Search

Previous studies have identified factors that influence genetic counseling applicants' decisions to initially apply to certain schools. However, research on the factors that influence their Genetic Counseling Admissions Match (GCAM) rank order preferences are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate these factors via an online survey sent to current students and recent graduates who participated in the GCAM. Participants (N = 415) were asked to rank factors within six categories (faculty, students, didactic curriculum, clinical training, cost of attendance, and general program information) on a 7‐point Likert scale. Factors related to clinical training were most influential to applicants (M = 5.68), while factors related to didactic training were least influential to applicants (M = 4.63). Several significant differences existed between underrepresented and overrepresented applicants; overrepresented was defined as White, non‐Hispanic female. Underrepresented applicants were more influenced by the diversity of program faculty (p = 0.016), students (p ≤ 0.001), and the location/patient population (p = 0.003), while overrepresented applicants are more influenced by program graduation and board pass rates (p = 0.021). The results of our study suggest that GCAM rank preferences are influenced by a large number of factors. Additionally, by demonstrating significant differences in the influence of program diversity on underrepresented applicants, the results of our study suggest that JEDI efforts of genetic counseling training programs should continue to be an area of focus, in order to create a more welcoming environment for all students and to further diversify the genetic counseling profession. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE Up to 10% of cancers may be associated with an inherited mutation that increases cancer risk. National guidelines emphasize referral for genetic counseling and testing for patients whose personal and/or family history increases their risk of having a hereditary cancer syndrome. METHODS To increase appropriate referrals for cancer genetic counseling and testing, we piloted an automated alert known as a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) in the electronic health record, Epic, to notify oncology providers when a patient had a personal and/or family history that merited referral to cancer genetics. Epic could not gather the complex clinical data needed for the referral decision automatically, necessitating staff completion of a questionnaire. After educating providers, the BPA was implemented with resources to support its use. RESULTS Initial interaction with the alert was high but rapidly dwindled, resulting in questionnaire completion in 7.2% of more than 32,000 encounters and 14.9% of patients over 9 months. However, cancer genetics referrals increased 95.9% during the pilot (P,.0001), with 18.5% placed through the BPA and the rest from a non-BPA mechanism. Semistructured interviews with key stakeholders revealed not only general acceptance of the BPA concept but also barriers to completion, such as pressure to room patients quickly in the face of competing BPAs and lack of buy-in from some providers. CONCLUSION These results suggest that provider engagement and BPA fatigue are significant obstacles to acceptance of a new automated alert. Despite interest in a tool for cancer genetics, the demand on clinical time for this complex BPA was poorly tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standardized pedigree nomenclature recommendations created by the National Society of Genetic Counselors Pedigree Standardization Work Group contains some Assistive Reproductive Technology (ART) specific nomenclature. However, the work groups' recommendations lack instructions on how to document 'the number of embryos conceived, frozen, and implanted, along with their genetic testing history' (Bennett et al., 2008, p. 429). The purpose of this qualitative study was to determine if the current symbols are sufficient for what genetic counselors need in the ART field and how genetic counselors are addressing any gaps. Ten genetic counselors with ART counseling experience participated in semi‐structured interviews. Participants reported using standard symbols and creating their own designs when standard symbols are not available for applicable ART situation. Thematic analysis identified seven reasons why participants felt that ART should be recorded on the medical pedigree. The 3 most common themes identified were: (1) medical assessment and facilitating development of a differential diagnosis, (2) clarity and continuity of documentation, and (3) psychosocial assessment of the family and fertility experience. All participants felt that the current nomenclature was not sufficient for their clinical practice and would support additional standard symbols. This study supports the need for development of further pedigree nomenclature inclusive of patients with ART experiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]