Search

Abstract Background The clinical translation of positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers for cancer management presents complex challenges. We have developed consensus-based recommendations for preclinical and clinical assessment of novel and established radiotracers, applied to image different cancer types, to improve the standardisation of translational methodologies and accelerate clinical implementation. Methods A consensus process was developed using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) to gather insights from a multidisciplinary panel of 38 key stakeholders on the appropriateness of preclinical and clinical methodologies and stakeholder engagement for PET radiotracer translation. Panellists independently completed a consensus survey of 57 questions, rating each on a 9-point Likert scale. Subsequently, panellists attended a consensus meeting to discuss survey outcomes and readjust scores independently if desired. Survey items with median scores ≥ 7 were considered ‘required/appropriate’, ≤ 3 ‘not required/inappropriate’, and 4–6 indicated ‘uncertainty remained’. Consensus was determined as ~ 70% participant agreement on whether the item was ‘required/appropriate’ or ‘not required/not appropriate’. Results Consensus was achieved for 38 of 57 (67%) survey questions related to preclinical and clinical methodologies, and stakeholder engagement. For evaluating established radiotracers in new cancer types, in vitro and preclinical studies were considered unnecessary, clinical pharmacokinetic studies were considered appropriate, and clinical dosimetry and biodistribution studies were considered unnecessary, if sufficient previous data existed. There was ‘agreement without consensus’ that clinical repeatability and reproducibility studies are required while ‘uncertainty remained’ regarding the need for comparison studies. For novel radiotracers, in vitro and preclinical studies, such as dosimetry and/or biodistribution studies and tumour histological assessment were considered appropriate, as well as comprehensive clinical validation. Conversely, preclinical reproducibility studies were considered unnecessary and ‘uncertainties remained’ regarding preclinical pharmacokinetic and repeatability evaluation. Other consensus areas included standardisation of clinical study protocols, streamlined regulatory frameworks and patient and public involvement. While a centralised UK clinical imaging research infrastructure and open access federated data repository were considered necessary, there was ‘agreement without consensus’ regarding the requirement for a centralised UK preclinical imaging infrastructure. Conclusions We provide consensus-based recommendations, emphasising streamlined methodologies and regulatory frameworks, together with active stakeholder engagement, for improving PET radiotracer standardisation, reproducibility and clinical implementation in oncology.

DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) plays a major role in the DNA damage response upon double-strand break formation. Here, the authors show that the DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648, enhances the activity of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and the PARP inhibitor olaparib in multiple mouse tumour models.

MET amplification is a frequently observed genomic aberration in solid tumors. We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for the combination therapy. The following dose levels were tested in this single-arm phase I study: docetaxel as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour at 60 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks of a 21-day schedule plus savolitinib (level 1, 200 mg qd; level 2, 400 mg qd; level 3, 600 mg qd; level 4800 mg qd). In total, there were 17 patients enrolled on to this study [7 gastric cancer (GC) patients, 5 melanoma patients, 3 sarcoma patients, and 2 rectal cancer patients]. Most of the patients (14 of 17) were heavily pretreated (≥third line or greater lines of treatment). For the first 3 cohorts (200 mg savolitinib + docetaxel 60 mg/m2, 400 mg savolitinib + docetaxel 60 mg/m2, 600 mg savolitinib + docetaxel 60 mg/m2), there were no DLTs. In the fourth dose cohort (800 mg savolitinib + docetaxel 60 mg/m2), one DLT occurred with generalized edema grade 3 that required intensive management. One GC patient with both MET overexpression (3+) and MET amplification (MET/CEP7 ratio, 7.3) achieved a durable partial response for 297 days, and another MET-amplified GC patient (MET/CEP7 ratio, 7.6) achieved stable disease for 86 days. Due to the higher incidence of G4 neutropenia in cohort 4 (800 mg), we recommend savolitinib 600 mg qd in combination with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 as the RP2D for phase II trial. The combination therapy demonstrated a very promising antitumor activity with durable responses in MET amplified GC patients.