Search

The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of early endometrial cancer remains controversial. In the recent ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO guidelines, lymphadenectomy is recommended for patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma Grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion, but complete agreement was not achieved. In Sweden, DNA aneuploidy has been included as a high-risk factor. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of tumor histology, FIGO grade, DNA ploidy and myometrial invasion (MI) on occurrence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with endometrial cancer. The study design is a retrospective cohort study based on prospectively recorded register data. Endometrial cancer patients registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer 2010-2015 with FIGO Stages I-III and verified nodal status were included. Data on DNA ploidy, histology, FIGO grade and MI were included in multivariable log-binomial regression analyses with LNM as dependent variable. 1,165 cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The multivariable analyses revealed increased risk of LNM in patients with tumors with MI ≥ 50% (risk ratio [RR] = 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-5.6), nonendometrioid compared to endometrioid histology (RR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.4) and FIGO Grade 3 compared to Grade 1-2 tumors (RR 1.5; CI 1.1-2.0). No statistically significant association between DNA ploidy status and LNM was detected. This population-based, nation-wide study in women with endometrial cancer confirms a strong association between MI ≥ 50%, nonendometrioid histology and FIGO Grade 3, respectively, and LNM. DNA ploidy should not be included in the preoperative decision making of removing nodes or not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Surgical complications after primary or interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer were investigated and associations with patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were explored., Material and Methods: A population-based cohort study including all women with ovarian cancer, FIGO III-IV, treated with primary or interval debulking surgery, 2013-2017. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification system ≤30 days postoperatively, were registered. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses were performed with severe complications (CD ≥ III) as endpoint. PFS in relation was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: The cohort included 384 women, where 304 (79%) were treated with primary and 80 (21%) with interval debulking surgery. Complications CD I-V were registered in 112 (29%) patients and CD ≥ III in 42 (11%). Preoperative albumin was significantly lower in the CD ≥ III cohort compared with CD 0-II (P = 0.018). For every increase per unit in albumin, the risk of complications decreased by a factor of 0.93. There was no significant difference in completed chemotherapy between the cohorts CD 0-II 90.1% and CD ≥ III 83.3% (P = 0.236). In the univariable analysis; albumin <30 g/L, primary debulking surgery, complete cytoreduction and intermediate/high surgical complexity score (SCS) were associated with CD ≥ III. In the following multivariable analysis, only intermediate/high SCS was found to be an independent significant prognostic factor. Low (n = 180) vs intermediate/high SCS (n = 204) showed a median PFS of 17.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.2-20.7) vs 21.5 months (95% CI 18.2-25.7), respectively, with a significant log-rank; P = 0.038., Conclusions: Advanced ovarian cancer surgery is associated with complications but no significant difference was seen in completion of adjuvant chemotherapy when severe complications occur. Importantly, our study shows that intermediate/high SCS is an independent prognostic risk factor for complications. Low albumin, residual disease and primary debulking surgery were found to be associated with severe complications. These results may facilitate forming algorithms in the decision-making procedure of surgical treatment protocols., (© 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Objective: To assess the efficacy of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of reproductive outcomes by following FSS for borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and comparing the safety of FSS versus radical surgery (RS)., Design: Nationwide cohort study based on prospectively recorded data., Setting: Sweden., Patient (s): All women of reproductive age (18-40 years) treated in Sweden for stage I BOT with the use of FSS or RS from 2008 to 2015, identified in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC)., Interventions (s): FSS or RS., Main Outcome Measure (s): Reproductive outcomes: natural conception, use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), live birth and obstetrical outcomes. Safety outcome: overall survival (OS) rates, comparing women undergoing FSS versus RS. The FSS cohort was linked to the Swedish Medical Birth Register to identify all women who had given birth after FSS and to obtain detailed obstetrical data. For information on ART treatment, the National Quality Registry for Assisted Reproduction was consulted. OS rate comparisons were conducted by means of Kaplan-Meier estimates., Result (s): Of the 277 women with BOTs, 213 (77%) underwent FSS, 183 (86%) unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 30 (14%) cystectomy. Following FSS, 50 women gave birth to 62 healthy children, 8% of which were preterm. Only 20 (9%) of the women underwent ART treatment. OS was similar in women treated with FSS and RS., Conclusion (s): Natural fertility was maintained after FSS; only 9% required ART treatment. FSS was also deemed to be equivalent to RS regarding survival outcome., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and relative survival (RS) before and after the 2011 implementation of centralized primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer., Methods: A population-based cohort study using the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecological Cancer (SQRGC). Women with FIGO stage III and IV epithelial ovarian and Fallopian tube cancers were divided into two cohorts: before and after centralization. We estimated RS using the Ederer II method, analyzed the difference in the excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) and estimated 5-year DFS in a Cox proportional hazard regression model with centralization, age, primary treatment and complete cytoreduction as variables., Results: A total of 495 women were identified with 244 women before (2008-2010) and 251 after (2011-2013) centralization. An increased 5-year RS from 24% (95%CI:19-31) to 37% (95%CI:31-44) and an increased median RS from 27 months (95%CI:23-34) to 44 months (95%CI:40-52), p < 0.001 (log-rank), were observed in the total cohort regardless of primary treatment. EMRR was found to be 0.62 (95%CI:0.51-0.76) in 2011-2013 compared to 2008-2010 for all patients. After centralization, 5-year DFS was significantly longer, hazard ratio of 0.77 (95%CI:0.64-0.93) and centralization was found to be an independent significant factor for both survival and DFS. Complete cytoreduction was found to be a significant independent factor associated with increased RS and DFS., Conclusion: Centralization of primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer was associated with significantly increased complete cytoreduction, 5-year RS and DFS, and was found to be a significant independent factor for both RS and DFS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is rare in women of reproductive age and fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) may be applied in early stages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of FSS for treatment of EOC., Methods: The Swedish nationwide population-based Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer was used to identify all women 18-40 years of age diagnosed with stage I EOC between 2008 and 2015. Detailed data on surgery, staging, histopathology, and follow-up were extracted and reviewed. Cross-linking of individuals to population-based registries allowed retrieval of data on obstetrical and reproductive outcomes after FSS. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared (Kaplan-Meier method) between women who underwent FSS vs. radical surgery (RS)., Results: In total 83 women were identified; 36 who had FSS performed and 47 RS. The 5-year OS rate was 92% and no statistical differences between DFS or OS were found between women treated by FSS or RS. The recurrence rate after RS was 13% compared to 6% after FSS. Recurrences were more frequently found in women with stage IC tumor or with histologic subtypes with more aggressive behavior. In the FSS cohort, nine women gave birth to 12 healthy children, all delivered at fullterm. Only one women had received assisted reproductive technology treatment., Conclusion: In this nationwide population-based cohort study natural fertility was maintained after FSS. Specific histologic subtypes showed greater prognostic impact on the oncological outcome than the use of FSS. Recurrences occurred after FSS, but none in the uterus, which questions the need of hysterectomy in young women with EOC., Trial Registration: This article reports the results of a healthcare intervention using the data prospectively registered in the Swedish population-based registries including the Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer, the National Death Register, the Swedish Medical Birth Register, and the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction.

