1. 18 F-FDG PET/MRI vs MRI in patients with recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma.
- Author
-
Kirchner J, Schaarschmidt BM, Sauerwein W, Deuschl C, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Holtmann L, Stebner V, Umutlu L, Antoch G, and Ruhlmann V
- Subjects
- Datasets as Topic, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis diagnostic imaging, Predictive Value of Tests, Radiopharmaceuticals, Sensitivity and Specificity, Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic diagnostic imaging, Head and Neck Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local diagnostic imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography
- Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of
18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18 FDG-PET/MRI) and MRI for recurrence diagnostics after primary therapy in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC)., Methods: A total of 32 dedicated head and neck18 F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were included in this analysis. MRI and18 F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were analyzed in separate sessions by two readers for tumor recurrence or metastases., Results: Lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 96%, 84%, 90%, 93%, and 91% for18 F-FDG PET/MRI and 77%, 94%, 95%, 73%, and 84% for MRI, resulting in a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy of18 F-FDG PET/MRI compared to MRI (P < .005)., Conclusion:18 F-FDG PET/MRI is superior to MRI in detecting local recurrence and metastases in patients with ACC of the head and neck. Especially concerning its negative predictive value,18 F-FDG PET/MRI outperforms MRI., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF