Search

Introduction and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate genital sparing radical cystectomy surgery in female patients from the point of view of both oncologic and functional outcomes (with emphasis on urinary and sexual outcomes) in a single high-volume center for the treatment of muscular invasive bladder cancer., Materials and Methods: Between January 2014 and January 2018, 14 female patients underwent radical cystectomy with preservation of genital organs (the entire vagina, uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries) and orthotopic urinary neobladder (Padua neobladder). Inclusion criteria were recurrent T1G3 tumors; refractory tumors after BCG therapy without associated carcinoma in situ (CIS); T2 or T3a tumors entirely resected at endoscopic transurethral resection of the bladder and not involving urethra/bladder trigone. Exclusion criteria were: T3b or higher bladder cancer, associated CIS and involvement of urethra or bladder trigone. Oncological and histopathological outcomes (Overall Survival - OS, Recurrence Free Survival - RFS), urinary outcomes (day and night incontinence, intermittent catheterization use, Sandvik Score) and sexual outcomes (Female Sexual Function Index 19 FSFI-19) were considered. The average follow-up time was 56 months., Results: Considering oncological outcomes, histologic examination reported urothelial carcinoma in 13/14 patients; 8/13 patients (61.5%) had high grade T1 stage, 3/13 patients (23%) had high grade T2 stage and finally 2/13 patients (15.5%) had high-grade T3 stage. One patient presented with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma completely excised after surgery (PT2aN0M0). No patient developed local or metastatic recurrence (RFS 100%); OS was 100%. Considering urinary continence outcomes, 12/14 patients retained daytime and nighttime continence (85.5%); 2/14 (14.5%) complained of low stress urinary incontinence daily and nighttime urinary leakage. The Sandvik Score showed complete continence in 7/14 patients (50%); mild degree incontinence in 6/14 patients without use of incontinence devices (43%); moderate degree of incontinence in one patient (7%). The FSFI administered at 1 year from the surgery showed sexual desire in all patients (100%); subjective arousal, achievement of orgasm and sexual satisfaction in 12/14 patients (85.5%); sufficient lubrication in 11/14 patients (78.5%). Only one patient (7%) complained about dyspareunia during sexual intercourse., Conclusions: Our study aims to demonstrate that genital-sparing radical cystectomy is a safe surgery in terms of oncologic outcomes and, most importantly, that it is beneficial in terms of urinary and sexual function. Indeed, patients' quality of life together with their psychological and emotional health should be put on the same level as oncological safety. However, it is a treatment reserved for selected patients who are strongly motivated to preserve fertility and sexual function and thoroughly informed about the benefits and complications of such a procedure.

Background and Purpose: The creation of the nephrostomy access is a fundamental step of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Dilation of the track is usually achieved with multiple incremental flexible exchange dilators of the Amplatz type, metal telescoping dilators of the Alken type, or a balloon. Currently, balloon dilation is regarded as the most modern and safest system, though it has the disadvantage of relatively high cost. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a procedure that we named "one shot," which consists of a single dilation of the track with a 25F or 30F Amplatz dilator, compares favorably in terms of efficacy, costs, and length with the other techniques of track dilation, without a significant increase in morbidity., Patients and Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent PCNL for stone disease from June 1998 to July 1999 were considered and divided into three groups according to the type of tract dilation used: A (Alken telescoping dilators), B (balloon), or C (one shot). Radiologic exposure, blood loss, and costs were evaluated., Results: The one-shot procedure compared favorably with both of the other dilation techniques without an increase in morbidity and with significant reductions in X-ray exposure and costs. Indeed, significant differences in estimated blood loss were observed between groups B and C and the minor bleeding for group C., Conclusion: Our experience indicates that one-shot dilation is feasible in the majority of patients. It is as safe and effective as the technique regarded today as the gold standard but less time consuming and less expensive. These encouraging results should be confirmed by further studies.

In some cases of primary transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), there may be some uncertainty in clinical decision making. We present a case in which a pT1-N0 urothelial tumor was found in the renal pelvis after an open nephrectomy for urolithiasis. Because incomplete excision of the ureter can lead to recurrence of the TCC, we deemed it necessary to remove the residual ureter. Therefore, a combined endoscopic-transvescical laparoscopic ureterectomy was performed. The transabdominal approach was chosen for the procedure, because the patient had already undergone open nephrectomy with retroperitoneal access and was thus likely to have adhesions and inflammation in the region. For the endoscopic phase of surgery, a technique of ureteral intussusception was combined with transurethral resection. The choice of the endoscopic transurethral procedure was prompted by the fact that transurethral resection of the ureteral orifice and invagination ureterectomy has already been proposed as the first step of nephroureterectomy. The combined endoscopic laparoscopic procedure was not technically demanding; the ureterectomy took no longer than an open procedure. The surgery was uneventful, and the patient resumed normal activities the day after surgery. The broader issue of whether this technique should be adopted by the urological community at large as a routine practice requires longer follow-up outcome data.