Objective: To compare the oncologic outcome of women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) vs. radical surgery (RS) for treatment of NEOC in a prospective, nationwide, population-based study and report on the reproductive outcomes in women after FSS., Methods: Using the Swedish Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer, we identified all women ages 18-40 treated with either FSS or RS for stage I NEOC between 2008 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data on use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments and obstetrical outcomes after FSS were extracted from the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF) and the Swedish Medical Birth Register., Results: During the study period, 73 women ages 18-40 received a stage I NEOC diagnosis. The majority, 78% (n = 57), underwent FSS. The 5-year OS rate, regardless of surgical approach, was 98%. There were no statistical differences between OS and PFS rates in women treated with FSS, compared to RS. Recurrences were more common after RS than FSS: 12.5% (2/16) vs. 3.5% (2/57), respectively. Following FSS, 11 women gave birth to 13 healthy children (all conceived naturally). Additionally, 12% of the women in the cohort developed infertility and received ART treatment (n = 7)., Conclusion: FSS is not associated with worse oncologic outcomes than RS in young women with early stage NEOC. The prognosis was excellent in both groups, with an OS of 98%. Natural fertility was maintained in women treated with FSS, only 12% required ART treatment., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after open and robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer., Patients and Methods: This was a nationwide population-based cohort study on all women with cervical cancer stage IA1-IB of squamous, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous histological subtypes, from January 2011 to December 2017, for whom radical hysterectomy was performed. The Swedish Quality Register of Gynaecologic Cancer was used for identification. To ensure quality and conformity of data and to disclose patients not yet registered, hospital registries were reviewed and validated. Cox and propensity score regression analysis and univariable and multivariable regression analysis were performed in regard to OS and DFS., Results: There were 864 women (236 open and 628 robotic) included in the study. The 5-year OS was 92% and 94% and DFS was 84% and 88% for the open and robotic cohorts, respectively. The recurrence pattern was similar in both groups. Using propensity score analysis and matched cohorts of 232 women in each surgical group, no significant differences were seen in survival: 5-year OS of 92% in both groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-2.01) and DFS of 85% vs 84% in the open and robotic cohort, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.66-1.78). In univariable and multivariable analysis with OS as the end-point, no significant factors were found, and in regard to DFS, tumour size (p < 0.001) and grade 3 (p = 0.02) were found as independent significant risk factors., Conclusion: In a complete nationwide population-based cohort, where radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer is highly centralised, neither long-term survival nor pattern of recurrence differed significantly between open and robotic surgery., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to compare robotic and open surgery in elderly women diagnosed as having endometrial cancer, in terms of costs, survival, surgical outcome, and operating time., Methods: Women 70 years or older undergoing open and robotic surgery for endometrial cancers were included consecutively before and after the introduction of robotic surgery at a tertiary center. Costs were calculated using the case-costing system, cost per patient, including the first 30 postoperative days. Relative and overall survival outcomes were obtained from the Swedish National Cancer Registry and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Surgical outcomes including operating and anesthesia times, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were reviewed., Results: In all, 137 and 141 women 70 years or older were identified to have undergone open and robotic surgery, respectively. The groups showed similar body mass index, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics. No statistically significant differences were seen in costs (robotic &OV0556;11,874 vs open &OV0556;11,521, P = 0.463) or 5-year survival outcomes (robotic 94% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 84-105] vs open 87% [95% CI, 78-98], P = 0.529). Robotic surgery was associated with significantly lower estimated blood loss (P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001) but longer anesthesia time (186 vs 174 minutes; P < 0.05) and operating theater time (205 vs 190 minutes; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications, but robotic surgery resulted in fewer postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II complications., Conclusions: Elderly women can safely undergo robotic surgery for endometrial cancer and could be offered this technique to the same extent as younger patients. They may benefit from shorter hospital stay, decreased blood loss, and postoperative complications, without resulting in higher costs to the health care system or jeopardizing their survival.

Background: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) ovarian cancer staging system includes no sub-stage for lymph nodes (LN) as only distant disease manifestation. We explore the prognostic implication of LN as only stage IV classifier in serous ovarian cancer., Method: This is a nation-wide, population-based study on 551 women with serous stage IV cancers diagnosed between 2009-2014. We compare overall survival (OS) in women with LN as only distant metastatic site to those with pleural metastases only and to patients with other/multiple stage IV manifestations. Cox regression models were used for uni- and multivariable estimations., Results: Of 551stage IV cases, distant metastatic site was registered in 433. Median OS for women with LN (n = 51) was 41.4 months, compared to 25.2 and 26.8 months for patients with pleural (n = 195) or other/multiple (n = 187) distant metastases (p = .0007). The corresponding five-year survival rates were 32, 11 and 22%, respectively. Multivariable analyzes confirmed shorter survival for women with pleural (HR 2.99, p = .001) or other/multiple distant sites (HR 2.67, p = .007), as compared to LN cases. LN only patients lived 9.1 months longer after primary than after interval surgery, but this difference was not significant (p = .245)., Conclusion: Women with stage IV serous ovarian cancer having lymph nodes as only distant metastatic site live longer than other stage IV patients.

