantitatively outperform the optimal human model, it shows qualitative signs of learning to solve the complex, occluded non-linear trajectory scenario. Given further training, investigation, and different algorithms, we believe a reinforcement learning agent could be used to solve such scenarios consistently. Our results demonstrate how complex drone surveillance tracking scenarios may be solved and fully autonomized by reinforcement learning agents. We hope our environment becomes a starting point for more sophisticated autonomy in control of pan–tilt–zoom cameras tracking of drones and surveilling airspace for anomalous objects. For example, distributed, multi-agent systems of pan–tilt–zoom cameras combined with other sensors could lead towards fully autonomous surveillance, challenging experienced human operators.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. SNR‐dependent drone classification using convolutional neural networks
- Author
-
Holly Dale, Chris Baker, Michail Antoniou, Mohammed Jahangir, George Atkinson, and Stephen Harman
- Subjects
optimisation ,signal classification ,radar signal processing ,radar cross‐sections ,Bayes methods ,Gaussian noise ,Telecommunication ,TK5101-6720 - Abstract
Abstract Radar sensing offers a method of achieving 24‐h all‐weather drone surveillance, but in order to be maximally effective, systems need to be able to discriminate between birds and drones. This work examines drone‐bird classification performance as a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR). Classification at low SNR values is necessary in order to classify drones with a small radar cross‐section (RCS), as well as to facilitate reliable classification at longer ranges. To investigate the relationship between classification performance and SNR, Gaussian noise is added to an experimentally obtained dataset of radar spectrograms. Classification is performed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs). It is shown that for the data available classification accuracy drops with falling SNR, as might be expected for any given CNN. The degree to which performance degrades with reduced SNR is presented. It is further shown that simpler network architectures are more robust to noise. Finally, it is demonstrated that data augmentation can be used as a means of enhancing classification accuracy at lower SNR values. Bayesian optimisation is used to find the optimal augmentation hyperparameters and overall, classification accuracies of 92% are achieved at low SNR.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Developing drone experimentation facility: progress, challenges and cUAS consideration
- Author
-
Ivan Petrunin, Neil Watson, Eimantas Puscius, Adrian Cole, Phil Vernall, Alex Williamson, Ian Williams-Wynn, Dimitri Panagiotakopoulos, Jonathan Reid, Gavin Goudie, Stephen Harman, Antonios Tsourdos, and Tim Quilter
- Subjects
Surveillance ,Computer science ,Aviation ,business.industry ,Air traffic control ,Sensor fusion ,Drone ,Ecosystems ,Radar detection ,Detect and avoid ,Aeronautics ,Range (aeronautics) ,Uncontrolled airspace ,business ,Collision avoidance ,Visualization - Abstract
The operation of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) is widely recognised to be limited globally by challenges associated with gaining regulatory approval for flight Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) from the UAS Remote Pilot. This challenge extends from unmanned aircraft flights having to follow the same ‘see and avoid’ regulatory principles with respect to collision avoidance as for manned aircraft. Due to the technical challenges of UAS and Remote Pilots being adequately informed of potential traffic threats, this requirement effectively prohibits BVLOS UAS flight in uncontrolled airspace, unless a specific UAS operational airspace is segregated from manned aviation traffic, often achieved by use of a Temporary Danger Area (TDA) or other spatial arrangements. The UK Civilian Aviation Authority (CAA) has defined a Detect and Avoid (DAA) framework for operators of UAS to follow in order to demonstrate effective collision avoidance capability, and hence the ability to satisfy the ‘see and avoid’ requirement. The National BVLOS Experimentation Corridor (NBEC) is an initiative to create a drone experimentation facility that incorporates a range of surveillance and navigation information sources, including radars, data fusion, and operational procedures in order to demonstrate a capable DAA System. The NBEC is part located within an active Airodrome Traffic Zone (ATZ) at Cranfield Airport, which further creates the opportunity to develop and test systems and procedures together with an operational Air Traffic Control (ATC) unit. This allows for manned and unmanned traffic to be integrated from both systems and procedural perspectives inside segregated airspace in a first stage, and then subsequently transiting to/from non-segregated airspace. The NBEC provides the environment in which a number of challenges can be addressed. This paper discusses the lack of target performance parameters, the methodology for gaining regulatory approval for non-segregated BVLOS flights and for defining peformance parameters for counter UAS (cUAS).
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.