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of data on endometrial (EC) and ovarian, fallopian tube, peritoneal, abdominal or pelvic cancers (OC) registered in the Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC)., Method: A random sample of 500 patients was identified in the SQRGC and their medical charts were reviewed for re-abstraction of 31 selected core variables by an independent validator. The data in the SQRGC and the re-abstracted data were compared. The data were collected from 25 hospitals evenly distributed throughout Sweden. The main outcomes were comparability, timeliness, completeness and validity. Coverage was compared with the National Cancer Register (NCR). Timeliness was defined as the speed of registration i.e. when patients were registered in the SQRGC relative to date of diagnosis. Internationally accepted coding systems for stage, grading and histologic type were used ensuring a high degree of comparability. Correlations were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen´s kappa coefficient., Results: The completeness was 95%. The timeliness was 88-91% within 12 months of diagnosis. The median degree of agreement between re-abstracted data and data in the SQRGC was 82.1%, with a median kappa value of 0.73 for ordinate variables and a median Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.96. The agreements for the type of surgery were 76% (95% CI 70-81%; kappa 0.49) and type of primary treatment 90% (95% CI 87-94%; kappa 0.85) in OC and in EC 88% (95% CI 84-93%; kappa 0.84). The agreements for the FIGO stage were in OC and EC 74% (95% CI 68-80%; kappa 0.69) and 87% (95% CI 82-91%; kappa 0.79), respectively., Conclusions: The data in the Swedish Quality Register for Gynecologic Cancer are of adequate quality in order to be used as a basis for research and to evaluate possible differences in treatment, lead times and treatment results.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine survival outcome in patients with serous cancer in the ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum and of undesignated origin., Methods: Nation-wide population-based study of women≥18years with histologically verified non-uterine serous cancer, included in the Swedish Quality Registry for primary cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum diagnosed 2009-2013. Relative survival (RS) was estimated using the Ederer II method. Simple and multivariable analyses were estimated by Poisson regression models., Results: Of 5627 women identified, 1246 (22%) had borderline tumors and 4381 had malignant tumors. In total, 2359 women had serous cancer; 71% originated in the ovary (OC), 9% in the fallopian tube (FTC), 9% in the peritoneum (PPC) and 11% at an undesignated primary site (UPS). Estimated RS at 5-years was 37%; for FTC 54%, 40% for OC, 34% for PPC and 13% for UPS. In multivariable regression analyses restricted to women who had undergone primary or interval debulking surgery for OC, FTC and PPC, site of origin was not independently associated with survival. Significant associations with worse survival were found for advanced stages (RR 2.63, P<0.001), moderate (RR 1.90, P<0.047) and poor differentiation (RR 2.20, P<0.009), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR1.33, P<0.022), residual tumor (RR 2.65, P<0.001) and platinum single (2.34, P<0.001) compared to platinum combination chemotherapy., Conclusion: Survival was poorer for serous cancer at UPS than for ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer. Serous cancer at UPS needs to be addressed when reporting and comparing survival rates of ovarian cancer., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate centralized primary care of advanced ovarian and fallopian tube cancers in a complete population cohort in relation to complete cytoreduction, time interval from surgery to chemotherapy and relative survival., Methods: A regional population-based cohort study of women diagnosed with primary ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and included in the Swedish Quality Registry (SQR) during 2008-2013 in a region where primary care of advanced stages was centralized in 2011. Surgical, oncological characteristics, outcomes, follow-ups and relative survivals were analyzed., Results: There were 817 women diagnosed with ovarian and fallopian tube cancers during 2008-2013 and 523 were classified as FIGO stage III-IV and further analyzed. Primary debulking surgery (PDS) was performed in 81% and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) in 11%. Complete cytoreduction at PDS was performed in 37% before compared to 49% after centralization (p<0.03). The chemotherapy protocols were identical in the cohorts and they received and completed the planned chemotherapy equally. The time interval between PDS and chemotherapy was 36days (median) before compared to 24days after centralization (p<0.01). The relative 3-year survival rate in women treated by PDS was 44% compared to 65% after centralization and the estimated excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) was reduced (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.79). Comparing the complete cohorts before and after centralization, regardless primary treatment, the relative 3-year survival rate increased from 40% to 61% with reduced EMRR (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.45-0.76)., Conclusion: Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian and fallopian tube cancers increases complete cytoreduction, decreases time interval from PDS to chemotherapy and improves relative survival significantly., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)